This article demonstrates that ethnicity itself didn’t play a significant role to cause conflicts in Osh in 1990 and 2010, but was rather a side effect or a catalyst produced inevitably by political struggle in the country.
The Osh conflict in 1990 occurred at the weakening of the USSR's institutional control and decreasing material support from the center. Kyrgyzstan being the major recipient of both indirect and direct subsidies from the USSR suffered a severe economic depression because subsidies were cut or substantially reduced. Moreover, the sudden disintegration of production and trade relations further exacerbated the economic situation in Kyrgyzstan. The economic decline caused a demographic imbalance, which has contributed to increased confrontation between Kyrgyz and ethnic Uzbeks in Osh. These social tensions coincided with political mobilization under the slogans of ethnicity and contributed to the intensification of the conflict making it look similar to an ethnic conflict for an outside observer.
Similarly, the Osh conflict in 2010 happened in the declining economy which was not only the result of the global economic crisis and difficulties in relations with Russia. The political short-sightedness of the Bakiyev regime in resolving problems with the air base at Manas led to complication of relations with Russia, which subsequently led to economic decline in Kyrgyzstan. The economic difficulties soon translated into institutional instability. Massive public demonstrations “framed” as an ethnic conflict by political elites intensified the battle, adding to it an “ethnic” dimension.
Ключевые слова: Kyrgyzstan, Osh, conflict, ethnicity, Central Asia.
1. Borishpolets K.P. Natsional'noe izmerenie global'nogo mira [National dimension of global world]. Moscow: Navona, 2009. 232 p. (In Russian).
2. Zviagel'skaia I.D. Spetsifika etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov i podkhody k ikh uregulirovaniiu [Ethopolitical conlicts specifics and approaches to its solving]. Moscow: Navona, 2008. 160 p. (In Russian).
3. Kniazev A. Simbioz endogennykh i ekzogennykh faktorov i metamorfozy gosudarstvennosti Kirgizii [Metamorphosos of the Kyrgyz stateness, simbioz of internal and external factors] In: Sistemnyi monitoring global'nykh i regional'nykh riskov Tsentral'naia Aziia [System monitoring of global and regional risks: the Central Asia]. Moscow: URSS, 2013. Pp. 282-305. (In Russian).
4. Laumulin M. K sobytiiam v Aprele 2010 goda v Kirgizstane: vzgliad iz Kazakhstana [On events in Kyrgystan in 2010: point of view from Kazachstan]. Tsentral'naia Aziia i Kavkaz. 2010, vol.13, no. 2, pp. 25-44. (In Russian).
5. Brady H.E., Kaplan C.S. Conceptualizing and Measuring Ethnic Identity. Measuring Identity: a guide for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pр. 33-71.
6. Buzan B. People, States and Fear. North Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press, 1983. 262 p.
7. Collins K. Clan politics and regime transition in Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 376 p.
8. Dabrowski M., Antczak R. Economic reforms in Kyrgyzstan. Warsaw: Center for social & economic research, 1994. URL: http://www.case-research.eu/sites/default/files/publications/3414534_028e_0.pdf (accessed: 01.04.17)
9. Fumagalli M. Framing Ethnic Minority Mobilisation in Central Asia: The Cases of Uzbeks in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Europe-Asia Studies. 2007, vol. 59, no.4, pp. 567-590.
10. Gorenburg D. Minority Ethnic Mobilisation in the Russian Federation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 312 p.
11. Kim T. The 1990 and 2010 Osh conflict: based on the mechanism of the outbreak of inter-ethnic violence. Sino-Soviet Affairs, vol. 39, no.3, 2015. (In Korean).
12. Nichol J. The April 2010 Coup in Kyrgyzstan and its Aftermath: Context and Implications for U.S. Interests. Congressional Research Service, 2010. URL: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41178.pdf (accessed: 01.04.17)
13. Rywkin M. Moscow's Muslim Challenge: Soviet Central Asia. New York: M.E. Sharpe Inc,
1990. 186 p.