<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimoreview</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник МГИМО-Университета</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>MGIMO Review of International Relations</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2071-8160</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2541-9099</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MGIMO Universty Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/2071-8160-2012-6-27-213-215</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimoreview-1646</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖКУЛЬТУРНАЯ КОММУНИКАЦИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Полемические размышления о возможности полемики в современной философии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Узелац</surname><given-names>М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Uzelaz</surname><given-names>Milan</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>ординарный профессор</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="ru" id="aff-1"><institution>Высшая педагогическая школа Вршац (Сербия)</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2012</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>12</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>6(27)</issue><fpage>213</fpage><lpage>215</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Узелац М., 2012</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2012</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Узелац М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Uzelaz M.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/1646">https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/1646</self-uri><abstract><p>На вопрос, возможна ли полемика в области философии в наше время, автор отвечает негативно, исходя из следующих соображений: в ранние эпохи реального столкновения мнений не могло быть, поскольку все философы находились внутри целостного понимания мира и их учения не противоречили друг другу; сегодняшние мыслители не обладают больше представлением о мире, которое могло бы их объединить и дать им единое основание для формирования спекулятивных понятий.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>On the question whether the controversy in the field of philosophy in our time, the author responds negatively, for the following reasons: in the early ages of the real clash of interests could not be, because all the philosophers were inside understanding integrity of the world and their teaching is not consistent; today's thinkers have no more idea of the world that they could unify and give them a uniform basis for the formation of speculative concepts.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Диалог</kwd><kwd>плюрализм</kwd><kwd>релятивность</kwd><kwd>постгегелевский период</kwd><kwd>феноменология Гуссерля</kwd><kwd>антагонизм современных наук и философии</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Dialogue</kwd><kwd>pluralism</kwd><kwd>relativity</kwd><kwd>postgegelevsky period</kwd><kwd>the phenomenology of Husserl</kwd><kwd>antagonism of modern science and philosophy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
