<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimoreview</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник МГИМО-Университета</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>MGIMO Review of International Relations</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2071-8160</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2541-9099</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MGIMO Universty Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/2071-8160-2014-4-37-278-286</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimoreview-185</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>НАУКОВЕДЕНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SCIENCE STUDIES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>От научного творчества к популяризации науки: теоретическая модель научной коммуникации</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>From Scientific Innovation to Popularisation of Science: Theoretical Model of Science Communication</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Медведева</surname><given-names>С. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Medvedeva</surname><given-names>S. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">svetamedvedeva@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>08</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4(37)</issue><fpage>278</fpage><lpage>286</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Медведева С.М., 2014</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Медведева С.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Medvedeva S.M.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/185">https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/185</self-uri><abstract><p>Научная коммуникация(НК) - это движение научных идей от учёного через научное сообщество в массовое сознание. В настоящее время эта область исследований вызывает пристальный научный и практический интерес. Вместе с тем, приходится признать, что научная коммуникация страдает от отсутствия теоретических моделей, способных её интегрировать. Данная статья представляет собой попытку в какой-то степени восполнить этот пробел. В ней предлагается пятиступенчатая модель движения и трансформации научных идей от момента создания до их появления в видесоциальных мифов в массовом кино и литературе. В качестве элементов НК рассматриваются: этап учёного (генерация идеи); этап научного сообщества (продвижение идеи внутри научных кругов, оформление её по правилам парадигмы); этап заинтересованных групп (коммуникация учёных с государством и бизнесом, обучение будущих специалистов); этап популярной науки (продвижение научных идей в массовой культуре); этап художественного творчества (предметом коммуникации становится не знания, а миф о науке). Каждый этап научной коммуникации рассматривается как самоценная сфера бытия научных идей. Между всеми этапами происходит постоянный взаимообмен. Движение идей может осуществляться последовательно через все этапы. Однако возможна и независимая коммуникация между несмежными подразделами: от учёного к популярным изданиям, от художественных произведений к научному сообществу. Причём движение идей происходит как в направлении от научного сообщества к общественности, так и обратно. Это и создаёт условия для полноценной коммуникации и диалога, все участники которого - равноценные партнеры.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Science communication is process of promotion of scientific ideas from a scientist through scientific community to muss public. Now this research area attracts a lot of attention from scientists. At the same time science communication suffers from the lack of theoretical framework, which can integrate it. In this article we try to contribute to the further theoretical integration of this area. Here we discuss a model of motion and transformation of ideas from the moment of their generation to the time of their appearance in public movies and literature. The model consists of 5 elements: phase of a scientist (generation of ideas); phase of scientific community (promotion of the ideas among scientists); phase of interested groups (communication with business and government, education of future scientists); phase of popular science (promotion of ideas into mass culture); phase of fiction (subject of communication becomes not scientific knowledge, but myth about science). Each phase is conceived as equal in value stage of existence of scientific ideas. There is a consistent interaction between all phases. The ideas can flow sequentially through all five phases. But independent communication among separate stages is also possible. Furthermore, the ideas can flow in both directions from scientific community to public and visa verse. As a result, scientific communication becomes a real dialogue with equal partners.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>научная коммуникация</kwd><kwd>популярная наука</kwd><kwd>массовая культура</kwd><kwd>общественность</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>science communication</kwd><kwd>popular science</kwd><kwd>mass culture</kwd><kwd>public</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ВЦИОМ. Пресс-выпуск №1684. http://wciom.ru/index.php?id=459&amp;uid=111345</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ВЦИОМ. Пресс-выпуск №1684. http://wciom.ru/index.php?id=459&amp;uid=111345</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">http://www.project2061 .org/publications/sfaa/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">http://www.project2061 .org/publications/sfaa/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">http://www.copusproject.org/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">http://www.copusproject.org/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bucchi M. Of deficit, deviations and dialog: theories of public communication of science/Handbook of Public communication of science and technology. N.Y., Routladge, 2008. p. 57-76</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bucchi M. Of deficit, deviations and dialog: theories of public communication of science/Handbook of Public communication of science and technology. N.Y., Routladge, 2008. p. 57-76</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Investigating science communication in information age/ Holliman R. etc. (Eds). Oxford, Oxford univ. press, 2009.312 р</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Investigating science communication in information age/ Holliman R. etc. (Eds). Oxford, Oxford univ. press, 2009.312 р</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Communicating science: new agendas in communication/ Kahlor L.A., Stout P. (Eds.). N.Y., Routledge, 2010. 265 p</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Communicating science: new agendas in communication/ Kahlor L.A., Stout P. (Eds.). N.Y., Routledge, 2010. 265 p</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gregory J., Miller S. Science in public. Communication, culture and credibility. Cambridge, Basic Books, 2000.304 p</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gregory J., Miller S. Science in public. Communication, culture and credibility. Cambridge, Basic Books, 2000.304 p</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology/ Irwin A., B. Wynne (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.240 p</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology/ Irwin A., B. Wynne (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.240 p</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wynne B. Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science. Public Understanding of Science. 1992, № 1, p. 281-304</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wynne B. Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science. Public Understanding of Science. 1992, № 1, p. 281-304</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Einsiedel E.F. Public participation and dialog. /Handbook of Public communication of science and technology. N.Y. Routladge, 2008. p.173 -184</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Einsiedel E.F. Public participation and dialog. /Handbook of Public communication of science and technology. N.Y. Routladge, 2008. p.173 -184</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Challenging Futures of Science in Society: Emerging trends and cutting-edge issues/Report of the MASIS Expert Group setup by the European Commission, 2009.84 p</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Challenging Futures of Science in Society: Emerging trends and cutting-edge issues/Report of the MASIS Expert Group setup by the European Commission, 2009.84 p</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Russell H. Communicating science: professional, popular, literary. Cambridge, Cambridge univ. press, 2010. 350 p</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Russell H. Communicating science: professional, popular, literary. Cambridge, Cambridge univ. press, 2010. 350 p</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gibbons M., Limoges C, Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P.,Trow M.The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London etc., Sage Publications, 1994.95 p</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gibbons M., Limoges C, Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P.,Trow M.The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London etc., Sage Publications, 1994.95 p</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Feuer L.S. Ideology and the ideologists. New York: Harper &amp; Row. 1975.213р</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Feuer L.S. Ideology and the ideologists. New York: Harper &amp; Row. 1975.213р</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лосев А.Ф. Диалектика мифа. М., Правда, 1990.558 с</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Лосев А.Ф. Диалектика мифа. М., Правда, 1990.558 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Флек Л. Возникновение и развитие научного факта. М., Идея-Пресс, Дом интеллектуальной книги, 1999.220 с</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Флек Л. Возникновение и развитие научного факта. М., Идея-Пресс, Дом интеллектуальной книги, 1999.220 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полани М. Личностное знание. М., Прогресс, 1995.344 с</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Полани М. Личностное знание. М., Прогресс, 1995.344 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gross, A. The Rhetoric of Science. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press. 1990ю 248 p</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gross, A. The Rhetoric of Science. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press. 1990ю 248 p</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Юревич A.B. Социальная психология науки. СПб, Изд-во РХГИ, 2001.350 с</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Юревич A.B. Социальная психология науки. СПб, Изд-во РХГИ, 2001.350 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Etzkowitz H.TheTriple Helix: University-industry-government Innovation in Action. N.Y, Routledge, 2008. 164 p</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Etzkowitz H.TheTriple Helix: University-industry-government Innovation in Action. N.Y, Routledge, 2008. 164 p</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Латур Б. Наука в действии. СПб, Из-во Европ. Унив. в СПб, 2013.414 с</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Латур Б. Наука в действии. СПб, Из-во Европ. Унив. в СПб, 2013.414 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Медведева С.М. Российская наука и государство: образ ученого в современном российском кино// Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2014. №2 с. 184-192</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Медведева С.М. Российская наука и государство: образ ученого в современном российском кино// Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2014. №2 с. 184-192</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Коннов В.И. Развитие системы высшего образования в России и за рубежом: теоретические ориентиры / Право и управление. XXI век. 2013. № 1. с. 28-36</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Коннов В.И. Развитие системы высшего образования в России и за рубежом: теоретические ориентиры / Право и управление. XXI век. 2013. № 1. с. 28-36</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
