mgimoreviewВестник МГИМО-УниверситетаMGIMO Review of International Relations2071-81602541-9099MGIMO Universty Press10.24833/2071-8160-2011-4-19-261-267mgimoreview-2159Research ArticleСВЕЖИЙ ВЗГЛЯДNEW VISIONОграничения свободы слова и защита права на достоинство и репутацию в судебной практике Великобритании и СШАProhibition of Incitement of Racial and Religious Hatred or Violence as Restriction of the Freedom of Speech in the Interests of Defense of Law and Order in the Legal Systems of the UK and USAПероваНаталья АлександровнаPerovaN. A.vestnik@mgimo.ruМГИМО(У) МИД РоссииRussian Federation20112808201104(19)261267Copyright © Перова Н.А., 20112011Перова Н.А.Perova N.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/2159

Право на свободу слова в демократическом обществе не может существо- вать отдельно от других прав и интересов. Право каждого человека на защиту своего достоинства и репутации также представляется важным. Публикация диффамационных сообщений представляет собой конфликт этих прав. На приме- ре правоприменительной практики судов США и Великобритании в этой статье продемонстрировано, каким образом конфликт этих прав разрешается

.

ReferencesPaul v. Davis 424 US 693 (1976).Paul v. Davis 424 US 693 (1976).Youm K.H. The interaction between American and foreign libel law: US courts refuse to enforce English libel judgments. // International & Comparative Law Quarterly. - 2000. - 49(1). - P. 134.Youm K.H. The interaction between American and foreign libel law: US courts refuse to enforce English libel judgments. // International & Comparative Law Quarterly. - 2000. - 49(1). - P. 134.Ibid.Ibid.Youm K.H. The interaction between American and foreign libel law: US courts refuse to enforce English libel judgments. // International & Comparative Law Quarterly. - 2000. - 49(1). - P. 136.Youm K.H. The interaction between American and foreign libel law: US courts refuse to enforce English libel judgments. // International & Comparative Law Quarterly. - 2000. - 49(1). - P. 136.Рихтер А.Г. Современное право средств массовой информации в США. - М.: Право и СМИ, 1997. - C. 21.Рихтер А.Г. Современное право средств массовой информации в США. - М.: Право и СМИ, 1997. - C. 21.Там же. - C. 23.Там же. - C. 23.Там же. - C. 24.Там же. - C. 24.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 225.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 225.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 205.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 205.Loveland I. Political libels: a comparative study. - Portland: Hart publishing, 2000. - P. 49.Loveland I. Political libels: a comparative study. - Portland: Hart publishing, 2000. - P. 49.New York Times v. Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964).New York Times v. Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964).Ibid, 279-280.Ibid, 279-280.Рихтер А.Г. Современное право средств массовой информации в США. - М.: Право и СМИ, 1997. - C. 14.Рихтер А.Г. Современное право средств массовой информации в США. - М.: Право и СМИ, 1997. - C. 14.Youm K.H. The interaction between American and foreign libel law: US courts refuse to enforce English libel judgments. // International & Comparative Law Quarterly. - 2000. - 49(1). - P. 163.Youm K.H. The interaction between American and foreign libel law: US courts refuse to enforce English libel judgments. // International & Comparative Law Quarterly. - 2000. - 49(1). - P. 163.См. Gertz v. Welch 418 US 323 (1974); Beloff M.J. Politicians and the Press. // Beatson J., Cripps Y. Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information. Essays in Honour of Sir David Williams. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. - P. 97.См. Gertz v. Welch 418 US 323 (1974); Beloff M.J. Politicians and the Press. // Beatson J., Cripps Y. Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information. Essays in Honour of Sir David Williams. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. - P. 97.Fisher L. Constitutional rights: civil rights and civil liberties. - New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995. - P. 681.Fisher L. Constitutional rights: civil rights and civil liberties. - New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995. - P. 681.Gertz v. Welch 418 US 323 (1974).Gertz v. Welch 418 US 323 (1974).Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 207.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 207.Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps 475 US 765 (1986).Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps 475 US 765 (1986).Milkovitch v. Lorain Journal 497 US 1 (1990).Milkovitch v. Lorain Journal 497 US 1 (1990).Dun and Bradstreet, Inc v. Greenmoss Builders 472 US 749 (1985).Dun and Bradstreet, Inc v. Greenmoss Builders 472 US 749 (1985).Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 US 767 (1986).Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 US 767 (1986).Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 209.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 209.Franklin M.A. Constitutional libel law: the role of content. // UCLA Law Review. - 1986. - 34. - P. 1657.Franklin M.A. Constitutional libel law: the role of content. // UCLA Law Review. - 1986. - 34. - P. 1657.Hustler Magazine v. Falwell 485 US 46 (1988).Hustler Magazine v. Falwell 485 US 46 (1988).Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 227.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 227.Sim v. Stretch [1936] 2 All ER 1237, 1240. Barendt E., Lustgarten L., Norrie K., Stephenson H. Libel and the media the chilling effect.- Oxford: Oxford University press, 2004. - P. 3.Sim v. Stretch [1936] 2 All ER 1237, 1240. Barendt E., Lustgarten L., Norrie K., Stephenson H. Libel and the media the chilling effect.- Oxford: Oxford University press, 2004. - P. 3.Barendt E., Hitchens L. Media Law: Cases and Materials. - Essex: Longman, Pearson Education Ltd, 2000. - P. 350.Barendt E., Hitchens L. Media Law: Cases and Materials. - Essex: Longman, Pearson Education Ltd, 2000. - P. 350.Ibid.Ibid.См. дело Vizetelly v. Mudie's Select Library Ltd [1900] 2 QB 170.См. дело Vizetelly v. Mudie's Select Library Ltd [1900] 2 QB 170.Telnikoff v. Matusevitch [1992] 2 AC 343.Telnikoff v. Matusevitch [1992] 2 AC 343.Bosma H. Freedom of Expression in England and under the ECHR: in Search of a Common Ground. A Foundation for the Application of the Human Rights Act 1998 in English Law. - Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2000. - P. 64.Bosma H. Freedom of Expression in England and under the ECHR: in Search of a Common Ground. A Foundation for the Application of the Human Rights Act 1998 in English Law. - Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2000. - P. 64.Schilling K. The Americanisation of English libel laws. // Entertainment Law Review. - 2000. - 11(3). - P. 49.Schilling K. The Americanisation of English libel laws. // Entertainment Law Review. - 2000. - 11(3). - P. 49.Ibid.Ibid.Feldman D. Civil Liberties and Human Rights in England and Wales. - Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. - P. 613.Feldman D. Civil Liberties and Human Rights in England and Wales. - Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. - P. 613.Derbyshire Country Council v. Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534, 549, Lord Keith.Derbyshire Country Council v. Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534, 549, Lord Keith.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 200.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 200.Barendt E., Hitchens L. Media Law: Cases and Materials. - Essex: Longman, Pearson Education Ltd, 2000. - P. 361.Barendt E., Hitchens L. Media Law: Cases and Materials. - Essex: Longman, Pearson Education Ltd, 2000. - P. 361.Derbyshire Country Council v. Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534.Derbyshire Country Council v. Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534.Barendt E. Libel and Freedom of Speech in English Law. // Public Law. 1993. - 449. - P. 453.Barendt E. Libel and Freedom of Speech in English Law. // Public Law. 1993. - 449. - P. 453.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 200.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 200.Ibid. - P. 201.Ibid. - P. 201.Федотов М.А. Право массовой информации в Российской Федерации. - М.: Международные отношения, 2002. - C. 22-23.Федотов М.А. Право массовой информации в Российской Федерации. - М.: Международные отношения, 2002. - C. 22-23.Там же. - C. 22-23.Там же. - C. 22-23.См. среди прочего Cook v. Alexander [1947] QB 279, CA.См. среди прочего Cook v. Alexander [1947] QB 279, CA.[1999] 4 All ER 609.[1999] 4 All ER 609.Markesinis B.S., Deakin S.F. Tort Law. - Oxford: Clarendon Press 1999. - P. 682.Markesinis B.S., Deakin S.F. Tort Law. - Oxford: Clarendon Press 1999. - P. 682.Reynolds v. Times Newspapers Ltd and others [1999] 4 All ER 609, HL.Reynolds v. Times Newspapers Ltd and others [1999] 4 All ER 609, HL.Reynolds v. Times Newspapers Ltd and others [1998] 3 All ER 862, СA, 899.Reynolds v. Times Newspapers Ltd and others [1998] 3 All ER 862, СA, 899.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 219.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 219.Reynolds v. Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127.Reynolds v. Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 220.Barendt E. Freedom of Speech. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 220.Galloway v. Telegraph Group [2004] EWHC 2786.Galloway v. Telegraph Group [2004] EWHC 2786.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.