<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimoreview</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник МГИМО-Университета</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>MGIMO Review of International Relations</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2071-8160</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2541-9099</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MGIMO Universty Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/2071-8160-2021-3-78-23-38</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimoreview-2900</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ СТАТЬИ. Критический взгляд на международные отношения</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLES. A Critical Look at International Relations</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Постколониальная/деколониальная критика и теория международных отношений</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Postcolonial/Decolonial Critique and the Theory of International Relations</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Эльмурадов</surname><given-names>А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Elmuradov</surname><given-names>Aziz</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Азиз Эльмурадов - факультет социологии</p><p>33501, X B2-218, Билефельд, Германия</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Aziz Elmuradov – PhD, Research Associate, Faculty of Sociology</p><p>Universitätsstraße 25, Bielefeld, Germany</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">aziz.elmuradov@uni-bielefeld.de</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Университет Билефельд</institution><country>Германия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Bielefeld University, Research Training Group “World politics: The Emergence of Political Arenas and Modes of Observation in World Society”</institution><country>Germany</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>06</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Эльмурадов А., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эльмурадов А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Elmuradov A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/2900">https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/2900</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья сфокусирована на дискуссии о роли постколониальной мысли в развитии теории международных отношений. Находясь на пересечении множества дисциплин и направлений исследований, постколониальные теории предлагают широкий взгляд не только на культурное наследие колониализма и империализма как таковые, но и на более сложные и многогранные проблемы современности («колониальность власти», «геополитика знаний»), а также условия их возникновения. Постколониальные теории способствуют критическому переосмыслению евроцентрических нарративов, противодействуя телеологическим и линейным представлениям о современности. Несмотря на свою популярность, постколониальные исследовательские подходы проникли в теорию международных отношений довольно поздно. Обе области интеллектуального поиска развивались как по отдельности, так и противостоя друг другу в самой своей эпистемологической сути. На основе обзора обширной литературы автор исследует связи между производством постколониальных знаний и теорией международных отношений, тем самым освещая проблемы современной политической науки и международных исследований. Формирование интегративных подходов к изучению мировой политики позволит обеспечить консолидацию как политической науки, так и международных исследований и успешное взаимодействие этих областей знания.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article is devoted to the discussion of the role of postcolonial/decolonial critique and its contribution to the theory of international relations. Intersecting with multiple disciplines and area studies, the postcolonial/decolonial critique offers a broad view not only on the cultural heritage of colonialism/imperialism as such, but also on the more complex and multifaceted challenges facing international relations – the coloniality of power and geopolitics of knowledge – and conditions of their emergence. Postcolonial/decolonial approaches foster critical engagement with Eurocentric narratives in social sciences, countering teleological or linear representations of modernity. Despite its importance, postcolonial/decolonial thought penetrated the theory of international relations rather late. The two fields of intellectual quest have developed not only separately, but they have often diverged in their very epistemological constitution. Based on a review of an extensive literature, the author explores the links between the production of postcolonial knowledge and the theory of international relations. Thus, the author illuminates the problems of modern political science and international studies, on the one hand, and on the other hand, emphasizes the need to make the theory of IR accessible to a variety of new global perspectives. The formation of integrative approaches in the study of world politics should provide a new consolidation of both political science and international studies and a productive interaction of these areas of knowledge.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>постконониализм</kwd><kwd>колониальность</kwd><kwd>геополитика знаний</kwd><kwd>теория международных отношений</kwd><kwd>деколонизация</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фитуни Л.Л., Абрамова И.О. 2020. Политическая теория деколонизации: императи- вы современного прочтения. Полис. Политические исследования. No 6. С. 26-40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Acharya A. 2011. Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theo- ries beyond the West. Millennium ‒ Journal of International Studies. 39(3). P. 619-637. DOI: 10.1177/0305829811406574</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Acharya A., Buzan B. 2010. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. London: Routledge. 256 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Acharya A., Buzan B. 2010. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. London: Routledge. 256 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bhabha H.K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge. 440 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bhabha H.K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge. 440 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brown C. 1994. “Turtles all the Way down”: Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory and International Relations. Millennium ‒ Journal of International Studies. 23(2). P. 213-236. DOI: 10.1177/03058298940230020901</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brown C. 1994. “Turtles all the Way down”: Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory and International Relations. Millennium ‒ Journal of International Studies. 23(2). P. 213-236. DOI: 10.1177/03058298940230020901</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chakrabarty D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Differ- ence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 336 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chakrabarty D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Differ- ence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 336 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chan S., Moore C. (eds.). 2009. Approaches to International Relations: Vol. 4. Non-Western Approaches to International Relations. London: SAGE.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chan S., Moore C. (eds.). 2009. Approaches to International Relations: Vol. 4. Non-Western Approaches to International Relations. London: SAGE.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chandra U. 2013. The Case for a Postcolonial Approach to the Study of Politics. New Politi- cal Science. P. 479-491.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chandra U. 2013. The Case for a Postcolonial Approach to the Study of Politics. New Politi- cal Science. P. 479-491.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chaturvedi V. (ed.). 2012. Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial. London: Verso. 384 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chaturvedi V. (ed.). 2012. Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial. London: Verso. 384 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chibber V. 2013. Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. London: Verso. 256 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chibber V. 2013. Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. London: Verso. 256 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dabashi H. 2012. The Arab Spring: The End of Postcolonialism. London: Zed. 296 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dabashi H. 2012. The Arab Spring: The End of Postcolonialism. London: Zed. 296 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dirlik A. 1994. The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capital- ism. Critical Inquiry. 20(2). P. 328-356.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dirlik A. 1994. The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capital- ism. Critical Inquiry. 20(2). P. 328-356.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dussel E. 1993. Organization Studies and Epistemic Coloniality in Latin America: Think- ing Otherness from the Margins. Organization. 13 (4). P. 463-488.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dussel E. 1993. Organization Studies and Epistemic Coloniality in Latin America: Think- ing Otherness from the Margins. Organization. 13 (4). P. 463-488.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Elmuradov A. 2021. Uzbekistan between Modernity and Tradition: Subject and Symbolic Order, in C. Pierobon, N. Becker and S. Schlegel (eds.), Central Asia after Three Decades of In- dependence. Politics and Societies between Stability and Transformation. Baden-Baden: Nomos.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Elmuradov A. 2021. Uzbekistan between Modernity and Tradition: Subject and Symbolic Order, in C. Pierobon, N. Becker and S. Schlegel (eds.), Central Asia after Three Decades of In- dependence. Politics and Societies between Stability and Transformation. Baden-Baden: Nomos.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fanon F. 1963. The Wretched of the Earth. Preface by Jean-Paul Sartre. New York: Grove. 251 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fanon F. 1963. The Wretched of the Earth. Preface by Jean-Paul Sartre. New York: Grove. 251 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fanon F. 1967. Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove. 186 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fanon F. 1967. Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove. 186 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fituni L.L., Abramova I.O. 2020. Politicheskaya teoriya dekolonizatsii: imperativy sovre- mennogo prochteniya (The Political Theory of Decolonization: The Imperatives of a Modern Reading). Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya. 6. P. 26-40. (in Russian)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fituni L.L., Abramova I.O. 2020. Politicheskaya teoriya dekolonizatsii: imperativy sovre- mennogo prochteniya (The Political Theory of Decolonization: The Imperatives of a Modern Reading). Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya. 6. P. 26-40. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fukuyama F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. Harmondsworth: Penguin.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fukuyama F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. Harmondsworth: Penguin.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Go J., Lawson G. (eds). 2017. Global Historical Sociology. Cambridge University Press. 310 p. Go J. 2016. Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 264 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Go J., Lawson G. (eds). 2017. Global Historical Sociology. Cambridge University Press. 310 p. Go J. 2016. Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 264 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grosfoguel R. 2002. Colonial Difference, Geopolitics of Knowledge, and Global Colonial- ity in the Modern/Colonial Capitalist World-System. Review Fernand Braudel Center. 25(3). P. 203-224.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grosfoguel R. 2002. Colonial Difference, Geopolitics of Knowledge, and Global Colonial- ity in the Modern/Colonial Capitalist World-System. Review Fernand Braudel Center. 25(3). P. 203-224.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hall M., Hobson J.M. 2010. Liberal International Theory: Eurocentric but not Always Im- perialist? International Theory. 2(2). P. 210-245. DOI: 10.1017/S1752971909990261</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hall M., Hobson J.M. 2010. Liberal International Theory: Eurocentric but not Always Im- perialist? International Theory. 2(2). P. 210-245. DOI: 10.1017/S1752971909990261</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hobson J.M. 2004. The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization. Cambridge, U.K.: Cam- bridge University Press. 394 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hobson J.M. 2004. The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization. Cambridge, U.K.: Cam- bridge University Press. 394 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hobson J.M. 2007. Is Critical Theory Always for the White West and for Western Impe- rialism? Beyond Westphilian towards a Post-Racist Critical IR. Review of International Studies. 33(S1). P. 91-116.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hobson J.M. 2007. Is Critical Theory Always for the White West and for Western Impe- rialism? Beyond Westphilian towards a Post-Racist Critical IR. Review of International Studies. 33(S1). P. 91-116.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hobson J.M. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760-2010. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 392 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hobson J.M. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760-2010. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 392 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Huggan G. (ed.). 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Postcolonial Studies. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press. 752 p. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199588251.001.0001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huggan G. (ed.). 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Postcolonial Studies. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press. 752 p. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199588251.001.0001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Inayatullah N., Blaney D.L. 2004. International Relations and the Problem of Difference. New York: Routledge. 288 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Inayatullah N., Blaney D.L. 2004. International Relations and the Problem of Difference. New York: Routledge. 288 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jabri V. 2014. Disarming Norms: Postcolonial Agency and the Constitution of the Interna- tional. International Theory. 6(2). P. 372-390. DOI: 10.1017/S1752971914000177</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jabri V. 2014. Disarming Norms: Postcolonial Agency and the Constitution of the Interna- tional. International Theory. 6(2). P. 372-390. DOI: 10.1017/S1752971914000177</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kaviraj S. 2001. In Search of Civil Society. In Kaviraj, S. Khilnani, S. (eds): Civil Society: History and Possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaviraj S. 2001. In Search of Civil Society. In Kaviraj, S. Khilnani, S. (eds): Civil Society: History and Possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ling L.H.M. 2002. Postcolonial International Relations: Conquest and Desire between Asia and the West. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave. 255 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ling L.H.M. 2002. Postcolonial International Relations: Conquest and Desire between Asia and the West. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave. 255 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ling L.H.M. 2014. Decolonizing the International: Towards Multiple Emotional Worlds. International Theory. 6(3). P. 579-583. DOI: 10.1017/S175297191400030X</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ling L.H.M. 2014. Decolonizing the International: Towards Multiple Emotional Worlds. International Theory. 6(3). P. 579-583. DOI: 10.1017/S175297191400030X</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Matin K. 2013. Redeeming the Universal: Postcolonialism and the Inner Life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations. 19(2). P. 353-377. DOI: 10.1177/1354066111425263</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Matin K. 2013. Redeeming the Universal: Postcolonialism and the Inner Life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations. 19(2). P. 353-377. DOI: 10.1177/1354066111425263</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McClintock A. 1992. The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term “Post-Colonialism.” Social Text. 31/32. P. 84-98. DOI: 10.2307/466219</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McClintock A. 1992. The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term “Post-Colonialism.” Social Text. 31/32. P. 84-98. DOI: 10.2307/466219</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mignolo W. 2000. Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 416 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mignolo W. 2000. Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 416 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mignolo W. 2003. Globalization and the Geopolitics of Knowledge: The Role of the Hu- manities in the Corporate University. Nepantla: Views from South. Duke University Press. 4. P. 97-119.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mignolo W. 2003. Globalization and the Geopolitics of Knowledge: The Role of the Hu- manities in the Corporate University. Nepantla: Views from South. Duke University Press. 4. P. 97-119.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mignolo W.D. 1993. Colonial and Postcolonial Discourse: Cultural Critique or Academic Colonialism? Latin American Research Review. 28(3). P. 120-134.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mignolo W.D. 1993. Colonial and Postcolonial Discourse: Cultural Critique or Academic Colonialism? Latin American Research Review. 28(3). P. 120-134.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mignolo W.D. 2002. The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference. South Atlantic Quarterly. 101(1). P. 57-96.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mignolo W.D. 2002. The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference. South Atlantic Quarterly. 101(1). P. 57-96.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mignolo W.D. 2007. Delinking ‒ the Rhetoric of Modernity, the Logic of Coloni- ality and the Grammar of De-Coloniality. Cultural Studies. 21(2-3). P. 449-514. DOI: 10.1080/09502380601162647</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mignolo W.D. 2007. Delinking ‒ the Rhetoric of Modernity, the Logic of Coloni- ality and the Grammar of De-Coloniality. Cultural Studies. 21(2-3). P. 449-514. DOI: 10.1080/09502380601162647</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morozov V. 2015. Russia’s Postcolonial Identity: a Subaltern Empire in a Eurocentric World. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 217 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morozov V. 2015. Russia’s Postcolonial Identity: a Subaltern Empire in a Eurocentric World. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 217 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nkrumah K. 1965. Neo-colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism. New York: International Publishers. 280 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nkrumah K. 1965. Neo-colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism. New York: International Publishers. 280 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Quijano A. 2000. Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology. 15(2). P. 215-232. DOI: 10.1177/0268580900015002005</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Quijano A. 2000. Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology. 15(2). P. 215-232. DOI: 10.1177/0268580900015002005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Quijano A. 2007. Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality. Cultural Studies. 21(2-3). P. 168- 178. DOI: 10.1080/09502380601164353</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Quijano A. 2007. Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality. Cultural Studies. 21(2-3). P. 168- 178. DOI: 10.1080/09502380601164353</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sabaratnam M. 2013. Avatars of Eurocentrism in the criTique of the Liberal Peace. Security Dialogue. 44(3). P. 259-278</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sabaratnam M. 2013. Avatars of Eurocentrism in the criTique of the Liberal Peace. Security Dialogue. 44(3). P. 259-278</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Said E.W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon. 368 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Said E.W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon. 368 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Said E.W. 2003. Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin. 432 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Said E.W. 2003. Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin. 432 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sen S. 2002. Uncertain Dominance: The Colonial State and Its Contradictions (with notes on the history of early British India). Nepantla: Views from the South. 3(2). P. 391-406.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sen S. 2002. Uncertain Dominance: The Colonial State and Its Contradictions (with notes on the history of early British India). Nepantla: Views from the South. 3(2). P. 391-406.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Seth S. 2013. Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction. Lon- don: Routledge. 216 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Seth S. 2013. Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction. Lon- don: Routledge. 216 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shani G. 2007. “Provincializing” Critical Theory: Islam, Sikhism and International Rela- tions Theory. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 20(3). P. 417-433.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shani G. 2007. “Provincializing” Critical Theory: Islam, Sikhism and International Rela- tions Theory. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 20(3). P. 417-433.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shani G. 2008. Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical Interna- tional Relations Theory. International Studies Review. 10(4). P. 722-734.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shani G. 2008. Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical Interna- tional Relations Theory. International Studies Review. 10(4). P. 722-734.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shilliam R. (ed.). 2011. International Relations and non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Co- lonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity. London: Routledge. 288 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shilliam R. (ed.). 2011. International Relations and non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Co- lonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity. London: Routledge. 288 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smith L.T. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London; Dunedin, New York: Zed Books; University of Otago Press. 220 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smith L.T. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London; Dunedin, New York: Zed Books; University of Otago Press. 220 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit50"><label>50</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Spivak G.C. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson &amp; L. Grossberg (eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. P. 271-313.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Spivak G.C. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson &amp; L. Grossberg (eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. P. 271-313.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit51"><label>51</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Spivak G.C. 2003. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press. 136 p. Tickner A.B. 2003. Hearing Latin American Voices in International Relations Studies. In-</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Spivak G.C. 2003. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press. 136 p. Tickner A.B. 2003. Hearing Latin American Voices in International Relations Studies. In-</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit52"><label>52</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ternational Studies Perspectives. 4(4). P. 325-350.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ternational Studies Perspectives. 4(4). P. 325-350.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit53"><label>53</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tickner A.B. 2013. Core, Periphery and (Neo)Imperialist International Relations. Euro-</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tickner A.B. 2013. Core, Periphery and (Neo)Imperialist International Relations. Euro-</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit54"><label>54</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">pean Journal of International Relations. 19(3). P. 627-646. DOI: 10.1177/1354066113494323 Tickner A.B., Wæver O. (eds.). 2009. International Relations Scholarship around the World.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">pean Journal of International Relations. 19(3). P. 627-646. DOI: 10.1177/1354066113494323 Tickner A.B., Wæver O. (eds.). 2009. International Relations Scholarship around the World.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit55"><label>55</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">New York: Routledge. 368 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">New York: Routledge. 368 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit56"><label>56</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tlostanova M. 2019. The Postcolonial Condition, the Decolonial Option and the Post- Socialist Intervention. In Albrecht M. (ed.), Postcolonialism Cross-Examined: Multidirectional Perspectives on Imperial and Colonial Pasts and the Newcolonial Present. Routledge. P. 165-178.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tlostanova M. 2019. The Postcolonial Condition, the Decolonial Option and the Post- Socialist Intervention. In Albrecht M. (ed.), Postcolonialism Cross-Examined: Multidirectional Perspectives on Imperial and Colonial Pasts and the Newcolonial Present. Routledge. P. 165-178.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit57"><label>57</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wallerstein I. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press. 305 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wallerstein I. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press. 305 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit58"><label>58</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wallerstein I. 2004. World-Systems ANALYSIS: An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke Uni- versity Press. 128 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wallerstein I. 2004. World-Systems ANALYSIS: An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke Uni- versity Press. 128 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit59"><label>59</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Waltz K. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw Hill. 250 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Waltz K. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw Hill. 250 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit60"><label>60</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Young R.J.C. 2001. Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Young R.J.C. 2001. Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit61"><label>61</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit62"><label>62</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zarakol A. 2011. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 297 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511921421</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zarakol A. 2011. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 297 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511921421</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
