<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimoreview</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник МГИМО-Университета</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>MGIMO Review of International Relations</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2071-8160</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2541-9099</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MGIMO Universty Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/2071-8160-2022-3-84-77-97</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimoreview-3142</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ СТАТЬИ. Дифференциация мировой политики</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLES. Differentiation of world politics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>«Антидипломатия» Ж. Болсонару</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Bolsonaro’s ‘Anti-Diplomacy'</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Тимофеева</surname><given-names>Ю. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Timofeeva</surname><given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Тимофеева Юлия Андреевна – преподаватель кафедры романских языковМосква, проспект Вернадского, 76</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Julia А. Timofeeva – lecturer at the Department of Roman Languages76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russia</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">timofeeva.yu.a@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД России<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>07</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>77</fpage><lpage>97</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Тимофеева Ю.А., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Тимофеева Ю.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Timofeeva J.A.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/3142">https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/3142</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье сделан обзор внешней политики президента Бразилии Жаира Болсонару, проведено сравнение дипломатия его команды с традиционной с объяснением того, как и почему его внешнеполитический подход отличается от классического. Дипломатии Бразилии до его прихода к власти были присущи такие принципы как мирное сосуществование с соседями, стремление к достижению национального величия, мирное разрешение споров и самостоятельность в принятии решений. Сегодня бразильский внешнеполитический курс характеризуется непредсказуемостью, непоследовательностью, потенциально конфликтным поведением и отходом от традиционного миролюбия.До произошедшей в 2021 г. смены президентской администрации в США Ж. Болсонару, как и многие его предшественники, делал ставку на северного соседа в попытке решить национальные проблемы. Односторонние уступки предсказуемо не принесли Бразилии плодов и снизили степень самостоятельности при принятии решений. США не были заинтересованы в укреплении позиций расположенного на латиноамериканском континенте конкурента, какими бы дружественными ни были взаимоотношения лидеров этих стран.Политика Ж. Болсонару приобрела новые черты из-за влияния различных групп в органах власти с противоположными интересами, среди которых важную роль играют военные и последователи идеолога Олаву ди Карвальу. Прислушиваясь поочередно к каждой из них, президент проводит непоследовательную внешнюю политику и рискует не реализовать важные политические проекты, а также оказаться в международной изоляции.Изменение характера внешней политики происходит на фоне внутриполитического и экономического кризиса в Бразилии. Пандемия коронавируса обострила конфликт ветвей власти. Чтобы укрепить свои позиции, президент пытается апеллировать к народу, ищет поддержку в парламенте и продвигает проект административной реформы, которая бы сделала президента более автономным в управлении структурой исполнительной власти.Выход на авансцену «правого» президента и сильное влияние консервативных военных – продукт экономического и политического кризиса в Бразилии, а его «особый» стиль руководства страной вписывается в общемировую тенденцию развития популизма и активного освещения политики в социальных сетях.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article compares Brazil’s president Jair Bolsonaro diplomacy with the traditional one and explains in what terms and why his foreign policy is different from a classical approach.Before he came to power, such principles as peaceful coexistence with neighbors, aspiration for national grandeur, peaceful conflict settlement and independent decision making were inherent in Brazilian diplomacy. Today the country’s foreign policy is unpredictable, inconsistent, and far from traditional peacefulness. Before changes in the US administration in 2021, Bolsonaro, as well as many of his predecessors, bet on the USA to solve national problems. Unilateral concessions to Washington predictably gave no results and lowered Brazilian independence in decision making. The USA was not interested in strengthening its rival in Latin America, no matter how friendly the relations between the two countries were. Bolsonaro’s policy is influenced by different lobby groups with opposing interests in government agencies. An important role is played by the military and followers of the theoretician Olavo de Carvalho. Paying attention to each of these groups, Bolsonaro implements an inconsistent foreign policy and runs a risk of not putting important political projects into practice and of finding himself in an international isolation.The changes in foreign policy take place amidst political and economic crisis in Brazil. Coronavirus pandemic aggravated the conflict of the branches of power. To strengthen his positions, the president appeals to the population, looks for support in the Parliament and pushes through an administrative bill aimed at making the president more autonomous in managing the executive branch structures.The appearance of the “right-wing” president and powerful influence of the conservative military stem from the economic and political crisis in Brazil, and Bolsonaro’s “special” governance style fits a worldwide trend of populism and active politics coverage in social networks.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>дипломатия Бразилии</kwd><kwd>традиции внешней политики</kwd><kwd>миролюбие</kwd><kwd>олависты</kwd><kwd>военные</kwd><kwd>внутриполитический кризис</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Brazil’s diplomacy</kwd><kwd>foreign policy traditions</kwd><kwd>peacefulness</kwd><kwd>the Olavists</kwd><kwd>the military</kwd><kwd>internal crisis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Federico G. 1989. The Kennedy-Johnson Years. John D Martz (eds) United States Policy in Latin America. University of Nebraska Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Federico G. 1989. The Kennedy-Johnson Years. John D Martz (eds) United States Policy in Latin America. University of Nebraska Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Milani C. 2019. Brazil’s Foreign Policy on the Couch. Folha de São Paulo. Aug. 8. URL: https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/en/brazil/2019/08/brazils-foreign-policy-on-thecouch.shtml (accessed 11.06.2022).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Milani C. 2019. Brazil’s Foreign Policy on the Couch. Folha de São Paulo. Aug. 8. URL: https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/en/brazil/2019/08/brazils-foreign-policy-on-thecouch.shtml (accessed 11.06.2022).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Almeida PR. 2019. Miséria da diplomacia. A destruição da inteligência no Itamaraty [Misery of Diplomacy. Intellect Destruction in Itamaraty]. Boa Vista: Editora da UFRR. 163 p. (In Portuguese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Almeida PR. 2019. Miséria da diplomacia. A destruição da inteligência no Itamaraty [Misery of Diplomacy. Intellect Destruction in Itamaraty]. Boa Vista: Editora da UFRR. 163 p. (In Portuguese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cervo AL. 2008. Inserção Internacional: formação dos conceitos brasileiros [International Insertion: Formation of Brazilian Concepts]. São Paulo: Editora Saraiva. 298 p. (In Potuguese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cervo AL. 2008. Inserção Internacional: formação dos conceitos brasileiros [International Insertion: Formation of Brazilian Concepts]. São Paulo: Editora Saraiva. 298 p. (In Potuguese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Manzur T.M. 2014. A política externa independente (PEI): antecedentes, apogeu e declínio [Independent Foreign Policy (IEP): Background, Heyday and Decline]. Lua nova. No93. P. 169–199. (In Portuguese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Manzur T.M. 2014. A política externa independente (PEI): antecedentes, apogeu e declínio [Independent Foreign Policy (IEP): Background, Heyday and Decline]. Lua nova. No93. P. 169–199. (In Portuguese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pereira M.G. 2012. Barão do Rio Branco 100 anos de memória [Baron Rio Branco: 100 years of memory]. Brasília: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão. 748 p. (In Portuguese)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pereira M.G. 2012. Barão do Rio Branco 100 anos de memória [Baron Rio Branco: 100 years of memory]. Brasília: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão. 748 p. (In Portuguese)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Santos T. 2000. O debate sobre a dependência [Debate on Dependency]. Santos T., Livros I. Teoria da dependência: balanço e perspectivas. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira. (In Portuguese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Santos T. 2000. O debate sobre a dependência [Debate on Dependency]. Santos T., Livros I. Teoria da dependência: balanço e perspectivas. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira. (In Portuguese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schutte R.G., Fonseca B.C., Carneiro G.S. 2019. Jogo de dois níveis voltado ao eleitorado: uma análise da política externa bolsonarista [Two-Level Game Targeted at the Electorate: an Analysis of the Pocket Foreign Policy]. Revista Conjuntura Global. 8(2). P.97-116. (In Portuguese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schutte R.G., Fonseca B.C., Carneiro G.S. 2019. Jogo de dois níveis voltado ao eleitorado: uma análise da política externa bolsonarista [Two-Level Game Targeted at the Electorate: an Analysis of the Pocket Foreign Policy]. Revista Conjuntura Global. 8(2). P.97-116. (In Portuguese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Souto Maior L. 2001. Brasil-Estados Unidos: desafios de um relacionamento assimétrico [Brazil – the United States: Challenges of an Asymmetric Relationship]. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. 44(1). P. 55-68. (In Portuguese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Souto Maior L. 2001. Brasil-Estados Unidos: desafios de um relacionamento assimétrico [Brazil – the United States: Challenges of an Asymmetric Relationship]. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. 44(1). P. 55-68. (In Portuguese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Безерра М. 2016. Как далеко намерена продвинуться НАТО? Международная жизнь. No3. С. 71–87.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bezerra M. 2016. Kak daleko namerena prodvinutsa NATO? [How far Does NATO Intend to Move?] The International Affairs. No3. P. 71–87. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Безерра М. 2020. Дипломатия Жаира Болсонару: демонтаж традиционной бразильской внешней политики. Ибероамериканские тетради. 8(3). C. 35-42. DOI: 10.46272/24093416-2020-8-3-35-42</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bezerra M. 2020. Diplomatiya Zhaira Bolsonaru: demontazh traditsionnoy brazil’skoy vneshney politiki [Jair Bolsonaro’s Diplomacy: Dismantling Traditional Foreign Policy of Brazil]. Cuadernos Iberoamericanos. 8(3). P. 35-42. DOI: 10.46272/2409-3416-2020-8-3-35-42 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мартынов Б.Ф., Борзова А.Ю. 2021. История внешней политики и дипломатии Бразилии. Москва: Аспект Пресс. 288 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Martynov B.F. 2004. “Zolotoy kantsler”. Baron de Rio-Branko – velikiy diplomat Latinskoy Ameriki. ["Golden Chancellor". Baron de Rio Branco is a Great Latin American Diplomat] Мoscow: ILA RAS. 160 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мартынов Б.Ф. 2004. «Золотой канцлер». Барон де Рио-Бранко – великий дипломат Латинской Америки. Москва: ИЛА РАН. 160 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Martynov B.F. 2010. Braziliya: Prioritety I fobii voskhodyaschey derzhavy [Brazil: Priorities and Fobias of an Emerging Power]. Security Index. 16(4,95). P. 43-57. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мартынов Б.Ф. 2010. Приоритеты и фобии восходящей державы. Индекс безопасности. 16(4,95). С. 43–57.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Martynov B.F., Borzova A.Yu. 2021. Istoriya vneshney politiki I diplomatii Brazilii [History of Brazilian Foreign Policy and Diplomacy]. Мoscow: Aspekt press. 288 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Окунева Л.С. 2020. Латинская Америка пришла в движение: в чем смысл социальных протестов октября 2019 года? Латинская Америка. No1. C. 8-21. DOI: 10.31857/ S0044748X0007755-9</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Okuneva L.S. 2020. Latinskaya Amerika prishla v dvizheniye: v chem smysl sotsial’nykh protestov oktyabrya 2019 goda? [Latin America Has Set in Motion: What is the Meaning of Social Protests in October 2019?] Latin America. 1. P. 8-21. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0007755-9 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пивоварова Н.С. 2015.Истоки программы «Союз ради прогресса» в идее «Панамериканской операции» Ж. Кубичека. Вестник Томского государственного университета. История. 2(34). С. 95–96. DOI 10.17223/19988613/34/15</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pivovarova N.S. 2015. Istoki programmy “Soyuz radi progressa v ideye “Panamerikanskoy operatsii” Zh.Kubicheka. [The Origins of the "Alliance For Progress" in The Idea of J. Kubitschek’s "Pan-American Operation"]. Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2(34). P. 95-96. DOI 10.17223/19988613/34/15 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сударев В.П. 2019. Возможности и пределы гегемонии США в Латинской Америке. Латинская Америка. No11. С. 6-14. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0006894-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sudarev V.P.2019. Vozmozhnosti i predely gegemonii SSHA v Latinskoy Amerike [Possibilities and Limits of the US Hegemony in Latin America]. Latin America. No11. P. 6-14. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0006894-2 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
