mgimoreviewВестник МГИМО-УниверситетаMGIMO Review of International Relations2071-81602541-9099MGIMO Universty Press10.24833/2071-8160-2019-1-64-83-106mgimoreview-871Research ArticleИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ СТАТЬИ. ООН в мировой политикеRESEARCH ARTICLES. United Nations in World PoliticsСША и Великобритания в ООН: фактор особых отношений (2001–2017 гг.)The U.S. and the UK in the United Nations: The Impact of the Special Relationship (2001 – 2017)МамедоваА. О.MamedovaA. O.

Анастасия Октаевна Мамедова – преподаватель кафедры английского языка №1, факультет Международных отношений

119454, Москва, пр. Вернадского, 76

Anastasia O. Mamedova – Lecturer at English Language Department #1, School of International Relations

76, Prospect Vernadskogo, 119454, Moscow, Russia

mamedova.a.o@my.mgimo.ruМосковский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД РоссииРоссияMoscow State Institute of International Relations (University)Russian Federation20192203201901(64)83106Copyright © Мамедова А.О., 20192019Мамедова А.О.Mamedova A.O.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/871

Взаимодействие США и Великобритании в ООН не часто становится предметом научных исследований. Тесные союзнические отношения, которые, несмотря на большое различие в военной и экономической мощи, сохраняются на протяжении более семидесяти лет, не могут не влиять на позиции двух стран в ООН. Обстоятельства вторжения коалиции в Ирак в 2003 г. бросили тень на деятельность двух союзников в организации. Сама ООН в начале XXI в. столкнулась с рядом вызовов, таких как терроризм и региональные кризисы. США недовольны эффективностью работы Организации и предпринимают попытки её реформирования.

Хронологические рамки исследования – 2001–2017 гг. Статья состоит из трёх частей. В первой части рассмотрены количественные и качественные показатели, определяющие место США и Великобритании в ООН, и сравниваются подходы обеих стран к работе организации. Во второй части на материалах мемуаров и интервью представлен анализ деятельности американских и британских постоянных представителей при ООН. В третьей части своего исследования автор останавливается на примерах сотрудничества и определённой конкуренции между двумя странами в рамках ООН. Основным критерием отбора примеров была их показательность с учётом фактора «особых отношений».

Анализ указывает на неоднозначный характер сотрудничества США и Великобритании в ООН, но и не развенчивает миф об «особых отношениях». В большинстве случаев сотрудничество весьма прагматично.

Currently U

Currently U.S.-UK cooperation in the UN does no attract as much attention as it deserves. Despite a conspicuous disparity in the countries’ military and economic might, they have maintained close ties for more than seventy years, which inevitably affects their position in the UN. The allies’ role in the 2003 invasion of Iraq cast suspicion on their activities in the organization. In the early 21st century, the UN itself was faced with a number of challenges, such as terrorism and regional conflicts; U.S. frustration with its effectiveness led to some reform efforts.

Covering the years 2001 – 2017, the article consists of three parts. The first part focuses on quantitative and qualitative parameters determining the U.S.’s and the UK’s roles in the UN and compares their approaches to it. The second part discusses the activity of American and British permanent representatives to the UN, based on their memoirs and interviews. The third part analyses some examples of cooperation and competition in the UN. The list of examples is illustrative rather than comprehensive given the existence of the special relationship.

The analysis of U

The analysis of U.S.-UK cooperation in the UN reveals its ambiguous nature, but it does not serve to debunk the myth of the special relationship. The cooperation is largely pragmatic.

СШАВеликобританияООНЕСособые отношениявторжение в ИракКосовореформа ООНпалестино-израильский конфликтДоговор о торговле оружиемU.S.UKUNEUspecial relationshipIraq warKosovoUN reformIsraeli-Palestinian conflictArms Trade TreatyReferencesВеликобритания. Эпоха реформ / под ред. Ал. Громыко. М.: Издательство «Весь мир». 2007. 536 с.Velikobritania. Epokha reform [Great Britain. The Epoch of Reforms] Ed. Al. Gromyko. Moscow. Ves’ Mir Publ. 2007. 536 p. (In Russian)Головин А.В. Роль Совета Безопасности ООН на последнем этапе иракского кризиса (2003 г.) // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 8: история. 2010. №1. Сс. 95–107.Golovin A.V. Rol’ Soveta bezopasnosti OON na poslednem etape irakskogo krizisa (2003 г.) [UNSC role at the final stage of the Iraq crisis (2003 г.)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 8: Istoriya – Moscow University Review. Series 8: History. 2010, no 1, pp. 95 – 107. (In Russian)Калинин А.А. Греческий вопрос в ООН в 1946 – 1947 гг. // Вестник Вятского государственного университета. 2015. №5. Сс. 39–47.Kalinin A.A. Grecheskiy vopros v OON v 1946 – 1947 [The Question of Greece in the U.N. 1946 – 1947] Vestnik Vyatskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta – Vyatka State University Review. 2015, no 5, pp. 39 – 47. (In Russian)Blanchfield L. United Nations Reform: Background and Issues for Congress // Congressional Research Service. 2015. 24 p.Blanchfield L. United Nations Reform: Background and Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service. 2015. 24 p.Bolton J. Surrender Is Not an Option. Defending America at the United Nations and Abroad. Threshold Editions. 2008. 512 p.Bolton J. Surrender Is Not an Option. Defending America at the United Nations and Abroad. Threshold Editions. 2008. 512 p.Curran D. The UK and United Nations peace operations: Identifying a way forward. A report based on a UNA-UK/RUSI roundtable discussion on UK engagement in UN peace operations // UNA-UK. 2015. 18 p.Curran D. The UK and United Nations peace operations: Identifying a way forward. A report based on a UNA-UK/ RUSI roundtable discussion on UK engagement in UN peace operations. UNAUK. 2015. 18 p.Curtis M. The Great Deception. AngloAmerican Power and World Order. London: Pluto Press. 1998. 272 p.Curtis M. The Great Deception. AngloAmerican Power and World Order. London: Pluto Press. 1998. 272 p.Dunne M. The United States, the United Nations and Iraq: ‘multilateralism of a kind’// International Affairs. 2003. No. 79:2. Pp. 257– 277.Dunne M. The United States, the United Nations and Iraq: ‘multilateralism of a kind’. International Affairs. 2003, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 257 – 277.Finger S.M. What Does the United States Really Owe the United Nations? // American Foreign Policy Interests. 2001. No. 23. Pp. 31–33.Finger S.M. What Does the United States Really Owe the United Nations? American Foreign Policy Interests. 2001, no. 23, pp. 31 – 33.Finkelstein L.S. The Rule of Law, the United States and the United Nations: An Ambiguous Record // American Foreign Policy Interests. 2006. No. 28. Pp. 297–303.Finkelstein L.S. The Rule of Law, the United States and the United Nations: An Ambiguous Record. American Foreign Policy Interests. 2006, no. 28, pp. 297 – 303.Forman S. The United States and the United Nations: One Strand in a Multilateral Strategy // American Foreign Policy Interests 2006. No. 28. Pp. 329–332.Forman S. The United States and the United Nations: One Strand in a Multilateral Strategy. American Foreign Policy Interests. 2006, no. 28, pp. 329 – 332.Glennon M.J. Why the Security Council Failed // Foreign Affairs May/June 2003. Pp. 16–35.Glennon M.J. Why the Security Council Failed. Foreign Affairs. May/June 2003, pp. 16 – 35.Greenstock J. Iraq: The Cost of War. Arrow Books. 2016. 480 p.Greenstock J. Iraq: The Cost of War. Arrow Books. 2016. 480 p.Groom A.J.R. The United States and the United Nations: Some Revolting European Thoughts // Journal of International Relations and Development. 2003. No. 6(2), Pp. 120–138.Groom A.J.R. The United States and the United Nations: Some Revolting European Thoughts. Journal of International Relations and Development. 2003, no. 6(2), pp. 120 – 138.Hill C. Powers of a kind: the anomalous position of France and the United Kingdom in world politics // International Affairs. 2016. 92:2. Pp. 393–414.Hill C. Powers of a kind: the anomalous position of France and the United Kingdom in world politics. International Affairs. 2016, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 393 – 414.Hoveyda F. The United States and the United Nations: From Close Relationship to Estrangement // American Foreign Policy Interests 2006. No. 28. Pp. 333–336.Hoveyda F. The United States and the United Nations: From Close Relationship to Estrangement. American Foreign Policy Interests. 2006, no. 28, pp. 333 – 336.Johnson E. Keeping Cyprus off the Agenda: British and American Relations at the United Nations 1954-58 // Diplomacy&Statecraft. Vol.11 No.3. Nov. 2000. Pp. 227–255.Johnson E. Keeping Cyprus off the Agenda: British and American Relations at the United Nations 1954-58. Diplomacy&Statecraft. 2000, vol.11, no. 3, pp. 227 – 255.Khalilzad Z. The Envoy: From Kabul to the White House, My Journey Through a Turbulent World. St. Martin’s Press. 2016. 336 p.Khalilzad Z. The Envoy: From Kabul to the White House, My Journey Through a Turbulent World. St. Martin’s Press. 2016. 336 p.Kim J., Woehrel S. Kosovo and U.S. Policy: Background to Independence // Congressional Research Service. 2008. 31 p.Kim J., Woehrel S. Kosovo and U.S. Policy: Background to Independence. Congressional Research Service. 2008. 31 p.Mingst K. Troubled Waters: The United StatesUnited Nations Relationship // International Peacekeeping. 2003. No.4. Pp. 82–93.Mingst K. Troubled Waters: The United States-United Nations Relationship. International Peacekeeping. 2003, no.4, pp. 82 – 93.Morjé Howard L. Sources of Change in United States – United Nations Relations // Global Governance. 2010. No.16. Pp. 485–503.Morjé Howard L. Sources of Change in United States – United Nations Relations. Global Governance. 2010, no.16, pp. 485 – 503.Rivlin B. The UN Reform Conundrum. American Foreign Policy Interests. 2005. No. 27. Pp. 365–384.Rivlin B. The UN Reform Conundrum. American Foreign Policy Interests. 2005, no. 27, pp. 365 – 384.Samuylov S. The United Nations, the United States and the War on Terrorism // Russian Politics and Law. 2002. Vol. 40, no. 6, November – December. Pp. 28–46.Samuylov S. The United Nations, the United States and the War on Terrorism. Russian Politics and Law. 2002, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 28–46.Self R. British Foreign and Defence Policy since 1945: Challenges and Dilemmas in a Changing World. Palgrave Macmillan. 2010. 288 p.Self R. British Foreign and Defence Policy since 1945: Challenges and Dilemmas in a Changing World. Palgrave Macmillan. 2010. 288 p.Sutterlin J.S. United Nations Relations with the Untied States: A Nettlesome Continuum Between Multifaceted Partners // American Foreign Policy Interests. 2007. No. 29. Pp. 257– 265.Sutterlin. J.S. United Nations Relations with the Untied States: A Nettlesome Continuum Between Multifaceted Partners. American Foreign Policy Interests. 2007, no. 29, pp. 257 – 265.Svendsen A.D.M. Intelligence Cooperation and the War on Terror. Anglo-American Security Relations after 9/11. Routledge. 2009. 272 p.Svendsen A.D.M. Intelligence Cooperation and the War on Terror. Anglo-American Security Relations after 9/11. Routledge. 2009. 272 p

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.