Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

NATURE-USE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2013-5-32-180-189

Abstract

The fundamental difference between a traditional economy and geoecological economy is discussed in the article. The deeper the economy is being introduced into the ecosystem, the stronger it will be pressure on it that is outside the ecosystem, the more destructive is this incompatibility. It is concluded that the geoecological sustainable economy requires that the laws of geoecology became the basis of economic policy. Rational nature-use is impossible without an understanding of the unity of society and nature, their historical development of mutual. Our challenge is to create a new economy, acting on geoecological laws, this task is quite feasible, but if we can make the market called the true price of goods and services, that is taking into account the ecosystem services. The article shows that humanity is now faced with two interrelated problems: First - this is a problem of rational use of geoecosystem services, including natural resources, and secondly - the problem of environmental protection of pollution and save geoecosystem services, that is there are two "sides of the coin" - geoecological and resource. The relationship of the concept of rational nature-use, developed by Soviet scientists in the mid-twentieth century, and the concept of sustainable development, suggested by Western scientists is studied. It is shown that sustainable development - this is more a slogan than a scientific concept, which is unlikely to be implemented at the local level. At the same time, the concept of rational nature-use is feasible in regions or individual countries. At the same time, it is concluded that there is no sense to abandon the idea of sustainable development, as it is in itself a very humane, has received wide international recognition, does not carry negative consequences, but you should always keep in mind that essentially - we are not talking about sustainable development but about rational nature-use in a given area of the globe. The examples of indicators of sustainable development are given in the article.

About the Author

V. A. Gorbanyov
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University), 76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russia.
Russian Federation

Doctor of History and Geography. Professor of World Economy Department



References

1. Анучин В.А. Основы природопользования. Теоретический аспект. М.: Мысль, 1978. 293 c.

2. Арманд Д.Л. Нам и внукам. М.: Мысль, 1964. 251 c.

3. Бобылев С.Н., Ходжаев А.Ш. Экономика природопользования. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2010. С.500.

4. Браун Л. Экоэкономика. Как создать экономику, сберегающую планету. М.: Весь мир, 2003. С. 392.

5. Голуб А.А., Маркадия А., Струкова Е.Б. Экономика окружающей среды и природных ресурсов: вводный

6. курс. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2003. С. 268.

7. Голубев Г.Н. Геоэкология. М.: ГЕОС, 1999. 337 c.

8. Гор А. Неудобная правда. Санкт-Петербург: Амфра, 2007. 328 c.

9. Горбанев В.А. Общественная география зарубежного мира и России. М.: ОЛМА-ПРЕСС, 2014. 400 c.

10. Данилов-Данильян В.И., Лосев К.С., Рейф И.Е. Перед главным вызовом цивилизации. Взгляд из России.

11. М.: МНФРА-М, 2005. 223 c.

12. Липец Ю.Г., Пуляркин В.А., Шлихтер С.Б. География мирового хозяйства. М.: Владос, 1999. 399 c.

13. Люри Д.И.Устойчивое ресурсопользование и концепция глобального ресурсно-экологического перехода

14. // Природопользование и устойчивое развитие. М.: Товарищество научных изданий КМК, 2006. С. 78-91

15. Медоуз Д, Рандерс Й, Пределы роста. 30 лет спустя. М.: Академкнига, 2007. 342 c.

16. Наше общее будущее. М.: Прогресс, 1989. 372 c.

17. Розанов Л.Л. Геоэкология. М.: Дрофа, 2010. 270 c.

18. Тарасова Н.П., Кручина Е.Б. Индексы и индикаторы устойчивого развития // Материалы Международной

19. конференции «Устойчивое развитие: природа–общество–человек», Т. 1. М.: 2006. C. 127-144.

20. Daly Herman. Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development. 268 p.

21. Kirk Hamilton. Genuine Saving as a Sustainability Indicator // The World Bank Environment Dep., Environmental

22. Economics Series. Oct. 2000. 28 p.

23. Millennium Ecosystem Assesment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, Island Press,

24. Washington, DC. 128 p.

25. Sustainable Development: Concepts, Rationalities and Strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/

26. Boston/London, 1998. 336 p.

27. Stavius R. Economics of the Environment: Forth edition. WW. Norton&Company, 2000.


Review

For citations:


Gorbanyov V.A. NATURE-USE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2013;(5(32)):180-189. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2013-5-32-180-189

Views: 2813


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)