Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

A DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT “MONEY”

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2013-5-32-227-231

Abstract

The article provides a diachronic analysis of the concept “money” in the Russian and English linguacultures. The author studies the genesis and development of money in Russia and Great Britain, and conducts a research on the formation of “money” terminology in the corresponding languages. As part of the study it has been found out that the historical development of the concept “money” in the Russian and English linguacultures has a number of common features: the cores of the concepts, the lexical items «деньги» and “money”are borrowings that entered the vocabularies of the corresponding languages at the same time; the usage of foreign monetary units, in the first place, Byzantine coins, before the introduction of national currencies, influenced “money” terminology, breeding numerous words of foreign origin, as well as the design of money. The article also outlines the etymology of basic monetary units, such as the grzywna, the kuna, the denga, the ruble, the polushka, the kopeck, the altyn ,the chervonets – in Russian, the sterling, the pound, the penny, the shilling, the farthing, the unit, the noble, the sovereign – in English. The author finds a correlation between peculiarities of money development and the evolution of money nomenclature in Russian and English. The concluding section presents similar features and common laws of the concept “money” in the two linguacultures.

About the Author

Y. S. Denisenkova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University), 76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russia.
Russian Federation
Lecturer


References

1. Алексеев В.А. История и современные реалии фунта стерлингов. Спб.: Инфо-Да, 2011. 107 c.

2. Воевода Е.В. Великобритания: история и культура = Great Britain: Culture across History: учебное пособие

3. по английскому языку для студентов II курса факультета МЭО. М.: МГИМО-Университет, 2009. 221 с.

4. Панченко Н.Н. Средства объективизации концепта «обман» (на материале русского и английского яз.):

5. автореф. дис. канд. филол. наук. Волгоград, 1999. 24 с.

6. Попырин В.И. Очерки истории денег в России. М.: Финансы и статистика Инфа-М, 2010. 224 с.

7. Степанов Ю.С. Константы: Словарь русской культуры. 3-е изд. М.: Академический проект, 2004. 982 c.

8. Фасмер М. Этимологический словарь русского языка. [Электронный ресурс]/ Режим доступа: http://dic.

9. academic.ru/contents.nsf/vasmer/

10. Черных П.Я. Историко-этимологический словарь современного русского языка [В 2т.] /П.Я. Черных. М.:

11. Русский язык, 1999. 623 с.

12. Checkland S.G. Scottish Banking: A History, 1695–1973. Glasgow: Collins, 1975. 785 p.

13. Harper D. Online Etymology Dictionary. [Электронный ресурс]/ Режим доступа: http://www.etymonline.com/

14. Sinclair D. The Pound: A biography: The Story of the Currency That Ruled the World. L.: Century, 2000. 298 p.

15. Walter W. Skeat A Concise etymological dictionary of the English language. L.: Oxford Clarendon press, 1972.

16. p.


Review

For citations:


Denisenkova Y.S. A DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT “MONEY”. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2013;(5(32)):227-231. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2013-5-32-227-231

Views: 956


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)