Power Struggle between China and the United States: Lessons of History
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-1-70-82-99
Abstract
Fernand Braudel, the economic historian, gave a key for reading the power struggles occurring today between the United States and China. «Just as a country at the center of a world-economy can hardly be expected to give up its privileges at international level, how can one hope that the dominant groups who combine capital and state power, and who are assured of international support, will agree to play the game and hand over to someone else?» In other words, the ruling circles in the United States, the hegemonic power of today, want to keep their leadership, China, the rising and challenging power, would like to replace the USA as the hegemonic country: the trade war starting in 2018 should be analysed in this context . The paper will deal with the recent developments of this hegemonic struggle: within the American establishment, the Pentagon and the US Department of Commerce have regained control over «Wall Street» which has resulted in an updated version of the US military-industrial complex, with China replacing the USSR in a new "cold war". Complex strategies are developped on both sides, involving manufacturing, technology, trade, financial, diplomatic and military issues. Referring to this geo-economic key for reading, a number of actions taken by the US government since 2018 aims in particular at checking China’s mounting economic and financial power. For the United States, it is about challenging the development of China’s influence in the world, in particular along the new maritime Silk Roads.
About the Author
L. EstachyFrance
Laurent Estachy – Professor in International Finance, Macroeconomics and Geopolitics
680 Cours de la Libération, 33405 Talence, France
References
1. Bernanke B.S. 2010. What the Fed did and why: supporting the recovery and sustaining price stability. Wall Street Journal. November 4.
2. Braudel F. 1992. The perspective of the world: Civilization and Capitalism 15th - 18th Century. Vol. 3. University of California Press. First edition. 699 p.
3. Brzezinski Z. 1997. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Publisher; Basic Books. 223 p.
4. Davis B. 2016. Jump in Chinese Imports Gave Trump Election Boost, Study Finds. Wall Street Journal. 22 November.
5. Mackinder H.J. 1904. The Geographical Pivot of History. The Geographical Journal. 170.4. P. 298-321.
6. Mahan A.T. 1890. The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660-1783. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
7. Mitchell T. 2018. Trade Wars: China Fears an Emerging United Front. Financial Times. 11 September.
8. Navarro P., Autry G. 2011. Death by China: Confronting the Dragon – A Global Call to Action. Pearson Education Press. 320 p.
9. Navarro P. 2015. The Crouching Tiger: What Chinese Militarism Means for the World. New York: Prometheus Books.
10. Pillsbury M. 2015. The Hundred-Year Marathon: China's Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower. New York: Henry Holt and Co. 336 p.
11. Prestowitz C. 2010. The Betrayal of American Prosperity: Free Market Delusions, America's Decline, and How We Must Compete in the Post-Dollar EraHardcover. May 11. 352 p.
12. Shkvarya L., Grigorenko O., Strygin A., Rusakovich V., Shilina S. 2016. The impact of the global economic crisis on Asian technology markets (India and China). Central Asia and the Caucasus. 17(2).
13. Spykman N.J. 1942. America's Strategy in World Politics: The United States and the Balance of Power. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
14. Triffin R. 1960. Gold and the Dollar Crisis the Future of Convertibility. Yale University Press.
15. Tian Y. 2019. Chinese-Russian trade cooperation: a new impetus to development Russia and Asia. 2(7). P. 22-30.
Review
For citations:
Estachy L. Power Struggle between China and the United States: Lessons of History. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2020;13(1):82-99. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-1-70-82-99