Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Measuring Systemic Risk in the Financial Sector

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2014-6-39-117-125

Abstract

The article discusses quantitative methods of assessing systemic risk of the financial sector and the possibilities of their practical application. Systemic risk, which is manifested in the failure of financial services provision and deterioration of the financial system, is a complex concept that can be realized in several forms: the risk of infection, exogenous shock, leading to a simultaneous decline in all financial institutions, and the risk of «financial fragility accumulation". The main causes of the imbalances in the system are unjustified loose standards of risk assessment during economic booms, procyclical behavior of economic agents and asymmetric information. The spread of the risk is associated with the financial accelerator mechanism. Realization of systemic risk in the financial sector leads to serious negative consequences for the real sector not only in the national economy, but also abroad. Quantitative methods of risk assessment provide national authorities with useful information for macroprudential supervision aimed at maintaining financial stability. At the same time it is very important that the data used by the regulator is accurate and reliable. After 2008 crisis, a large number of qualitative approaches appeared, but they all reflect only certain aspects of the risk. The article focuses on stress tests, early-warning indicators, network models, VaR- methods and specific indices. According to research, different assessment methods produce different results. In addition, due to insufficient statistical database existing models are good at predicting crises with hindsight, but cannot identify stressful episodes ex-ante. Thus model results should be treated with caution and require further scrutiny. To get a holistic understanding of the systemic risk regulating authorities should apply different quantitative methods together with qualitative approaches and expert judgement.

About the Author

M. A. Shchepeleva
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation


References

1. Прикладная макроэкономика: базовые модели для экономической политики. Учебное пособие // Под общей редакцией М.В. Сафрончук. - М.: Издательский дом «НАУЧНАЯ БИБЛИОТЕКА», 2014. - 156 с.

2. Органическая механика финансовой системы (по материалам «The Financial Times»). Источник: Forexpf. Ru, режим доступа: http://www.forexpf.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=454896

3. Nicolas Blancher, Srobona Mitra, Hanan Morsy, Akira Otani, Tiago Severo, and Laura Valderrama. Systemic Risk Monitoring (SysMo) Toolkit- A User Guide. IMF Working paper, July 2013.

4. Методические комментарии и разъяснения к Обзору денежного рынка. Режим доступа: http://www. cbr.ru/analytics/fin_stab/MMR_comments.pdf

5. Показатели финансовой устойчивости. Руководство по составлению. - Вашингтон, округ Колумбия, США: Международный Валютный Фонд, 2007 г.

6. Солнцев О., Шатковская Т. «Чем рискуем?» // Банки и деловой мир, сентябрь 2008, режим доступа: http://www.forecast.ru/_ARCHIVE/Analitics/Crisis08/Forecast/july_2008_BDM.pdf

7. Солнцев О.Г., Пестова А.А., Мамонов М.Е., Магомедова З.М. Опыт разработки системы раннего оповещения о финансовых кризисах и прогноз развития банковского сектора России на 2012 год // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2011. № 12. Режим доступа: http://www.forecast.ru/_ARCHIVE/ Analitics/EcoAs/CMASF12-2011.pdf

8. Миною К. Сеть, из которой не вырваться. // Финансы и развитие, сентябрь 2012, режим доступа: http:// www.imf.org/external/russian/pubs/ft/fandd/2012/09/pdf/minoiu.pdf

9. Adrian T., Brunnermeier M. CoVaR. Staff Report №348. - Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 2008. -September. URL: https://www.princeton.edu/~markus/research/papers/CoVaR

10. Барабаш В.А., Сидоров С.П. Анализ взаимного влияния экономических субъектов с использованием меры риска CoVaR на примере российских компаний. Электронный журнал «Корпоративные финансы». Выпуск № 1 (29), 2014, с. 72 - 82.

11. Gunter Loffler, Peter Raupach. Robustness and Informativeness of Systemic Risk Measures. Discussion Paper, Deutsche Bundesbank, № 04/2013.

12. Lukas Scheffknecht (2013). «Contextualizing Systemic Risk». Discussion Paper Series ISSN 1865-7052.

13. Jon Danielsson, Kevin James, Marcela Valenzuela, Ilknur Zer. «Model Risk of Risk Models». April 2014.

14. Lars Peter Hansen. Challenges in Identifying and Measuring Systemic Risk. Working Paper, February 11, 2013.

15. Michail Stolbov (2013). Anatomy of International Banking Crises at the Onset of the Great Recession. MPRA Paper № 51236.


Review

For citations:


Shchepeleva M.A. Measuring Systemic Risk in the Financial Sector. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2014;(6(39)):117-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2014-6-39-117-125

Views: 939


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)