Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Three Waves of Populism in Latin America

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2014-6-39-153-160

Abstract

Contemporary political regimes in Venezuela and Bolivia led by late Hugo Châvez (now by his successor Nicolas Maduro) and Evo Morales are considered by foreign and Russian scholars as part of the third wave of populism. In the 20th century Latin America already witnessed two waves of populism which coincided with significant political transitions, namely a transition from oligarchy to mass politics accompanied by implementation of import substitution industrialization policies, and a transition from authoritarian rule to democracy during the third wave of democratization which triggered neoliberal reforms inspired by Washington Consensus. This article presents common characteristics of Latin American populist regimes that emerged in different historical periods which help identify the origins as well as distinctive features of Venezuelan and Bolivian political regimes. It is stated that the Châvez and Morales left populist regimes resemble classic populist regimes in that they rely on incendiary anti-establishment discourse. Therefore, left populist regimes are characterized by high levels of polarization as well as weak institutionalization and class or indigenous orientation. Election of left populist leaders may lead to institutional deadlock, uneven playing field and transition to competitive authoritarianism.

About the Author

O. V. Varentsova
MGIMO-University
Russian Federation


References

1. Дабагян Э.С. 2007. Методологические основы изучения феномена «левого поворота» // «Левый поворот» в Латинской Америке / Ред. Сударев В.П. М.: Институт Латинской Америки РАН. 216 с.

2. Корралес Х. 2006. Диктатор нового типа // Pro et Contra. №1, с. 74-83.

3. Angell A. 1998. The Left in Latin America since c.1920. // Latin America, vol. 6: 1930 to the Present, part 2: Politics and Society/ Ed. by Bethell L., pp. 163-232.

4. Conniff M.L. 1999. Introduction. Populism in Latin America / Ed. by Connif M.L. Tuscaloosa and London: The University of Alabama Press. 243 p.

5. Dix R.H. 1989. Cleavage Structures and Party Systems in Latin America // Comparative Politics, no. 22, pp. 23-37.

6. Dornbusch R., Edwards S. 1992. La macroeconomia del populismo. Macroeconomia del populismo en la América Latina / Ed. por Dornbusch R., Edwards S. México: Fondo de cultura econômica, 459 p.

7. Drake P.W. 1982. Conclusion: Requiem for Populism? Latin American Populism in Comparative Perspective / Ed. by Conniff M.L. Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press. 257 p.

8. Germani G. 1977. Politica y sociedad en una época de transiciôn. De la sociedad tradicional a la sociedad de masas. Buenos Aires: Paidos. 371 p.

9. Laclau E. 1978. Politica e ideologia en la teoria marxista. Capitalismo, fascismo, populismo. Madrid: Siglo XXI de Espana Editores, S.A. 323 p.

10. Levitsky S., Loxton J. 2012. Populism and Competitive Authoritarianism in the Andes. Democratization, no 20 (1), pp. 107-136.

11. Madrid R. 2005. Ethnic Cleavages and Electoral Volatility in Latin America. Comparative Politics, no. 38 (1), pp. 1-20.

12. Malloy J.M. 1977. Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America: The Model Pattern. Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America / Ed. by Malloy J.M. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 529 p.

13. Potter B. 2007. Constricting Contestation, Coalitions, and Purpose: The Causes of Neoliberal Restructuring and Its Failures. // Latin American Perspectives, no. 34 (3), pp. 3-24.

14. Roberts K.M. 2002. Social Inequalities Without Class Cleavages in Latin America's Neoliberal Era. // Studies in Comparative International Development, no. 36 (4), pp. 3-33.

15. Roberts K. 2003. Social Polarization and the Populist Resurgence in Venezuela. // Venezuelan Politics in the Chavez era. Class, Polarization and Conflict / Ed. by Ellner S., HellingerD. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. P.55-72.

16. Roberts K.M. 2007. Latin America's Populist Revival. // SAIS Review, no. 27 (1), pp. 3-14.

17. Seligson M. A. 2007. The Rise of Populism and The Left in Latin America. // Journal of Democracy, no. 18 (3), pp. 81-95.

18. Stokes S.C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy. Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 220 p.

19. Weffort F. 1999. El populismo en la politica brasilena. Populismo y neopopulismo en América Latina: el problema de la Cenicienta / Ed. por Mackinnon M.M., Petrone M.A. Buenos Aires: Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires. Pp. 135-152.

20. Weyland K. 1996. Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities. Studies in Comparative International Development, no. 31 (3), pp. 3-31.

21. Weyland K. 2002. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies. Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 335 p.

22. Weyland K. 2013. The Threat From the Populist Left. // Journal of Democracy, no. 24 (3), pp.18-32.


Review

For citations:


Varentsova O.V. Three Waves of Populism in Latin America. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2014;(6(39)):153-160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2014-6-39-153-160

Views: 2061


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)