Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

US Migration Policy Towards the States of the North American Continent

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2021-5-80-101-129

Abstract

The article aims at characterizing the content, problems, and consequences of the US interaction with the countries of the North American continent in the sphere of migration. The objective is to identify the main directions and assess the prospects for the overdue reform of the US regional migration policy. The author examines migration policy in the framework of NAFTA-USMCA and multi-vector initiatives aimed at managing movements within the region.
The results show that migration on the continent, primarily from Mexico and Central America to the United States, is characterized by a high level of regionalization. Due to massive spontaneous flows of migrants who lack the required documents for entering, staying, and working in the country of destination, including asylum seekers, the region's countries face serious challenges aggravated by the pandemic. The US cooperates in various forms and directions with the region's countries in the sphere of migration. It includes limited liberalization of specific categories of specialists and business representatives from the three member-states of the NAFTA-USMCA. Nevertheless, such interaction focuses on curbing the inflow of migrants without documents to the United States, which makes these relations asymmetric along the center-periphery axis. Such a policy is inconsistent and leads to acute humanitarian crises on the borders of the region's states. The administration of Joe Biden faces difficulties in reforming migration policy during the pandemic and growing public concern. The issue urges regional cooperation on a fairer and more equitable basis; otherwise, it is impossible to advance towards the promotion of legal migration.

About the Author

I. P. Tsapenko
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)
Russian Federation

Irina P. Tsapenko – Doctor of Economics, Head of Section of Economic and Social Development and Migration Processes of the Center for Comparative Socio-economic and Political Studies 

 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997



References

1. Efremova K.A. 2017. Ot regionalizma k transregionalizmu teoreticheskoe osmyslenie novoi realnosti [From Regionalism to Transregionalism: Theoretical Comprehension of the New Reality]. Comparative Politics Russiaa. 8(2). P. 58-72. DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-2-58-72. (In Russian)

2. Glushchenko G.I. 2006. Vliyanie mezhdunarodnoj trudovoj migracii na razvitie mirovogo i nacional'nogo hozyajstva [Impact of International Labor Migration on the Development of the World and National Economy]. Moscow: Statistika Rossii. (In Russian)

3. Ioncev V.A. 1999. Mezhdunarodnaya migraciya: naseleniya: teoriya i istoriya izucheniya [International Migration: Population: Theory and History of Study]. Moscow: Dialog-MGU. (In Russian)

4. Ivakhniuk I.V. 2016. Razvitie migratsionnoi teorii v usloviiakh globalizatsii [Development of Migration Theory in the Context of Globalization]. Vek globalizatsii. 1-2(17-18). P. 26-43. (In Russian)

5. Komkova E.G. 2018. Perspektivy NAFTA [Perspectives of NAFTA]. SSHA & Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kultura. №2. P. 5-19. DOI: 10.7808/S3254256418020015 (In Russian)

6. Kudeiarova N.Yu. 2019. Politizatsiia pogranichnoi problemy SSHA i Meksika v regionalnoi migratsionnoi sisteme [Politicization of the Border Issue: USA and Mexico in the Regional Migration System]. SSHA & Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kultura. №11. P. 55-70. DOI: 10.31857/S032120680007286-8 (In Russian)

7. Kudeiarova N.Yu. 2021. Migratsionnaia problematika v amerikano-latinoamerikanskikh otnosheniiakh konflikty i resheniia [Migration Issues in American-Latin American Relations (Conflicts and Solutions)]. SSHA & Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kultura. №7. P. 76-82. DOI: 10.31857/S268667300015577-4 (In Russian)

8. Kul'turnaya slozhnost' sovremennyh nacij [Cultural Complexity of Modern Nations]. 2016. Ed. by V.A. Tishkov, E.I. Filippova. Moscow: Politicheskaya enciklopediya. (In Russian)

9. Lebedeva L.F. 2019. Podkhody k ekonomicheskoi i sotsialnoi bezopasnosti v period prezidentstva D. Trampa [Approaches to Economic and Social Security during the Trump Presidency]. SSHA & Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kultura. №2. P. 29-42. (In Russian)

10. Lebedeva L.F., Aksenov P.A. 2021. Novaia ekonomicheskaia politika dzhozefa baidena globalnoe izmerenie [Joseph Biden's New Economic Policy: a Global Dimension]. Mezhdunarodnaia torgovlia i torgovaia politika. 2(26). P. 7-16. DOI: 10.21686/2410-7395-2021-2-7-16 (In Russian)

11. Lebedeva M.M. 2013. Aktory sovremennoj mirovoj politiki: trendy razvitiya [Actors of Contemporary World Politics: Trends of Development]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 1(28). P. 38-42. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2013-1-28-38-42 (In Russian)

12. Nikolskaia G.K. 2020. Diskussiia ob immigratsionnoi politike kak odno iz proiavlenii raskola v amerikanskom obshchestve [Discussion about Immigration Policy as One of the Manifestations of the Split in American Society]. Оbshchestvo i ekonomika. №1. P. 91-106 (In Russian)

13. Ryazancev S.V., Tkachenko M.F. 2010. Mirovoj rynok i mezhdunarodnaya migraciya [World Market and International Migration]. Moscow: ZAO «Izdatel'stvo «Ekonomika». (In Russian)

14. Shipkov V.A. 2017. Regionalizm kak ideologiia globalizma [Regionalism as an Ideology of Globalism]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet. (In Russian)

15. Topilin A.V. 2021. O sistemnom podkhode k izucheniiu mezhdunarodnykh migratsionnykh protsessov [On a Systematic Approach to the Study of International Migration Processes]. DEMIS Demograficheskie issledovaniia. 1(1). P. 17-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/demis.2021.1.1.2 (In Russian)

16. Tsapenko I.P. 2017. Regionalizatsiia migratsionnykh protsessov [Regionalization of Migration Processes]. Kontury globalnykh transformatsii politika ekonomika pravo. №10. P. 70-85. DOI 10 23932 2542-0240-2017-10-4-70-85 (In Russian)

17. Tsapenko I.P. 2020. Migratsionnyi vopros v sisteme antikoronakrizisnogo upravleniia D Trampa [Migration Issue in D. Trump's Anti-crisis Management System]. SSHA & Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kultura. №9. P. 22-43. DOI 10 31857 S268667300010963-9 (In Russian)

18. Benton M., Batalova J., Davidoff-Gore S., Schmidt T. 2021. COVID-19 and the State of Global Mobility in 2020. DC: Migration Policy Institute. 57 p.

19. Castells M. 1996. The Rise of the of Network Society. Vol. I: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.

20. Farrell M., Hettne B., Van Langenhove L. (eds). 2005. Global Politics of Regionalism: Theory and Practice. London, Pluto Press.

21. Mabogunje A.L. 1970. Systems Approach to a Theory of Rural-Urban Migration. Geographical Analysis. №2. P. 1-18.

22. Mareï N., Richard Y. 2020. Global Regionalization Processes and (Macro)Regional Integration. In Favor of Generalization in Geography. Revue belge de géographie. №4. 20 p. DOI: 10.4000/belgeo.43433

23. Martin P. 1993. Trade and Migration: The Case of NAFTA. Asian and Pacific Migration. Journal. №3. P. 329-367. DOI: 10.1177/011719689300200306

24. Migration, Free Movement and Regional Integration. 2017. Ed. By S. Nita, A. Pecoud, P. De Lombaerde, K. Neyts and J. Gartland. Paris: UNESCO – UNU-CRIS.

25. Nita S. 2013. Regional Migration Governance: A Comparative View. Draft paper prepared for the UNRISD Conference Regional Governance of Migration and Socio-Political Rights: Institutions, Actors and Processes. Geneva. 12 p.

26. Papademetriou D. 2020. Managing the Pandemic and Its Aftermath: Economies, Jobs, and International Migration in the Age of COVID-19. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. 64 p.

27. Pellerin H. 1999. Regionalisation of Migration Policies and Its Limits: Europe and North America Compared. Third World Quarterly. №5. P. 995-1011.

28. Pierce S., Bolter J. 2020. Dismantling and Reconstructing the U.S. Immigration System. A Catalog of Changes under the Trump Presidency. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. 122 p.

29. Sanchez G. 2021. Time for a Wake-up Call? Mexico and Central America and Their Present and Future Migration Policy Challenges. Migration Policy Practice. №1. Р. 21-44.

30. Selee A., Soto A. 2020. Building a New Regional Migration System: Redefining U.S. Cooperation with Mexico and Central America. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.

31. Selee A., Giorguli-Saucedo S., Soto A., Masferrer C. 2019. Investing in the Neighborhood: Changing Mexico-U.S. Migration Patterns and Opportunities for Sustainable Cooperation. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. 40 p.

32. Selm J. 2020. A Pandemic-fueled Approach to Immigration in the United States and the Neighbouring Region. Migration Policy Practice. №2. Р. 40-47.

33. Selm J. 2021. The United States of America’s Immigration Policy for 2021. Migration Policy Practice. №1. Р. 37-40.

34. Soto A. 2020. One Year after the U.S.-Mexico Agreement. Reshaping Mexico’s Migration Policies. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. 21 p.


Review

For citations:


Tsapenko I.P. US Migration Policy Towards the States of the North American Continent. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2021;14(5):101-129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2021-5-80-101-129

Views: 2620


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)