Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Joint Initiatives Instead of Multilateralism: A New Reality for the WTO?

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2021-5-80-167-186

Abstract

The article examines the complexities of the negotiation function of the WTO, in which consensus in decision-making plays an important role. The author systematizes the possibilities and limitations for incorporating the results of plurilateral negotiations (i.e., with a limited number of participants) held within the framework of the so-called joint statement initiatives into the organization's law. The article also analyzes the prospects for integrating specific joint initiatives (internal regulation in services, simplification of investments in development, e-commerce) into the WTO system. The article emphasizes that despite standard features, all initiatives are unique in their content, format, and history and are at different stages of readiness, for Russia, which takes an active part in these joint initiatives, bringing the negotiations to a conclusion. The article criticizes joint initiatives from their primary opponents (India and South Africa), who insist that plurilateral initiatives' participation ignores existing multilateral mandates reached by consensus. Thus, they destroy the multilateral system.
The purpose of the article is to review conceptual and practical approaches to forming new trade rules in the WTO system in the context of the multilateral crisis. The author concludes that plurilateral agreements can become a way out of the crisis in the negotiation function of the WTO, as well as the basis for future trade agreements in the system of organization. However, for plurilateralism to be effective and sustainable, it must be linked to multilateral norms and principles. Any plurilateral approach must allow flexibility in forming the basis for negotiating trade rules at multilateral level. It seems that if in the near future the WTO does not take decisive actions to adjust the rules and procedures for the new agreements, the prospects for advancing negotiations and maintaining the relevance of the leading institution of the international trading system will become even bleaker.

About the Author

O. V. Biryukova
University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Olga V. Biryukova – Candidate of Sciences in International Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Trade Policy

20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000



References

1. Adlung R., Mamdouh H. 2017. Plurilateral trade agreements: An escape route for the WTO? WTO Staff Working Paper. № ERSD-2017-03. Geneva: World Trade Organization (WTO). 23 p.

2. Bayne N., Woolcock S. (eds.). 2011. The New Economic Diplomacy. Decision-Making and Negotiation in international Economic Relations. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited. 360 p.

3. Cerny P.G. 1993. Plurilateralism: Structural Differentiation and Functional Conflict in the Post-Cold War Order. Millenium: Journal of International Studies. 22(1). P. 27-51.

4. Hoekman B., Kostecki M. 2009. The Political Economy of the World Trading System. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 739 p.

5. Hoekman B., Sabel C. 2021. Plurilateral Cooperation as an Alternative to Trade Agreements: Innovating One Domain at a Time. Global Policy. Vol. 12. Supplement 3. April 2021. P. 297-312. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12923

6. Lamp N. 2016. ‘The Club Approach to Multilateral Trade Lawmaking’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law. 49(1). P. 7-55. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2574864.

7. Nottage H., Sebastian T. 2006. Giving Legal Effect to the Results of WTO Trade Negotiations: An Analysis of the Methods of Changing WTO Law. Journal of International Economic Law. 9(4). P. 989-1016. DOI: 10.1093/jiel/jgl028

8. Portanskiy A. 2019. The Imperative of WTO Reform in an Era of Rising Protectionism and Trade Wars. International Organisations Research Journal. 14(2). P. 304-318. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2019-02-12

9. Saner R. 2008. The Expert Negotiator: Strategy, Tactics, Motivation, Behaviour and Leadership. Leiden: Martinus Nitjoff Publishers. 291 p.

10. Saner R. 2012. Plurilateral Agreements: Key to Solving Impasse of WTO/Doha Round and Basis for Future Trade Agreements within the WTO Context. CSEND Policy Brief. №7. Geneva, April. 34 p.

11. Zartman W. (ed.). 1994. International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 290 p.

12. Biryukova O., Daniltsev A. 2019. Kogda sotrudnichestvo ne skladyvaetsya: global'noe upravlenie cifrovoj torgovlej [When Cooperation Fails: the Global Governance of Digital Trade]. International Organisations Research Journal. 14(1). Р. 7–20. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2019-01-01 (In Russian)

13. Dumoulin I.I. 2016. Mezhdunarodnaya torgovlya v poslekrizisnye gody (2010 - 2015 gg.) – novye tendencii i nekotorye problemy [International Trade in the Post-Crisis Years (2010-2015) – New Trends and Some Problems]. Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin. №7. P. 3-13. (In Russian)

14. Isachenko T.M. 2016. Reforma VTO: predposylki, usloviya i perspectivy [WTO Reform: Prerequisites, Conditions and Prospects]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 3(48). P. 239–248. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2016-3-48-239-248. (In Russian)

15. Maiorova E. 2020. Podhody Rossii k reforme VTO [Russia’s Approaches to Reform of the WTO]. Trade policy. 2(22). P. 16-20. DOI: 10.17323/2499-9415-2020-2-22-16-20. (In Russian)

16. Оleinov A.G. 2013. Economic Analysis of International Interaction: International Economics and International Political Economy. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 1(28). P. 102-112. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2013-1-28-102-112. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Biryukova O.V. Joint Initiatives Instead of Multilateralism: A New Reality for the WTO? MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2021;14(5):167-186. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2021-5-80-167-186

Views: 1291


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)