Pacific Pumas in Indian Jungle: Place of Latin America in Indo-Pacific

The article examines the political potential of Latin American countries in bolstering their influence within the Indo-Pacific region (IP). It delves into the Indo-Pacific concept, championed internationally by India and Japan, as an alternative viewpoint in contrast to the predominant orientation towards China as the regional leader in the Asia-Pacific region. Carlos Exudé's "Peripheral Realism" provides the theoretical framework for the study, although Latin American states strive to move beyond their peripheral status.

The focus is on four Pacific coastal countries in Latin America: Colombia, Mexico, Peru, and Chile. It identifies key areas of cooperation between these nations and major players in the IP such as India, Japan, South Korea, and Australia. Chile and Peru have established a more robust transpacific partnership compared to their neighbors. However, Mexico possesses a significant advantage due to its unique geographical position intersecting the Atlantic and Pacific routes.
Colombia, along with Mexico, Chile, and Peru, formed the Pacific Alliance, an integration association that emphasizes closer ties with Asian countries. Over its decade-long existence, this Alliance has significantly increased in both economic and political significance. The article highlights the pivotal role of this alliance in fostering Asian-Latin American trade and entrepreneurship.

The study also delves into the prospects of integrating the two regions by extending the reach of Pacific economic megablocks (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, Trans-Pacific Partnership) to Latin America. After the ratification of the TPP by Mexico, Peru, and Chile, an agreement that unites all four Pacific Ocean continents for the first time emerged. The advent of the RCEP, which includes powerful economies such as China, South Korea, and Japan, demonstrates a clear global shift from the Atlantic to the Pacific and from West to East. The inclusion of Latin American countries in these processes is poised to advance their regional and global interests on the international stage.

1. Esposto A., Abbott M., Tran M. 2022. Increasing Complexity: Australia’s Foreign Policy Links with Latin America, 1973 to 2019. Estudios económicos. XXXIX(79). P. 271-300.

2. Durán Lima J., Aguiar A., Ronzheimer I. 2021. Economic and Social Effects of a Possible Trade Agreement between Latin America and the Asia-Pacific Region. International Trade Series. №168. Santiago, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 49 p.

3. Kahn T. 2016. A Virtuous Cycle of Integration: The Past, Present, and Future of Japan-Latin America and the Caribbean Relations. Inter-American Development Bank. 42 p.

4. Mesquita Moreira M., Dolabella M., Ko K. [and others]. 2022. Latin America and Korea: Partners for Sustainable Trade and Investment. Inter-American Development Bank. 48 p.

5. Myers M., Hosono A. 2019. Japanese Engagement with LAC. Japan-LAC Report. The Dialogue. 11 p.

6. Wilhelmy M. 2005. Chile, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific Region. Revista de ciencia política (Santiago). 25(2). P. 190-197. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-090X2005000200010

7. Bernal-Meza А. 2015. Alaianza de Pacífico versus ALBA y MERCOSUR: Entre el desafío de la convergencia y el riesgo de la fragmentación de Sudamérica [The Pacific Alliance versus ALBA and MERCOSUR: between the Challenge of Convergence and the Risk of Fragmentation of South America]. Persquisa & Debate. SP. 26(1(47)). P. 1–34. (In Spanish).

8. Baroni P.A., Seshasayee H. 2020. La India y la Alianza del Pacífico: oportunidades y desafios [India and the Pacific Alliance: Opportunities and Challenges]. Agenda Internacional. №38. P. 141–164. (In Spanish).

9. Beltrán Mora L.N., Ferrer Toscano H.E. 2016. Alianza Pacifico: una perspectiva geopolítica y económica [Pacific Alliance: A Geopolitical and Economic Perspective]. Dimensión Empresarial. № 14(1). P. 79-94. DOI: 10.15665/rde.v14i1.632 (in Spanish).

10. Fortín C., Heine J., Ominami C. 2020. El no alineamiento activo: un camino para América Latina [Active Non-Alignment: A Path for Latin America]. Nueva Sociedad. URL: https://nuso. org/articulo/el-no-alineamiento-activo-una-camino-para-america-latina/ (accessed 12.02.2023) (In Spanish).

11. Marchini G. 2019. Las relaciones económicas de la Alianza del Pacífico con Japón: especificidades y perspectivas [Economic Relations of the Pacific Alliance with Japan: Specificities and Perspectives]. Contextualizaciones Latinoamericanas. 11(22). Enero-Junio. P. 140–166. (In Spanish)

12. Myers M., Kuwayama M. 2016. Una nueva fase en las relaciones entre Japón y América Latina yel Caribe. Informe Japón-América Latina [A New Phase in Relations between Japan and Latin America and the Caribbean. Japan-Latin America Report]. The Dialogue. 16 p. (In Spanish).

13. Serbin A. 2021. El Indo-Pacífico y América Latina en el marco de la disputa geoestratégica entre Estados Unidos y China [The Indo-Pacific and Latin America in the Framework of the Geostrategic Dispute between the United States and China]. Documentos de Trabajo. №45. Madrid: Fundación Carolina. 18 p. (In Spanish).

14. Telias D. 2020. El retorno de Japón hacia América Latina y el Caribe: ¿una estrategia de hedging ante el crecimiento de China? [Japan’s Return to Latin America and the Caribbean: A Hedging Strategy in the Face of China’s Growth?] Estudios Internacionales. 52(197). P. 9–37. DOI: 10.5354/0719-3769.2020.55477 (In Spanish).

15. Batyuk V.I. 2021. Indo-Tikhookeanskaia strategiia SShA i Evraziia [Us Indo-Pacific Strategy and Eurasia]. Current Problems of Europe. 1(109). P. 135–153. DOI: 10.31249/ape/2021.01.06 (In Russian).

16. Bobrovnikov A.V., Davydov V.M., Martynov B.F. [and others]. 2014. BRIKS – Latinskaia Amerika: pozitsionirovanie i vzaimodeistvie [BRICS – Latin America: Positioning and Interaction]. Moscow: ILA RAS. 186 p. (In Russian).

17. Bol'shova E.V., Savel'eva A.V., Shcherbakov D.A. 2015. Osobennosti razvitiia torgovo-ekonomicheskikh otnoshenii Iaponii so stranami Latinskoi Ameriki [The Features of the Development of Trade and Economic Relations between Japan and Latin America]. Latin America. №8. P. 51–65. (In Russian).

18. Butskaia N.G., Kachian M.A. 2018. Tikhookeanskii al'ians: mesto i rol' v sovremennoi global'noi ekonomike [Pacific Alliance: Place and Role in Modern Global Economy]. The bulletin of the Far Eastern Federal University. Economics and Management. №1. P. 133–142. (In Russian).

19. Eremin A.A. 2021. Periferiinyi realizm Karlosa Eskude [The Peripheral Realism of Carlos Escudé]. Cuadernos Iberoamericanos. 9(1). P. 50–61. DOI: 10.46272/2409-3416-2021-9-1-50-61 (In Russian).

20. Evseenko A.S. 2022. Rasshirenie prisutstviia KNR i RF v Latinskoi Amerike kak vyzov amerikanskim interesam [China’s and Russia’s Growing Footprint in Latin America as a Challenge to American Interests]. Science of Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations. 27(2). P. 163–177. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu4.2022.2.14 (In Russian).

21. Galishcheva N.V. 2011. Sovremennaia vneshneekonomicheskaia strategiia Indii: sotrudnichestvo «Iug – Iug» [Contemporary External Economic Strategy of India: “South – South” Cooperation]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. №5. P. 96–106. DOI: 10.24833/2071-81602011-5-20-96-106 (In Russian).

22. Jeifetz V.L. (Ed.) 2019. Ot bipoliarnogo k mnogopoliarnomu miru: latinoamerikanskii vektor mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v XXI veke [From a Bipolar to a Multipolar World: Latin American Vector of International Relations in the 21st Century]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 494 p.

23. Katkova E.Iu., Eremin A.A. 2022. Otnosheniia KNR s regionom Latinskoi Ameriki i Karibskogo basseina na sovremennom etape [China's Relations with Latin America and the

24. Caribbean at the Present Stage]. International Organisations Research Journal. 17(2). P. 164–188. (In Russian).

25. Kosevich E.Iu. 2020. Meksika v sisteme geopoliticheskikh koordinat nachala XXI veka [Mexico in the System of Geopolitical Coordinates in the Beginning of the 21st Century]. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. 312 p. (In Russian).

26. Kudeiarova N.Iu. 2017. Epokha massovykh migratsii v Latinskoi Amerike: globalizatsiia vs lokalizatsiia [The Mass Migration Epoch in Latin America: Globalization vs Localization]. Latin America. №2. P. 76–91. (In Russian).

27. Kupriianov A.V. 2020. Kontseptsiia Indo-Tikhookeanskogo regiona v rabotakh indiiskikh politologov [The Concept of Indo-Pacific Region in the Works of Indian Political Scientists]. Outlines of global transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. 13(3). P. 47–65. DOI: 10.23932/2542-02402020-13-3-3. (In Russian).

28. Kupriianov A.V. 2021. Indo-Patsifika kak geopoliticheskii konstrukt: podkhod Indii i interesy Rossii [Indo-Pacific as a Geopolitical Construct: India's Approach and Russia's Interests]. The International Affairs. №11. P. 60–71. (In Russian).

29. Kupriianov A.V. 2022. Strategicheskie imperativy Indii: ot Indiiskogo okeana k ITR i obratno [Strategic Imperatives of India: From the Indian Ocean to the Indo-Pacific and Back Again]. USA & Canada: Economics. Politics. Culture. №8. P. 75–89. DOI: 10.31857/S2686673022080065 (In Russian).

30. Kuznetsov D.A. 2015. Latinoamerikanskaia integratsiia i subregionalizatsiia na sovremennom etape: politiko-ideologicheskoe izmerenie [Latin American Integration and Sub-Regionalization: Political and Ideological Dimension]. Comparative politics Russia. 6(3). P. 65–84. (In Russian).

31. Lavut A.A. 2014. Megabloki – vyzov dlia Latinskoi Ameriki [Megablocks as a Challenge for Latin America]. Latin America. №6. P. 37–52. (In Russian).

32. Lavut A.A. 2017. Transtikhookeanskoe partnerstvo, Donal'd Tramp i latinoamerikanskaia integratsiia [Trans-Pacific Partnership, Donald Trump and Latin American Integration]. Latin America. №9. P. 19–35. (In Russian).

33. Leksyutina Ya.V. 2019. Rol' Kitaia v strategii «Svobodnyi i otkrytyi Indo-Tikhookeanskii region» D. Trampa. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations [China in D. Trump’s Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy]. 19(1). P. 22–34. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-22-34 (In Russian)

34. Lukin A.V. 2023. Amerikano-kitaĭskoe sopernichestvo v ATR: deklaratsii i real'nost' [Sino– U.S. Rivalry in the Asia-Pacific: Declarations and Actual Policies]. Russia in Global Affairs. 21(1). P. 118–137. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2023-21-1-153-173 (In Russian)

35. Razumovskiy D.V. 2014. Novye puti regional'noi integratsii: latinoamerikanskii i vostochnoaziatskii opyt [New Ways of Regional Integration: Latin American and East Asian Experience]. The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. №1. P. 122–129. (In Russian)

36. Santoro M. 2020. Politika Kitaia v Latinskoi Amerike v XXI veke [China in Latin America in the 21st Century] Cuadernos Iberoamericanos. 8(3). P. 24–34. DOI: 10.46272/2409-3416-2020-8-3-24-34 (In Russian)

37. Sudarev V.P. 2007. SShA i «levyi povorot» v Latinskoi Amerike [USA and the “Left Turn” in Latin America]. Latin America. №5. P. 4–17. (In Russian).

38. Vorotnikova T.A. 2013. Cherez Zapad na Vostok Perspektivy indiisko-latinoamerikanskogo sotrudnichestva [Through the West to the East. The Prospects of Indian-Latin American Cooperation]. Latin America. №5. P. 35–47. (In Russian).