The Entente’s Support for the White Armies in Southern Russia (Late 1918–1919)

This article examines a previously underexplored aspect of the Russian Civil War during its critical phase in late 1918–1919: the logistical support provided by the Entente to the White armies in the South, set against the backdrop of the final military interventions. The authors concentrate on the interactions between General A.I. Denikin's regime and the British authorities, who were the primary proponents of the Entente's intervention in Russia, as well as the conditions surrounding the involvement of the French armed forces.
The research primarily draws on documents from the Russian State Military Archive, created by officers of the White armies of Southern Russia, and the National Archives of Great Britain. This comprehensive source base enables a reassessment of some long-held views in Russian historiography regarding the Entente's intervention in the Black Sea region. The study aims to delineate the scope and nature of the Entente’s support and to understand why this assistance failed to secure a victory for the White forces.
Post-Soviet historiography commonly posits that the Red Army enjoyed an economic advantage in terms of weapons and ammunition supply for most of the Civil War. This article, however, reveals that the support from Entente countries was substantial and that the use of foreign weapons and equipment significantly influenced the late 1918-1919 period. Nonetheless, the critical factor, as argued by the authors, was the timing of deliveries. The peak of the Entente’s military-technical support to the Armed Forces of Southern Russia occurred after the Red Army had already fortified its positions with adequate firepower. The lengthy strategic decision-making processes of the British Cabinet, characteristic of British democratic and bureaucratic systems, resulted in delayed assistance to Denikin’s troops, ultimately undermining its effectiveness.

1. Cinvig C. 2006. Churchill’s Crusade. The British invasion in Russia. London, New York, Hambledon Continuum. 373 p.

2. Debo R.K. 1986. The Manuilskii Mission: An Early Soviet Effort to Negotiate with France, August 1918-April 1919. The International History Review. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 214–235.

3. Jackson R. 1972. At war with Bolsheviks. The Allied intervention into Russia 1917–1920. London, Tom Stacey. 325 p.

4. Mawdsley E. 2007. The Russian Civil War. New York, Book club ed. 390 p.

5. Moffat I.C.D. 2015. The Allied Intervention in Russia, 1918–1920. The Diplomacy of Chaos. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. 330 p.

6. Dolgova A.V. 2008. Dezertirstvo v Krasnoy i Beloy armiyakh v 1917–1922 godakh [Desertion in the Red and White Armies in 1917–1922]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta, no. 7 (23), pp. 39–45. (In Russian)

7. Egorov A.I. 2003. Grazhdanskaya voyna v Rossii: Razgrom Denikina [Civil War in Russia: The

8. Defeat of Denikin]. Moscow: AST, St. Petersburg: Terra Fantastica. 637 p. (In Russian)

9. Eykhe G.Kh. 1966. Oprokinutyy tyl [Overturned Rear]. Moscow: Voennoe izdatel'stvo Ministerstva oborony SSSR. 384 p. (In Russian)

10. Gagkuev R.G. 2012. Beloe dvizhenie na Yuge Rossii. Voennoe stroitel'stvo, istochniki komplektovaniya, sotsial'nyy sostav. 1917–1920 gg. [The White Movement in Southern Russia. Military Construction, Recruitment Sources, Social Composition. 1917–1920]. Moscow: Posev. 703 p. (In Russian)

11. Ganin A.V. 2011. Pomnyat psy-atamany, pomnyat pol'skie pany. Pochemu pobezhdala Krasnaya armiya [The Chieftains Remember, the Polish Lords Remember. Why the Red Army Won]. Rodina, no. 2, pp. 12–27. (In Russian)

12. Ganin A.V. 2018. Sem' "pochemu" rossiyskoy Grazhdanskoy voyny [Seven "Whys" of the Russian Civil War]. Moscow: Pyatyy Rim. 860 p. (In Russian)

13. Grazhdanov Yu.D. 2015. Vsevelikoe Voysko Donskoe v gody Grazhdanskoy voyny (1918–1919 gg.) [The Great Don Army during the Civil War (1918–1919)]. Rostov-on-Don: Antey. 240 p. (In Russian)

14. Ippolitov G.M. 2006. Denikin [Denikin]. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya. 665 p. (In Russian)

15. Ivanov A.A. 2012. Amerikanskaya intervenciya na Russkom Severe (1918–1919 gody): perekrestok mneniy [American Intervention in the Russian North (1918–1919): A Crossroad of Opinions]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 2 (3), pp. 106–111. (In Russian)

16. Ivanov A.V. 2003. Volya sluchaya ili istoricheskaya zakonomernost'? Razmyshleniya o prichinakh porazheniya belogo dvizheniya v Grazhdanskoy voyne [Chance or Historical Inevitability? Reflections on the Reasons for the Defeat of the White Movement in the Civil War]. Belaya armiya. Beloe delo, no. 12, pp. 5–27. (In Russian)

17. Karpenko S.V. 2015. Ekonomicheskiy krizis i korruptsiya: iz istorii tyla belykh armiy Yuga Rossii (1918–1920 gg.) [Economic Crisis and Corruption: From the History of the Rear of the White Armies in Southern Russia (1918–1920)]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, no. 1 (37), pp. 108–135. (In Russian)

18. Karpenko S.V. 2015. Krizis tovarno-denezhnogo obrashcheniya i prodovol'stvennoe snabzhenie armii i gorodskogo naseleniya na belom Yuge Rossii (1919) [Crisis of Commodity-Money Circulation and Food Supply to the Army and Urban Population in the White South of Russia (1919)]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, no. 1 (37), pp. 101–121. (In Russian)

19. Plotnikov I.F. 2002. A.V. Kolchak: issledovatel', administrator, verkhovnyy pravitel' Rossii [A.V. Kolchak: Researcher, Administrator, Supreme Ruler of Russia]. Moscow: Centrpoligraf. 701 p. (In Russian)

20. Popov G.G. 2019. Intervenciya [Intervention]. Moscow: Veche. 418 p. (In Russian)

21. Puchenkov A.S. 2021. Pervyy god Dobrovol'cheskoy armii: ot vozniknoveniya "Alekseevskoy organizatsii" do obrazovaniya Vooruzhennykh sil na Yuge Rossii (noyabr' 1917–dekabr' 1918) [The First Year of the Volunteer Army: From the Emergence of the "Alekseev Organization" to the Formation of the Armed Forces in Southern Russia (November 1917–December 1918)]. St. Petersburg: Aleksandr Dal'. 813 p. (In Russian)

22. Ryabov V.V., Nefedov A.Yu. 2019. Intervenciya v Rossii: beskorystnaya pomoshch' ili sobstvennye interesy? [Intervention in Russia: Selfless Help or Own Interests?]. Noveishaya istoriya Rossii, no. 4, pp. 26–34. (In Russian)

23. Saldugeev D.V. 2015. K voprosu o dezertirstve v armiyakh Belogo dvizheniya v gody Grazhdanskoy voyny v Rossii [On the Issue of Desertion in the Armies of the White Movement during the Civil War in Russia]. Tradicionnye nacional'no-kul'turnye i dukhovnye cennosti kak fundamental'naya innovacionnogo razvitiya Rossii, no. 2 (8), pp. 31–35. (In Russian)

24. Sergeev E.Yu. 2019. Bolsheviki i anglichane. Sovetsko-britanskie otnosheniya, 1918–1924 gg.: ot intervencii k priznaniyu [Bolsheviks and the British. Soviet-British Relations, 1918–1924: From Intervention to Recognition]. St. Petersburg: Nauka. 830 p. (In Russian)

25. Sukhova O.A. 2016. Dezertirstvo v period Grazhdanskoy voyny v Rossii: kul'turno-antropologicheskiy aspekt [Desertion during the Civil War in Russia: Cultural and Anthropological Aspect]. Vestnik NII Gumanitarnykh nauk pri Pravitel'stve Respubliki Mordoviya, no. 2 (38), pp. 37–47. (In Russian)

26. Tsvetkov V.Zh. 2019. Beloe delo v Rossii: 1917–1919 gg. [The White Cause in Russia: 1917– 1919]. Moscow: Yauza: Yakor'. 1053 p. (In Russian)

27. Vasil'ev M.V. 2019. Geopoliticheskiy podtekst Grazhdanskoy voyny v Rossii. Chast' 1 [Geopolitical Context of the Civil War in Russia. Part 1]. Arkhont, no. 6 (15), pp. 43–56. (In Russian)

28. Venkov A.V., Zubkov V.N. 2015. Donskaya armiya. Organizatsionnaya struktura i komandnyy sostav. 1917–1920 gg. Vypusk 2 «Mobilizovannaya armiya» [Don Army. Organizational Structure and Command Staff. 1917–1920. Issue 2 "Mobilized Army"]. Rostov-on-Don: Antey. 400 p. (In Russian)