The Promise and Failure of Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process in 1990s: A Literature Review

In 2023, the world marked 30 years since the start of the Oslo process, which sought to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Given the ultimate breakdown of these negotiations, it is crucial to examine the evolution of academic research on this process, identifying its key themes and trends. This literature review focuses on both empirical and theoretical studies of the Oslo process, with a particular emphasis on research that investigates the reasons behind its failure. Such studies provide valuable insights for developing more effective models of negotiation and conflict resolution. Initially, the commencement of the Oslo negotiations was met with optimism in the academic community, with scholars highlighting the pivotal role of individual leaders in successfully launching the process. However, as the peace process faltered, the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations were analyzed through existing theoretical frameworks. Various scholars critically examined the Oslo Accords from the perspective of international law and highlighted economic factors that obstructed the path to a lasting peace. Other studies explored indirect influences on the peace process, such as public opinion and electoral dynamics, often employing Robert Putnam's “two-level games” theory. Nevertheless, these studies mainly address the immediate causes of the peace process’s failure and do not fully account for the underlying motivations driving the behavior of actors in the negotiations. Research into the deeper causes of the Oslo process’s collapse has highlighted socio-psychological barriers, such as the “conflict syndrome” and issues of ontological security. Scholars have investigated the roles of historical memory, collective trauma, and cultural identities in shaping negotiation outcomes. The rise of interdisciplinary approaches—combining insights from psychology, philosophy, and linguistics—has been essential for understanding the complex dimensions of this conflict. The diverse body of research and theories inspired by the Oslo peace process continues to influence the field of negotiation and conflict resolution studies, underscoring the enduring significance of this critical episode in diplomatic history.

1. Abbas M. 1997. Through Secret Chennels. The Road to Oslo, Senior PLO Leader Abu Mazen's Revealing Story of the Negotiations with Israel. Reading: Garnet Publishing Ltd. 252 p.

2. Achar G. 2010. The Arabs and the Holocaust: The Arab-Israeli War of Narratives. New York: Metropolitan Books. 400 p.

3. Arnon A., Spivak A. 1998. Economic Aspects of the Oslo Process. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics and Culture. 5(3). URL: https://pij.org/articles/388/economic-aspects-of-theoslo-process (дата обращения 20.08.2024).

4. Arzt D.E., Zughaib K. 1992. Return to the Negotiated Lands: The Likelihood and Legality of a Population Transfer Between Israel and a Future Palestinian State. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. Vol. 24. P. 1399-1513.

5. Atran S., Axelrod R., Davis R. 2007. Sacred Barriers to Conflict Resolution. Science. 317(5841). P. 1039-1040. DOI: 10.1126/science.1144241

6. Bar-On D., Sarsar S. 2004. Bridging the unbridgable: the Holocaust and Al-Nakba. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics and Culture. 11(1). URL: https://pij.org/articles/17 (дата обращения 20.08.2024).

7. Barak O. 2005. The Failure of the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process, 1993-2000. Journal of Peace Research. 42(6). P. 719-736. DOI: 10.1177/0022343305057889

8. Bercovitch D. 1997. Conflict Management and the Oslo Experience: Assessing the Success of Israeli–Palestinian Peacemaking. International Negotiation. 2(2). P. 217-235. DOI: 10.1163/15718069720847951

9. Bercovitch J., Jackson R. 2009. Conflict Resolution in the Twenty-First Century: Principles, Methods, and Approaches. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

10. Bracka J. 2021. Transitional Justice for Israel/Palestine: Truth-Telling and Empathy in Ongoing

11. Conflict. Springer Cham. 387 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89435-1

12. Brown N.J. 2008. The International Politics of the Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press

13. Bzostek R., Rogers A. 2014. Oslo +20: Reassessing the role of confidence building measures. The Social Science Journal. 51(2). P. 250-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2013.11.002

14. Carcasson S., Putnam D. 1997. Communication and the Oslo Negotiation: Contacts, Patterns, and Modes. International Negotiation. 2(2). P. 251-278. DOI: 10.1163/15718069720847979

15. Chomsky N. 2017. The Oslo Accords: Their Context, Their Consequences. In The Oslo Accords: A Critical Assessment. Ed. by P. Bauck, M. Omer. The American University in Cairo Press. P. 1-12. DOI: 10.5743/cairo/9789774167706.003.0001

16. Dessus S. 2004. A Palestinian Growth History, 1968-2000. Journal of Economic Integration. 19(3). P. 447-469

17. Falk R. 2017. After Oslo: A Legal Historical Perspective. In The Oslo Accords: A Critical Assessment. Ed. by P. Bauck, M. Omer. The American University in Cairo Press. P. 67-78. DOI: 10.5743/ cairo/9789774167706.003.0007

18. Golan G. 2014. Israeli Peacemaking since 1967: Factors behind the breakthroughs and failures. London: Routledge. 246 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315766225

19. Hagopian E.C. 1997. Is the Peace Process a process for Peace? Retrospective Analysis of Oslo. Arab Studies Quarterly. 19(3). P. 1-28.

20. Hovdenak A. 2009. Trading Refugees for Land and Symbols: The Palestinian Negotiation Strategy in the Oslo Process. Journal of Refugee Studies. 22(1). P. 30–50. DOI: 10.1093/jrs/fen039

21. Hoobler G. Donohue A. 2002. Relational Frames and Their Ethical Implications in International Negotiation: An Analysis Based on the Oslo II Negotiations. International Negotiation. 7(2). P. 143-167. DOI: 10.1163/138234002761384945

22. Imseis A. 2000. Law, Reality, and the Oslo ‘Peace’ Process. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 20(3). P. 469-476. DOI: 10.1093/ojls/20.3.469

23. Jones D. 1999. The Oslo peace accords and the radical intimacy of the hearth. Cambridge

24. Review of International Affairs. 13(1). P. 224-238. DOI: 10.1080/09557579908400287

25. Kelman H. 1997. Some Determinants of the Oslo Breakthrough. International Negotiation. 2(2). P. 183-194. DOI: 10.1163/15718069720847933

26. Kelman H. 1999. The Interdependence of Israeli and Palestinian National Identities: The Role of the Other in Existential Conflics. Journal of Social Issues. 55(3). P. 581-600. DOI: 10.1111/0022-4537.00134

27. Kelman H. 2007. Social-psychological dimensions of international conflict. In Peacemaking in international conflict: methods & techniques. Revised edition. Ed. by I.W. Zartman. Washington, D.C.: US Institute of Peace Press. P. 61-107.

28. Kibrik R. 2016. Sovereignty as It Should Be: Theoretical Gaps and Negotiations for Peace in Israel/Palestine. International Negotiation. 21(3). P. 440-472. DOI: 10.1163/15718069-12341338

29. Kriesberg L. 2000. Negotiating the Partition of Palestine and Evolving Israeli-Palestinian Relation. The Brown Journal of World Affairs. 7(1). P. 63-80.

30. Kriesberg L. 2015. Negotiating Conflict Transformations. In Handbook of International Negotiation: Interpersonal, Intercultural, and Diplomatic Perspectives. Ed. by M. Galluccio. Cham: Springer. P. 109-122. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10687-8_9

31. Lasensky S. 2004. Paying for Peace: The Oslo Process and the Limits of American Foreign Aid.

32. Middle East Journal. 58(2). P. 210-234. DOI: 10.3751/58.2.13

33. Levanon O.S. 2021. Under a constant shadow: The Israeli–Palestinian conflict and the traumatic memory of the Holocaust. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 27(1). P. 58–66. DOI: 10.1037/pac0000499

34. Levine M. 1995. Palestinian Economic Progress Under the Oslo Agreements. Fordham International Law Journal. 19(4). P. 1393-1418.

35. Lieberfeld D. (2008). Secrecy and "Two-Level Games" in the Oslo Accord: What the Primary Sources Tell Us. International Negotiation. 13(1). P. 133-146. DOI: 10.1163/138234008X298002

36. Lustick I.S. 1997. The Oslo Agreement as an Obstacle to Peace. Journal of Palestine Studies. 27(1). P. 61-66.

37. Lupovici A. 2015. Ontological security and the Israeli-Palestinian peace process: Between unstable conflict and conflict in resolution. In Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security: Peace Anxieties. Ed. by B. Rumelili. London: Routledge. P. 33-51. DOI: 10.4324/9781315796314-4

38. Makovsky D. 1996. Making Peace with the PLO: The Rabin Government`s Road to the Oslo Accord. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 250 p.

39. Malik I. 2001. Analysis of Oslo Accords. Strategic Studies. 21(2) P. 134-145.

40. Miller R. 2012. Divided against Zion: Anti-Zionist Opposition in Britain to a Jewish State in Palestine, 1945–1948. London: Routledge

41. Mitzen J. 2006. Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma, European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), pp. 341-370.

42. Pearlman W., Cunningham K.G. 2012. Nonstate Actors, Fragmentation, and Conflict Processes. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 56(1). P. 3-15. DOI: 10.1177/002200271142966

43. Peres S. 1995. Battling for Peace: A Memoir. New York: Random House. 350 p.

44. Pruitt D.G. 1997. Ripeness Theory and the Oslo Talks. International Negotiation. 2(2). P. 237– 250. DOI: 10.1163/15718069720847960

45. Putnam R. D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization. 42(3) P. 427-460. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300027697

46. Quigley J. 2005. The Case for Palestine: An International Law Perspective. Duke University Press. 360 p. DOI: 10.1215/9780822386766

47. Ramsbotham O. 2010. Transforming Violent Conflict: Radical Disagreement, Dialogue and Survival. Abingdon: Routledge. 288 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203859674

48. Ramsbotham O. 2013. Is There a Theory of Radical Disagreement? International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution. 1(1) P. 56-82

49. Reiter Y. 2010. Religion as a Barrier to Compromise in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. In Barriers to Peace in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Ed. by Y. Bar-Siman-Tov. Jerusalem: KonradAdenauer-Stiftung Israel; Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies. P. 228-263.

50. Ricarte J. 2023. The Impact of Protracted Peace Processes on Identities in Conflict: The Case of Israel and Palestine. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 256 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-16567-2

51. Rynhold J., Steinberg G. 2004. The Peace Process and the Israeli Elections. Israel Affairs. 10(4). P. 181-204. DOI: 10.1080/1353712042000283748

52. Said E.W. 1996. Peace and Its Discontents: Essays on Palestine in the Middle East Peace Process. New York: Vintage Books. 188 p.

53. Sanders J. 1999. Honest Brockers? American and Norwegian Facilitation of Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations (1991-1993). Arab Studies Quaterly. 21(2). P. 47-70.

54. Singer J. 2021. The Israel-PLO Mutual Recognition Agreement. International Negotiation. 26(3). P. 366-390. DOI: 10.1163/15718069-bja10026

55. Schwartz A., Gilboa E. 2023. The False Readiness Theory: Explaining Failures to Negotiate Israeli-Palestinian Peace. International Negotiation. 28(1). P. 126-154. DOI: 10.1163/15718069bja10059

56. Selby J. 2003. Dressing Up Domination as “Cooperation”: The Case of Israeli-Palestinian Water Relations. Review of International Studies. 29(1). P. 121-138. DOI: 10.1017/S026021050300007X

57. Sheikh H., Ginges J., Atran S. 2013. Sacred values in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: resistance to social influence, temporal discounting, and exit strategies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1299(1). P. 11-24. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12275

58. Shamir J., Shikaki K. 2005. Public Opinion in the Israeli-Palestinian Two-Level Game. Journal of Peace Research. 42(3). P. 311-328. DOI: 10.1177/0022343305052014

59. Shlaim A. 2005. The Rise and Fall of the Oslo Peace Process. In International Relations of the Middle East. Ed. by L. Fawcett. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 241-61.

60. Smith D. The state of the Middle East: an atlas of conflict and resolution. Routledge, 2014.

61. Steele B. J. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. London: Routledge. 215 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203018200

62. Strombom L., Kapshuk Y. 2022. Tracing responses to recognition in the Oslo peace process and its aftermath—The interlinkage between relational and internal ontological security. Conflict Resolution Quarterly. 39(3). P. 315-332. DOI: 10.1002/crq.21333

63. Tapper A.H., Sucharov M., eds. 2019. Social Justice and Israel/Palestine: Foundational and Contemporary Debates. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 296 p.

64. Watson G.R. 2000. An Overview of the Oslo Accords. In The Oslo Accords: International Law and the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Agreements. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 41-54. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298915.003.0002

65. Weiner J.W. 1996. An Analysis of the Oslo II Agreement in Light of the Expectations of Shimon Peres and Mahmoud Abbas. Michigan Journal of International Law. 17(3). P. 667-704.

66. Wistrich R.S. 1997. Israel and the Holocaust Trauma. Jewish History. 11(2). P. 13-20.

67. Zartman I.W. 1997. Explaining Oslo. International Negotiations. 2(2). P. 195-215. DOI: 10.1163/15718069720847942

68. Jensen L., Zartman I.W., Pruitt D. G., Young H.P., Druckman D. 1996. Negotiation as a search for justice. International Negotiation. 1(1). P. 79-98. DOI: 10.1163/157180696X00304

69. Zartman I.W. 2000. Ripeness: The Hurting Stalemate and Beyond. In International Conflict Resolution After Cold War. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. P. 225-250.

70. Zreik R. 2003. The Palestinian Question: Themes of Justice and Power: Part I: the Palestinians of the Occupied Territories. Journal of Palestine Studies. 32(4). P. 39-49. DOI: 10.1525/ jps.2003.32.4.39

71. Abramov S.M. 2016. Izrail' i Palestina: ispytanie peregovornym protsessom (na primere «Oslo-1» i «Oslo-2») [Israel and Palestine: The Challenge of Negotiation Process (“Oslo-1” and “Oslo-2” Cases)]. Istoricheskaia i sotsial'no-obrazovatel'naia mysl'. 8(4/1). P. 29-41. (In Russian).

72. Gofman A.V. 2017. Soglasheniia Oslo kak popytka uregulirovaniia palestino-izrail'skogo konflikta: istoriograficheskii aspekt [The Oslo accords as an attempt to settle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: the historiographical aspect]. Chelovek i obshchestvo. No. 4. P. 10-14. DOI: 10.21661/r466068 (In Russian).

73. Krylov A.V. 2011. Palestino-izrail'skii peregovornyi protsess posle podpisaniia norvezhskikh soglashenii (1996-2001) [Palestinian-Israeli Negotiation Process after Norwegian agreements (1996-2001)]. Israel, Russia and Russian-Speaking Jewry in the Context of the International Politics. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual International Conference on Jewish Studies. Volume III. Moscow: Center “Sefer”. P. 133-149. (In Russian).

74. Morozov V.M., Melnikova S.V., Shebalina E.O. 2023. Evoliutsiia otsenok soglashenii Oslo v sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniiakh [Evolution of Assessment of the Oslo Agreements in Contemporary International Relations]. Vostok (Oriens). No. 5. P. 104–115. DOI: 10.31857/S086919080024658-0 (In Russian).