Zeitenwende Through the Lens of Olaf Scholz’s Government Strategic Documents
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2024-6-99-230-251
Abstract
This study examines German doctrinal documents issued under the government of Olaf Scholz in the context of the “Zeitenwende” (turning point) proclaimed in 2022. Key documents analyzed include the National Security Strategy, Guidelines for Feminist Foreign Policy, Strategy on China, and Defense Policy Guidelines. Of particular interest are the ongoing transformations in Germany's strategic culture, which are unprecedented in scope and aim to position the Federal Republic as a significant actor in military policy. In response to Russia's military intervention in Ukraine, Berlin has increasingly emphasized the military dimension of its policy, including arms deliveries to Kyiv—an action that marks a departure from the postwar principle of refraining from supplying weapons to conflict zones.
The article explores how intra-German debates on military and political issues are reflected in these strategic documents. The participants in these debates can be broadly categorized into three groups: proponents of both the “Zeitenwende” and the government's associated policies; supporters of the “Zeitenwende” who dissent on the methods or tools of implementation; and opponents of the “Zeitenwende” in principle. Using qualitative content analysis, the study identifies contradictions within the documents and inconsistencies in the implementation of Berlin's declared objectives. Many formulations in the documents are characterized by ambiguity, allowing for future revisions or additions. Notably, the Green Party exerts significant influence over the content, promoting a bellicose rhetoric and advocating for an expanded understanding of security issues.
The findings suggest that Germany's practical approach remains measured and cautious. However, the incorporation of the “Zeitenwende” principles into strategic documents ensures their longevity, making it unlikely that any future government coalition will disregard these foundational shifts in Germany's military and foreign policy.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. P. SokolovRussian Federation
Artem P. Sokolov – Candidate of Historical Sciences, research Associate of the Center for European Studies, Institute of International Studies
119454, Russia, Moscow, Vernadskogo Pr. 76
S. E. Protsenko
Russian Federation
Stanislav E. Protsenko – Master's degree graduate
119454, Russia, Moscow, Vernadskogo Pr. 76
References
1. Biehl H. 2001. Wendepunkt Kosovo? Sicherheitspolitische Einstellungen in den alten und neuen Ländern. SOWI-Arbeitspapier. Strausberg, 2001. Nr. 128. 42 S.
2. Dinkel S., Schirwon D., and Stamm L. 2022. Feministische Außenpolitik kann Deutschlands erste Nationale Sicherheitsstrategie prägen. DGAP Policy Brief, 24. Berlin: Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik. URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168ssoar-84481-6 (accessed: 30.10.2023).
3. Hauschild A. and Stamm L. 2024. From feminist questions towards feminist processes: strengthening Germany’s feminist foreign policy. European Journal of Politics and Gender. XX (XX): P. 1–5. DOI: 10.1332/25151088Y2023D000000017
4. Kaim M., Mair S. (Koord.). 2023. Nach der Nationalen Sicherheitsstrategie – die nächsten Schritte. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (360 Grad). URL: https://www.swp-berlin.org/ publikation/nach-der-nationalen-sicherheitsstrategie-die-naechsten-schritte#publication-article-127 (accessed: 15.11.2023).
5. Kupchan A. 2002. The End of the American Era: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-first Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
6. Maihold G., Mair S., Müller M., Vorrath J., and Wagner C. 2021. Deutsche Außenpolitik im
7. Wandel: unstete Bedingungen, neue Impulse. SWP-Studie, 15. https://doi.org/10.18449/2021S15
8. Mair S. 2022. Die Nationale Sicherheitsstrategie im Zeichen der außenpolitischen Zeitenwende: Prioritäten, Risiken, Potentiale. VerfBlog. DOI: 10.17176/20220330-131209-0
9. Maull H. 2000. Germany and the use of force: Still a “civilian power”? Survival. Vol. 42. No 2. P. 56-80. DOI: 10.1093/survival/42.2.56
10. Meiers Fr.-J. 2006. Zu neuen Ufern? Die Deutsche Sicherheitsund Verteidigungspolitik in einer Welt des Wandels 1990-2000. Germany, Paderborn. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00654.x
11. Mölling C., Schütz T. and Hellmonds S. 2023. Zeitschleife statt Zeitenwende. DGAP Policy Brief, 15. URL: https://dgap.org/de/forschung/publikationen/zeitschleife-statt-zeitenwende (accessed: 12.12.2023).
12. Rühlig T. 2023. Germany’s New China Strategy: Following. Berlin: Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik. URL: https://dgap.org/de/forschung/publikationen/ germanys-new-china-strategy-following-brussels (accessed: 23.10.2023).
13. Zilla C. 2023. Neuausrichtung der Außenpolitik. SWP-Aktuell, A21. https://doi. org/10.18449/2023A21
14. Basov F.A. 2022. Vnutrennie i vneshnie determinanty pozicii FRG v otnoshenii proekta «Severnyj potok-2». Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 25. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija i mirovaja politika. [Germany’s Stance on the Nord Stream 2 Project: Internal and External Determinants]. №2. P. 76-108. https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2022-14-2-76-108. (In Russian).
15. Belov V.B. 2023. Pervaja v istorii Germanii kompleksnaja Strategija nacional'noj bezopasnosti [The First in German History Comprehensive National Security Strategy]. Analiticheskie zapiski Instituta Evropy RAN. (Vypusk II) №13 (№310). http://doi.org/10.15211/analytics21320234453. (In Russian).
16. Belozjorov V.K. 2023. Germanija konstruiruet strategicheskuju kul'turu [Germany Constructs a Strategic Culture]. Rossija v global'noj politike. V. 21. № 5. P. 166–177. DOI: 10.31278/18106439-2023-21-5-166-177 (In Russian).
17. Horol'skaja M.V. 2023. Izmenenija v politicheskom landshafte Germanii posle nachala boevyh dejstvij na Ukraine: vyzovy dlja Rossii [Changes in the German Political Landscape After the Outbreak of the Conflict in Ukraine: Challenges for Russia]. Analiz i prognoz. Zhurnal IMJeMO RAN. № 2. P. 73-83. DOI: 10.20542/afij-2023-2-73-83. (In Russian).
18. Kokeev A.M. 2018. Novye akcenty v oboronnoj strategii i politike bezopasnosti Germanii [New emphases in German defense strategy and security policy]. Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija. V. 62. № 11. P. 26-34. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-11-26-34 (In Russian).
19. Kokeev A.M., Vasil'ev V.I., Basov F.A., Horol'skaja M.V. 2018. Nemeckoe predstavlenie o bezopasnosti [German perception of security]. Mezhdunarodnaja zhizn'. № 10. P. 37-54 (In Russian).
20. Pavlov N.V. 2023. Jera Angely Merkel’ [The era of Angela Merkel]. M: Izdatel'stvo «Aspekt Press». 431 p. (In Russian).
21. Pimenova E.V. 2022. Jepoha, kotoraja uhodit. Kakuju Germaniju ostavljaet Angela Merkel’ [Epoch which goes. What Germany leaves Angela Merkel] Svobodnaja mysl'. № 2(169). P. 125-134. (In Russian).
22. Sokolov A.P. 2023. Quo vadis, Germania? Rossija v global'noj politike. V. 21. № 4. P. 135–149. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-4-135-149 (In Russian).
23. Trunov F.O. 2023. Modelirovanije uchastija strany v uregulirovanii vooruzhjonnyh konfliktov: kejs dejstvij FRG v Mali [Modeling the Country’s Participation in Armed Conflict Resolution: Case of Germany’s Activity in Mali]. Vestnik RUDN. Serija: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija. 2023. №1. P. 48-66. (In Russian).
24. Vasil'ev V.I. 2018. Strategicheskie imperativy Germanii [Germany's Strategic Imperatives]. Nauchno-analiticheskij zhurnal Obozrevatel'. № 3 (338). P. 6-25. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Sokolov A.P., Protsenko S.E. Zeitenwende Through the Lens of Olaf Scholz’s Government Strategic Documents. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2024;17(6):230-251. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2024-6-99-230-251