Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy Amidst the Crisis of the White Movement: Early 1920
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2025-2-101-69-98
Abstract
Drawing upon extensive archival sources, this article examines a critical and challenging period in the history of the Foreign Diplomatic Corps of the White Movement. Despite the successive defeats experienced by the White armies within Russia, the diplomatic arm of the movement persisted in its operations abroad. Recognizing that subordination to Soviet authorities or the transfer of diplomatic responsibilities to representatives appointed by Moscow was unacceptable, the Corps' leadership opted to maintain organizational autonomy in the event of an unfavorable outcome to the Civil War. To achieve this goal, efforts were made to restore internal hierarchy and discipline, streamline the diplomatic staff, and preserve the representational functions of Corps institutions worldwide. Securing sustainable financial support for ongoing diplomatic activities also emerged as a priority.
Amid these organizational transformations, the Corps expanded its responsibilities by actively addressing the pressing needs of the rapidly growing Russian émigré community and protecting Russian assets overseas. The diplomatic leadership initiated discussions regarding legal safeguards for Russian citizens abroad, anticipating a potential defeat of the White Movement within Russia.
The rise of General Baron Wrangel to power in Sevastopol provoked mixed reactions among Russian émigré circles. Despite Foreign Minister S.D. Sazonov's demonstrated loyalty to Wrangel's government, the general chose to replace him, entrusting foreign policy management to P.B. Struve. Nevertheless, Sazonov successfully positioned Ambassador M.N. Girs, the Corps' most senior diplomat based in Rome, as the head of the Diplomatic Corps. Consequently, Struve and Girs jointly shared leadership and responsibility. Under this new arrangement, the Diplomatic Corps significantly reinforced its autonomous standing, effectively transforming itself from a subordinate agency into a fully recognized partner of the central authorities. This enhanced status provided the Corps with greater prospects for continuing its diplomatic activities following the conclusion of the Civil War in Russia.
About the Author
E. M. Mironova
Institute of world history RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena M. Mironova - PhD (Historical science), Associate Professor, Senior Researcher
119334 Moscow, Leninsky Prospekt 32-A.
References
1. Brinkley G.A. 1966. The Volunteer Army and Allied Intervention in South Russia, 1917–1921. A Study in the Politics and Diplomacy of the Russian Civil War. London. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 466 р.
2. Ullman R.H. 1968. Anglo-Soviet Relations, 1917–1921. In 3 vols. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton Univ. Press. Vol. 2: Britain and the Russian Civil War. 396 p.
3. Budnickij O.V. 2001. Posly nesushchestvuyushchej strany [Ambassadors of a Non-Existent Country]. «Sovershenno lichno i doveritel'no» B.A.Bahmetev – V.A.Maklakov. Perepiska 1919–
4. Moscow: Rosspen; Stenford: Izdatel'stvo Guverovskogo instituta, T. 1. P. 16–113. (In Russian)
5. Budnickij O.V. 2008. Den'gi russkoj emigracii: kolchakovskoe zoloto 1918–1957 [Money of the Russian Emigration: Kolchak's Gold 1918–1957]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 508 p. (In Russian)
6. Chemakin A.A. 2020. Deyatel'nost' P.B. Struve kak ministra inostrannyh del pravitel'stva Yuga Rossii (1920) [Struve’s Activities as Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Government of the South of Russia (1920)]. Nauchnyj dialog №12. P. 362–377. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-12-362-377
7. Ermakov V.P., Grishanin P.I. 2002. God 1920 v Krymu: «beloe delo» generala P.N. Vrangelya i pozicii pravitel'stva SShA [The Year 1920 in Crimea: The "White Case" of General P.N. Wrangel and the Position of the US Government]. Aktual'nye problemy rossijskoj i mirovoj istorii. Uchyonye zapiski. Vypusk I. Pyatigorsk. P. 99–107. (In Russian)
8. Kroner E. 2011. Belaya armiya, Chernyj baron: zhizn' generala Petra Vrangelya [The White
9. Army, the Black Baron: the Life of General Peter Wrangel.] Moscow: ROSSPEN. 462 p. (In Russian)
10. Karlej M.D. 2017. Antibol’shevizm vo vneshnej politike Francii: pol’skij krizis 1920 g. [AntiBolshevism in French Foreign Policy: The Polish Crisis of 1920]. Zhurnal rossijskih i vostochnoevropejskih istoricheskih issledovanij. Moscow. 3(10). P. 52–73. (In Russian).
11. Listikov S.V. 2009. World without Russia. "White" Representation at the Paris Peace Conference. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 1(4). Р. 15–29. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2009-1-4-15-29 (In Russian)
12. Mironova E.M. 2011. Polozhenie russkoj kolonii i sozdanie nebol'shevistskogo predstavitel'stva v Finlyandii (1917–1921) [The Situation of the Russian Colony and the Establishment of a Non– Bolshevik Representative Office in Finland (1917–1921)]. Saint Petersburg. Klio. №4. P. 77–83 (In Russian)
13. Mironova E.M. 2015. Kazusy rossijskogo predstavitel'stva v Shvejcarii v pervye porevolyucionnye gody (1917–1925 gg.) [Incidents of the Russian Representation in Switzerland in The Early Post-Revolutionary Years (1917–1925)]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. Special'nyj vypusk «Istoriya bez kupyur». P. 132–145. (In Russian)
14. Mironova E.M. 2021. Zashchita russkoj diplomaticheskoj missiej v Belgrade interesov sootechestvennikov v Yugoslavii. 1919–1940 [Protection of the Interests of Compatriots in Yugoslavia by the Russian Diplomatic Mission in Belgrade. 1919–1940]. Russkaya emigraciya na Balkanah. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Skop'e. P. 81–97. (In Russian)
15. Mironova E.M. 2022. Mihail Nikolaevich Girs. Russkij diplomat v period grazhdanskoj vojny v Rossii i emigracii [Mikhail Nikolaevich Girs. Russian Diplomat During the Russian Civil War and Emigration]. Elektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal «Istoriya». 13(7(117)). (In Russian) DOI: 12.18254/S207987840022194-2
16. Mironova E.M. 2023a. Imperskaya diplomatiya na sluzhbe Rossii posle gibeli imperii (1917– 1940) [Imperial Diplomacy in the Service of Russia after the Fall of the Empire (1917–1940)]. Rossiya v centre istorii. Nauchnyj sbornik pamyati Niny Stepanovny Kinyapinoj (1920–2003). Moscow: Modest Kolerov, P. 433–467. (In Russian)
17. Mironova E.M. 2023b. Russkaya nebol'shevistskaya diplomatiya i vopros mezhdunarodnogo priznaniya Belogo dvizheniya v 1918–1920 gg. [Russian non-Bolshevik Diplomacy and the Issue of International Recognition of the White Movement in 1918–1920]. Moscow. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 16(1). P. 52–86. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2023-1-88-52-86
18. Ross N. 1982. Vrangel' v Krymu [Wrangel is in Crimea]. Frankfurt am Main: Posev. 362 p. (In Russian)
19. Pajps P. 2001. Struve. Biografiya [Struve. Biography]. Moscow: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskih issledovanij. T. 2. 348 p. (In Russian)
20. Sergeev E.Yu. 2019. Bol'sheviki i anglichane. Sovetsko-britanskie otnosheniya, 1918— 1924 gg.: ot intervencii k priznaniyu [The Bolsheviks and the British. Soviet-British Relations,
21. –1924: from Intervention to Recognition]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka. 830 p. (In Russian)
22. Shmelyov A.V. 2017. Vneshnyaya politika pravitel'stva admirala Kolchaka. 1918–1919 [The Foreign Policy of Admiral Kolchak's Government. 1918–1919]. Saint Petersburg. 266 p. (In Russian)
23. Smolin V. 2017. U zakrytyh dverej Versal'skogo dvorca. Parizhskaya mirnaya konferenciya i russkaya diplomatiya v 1919 g. [At the Closed Doors of the Palace of Versailles. The Paris Peace Conference and Russian Diplomacy in 1919]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka. 419 p. (In Russian;
Review
For citations:
Mironova E.M. Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy Amidst the Crisis of the White Movement: Early 1920. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2025;18(2):69-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2025-2-101-69-98
Views:
369
Email this article 