Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

The Emerging Global Energy Landscape

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2025-4-103-137-163

Abstract

The article examines the impact of key macroeconomic, technological, demographic, and political factors on shaping the future global energy landscape. Based on a systems analysis of data from the IEA, World Bank, OECD, and leading think tanks, it is shown that by 2050 the combined population growth of Africa and the Asia–Pacific region by 1.4 billion and accelerated urbanization will account for up to 60% of the global increase in electricity consumption. The technological revolution, driven by AI and data centers, will raise their annual electricity demand beyond 1,000 TWh by 2030, comparable to Japan’s current level. The study demonstrates that the “green” transition faces constraints: achieving net zero by 2050 would require about USD 180 trillion in investments, while the power density of renewables remains far lower than that of conventional sources. Analysis of the nuclear sector reveals a 50% investment increase over the past five years, with China and Russia leading in new reactor construction and closed fuel cycle technologies. Coal retains around 25% of the global energy mix, with its consumption peak postponed, underlining the importance of balancing traditional and alternative sources. Strategic approaches of China, India, the US, and Russia to energy security are reviewed, including grid modernization, battery technology development, synthetic fuels, and coal power expansion. The paper concludes that an effective future global energy model requires integration of high-density traditional and low-carbon energy sources, enhancement of inter-fuel competition, and alignment of national strategies with global priorities.

About the Author

I. I. Sechin
Rosneft Oil Company
Russian Federation

Igor I. Sechin – PhD in Economics, Chief Executive Officer, Rosneft Oil Company,

117997, Moscow, 26/1 Sofiyskaya Naberezhnaya



References

1. Ferguson N. 2025. Ferguson’s Law: Debt Service, Military Spending, and the Fiscal Limits of

2. Power. The Hoover Institution History Working Paper. February P. 7–29.

3. Lindzen R., Happer W. 2024. Physics Proves Net Zero Carbon Dioxide Will Prevent Very Little Warming but Cause Great Harm.

4. Sethuraman N.R. 2025. India Eases Coal Supply Rules to Ramp up Power Generation Capacity.

5. Smil V. 2015. Power Density: A Key to Understanding Energy Sources and Uses. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

6. Smil V. 2017. Energy and Society. 2nd ed. Energy and Civilization: A History. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. P. 1–20.

7. Wang W., Shen Y., Chen Q., Wang F., Yu Y. 2025. Spatiotemporal Mass Change Rate Analysis from 2002 to 2023 over the Antarctic Ice Sheet and Four Glacier Basins in Wilkes-Queen Mary Land. Sci. China Earth Sci. Vol. 68. P. 1086–1099.

8. Wijngaarden W.A., Happer W. 2025. Radiation Transport in Clouds. Science of Climate Change. 5(1). P. 1–12.

9. Zalk J.V., Behrens P. 2018. The Spatial Extent of Renewable and Non-Renewable Power Generation: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Power Densities and Their Application in the U.S. Energy Policy. №123. December 2018. P. 83–91.


Review

For citations:


Sechin I.I. The Emerging Global Energy Landscape. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2025;18(4):137-163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2025-4-103-137-163

Views: 28


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)