Emotions in EU Foreign Policy
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2026-2-107-7-23
Abstract
This article examines how emotions are conceptualized and mobilized in the foreign policy of the European Union. Starting from the affective turn in the social sciences, the author reviews scholarship that treats the EU as both a normative actor and a potential “emotional actor.” The focus is not emotions as individual states, but emotional norms: socially expected affective responses to violations of political, legal, or moral norms. The article asks which areas of EU foreign policy have been studied through this lens, what methods and theories researchers use, and whether collective emotions can anticipate EU decisions.
The analysis covers studies of genocide recognition, security, armed conflicts, migration, European identity, climate policy, and sanctions, and compares their conclusions with opinion surveys in EU member states in 2022–2025. Special attention is paid to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Israel’s military operation in Gaza, and the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over NagornoKarabakh. The article shows that EU institutions seek to create a supranational emotional community, or emotional regime, in which member states share a common understanding of norms, their violation, and the need for collective action.
The findings are ambivalent. In the case of Ukraine, fear, insecurity, anger, sympathy, and solidarity have helped legitimize sanctions, humanitarian assistance, support for refugees, and stronger defense cooperation, although public support varies across countries and declines when the costs of solidarity increase, especially regarding arms deliveries and EU accession. The Gaza case demonstrates that bottom-up emotional mobilization does not necessarily produce an equally coherent EU response. The Nagorno-Karabakh case reveals weaker emotional resonance and highlights pragmatic constraints, including energy dependence and geopolitical interests.
The article concludes that emotions matter because they participate in the construction, interpretation, hierarchy, and enforcement of norms. Yet the EU lacks a unified emotional regime: collective reactions remain uneven and politically selective. Fear and insecurity increasingly push the Union from the identity of a peaceful normative project toward that of a geopolitical actor with a military component. Monitoring public opinion is therefore useful for predicting shifts in EU foreign policy, but only when national differences, norm hierarchies, and the costs of solidarity are taken into account.
About the Author
L. V. DeriglazovaRussian Federation
Larisa V. Deriglazova – Doctor of Sciences in History, Professor, senior research fellow
Mokhovaya st. 11-3, Moscow, Russia
125009, 36 Lenina ave., Tomsk, Russia, 634050
References
1. Åhäll L., Gregory T. (Eds.). 2015. Emotions, Politics and War (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315765068
2. Aleksiun N., Z. Wóycicka, R. Utz. 2023. The Rescue Turn and the Politics of Holocaust Memory. Detroit: Wayne University Press.
3. Ariffin Y., Coicaud J.-M., Popovski V. (Eds.). 2016. Emotions in International Politics: Beyond Mainstream International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
4. Blanc E. 2024. Crisis in EU-US Relations under Trump: An Emotional Contemptuous Double Game of Misrecognition. Journal of European Integration. 46(5). P. 685–705. DOI: 10.1080/070 36337.2024.2360154
5. David M. 2024. Russia’s War on Ukraine: Unbottled Emotions and the Conditioning of the EU’s Russia policy. Journal of European Integration. 46(5). P. 661–684. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2024.2363613
6. Emotions in EU Foreign Policy. Special Issue. 2021. Global Affairs. 7(2).
7. Emotions in the Politics of Security and Diplomacy. Special Issue. 2019. Political Psychology. 40(6). P. 1199–1200. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12521;
8. Ermihan E., Akgül Açikmeşe S. 2024. Emotions and Norms in the Syrian Refugee Crisis: The Comparative Responses of the EU and Turkey. Journal of European Integration. 46(5). P. 751–773. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2024.2359586
9. Gürkan S. 2021. Emotions in Parliamentary Diplomacy: Debating the Armenian Genocide in the European Parliament. Global Affairs. 7(2). P. 103–122. DOI: 10.1080/23340460.2021.1921604
10. Gürkan S. 2024. Constructing an ‘Emotional Community’ in Times of Crisis: the EU’s Response to Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Journal of European Integration. 46(5). P. 635–659. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2024.2360703;
11. Gürkan S., Terzi Ö. 2024. Emotions in EU Foreign Policy – When and How do They Matter?
12. Journal of European Integration. 46(5). P. 575–596. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2024.2360697
13. Hall T. 2015. Emotional Diplomacy: Official Emotion on the International Stage, Cornell University Press.
14. Hutchison E. 2010. Trauma and the Politics of Emotions: Constituting Identity, Security and Community after the Bali Bombing. International Relations. 1(24). P.65–86.
15. Juncos A., M. Lovato, K. Pomorska. 2024. Coordinative Europeanization and Russia’s War of Aggression: How Crises Shape Europeanization Dynamics in EU Foreign Policy. Contemporary European Politics. DOI: 10.1057/s41295-024-00390-8.
16. Koschut S. (Ed.). 2020. The Power of Emotions in World Politics (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429331220;
17. Koschut S. 2024. Feeling European? The EU as an emotional community. Journal of European Integration. 46(5). P. 597–613. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2024.2358883
18. Manners I. 2018. Political Psychology of European Integration: The (Re)production of Identity and Difference in the Brexit Debate. Political Psychology. 39(6). P. 1213–1232. DOI: 10.1111/ pops.12545.
19. Manners I. 2021. Political Psychology of Emotion(al) Norms in European Union Foreign Policy. Global Affairs. 7(2). P. 193–205. DOI: 10.1080/23340460.2021.1972819
20. Manners I. 2024. Political Psychology of Emotions in European Union Foreign Policy in Times of Ontological (In)Security and Crisis. Journal of European Integration. 46(5). P. 817–837. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2024.2345608
21. Maurer H., Lovato M. 2024. Group Emotions and Their Role in EU Foreign Policy: a Social Relational Model on How Emotions Travel between EU Member States. Journal of European Integration. 46(5). P. 795–815. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2024.2363378
22. Novotna T. 2024. Emotions and Sanctions in EU – China and EU – North Korea Policies. Journal of European Integration. 46(5). P. 707–727. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2024.2359587
23. Özer Y., Kaçar Aşcı F. 2021. Instrumentalization of Emotions and Emotion Norms: Migration Issue in European Right-Wing Populist Discourse. Global Affairs. 7(2). P. 173–192. DOI: 10.1080/23340460.2021.1944261;
24. Palm T. 2021. An Emotional Security Community under Pressure? Emotional Discursive (De)Legitimation in EU External Border Control. Global Affairs. 7(2). P. 123–138. DOI: 10.1080/2 3340460.2021.1954048
25. Popovski V. Eds. 2016. Emotions in International Politics: Beyond Mainstream International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
26. Pospieszna P., Onderco M., van der Veer R. 2023. Comparing Public Attitudes towards Internal and External EU Sanctions: the Role of Populism, Trust and Euroscepticism. East European Politics. 40(2). P. 345–366. DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2023.2289089
27. Richardson L.F. 1919. Mathematical Psychology of War. Oxford: Wm Hunt.
28. Smith K. E. 2024. Avoiding an Emotions-Action Gap? The EU and Genocide Designations. Journal of European Integration. 46(5). P. 615–634. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2024.2358871
29. Stearns Peter N., Carol Z. Stearns. 1985. Emotionology: Clarifying the History of Emotions and Emotional Standards. The American Historical Review. 90(4). P. 813–836. DOI: 10.2307/1858841.
30. Terzi Ö. 2021. Norms of Belonging: Emotion Discourse as a Factor in Determining Future “Europeans.” Global Affairs. 7(2). P. 139–155. DOI: 10.1080/23340460.2021.1927794;
31. Terzi Ö. 2024. Emotional Politics of Norm Hierarchy in EU’s External Relations: the Case of Climate Crisis and the EU’s Arctic Policy. Journal of European Integration. 46(5). P. 729–749. DOI:10.1080/07036337.2024.2359590
32. Terzi Ö., Palm T., Gürkan S. 2021. Introduction: Emotion(al) Norms in EU Foreign Policy.
33. Global Affairs. 7(2). P. 93–102. DOI: 10.1080/23340460.2021.1953394;
34. The Role of Emotions in EU Foreign Policy. Special Issue. 2024. Journal of European Integration. 46(5).
35. Tonra B. 2021. Emotion Norms: Ireland, Brexit, backstops and protocols. Global Affairs. 7(2). P. 157–171. DOI: 10.1080/23340460.2021.1931399;
36. Völkel J.C. 2024. European Diplomats in the MENA Region: a Two-Sided Sense of Disillusionment. Journal of European Integration. 46(5). P. 775–794. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2024.2359583.
37. Weiss E. 2025. Parasitical Solidarity. A Conceptual Framework for Analysing the Misappropriation of Solidarity. Annual review for the sciences of the democracies. 1(1). P. 1–26. DOI: 10.5117/ demo2025.1.003.wei
38. Zotova D.A., Lanko D.A., Parfenyonok N.L. 2024. Evropejskaya solidarnost' i raznoskorostnaya integraciya: rezul'taty laboratornogo eksperimenta [European Solidarity and Differentiated Integration: Results of Laboratory Experiment]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ekonomika. 40(2). P. 212–232. DOI: 10.21638/spbu05.2024.204 (In Russian)
39. Assman A. 2022. Evropejskaya mechta. Pereizobretenie nacii [European Dream: Reinvention of Nations]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 512 p. (In Russian)
40. Avanskaya V.A. 2018. Metodologiya izucheniya emocij v mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniyah [Methodology of Emotion Studies in International Relations]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 3(13). P. 43–60. DOI: 10.28995/2073-6339-2018-3-43-60 (In Russian)
41. Avanskaya V.A. 2019. Istoriya holodnoj vojny kak istoriya emocij: na primere gonki yadernyh vooruzhenij [History of Cold War as a History of Emotions: a Case of Nuclear Arms Race]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. №4. P. 10–22. DOI: 10.28995/2073-6339-2019-4-10-22 (In Russian)
42. Avanskaya V.A. 2023. Karibskij krizis v emocional'nyh reprezentaciyah amerikancev (na primere pisem amerikanskih grazhdan N.S. Hrushchevu) [Caribbean Crisis in Emotional Representations of Americans (on Example of Letters by American Citizens to N.S. Hrushchev]. Rossiya i sovremennyj mir. 2(119). P. 41–52. DOI: 10.31249/rsm/2023.02.03 (In Russian)
43. Gofman I. 2004. Analiz freymov: esse ob organizatsii povsednevnogo opyta [Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience]. Moscow: Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences. 752 p. (In Russian)
44. Kocur G.V. 2021. Emocii i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Emtions and International Relations]. Mezhdunarodnye processy. 3(66). P. 43–67. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2021.19.3.66.2 (In Russian)
45. Matyashova D.O. 2023. Mezhdu rezhimom i soobshchestvom: funkcii emotivov v kommunikaciyah Indijskogo nacional'nogo kongressa s elektoratom i storonnikami [Between Regime and Community: Functions of Emotives in Communications of Indian National Congress with Electorate and Supporters]. Russkaya politologiya. 2(27). P. 33–40. (In Russian)
46. Soldatova G.U. 1998. Psikhologiya mezhetnicheskoy napryazhennosti [Psychology of Interethnic Tension]. Moscow: Smysl. 389 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Deriglazova L.V. Emotions in EU Foreign Policy. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2026;19(2):7-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2026-2-107-7-23
JATS XML

























