“NEW PERIPHERY STRATEGY” OF ISRAEL
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2017-1-52-101-118
Abstract
Israel’s strategy of the “periphery Doctrine” served as a way to enhance security and economic ties and reduce isolation. Following the deterioration of the regional situation Israel had begun to consolidate new relations with peripheral nations. The post-Arab Spring regional order has largely transformed the Central Asia-Israel potential partnership. New regional order has jeopardized Israel’s geostrategic balance, and so that country is looking to deepen alliances in the Muslim world. Central Asian states can fill that role. The basis for this partnership is the understanding by the involved parties that they share certain security and economic interests that can provide benefits. The relationships between Israel and Central Asian countries are long-established and cordial in the political, economic and strategic realms, and based on shared views of world order and intense person-to-person relations. All of the Central Asian governments cultivated their secular traditions and stepped up their anti-Islamic stance for fear of the development of domestic, Islamic-oriented opposition. Islam has no specific legal status in any of the five states in the region, and the fight against alleged Islamic extremism has become a mainstay of domestic and foreign policies. This article surveys the constellation of bilateral ties that has formed between Israel and the Muslim states of Central Asia and draws a comparison to Israel’s previous relations with peripheral countries Turkey and Iran. Person-to-person relations between Israel and Central Asia are probably Tel-Aviv’s leading means of influence in the region. Israeli investments have strengthened the political partnership.
About the Author
Y. I. KostenkoRussian Federation
Associate Professor, Department of Middle East Languages,
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454
References
1. Bauchek K. Politika Izrailia v TSentral’noi Azii [Israel Policy in Central Asia]. Central Asia and Caucasus, 2004, no.4, pp.76- 89. (In Russian).
2. Gantman I. Izrail’ tretiĭ na rynke vooruzheniĭ byvshego SSSR - kliuchevye igroki [Gantman Israel third in the arms market of the former Soviet Union - the key players]. IZRUS, 21.10.2011. Available at: http://izrus.co.il/dvuhstoronka/ article/2011-10-21/15875.html (Accessed: 15.11.2016). (In Russian).
3. Zviagel’skaia I.D. Blizhnevostochnyĭ klinch. Konflikty na Blizhnem Vostoke i politika Rossii [Middle East clinch. Conflicts in the Middle East and Russia policy]. Moscow, Aspect Press Publ., 2014. 207 p. (In Russian).
4. Zviagel’skaia I.D. Istoriia Gosudarstva Izrail’ [History of the State of Israel]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2012. 360 p. (In Russian).
5. Izrail’ stal dlia Indii postavshchikom voennoĭ tekhniki no. 1 [Israel has become a supplier to India’s military hardware no. 1]. MIGNEWS.com, 08.11.2009. Available at: mignews.com/news/politic/ world/081109_155347_93065.html (Accessed: 19.11.2016). (In Russian).
6. Mesamed V.I. Izrail’ v TSentral’noĭ Azii: grezy i real’nost’. Moscow, Institut Blizhnego Vostoka Publ., 2012. 240 p. (In Russian).
7. Fal’kov M. Knesset vzialsia za sovetskikh musul’man. IZRUS, 17.06.2008. Available at: http://izrus.co.il/article/1015.html (Accessed: 16.11.2016). (In Russian).
8. Fal’kov M. Ėks-glava voennoĭ razvedki: Rossiiu nuzhno podkliuchit’ k neĭtralizatsii Irana. IZRUS, 03.05.2009. Available at: http://izrus.co.il/dvuhstoronka/article/2009-05-03/ (Accessed: 19.11.2016). (In Russian).
9. Fal’kov M. Umer as shpionazha, otkryvshiĭ Izrailiu musul’man SNG. IZRUS, 10.03.2010. Available at: http:// izrus.co.il/history/article/2010-03-10/ (Accessed: 19.11.2016). (In Russian)
10. Khalevi Ė. Byvshiĭ shef razvedki: Mossad nikogda ne ustraival gosudarstvennykh perevorotov. IZRUS, 07.04.2011. Available at: http://izrus.co.il/obshie_ novosti/news/2011-04-07/ (Accessed: 09.09.2016). (In Russian).
11. Shtaĭnmaĭer poiasnil, pochemu Sredniaia Aziia vazhna dlia Germanii. REGNUM, 30.03.2016. Available at: http://regnum. ru/news/polit/2107924.html (Accessed: 26.11.2016) (in Russian)
12. Abadi J. Israel’s Quest for Recognition and Acceptance in Asia: Garrison State Diplomacy. London, Frank Cass Publ., 2004. 504 p.
13. Ahevd berq nepgesh ‘em nesheya qezhesten baremvenv [Ehud Barak met with the President of Kazakhstan in his palace]. Available at: http://news.walla.co.il/ item/2722835 (Accessed: 21.01.2017). (In Hebrew).
14. Yevsey alepr. medyenh bevdedh. hheypevsh hheshay shel yesheral aher b’elevt beryet bazevr. metr, 2015, ‘em’ 132 [Alpher J. Lonely country. Secret Israel find allies in the region. Matar, 2015. 132 p.]. (In Hebrew).
15. ‘Em’ 165 mayer ‘emeyt, rash berash, hed aretsey, 1999 [Amit M. Abesoluteley. Or Yehuda: Ged Aretzi, 1999, 165 p.]. (In Hebrew).
16. beyqevr rh’’m netneyhev bazerbeyyeg’n vebqezhesten [The visit of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan]. Available at: http://www.netanyahu.org.il (Accessed: 24. 12.2016) (in Hebrew).
17. Bishku M.B. The Relations of the Central Asian Republics of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan with Israel. Middle Eastern Studies, vol. 48, no. 6, p. 927.
18. Yeval gevz’nesqey vegleyh leynedneshetraves. theyyet qevnespet hepreyperyeyh bemdeyneyvet hhevtes heysheraleyt? hemkevn lemheqrey beythevn lavemy, ‘edekn asetretgey, kerk 15, geyleyven 2, yevley 2012 [Guzhanski NY, Lindenstrauss G. Revival of the concept “periphery” in the foreign policy of Israel? Strategic Gazette, vol. 15, no. 2, July 2012. Tel Aviv, Institute for the Study of National Security.].
19. Pipes D. The Event of Our Era: Former Soviet Muslim Republics Change the Middle East. Central Asia and the World: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan. Ed. by M. Mandelbaum. New York, 1994, 83 p
Review
For citations:
Kostenko Y.I. “NEW PERIPHERY STRATEGY” OF ISRAEL. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2017;(1(52)):101-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2017-1-52-101-118