Conventional Wisdom and Contemporary Russian Messianism. A Critical Verification

The article offers a critical overview of nine views common in academia related to Russian messianism. The main premise of messianism which is important for its political dimension, is: Providence has a plan along which History unfolds, and in this plan the chosen one (individual or collective) has a special role to play (mission). Under «mission» we understand that a certain community (state/nation) is exceptional and that this exceptionality manifests itself in its special destiny. I discern three distinctive, but interconnected, features of «mission»: (1) the conviction of having a special destiny, (2) a sense of moral superiority, (3) the conviction that the state’s activity is motivated not only by its own national interest but also by a higher cause important for a broader (regional, global etc.) community. The first two components of mission express exceptionalism of the mission-beholder, while the third component refers to the universalistic nature of the calling.

This selection of nine views is not a complete catalogue but it does include the core concepts that may be encountered while reading about Russian messianism. The article seeks to verify and put in order the existing body of knowledge on this topic. The critical verification is based on the material that comes from two main sources. The first is the existing body of academic literature (in English and Russian) which is used to identify and cross-examine the views circulating among academia. The second source comes with the material gathered as a result of the content and discourse analysis of the official statements of Vladimir Putin. The article is structuralised along the enumeration of nine popular views on Russian messianism. Each view is critically combined with the academic literature and the empirical data. The views discussed in the article tend to essentialise Russian messianism and essentialise Russia as well.

1. Anthashev T., Velizhev М., Zorin A. eds. «Osobyy put’» Ot ideologii k metodu [«A special way» From ideology to method]. Moscow: Novoye Literaturnoye Obozreniye, 2018. 488 p. (in Russian)

2. Barkey K. Empire of Difference. The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2008. 360 p.

3. Batalov E. Russkaia ideia i amerikanskaia mechta [Russian idea and American dream]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiia, 2009. 384 p. (in Russian)

4. Bokov M. Rol’ Rossii v mire, in: [ed.] Tarusin M. Summa ideologii. Mirovozreniye i ideologiya sovremennoy rossiyskoy elity [The amount of ideology. Worldview and ideology of the modern Russian elite]. Moscow, Institut obshchestvennogo proyektovaniya, 2008. 296 p.

5. Bouveng K.R. The Role of Messianism in Contemporary Russian Identity and Statecraft, Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Durham University. 2010, 322 p. URL: http://etheses.dur. ac.uk/438/ (accessed 02.02.2019)

6. Clunan А. Historical aspiration and the domestic politics of Russia’s pursuit of international status, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 2014, vol. 47, no. 3-4, pp. 281-290.

7. Dubin В. The West, the Border, and the Unique Path. Symbolism of the ‘Other’ in the Political Mythology of Contemporary Russia, Russian Politics and Law, 2002, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 5-29.

8. Duncan P. Russian Messianism: Third Rome, Revolution, Communism and After. London – New York, Routledge, 2000. 256 p.

9. Engström M. Contemporary Russian Messianism and New Russian Foreign Policy. Contemporary Security Policy, 2014, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 368-370.

10. Falcon I. Russian Strategic Culture in the 21st Century: Redefining the West-East Balance, in: [eds.] Tellis A.J., Szalwinski A., Wills M., Strategic Asia 2016-17: Understanding Strategic Cultures in the Asia-Pacific. Seattle and Washington D.C., The National Bureau of Asian Research, 2016.

11. Feklyunina V. Battle for Perceptions: Projecting Russia in the West. Europe-Asia Studies, 2008, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 605-629.

12. Frye T., Gehlbach S., Marquardt K.L., Reuter O.J. Is Putin’s popularity real?, The Post-Soviet Affairs, 2017, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1-15.

13. Gorshkov M., Petukhov V. Vneshnepoliticheskiye oriyentatsii rossiyan na novom perelome [Foreign policy orientation of the Russians at a new turning point] Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya, 2015, no. 5, pp. 10-34.

14. Gudkov L., Dubin B., Pain E. Does the «Special Path» Ideology contain the Potential for Modernisation. Russian Politics and Law, 2012, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 79-92.

15. Gvosdev N. Their Proclamation Has Gone Out into All The Earth: Soviet Messianism and the International System. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 1990, 32, no. 4, pp. 431-443.

16. Herf J. Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 1986. 263 p.

17. Kasamara V., Sorokina A. Imperial ambitions of Russia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 2012, vol. 45, no. 3-4, pp. 279-288.

18. Kohn H. The Permanent Mission: An Essay on Russia. The Review of Politics, 1948, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 267-289.

19. Kotkin S. Russia’s Perpetual Geopolitics: Putin Returns to the Historical Pattern. Foreign Affairs, 2016, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 2-9.

20. Kolesnikov A. Rossiyskaya ideologiya posle Kryma. Predely effektivnostii mobilizatsii [Russian ideology after the Crimea. Efficiency limits and mobilization]. Moscow, Carnegie Moscow Center, 2015. URL: http://carnegie.ru/2015/07/07/rupub-60606

21. Kumar K. The Making of English National Identity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003. 367 p.

22. Kushnir O. Ukraine and Russian Neo-Imperialism. The Divergent Break. London, Lexington Books, 2018. 218 p.

23. Lavrov S. Istoricheskaya perspektiva vneshney politiki Rossii [Historical perspective of Russian foreign policy], Russia in Global Affairs, 2016, no. 2, pp. 8-20. URL: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/global-processes/Istoricheskaya-perspektiva-vneshnei-politiki-Rossii-18017 (accessed 3.03.2016)

24. Lebow R.N. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009. 762 p.

25. Legvold R. Introduction, in: [ed.] Legvold, Russian Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century and the Shadow of the Past, NY, Columbia University Press, 2007. 544 p.

26. McDaniel T. The Agony of the Russian Idea. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1996. 210 p.

27. McDougall W. Promised Land, Crusader State: The American Encounter with the World Since 1776. New York, Mariner Books, 1998. 286 p.

28. Miller A. The Empire and the Nation in the Imagination of Russian Nationalism, in: [ed.] Miller A., Rieber A., Imperial Rule. Budapest, Central European University Press, 2005. 218 p.

29. Mitzen J. Ontological security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 2006, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 341-370.

30. Niebuhr R. The Structure of Nations and Empires. New York, Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1959. 306 p.

31. Oskanian K.K. A Very Ambiguous Empire: Russia’s Hybrid Exceptionalism. Europe-Asia Studies, 2018, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 26-52.

32. Østbø J. The New Third Rome: Readings of a Russian Nationalist Myth. Stuttgart, Ibidem Verlag, 2016. 258 pp.

33. Pagden A. Lords of all the World: Ideologies of Empire in Spain, Britain and France c.1500-c.1800. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1998. 244 p.

34. Pain E. Imperskiy natsionalizm (Vozniknoveniye, evolyutsiya i politicheskiye perspetkivy v Rossii) [Imperial nationalism (emergence, evolution and political prospects in Russia)]. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’, 2015, no. 2, pp. 54-71.

35. Pastukhov V. Konets russkoy ideologii [The end of Russian ideology (A new course or a new Path?)]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2001, no. 1, pp. 4963.

36. Petukhov V., Barash R. Russkiye i russkiy mir: istoricheskiy kontekst i sovremennoye prochteniye [Russians and "Russian world": historical context and modern interpretation], Polis. Politicheskoye issledovaniya, 2014, no. 6, pp. 83-101.

37. Renshon J. Fighting for Status. Hierarchy and Conflict in World Politics. Princeton-Oxford, Princeton University Press, 2017. 328 pp.

38. Rowley D.G. «Redeemer Empire»: Russian Millenarianism. American Historical Review, 1999, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 1582-1602.

39. Rywkin M. Russia: Mythology in the Service of Realpolitik. American Foreign Policy Interests, 2014, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 195-200.

40. Storchak V. Tema rossiĭskogo messianizma v obshchestvenno-politicheskoĭ i filosofskoĭ mysli Rossii (XV-XVIII) [The theme of Russian messianism in the ideology of parties and organizations of the Orthodox-monarchical and nationalPatriotic sense]. State, religion, Church in Russia and abroad. Information and analytical Bulletin, 2003, Moscow: RAGS, 249 p.

41. Storchak V. Fenomen rossiĭskogo messiia͡ nizma v obshchestvenno-politicheskoĭ mysli Rossii (XIX-XX) [The phenomenon of Russian messianism in the socio-political and philosophical thought of Russia: the second half of XIX-the fi st third of XX century], Мoscow, RAGS, 2005. 249 p.

42. Surguladze V. Grani rossiyskogo samoznaniya. Imperiya, natsional’noye soznaniye, massyanizm i bizantinizm Rossii [Facets of Russian identity. Empire, national consciousness, messianism and Byzantium of Russia]. Moscow, W.Bafi g, 2010. 480 p.

43. Svenungsson J. Divining History. Prophetism, Messianism and the Development of the Spirit. New York, Berghahn Books, 2016. 240 p.

44. Talmon J. Political Messianism. The Romantic Phase. London, Secker&Warburg, 1960. 607 p.

45. Tikhonova N. «Mechty rossiyan „ob obshchestve» i „o sebe»: mozhno li govorit’ ob osobom rossiyskom tsivilizatsionnym proyekte?» [Dreams of Russians "about society» and "about themselves": can we talk about a special Russian civilizational project?]. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’, 2015, no. 1, pp. 52-63.

46. Travin D. Osobyy put’ Rossii. Ot Dostoyevskogo do Konchalovskogo ["Special way" of Russia: from Dostoevsky to Konchalovsky]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropeyskogo universiteta v SanktPeterburge, 2018. 224 p.

47. Van H., Marcel H. Putin’s Propaganda Machine. Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London, Rowman & Littlefi ld, 2016. 336 p.

48. Vassiliev A. Russian Policy in the Middle East: From Messianism to Pragmatism. Reading, Ithaca Press, 1993. 384 p.

49. Walicki A. The Slavophile Controversy: History of a Conservative Utopia in Nineteenth-Century Russian Thought. Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, 1989. 609 p.

50. Walicki A. Filozofia a mesjanizm. Studia z dziejów filozofii i myśli społeczno-religijnej romantyzmu polskiego. Warsaw, PIW, 1968. 318 p.

51. Zarakol A. After Defeat. How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010. 310 p.