The Role of Iran’s «Soft Power» in Confronting Iranophobia
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-4-67-216-238
Abstract
«Soft power» is a set of activities designed by a government or regional and international actors aimed to influence external public opinion, promote external image or attract support for a particular policy, which is implemented through all the available tools and new technologies. The non-governmental actors also play an effective and important role in this diplomacy. Considering the public diplomacy and soft power of the Islamic Republic of Iran as a deliberate and conscious approach can be of great importance in the country's grand strategies that will strengthen national interests in the domestic sphere and influence them at regional and global levels. The article analyzes the role of Iran’s soft power in confronting Iranophobia. The study is aimed at presenting a theoretical definition of public diplomacy and soft power in foreign policy and international system, and then examines its role in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran with an emphasis on confronting Iranophobia.
The authors answer the research question: “What is the role of soft power in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in confronting Iranophobia?” The research method is descriptive-analytical based on historical evidence, documents, and analytical issues of theorists, authors, and media being expressed in the theoretical framework of soft power. The paper is based on a synthesis of Stephen Walt’s “balance of threat” theory with Alexander Wendt’s social constructivism to explain the Iranian “threat” in American foreign policy.
The findings of this research show that without the use of force and disturbing the balance in the international relations, using a variety of tools and instruments the Iranian public diplomacy and soft power might be effective to reduce the global and regional atmosphere of Iranophobia and undermine anti-Iranian solidarity.
About the Authors
S. M. Mirmohammad Sadeghi
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
Islamic Republic of Iran
Islamic Republic of Iran
Seyyed Mehdi Mirmohammad Sadeghi – PhD Student in International Relations, North Tehran Branch.
R. Hajimineh
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
Islamic Republic of Iran
Islamic Republic of Iran
Rahmat Hajimineh – Assistant Professor of International Relations, Department of Communication and Social Science, East Tehran Branch.
References
1. Asghari Rad J. 2011. An Introduction to Public Diplomacy. Tehran: Kosar Educational Research Center. 159 p. (in Farsi)
2. Dehsheiri M. 2014. Cultural Diplomacy of Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran, Cultural and Scientific Publishing. 590 p. (in Farsi)
3. Eltiaminia R., Taqvayi Nia A. 2016. Explaining the Role and Place of Soft Power in Realizing the Goals of Domestic Politics. ‒ Quarterly Journal of Political Research in Islamic World. No. 3. P. 167-196. URL: http://priw.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-503-1&sid=1&slc_lang=fa (in Farsi)
4. Ersig H., Toyserkani M. 2009. The Comparing the Power of Iran and USA in the Middle East. ‒ Quarterly Journal of Political Science. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 169-203. URL: http://ensani.ir/fa/article/260696/ (in Farsi)
5. Gurgu E. 2016. The Role of Public Diplomacy in International Relations in Full Process of Globalization. ‒ Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 125-141.
6. Guha S. 2019. Sanctions Are Coming: Fear and Iranophobia in American Foreign Policy. E-International Relations, January. URL: https://www.e-ir.info/2019/01/07/sanctions-are-coming-fear-and-iranophobia-in-american-foreign-policy/
7. Happer C., Philo G. 2013. The Role of the Media in the Construction of Public Belief and Social Change. ‒ Journal of Social and Political Psychology. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 321-336.
8. Leonard M., Stead C., Smewing C. 2002. Public Diplomacy. London: Foreign Policy Centre. 183 p.
9. Malek Mohammadi H., Davoodi M. 2012. The Effect of Iranophobia on Military Security Policies of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council. ‒ Politics Quarterly: Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science. Vol. 42. No. 2. P. 227-246.
10. Melissen J. 2005. The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. In Melissen J. (ed.) The New Public Diplomacy Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 3-27.
11. Melissen J. 2011. Beyond the New Public Diplomacy. Netherlands Institute of International Relations. Clingendael Paper No. 3. 34 p. URL: https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/20111014_cdsp_paper_jmelissen.pdf
12. Mir Hosseini Z. 2001. Iranian Cinema. ‒ Middle East Report. No. 219. URL: https://merip.org/2001/06/iranian-cinema/
13. Nargesi A. 2014. The Thought of Iranophobia and its Reproduction in USA Foreign Policy during Obama Government. Master's Thesis. Islamic Azad University. 121 p. (in Farsi)
14. Nye J.S. 2002. The Paradox of American Power: Why the World's Only Superpower Can't Go It Alone. New York: Oxford University Press. 240 p.
15. Ram H. 2009. Iranophobia: The Logic of an Israeli Obsession. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. 224 p.
16. Snow N., Philip Taylor M. (eds). 2009. Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. London: Routledge, 2009. 404 p.
17. Speier H. 1950. Historical Development of Public Opinion. ‒ American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 55. No. 4. P. 376-388.
18. Tamdemir E.O. 2017. Islamic Republic of Iran Diplomacy and Soft Power. Master Thesis. Ankara, Yidirim Beyazit University. 118 p.
19. Tsygankov A.P. 2016. Russia's Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 336 p.
20. Walt S. 1985. Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power. ‒ International Security. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 3-43.
21. Wastnidge E. 2015. The Modalities of Iranian Soft Power: from Cultural Diplomacy to Soft War. ‒ Politics. Vol. 35. No. 3-4. P. 364-377.
22. Wendt A. 1992. Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. ‒ International Organization. Vol. 46. No. 2. P. 391-425.
23. Wilson E.J. 2008. Public Diplomacy in a Changing World. ‒ The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Vol. 616. P. 110-124.
24. Zaharna R.S. 2009. Public Diplomacy through the Looking Glass: Obama, US Public Diplomacy and the Islamic World. Symposium on Old and New Media, and the Changing Faces of Islam, sponsored by Religion, Media and International Studies Project. Syracuse University. 10 p. URL: https://www.american.edu/soc/faculty/upload/public-diplomacy-through-the-looking-glass.pdf
25. Zaharna R.S. 2007. The Soft Power Differential: Network Communication and Mass Communication in Public Diplomacy. ‒ The Hague Journal of Diplomacy. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 213-228.
26. Zarif M.J. 2014. What Iran Really Wants: Iranian Foreign Policy in the Rouhani Era. ‒ Foreign Affairs. Vol. 93. No. 3. P. 49-59.
Review
For citations:
Mirmohammad Sadeghi S.M., Hajimineh R. The Role of Iran’s «Soft Power» in Confronting Iranophobia. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2019;12(4):216-238. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-4-67-216-238
Views:
2988
Email this article 