Western Experience in Strategic Planning for National Security
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-5-68-12-23
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the best Western practices in strategic planning with the view to improve the effectiveness of the Russian Federation national security policy in the face of new challenges and threats.
Having analyzed Western approaches to ensuring national security, the article concludes that the political and governance practice needs to include more of strategic planning elements, such as strategic forecasting, monitoring, and national security assessment. Based on applicability to the Russian environment, the article particularly focuses on the American experience in strategic planning and discusses the origins and nature of the ideologeme of Americentrism that has dominated the American politics since 1990s. The author reveals how important role the use of soft power in specific national interests plays in the government policy for national security purposes and concludes that interrelation and mutual influence between planning and governance are indispensable.
Having analyzed the Western practices, the article demonstrates the need to adjust significantly the strategic goal setting, first and foremost in Russia’s essential strategic planning documents.
About the Author
V. P. NazarovRussian Federation
Vladimir P. Nazarov — Ph.D. in Political Sciences, Advisor
References
1. Brzezinski Z. 1990. Grand Failure: The Birth and Death of Communism in the Twentieth Century. New York: Collier Books.
2. Brzezinski Z. 1997. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. Basic Books.
3. Brzezinski Z. 2004. The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership. Basic Books.
4. Forrester J.W. 1969. Urban dynamics. Waltham, MA: Pegasus Communications.
5. Forrester J.W. 1968.Market Growth as Influenced by Capital Investment. Industrial Management Review. IX(2).
6. Gattermann C. 2012. Die neue alte Welt. Aufsätze zur Sicherheitspolitik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Universitätsdrucke Göttingen). Universitätsverlag Göttingen, Göttingen.
7. Gordon Th., Helmer-Hirschberg O. 1964. Report on a Long-Range Forecasting Study. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. URL: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P2982.html (accessed 26.09.2019).
8. Lake A. 1993. Remarks of Anthony Lake, Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs "From Containment to Enlargement". Johns Hopkins University, School of Advanced International Studies. Washington, D.C. URL: https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/lakedoc.html (accessed 26.09.2019)
9. Lake D. 1999. Entangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in Its Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 332 p.
10. Lake D. 2018. International Legitimacy Lost? Rule and Resistance When America Is First. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592717003085
11. Lake D. 2018. Perspectives on Politics. Vol. 16, Issue 1. Pp. 6-21. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592717003085
12. Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., Behrens III W.W. 1972. The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books.
13. Nye J.S. Jr. 2005. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs.. 130 p.
14. Popper K. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies.
15. Rummel R.J. 1984. Libertarianism, Violence within States, and the Polarity Principle. Comparative Politics. 16(4). Pp. 443-462. New York : Comparative Politics, Ph.D. Programs in Political Science.
16. Rummel R.J. 1992. Democide: Nazi Genocide and Mass Murder. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
17. Rummel R.J. 1997. Power Kills: Democracy as a Method of Nonviolence. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
18. Szayna Th.S., Daniel Byman D., Bankes S., Eaton D., Jones S., Mullins R., Lesser J. and Rosenau W. 2001. The Emergence of Peer Competitors: A Framework for Analysis. Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation. MR-1346-A. URL: https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1346.html (accessed 26.09.2019)
19. Aron R. 1993. Demokratiia i totalitarizm (Démocratie et totalitarisme) [Democracy and Totalitarianism]. Perevod s frantsuzskogo G.I. Semenova. Moscow: Tekst. 304 p. (In Russian)
20. Bogaturov A. 2004. Istoki amerikanskogo povedeniia. Rossiia v globalnoi politike. №6. (In Russian) URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/number/n_4204 (accessed 26.09.2019)
21. Kissindzher G. 1997. Diplomatiia. Moscow: Ladomir. 848 p. (In Russian).
22. Vorobev V. 2002. Konstitutsionno-pravovaia sistema Gosudarstva Izrail [Constitutional and Legal System of the State of Israel]. Moscow: MGIMO; Izdatelskii dom “Nnatsionalnoe obozrenie”. 319 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Nazarov V.P. Western Experience in Strategic Planning for National Security. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2019;12(5):12-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-5-68-12-23