“Ethnic Revival” in Globalizing World: The Example of Indigenous Political Movements in Latin America

The article offers an inquiry into the problem of “ethnic revival” in politics against the background of the accelerated globalization processes through the example of the indigenous movements in Latin America. In particular, it explains how such global trends as the democratization and liberalization of social and political spheres, intensified activities of international institutions on the empowerment of disadvantaged social groups, the inclusion of ecological problems in national and international agendas, growing interest of international society to the social and political problems of developing countries have contributed to the intensification of political activities of the indigenous peoples in Latin America in the last 25 years.

The indigenous political activism has taken radically different institutional forms and has led to diverse outcomes. For instance, in Mexico the indigenous peoples did not manage to create a viable sociopolitical force capable of advocating for their rights. In some other Latin America states, there are indigenous organizations that successfully promote the interests of native peoples. Moreover, in various countries the indigenous representatives are elected to national and local governments. In Colombia, Ecuador and Nicaragua the indigenous political parties were found, which, as long as other political forces, are participating in electoral processes and are delegating their representatives to public institutions. Whereas in case of Bolivia, the indigenous movement in alliance with left and progressive social organizations, has become the leading political force.

The author gives an explanation why the political activism of the indigenous peoples in different Latin American countries has taken such forms and has contributed to such results. On the basis of the analysis of these political activities the conclusion is made about common features of political culture, self-identification and perception of social and political processes by the indigenous peoples of Latin America.

1. Barrera G.A. 2001. Acción Colectiva y la Crisis Política: el Movimiento Indígena Ecuatoriano en los Años Noventa. Quito: Ediciones Abya-Ala.

2. Cedillo D.R. 2018. Inclusión política indígena en el Perú del siglo XXI. Apuntes Electorales: revista del instituto electoral del estado de México. No. 59. P. 9-44.

3. Chong N.G. 2010. Indigenous Political Organizations and the Nation-State: Bolivia, Ecuador, Mexico. Alternatives. 35(3). P. 259-268.

4. González M. 2015. Indigenous Territorial Autonomy in Latin America: An Overview. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies. 10(1). P. 10-36. DOI: 10.1080/17442222.2015.1034438

5. Harvey N. 2015. Practicing Autonomy: Zapatismo and Decolonial Liberation. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies. 11(1). P. 1-24. DOI: 10.1080/17442222.2015.1094872

6. Horowitz D. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.

7. Nietschmann B. 1994. The Fourth World: Nations Versus States’. Demko, G.J. and Wood, W.B. (eds.) Reordering the World: Geopolitical Perspectives on the 21st Century. Westview. P. 225-342.

8. Madrid R. 2005. Indigenous Parties and Democracy in Latin America. Latin American Politics & Society. 47(4). P. 161-179.

9. Martí i Puig S. 2010. The Emergence of Indigenous Movements in Latin America and Their Impact on the Latin American Political Scene. Interpretive Tools at the Local and Global Levels. Latin America Perspectives. No. 6. P. 70-94.

10. Pallister K. 2013. Why No Mayan Party? Indigenous Movements and National Politics in Guatemala. Latin American Politics and Society. 55(3). P. 117-138. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2013.00205.x

11. Patrinos H.A., Psacharopoulos G. 1994. Pueblos indígenas y pobreza en América Latina: un análisis empírico. Estudios sociodemográficos de pueblos indígenas. Santiago. P. 417-430.

12. Sieder R. Barrera V.A. 2017. Legalizing Indigenous Self-Determination: Autonomy and Buen Vivir in Latin America. Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology. 22(1). P. 9-26. DOI: 10.1111/jlca.12233

13. Thompson B. 2011. Pachakuti: Indigenous Perspectives, Buen Vivir, Sumaq Kawsay and Degrowth. Development. 54(4). P. 448-454.

14. Toledo V.M., Garrido D., Barrera-Bassols, N., Breña, M.O. 2015. The Struggle for Life: Socio-Environmental Conflicts in Mexico. Latin American Perspectives. 42(5). P. 133-147. DOI: 10.1177/0094582X15588104

15. Boliviya ‒ vremya levoindikhenistskogo eksperimenta [Bolivia: Time of the Left-Indiential Experiment]. 2009. Martynov B.F., Chumakova M.L., Nikolayeva L.B., Konstantinova N.S., Vorotnikova T.A. Moscow: ILA RAS, «Sammit». 75 p. (In Russian)

16. Vorotnikova T.A. 2011. Indeyskiy mir pered vyzovami XXI veka [The Indian World in Front of the Challenges of the Twenty-First Century]. Ed. by Chumakova M.L., Martynov B.F. Moscow: ILA RAS. 204 p. (in Russian)

17. Vorotnikova T.A. 2010. Politicheskiy protsess v polietnicheskom gosudarstve: opyt Bolivii (konets XX ‒ nachalo XXI vv.) [The Political Process in a Multi-Ethnic State: the Experience of Bolivia (late XX ‒ early XXI centuries)]. Abstract of PhD dissertation. Moscow: ILA RAS. (in Russian)

18. Goncharova T.V. 1979. Indeanizm: ideologiya i politika. Boliviya, Peru, Ekvador 50-60 gg. XX veka [Indeanism: Ideology and Politics. Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador 1950-1960’]. Moscow. 201 p. (in Russian)

19. Zubritskiy Yu.A. 1975. Inki-kechua. Osnovnyye etapy istorii naroda [Inky-Quechua. The Main Stages of the History of the People]. Moscow. 189 p. (in Russian)

20. Istomin A.A. 1988. Osobennosti gosudarstvennoy bor'by v Ekvadore v 1976-1984 gg [Features of the State Struggle in Ecuador in 1976-1984]. Abstract of PhD dissertation. Moscow. (in Russian)

21. Kuz'mishchev V.A. 1979. U istokov obshchestvennyye mysli v Peru: Garsilaso i yego istoriya inkov [At the Root of Social Thought in Peru: Garcilaso and his Inca history]. Moscow. 383 p. (in Russian)

22. Meksika: paradoksy modernizatsii [Mexico: the Paradoxes of Modernization]. 2013. Moscow: ILA RAS. 336 p. (in Russian)

23. Rakuts N.V. 2011. Ispaniya i Latinskaya Amerika: dinamika prirodnykh protsessov v kontse XX ‒ nachale XXI vekov [Spain and Latin America: the Dynamics of Natural Processes in the Late XX ‒ Early XXI Centuries]. Moscow: ILA RAS. (in Russian)

24. Rakuts N.V. 2018. Kul'tura indeyskikh narodov i politika gosudarstva. Yuzhnoamerikanskiye realii [Indian Culture and State Policy. South American Realities]. Moscow: ILA RAS. 264 p. (in Russian)

25. Samarkina I.K. 1974. Obshchina v Peru. Ocherk sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Community in Peru. Essay on Socio-Economic Development]. Moscow. 250 p. (in Russian)

26. Serov S.Ya. 1972. Problemy etnicheskoy istorii kechua (vtoraya polovina XVI v.) [Problems of the Quechua Ethnic History (Second Half of the 16th Century)]. Moscow. (in Russian)

27. Chernyshov A.L. 2015. Politizatsiya etnichnosti v epokhu globalizatsii: opyt Latinskoy Ameriki [Politicization of Ethnicity in the Era of Globalization: the Experience of Latin America]. Latinskaya Amerika. No. 9. P. 73-80. (in Russian)

28. Shinkarenko A.A. 2010. Indeyskiye dvizheniya i organizatsii v ofitsial'nykh protsessakh Peru i Ekvadora [Native American Movements and Organizations in the Official Processes of Peru and Ecuador]. Abstract of PhD dissertation. Moscow: ILA RAS. (in Russian)

29. Ekvador na puti «obshchestvennoy revolyutsii» [Ecuador on the Way of the “Social Revolution”]. 2009. Ed. by Kalashnikov N.V., Gavrilova Ye.Kh., Ivanovskii Z.V., Pyatakov A.N., Chumakova M.L., Konstantinova N.S., Shinkarenko A.A. Moscow: ILA RAS, series «Sammit». 107 p. (in Russian)