The “Nixon China Shock” in the Mirror of Japanese Domestic Politics
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-6-69-61-77
Abstract
The “Nixon China Shock” (the July 15, 1971 statement by the U.S. President R. Nixon about the recent trip of his National Security Advisor H. Kissinger to the PRC and about the President’s upcoming visit there) became one of the pivotal points in the history of Japanese foreign policy and contributed to Tokyo becoming more independent from Washington in its diplomatic course. Using the case of Japan’s reaction to this event, the article explores the characteristic features of the foreign policy making process in post-war Japan and demonstrates the considerable influence of these features on the character of Japanese foreign policy of the so-called “1955 System” period (the prolonged and continuous dominance of the conservative Liberal Democratic Party in 1955-93). The paper shows the decentralization of the foreign policy making process, expressed in the limited ability of the Prime Minister to determine foreign policy, the presence of considerable internal contradictions in the MoFA of Japan, the factionalism of the ruling party, and the high degree of dependency of the government’s policy course on the public opinion. It proves that these factors were one of the reasons for Japan’s political leadership avoiding decisive actions to normalize relations with the PRC before the “Nixon shock”, cautious that it might damage its relations with the U.S. and unable to discern the signs of upcoming U.S.-Chinese détente, and after this event, vice versa, making every effort to normalize its relations with Beijing as soon as possible, reaching this goal even before their American partners did. Given the historical importance of the “1955 System” for contemporary Japanese politics, the article’s conclusions are significant for the understanding of the logic of Japan’s domestic politics and foreign policy of the entire post-war period.
Author declares the absence of conflict of interests.
About the Author
V. V. Nelidov
Institute of Oriental studies RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Nelidov, PhD (History), lecturer, research fellow, Center for Japanese Studies
12 Rozhdestvenka Street, Moscow, 107031
References
1. Berton P. 2004. The Chinese and Japanese communist parties: three decades of discord and reconciliation, 1966-1998. Communist and Post-Communist Studies. Vol. 37. Р. 361-372.
2. Calder K.E. 1988. Japanese Foreign Economic Policy Formation: Explaining the Reactive State. World Politics. 40(4). Р. 517-541.
3. Campbell J.C., Scheiner E. 2008. Fragmentation and Power: Reconceptualizing Policy Making under Japan’s 1955 System. Japanese Journal of Political Science. 9(1). Р. 89-113.
4. Cooney K.J. 2007. Japan’s Foreign Policy since 1945. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc. 295 p.
5. Hagan J.D., Everts P.P., Fukui H., Stempel J.D. 2001. Foreign Policy by Coalition: Deadlock, Compromise, and Anarchy. International Studies Review 3(2). Р. 169-216.
6. Hoey F. 2015. Sato, America and the Cold War: US-Japanese relations, 1964-72. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 245 p.
7. Hook G. et al. 2005. Japan's international relations: politics, economics and security. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge. 623 p.
8. Johnson C. 1986. The Patterns of Japanese Relations with China, 1952-1982. Pacific Affairs. 59(3). Р. 402-428.
9. Lee C. 1970. Factional Politics in the Japan Socialist Party: The Chinese Cultural Revolution Case. Asian Survey. 10(3). Р. 230-243.
10. Mendel D.H. 1972. Sino-Japanese Relations in Crisis. China Report. 8(4). Р. 18-27.
11. Ogata S. 1965. Japanese Attitude toward China. Asian Survey. 5(8). Р. 389-398.
12. Ogata S. 1988. Normalization with China. A Comparative Study of U.S. and Japanese Processes. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California. 113 p.
13. Pugliese G. 2017. Kantei diplomacy? Japan’s hybrid leadership in foreign and security policy. The Pacific Review. 30(2). Р. 152-168.
14. Rose G. 1998. Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics. 51(1). P. 144-172.
15. Togo K. 2010. Japan's Foreign Policy, 1945-2009: The Quest for a Proactive Policy. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 484 p.
16. Yoshii M. 2008. The Creation of the “Shock Myth”: Japan’s Reactions to American Rapprochement with China, 1971-1972. The Journal of American-East Asian Relations. Vol. 15. Р. 131-146.
17. Vneshnepoliticheskij protsess v stranakh Vostoka [Foreign Policy Process in Countries of the East]. 2011. Ed. by Streltsov D.V. Moscow: Аspekt Press 336 p. (In Russian)
18. Kistanov V.O. 1995. Yaponiya v АTR. Аnatomiya ehkonomicheskikh i politicheskikh otnoshenij [Japan in the Asia Pacific Region. Anatomy of Economic and Political Relations]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literature. 336 p. (In Russian)
19. Kuriyama T. 2016. Sengo Nihon gaiko:. Kiseki to kadai [Post-War Japanese Diplomacy: Trajectory and Issues]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten. 271 p. (In Japanese)
20. Nakamura T. 2012. Sho:wa shi (1945-89) [History of the Showa Era (1945-89)]. Vol. 2. Tokyo: Toyo keizai shimposha. 897 p. (In Japanese)
21. Pavlenko P.А. 2006. Liberal'no-demokraticheskaya partiya v politicheskoj sisteme sovremennoj Yaponii (1955-2001) [Liberal Democratic Party in the political system of contemporary Japan]. Moscow: АIRO-XXI. 268 p. (In Russian)
22. Shoji T. 2011. [Struggle around Composing the Bill. The Foreign Ministry and the Process of Composing the United Nations Peace Cooperation Bill]. Japanese Political Science Review. 62(2). Р. 206-227. (In Japanese)
23. Streltsov D.V. 2010. [Foreign Policy Process in Contemporary Japan]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 1(10). Р. 245-256. (In Russian)
24. Streltsov D.V. 2016. [The System of Dominant Party in Japan: Some Lessons from Historical Experience]. Japanese Studies in Russia. № 3. Р. 70-85. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Nelidov V.V. The “Nixon China Shock” in the Mirror of Japanese Domestic Politics. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2019;12(6):61-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-6-69-61-77
Views:
1786
Email this article 