Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

The Impact of Digital Technologies on Leadership in Global Processes: from Platforms to Markets?

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-1-70-100-116

Abstract

Discussions on the impact of digital technologies on national and global processes are rising. Among important issues is the role of large Internet platforms (Facebook, Google, Alibaba, etc.) - key players of the digital markets and in the digital innovations – in producing global leadership / dominance. The article argues, that on the economy side existing USA-China duopoly on the platform markets creates asymmetric advantages for both nations resulting (in future) in unprecedented influence on global processes (up to “digital colonialism”). It is doubtful that potential competitors from third nations may ever destroy this duopoly. Also, the information functions of the platforms are reviewed as resource for global leadership. Noting the evolution of assessments (from techno-optimistic views of platforms as engines of democracy to alarmist views of their role as a “backdoor” for the opponents and adversaries) we accent platform`s growing information impact on the global processes (digital diplomacy, etc.). However, here the USA-PRC duopoly is also actual. Dilemma of alternative solutions to boost the influence of third nations in the new digital, platform economy still may be resolved. Since data is the key resource for the digital markets and platforms, formation of data regulatory regimes appears to be an asymmetric solution. The experience of the EU with its GDPR and other efforts to form new data/digital regimes may serve as a model. Exploiting its` large data market as a competitive factor, the EU may neutralize part of the advantages of stronger actors and orient global platforms towards a more acceptable strategy. However, regulatory practices should be complemented by the development of digital technologies, as well as regional- or national-level platforms. A serious challenge also lies in achieving needed market scale (in order to influence global platforms) and – in the future – in competition of jurisdictions.

About the Author

I. V. Danilin
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University); Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Ivan V. Danilin – candidate of political science, senior research fellow, laboratory of applied analysis of international problems, MGIMO University; head of Department of Science and Innovation, Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences

76, Prospect Vernadskogo Moscow, Russia, 119454; 23 Profsoyuznaya street, Moscow, Russia, 117997



References

1. Awan I. 2017. Cyber-Extremism: Isis and the Power of Social Media. Society. Vol. 54. P. 138–149. DOI: 10.1007/s12115-017-0114-0.

2. Casares A.P. 2018. The Brain of the Future and the Viability of Democratic Governance: The Role of Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Machines, and Viable Systems. Futures. Vol. 103. P. 5–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2018.05.002.

3. Cath C., Wachter S., Mittelstadt B., Taddeo M., Floridi L. 2018. Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: The US, EU, and UK Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics. 24(2). P. 505-528. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7.

4. Cohen J. E. 2018. The Biopolitical Public Domain: the Legal Construction of the Surveillance Economy. Philosophy & Technology. Vol. 31. P. 213–233. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-017-0258-2.

5. Couldry N., Mejias U. 2018. Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject. Television and New Media. 20(4). P. 336-349. DOI: 10.1177/1527476418796632.

6. Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. 2015. Ed by Bjola C., Holmes M. New York: Routledge. 252 p.

7. Digital Dominance. 2018. Ed. by Moore M. and Tambini D. New York: Oxford University Press. 420 p.

8. Dodd M.D., Collins S.J. 2017. Public Relations Message Strategies and Public Diplomacy 2.0: An Empirical Analysis Using Central-Eastern European and Western Embassy Twitter Accounts. Public Relations Review. 43(2). P. 417-425. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.004.

9. Dorney M.S. 1990. Moore V. The Regents of the University of California: Balancing the Need for Biotechnology Innovation against the Right of Informed Consent. High Technology Law Journal. 5(2). P. 333-369. URL: https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1087&context=btlj (accessed 22.12.2019).

10. Dwivedi Y.K., Hughes L., Ismagilova L. et al. 2019. Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Emerging Challenges, Opportunities, and Agenda for Research, Practice and Policy. International Journal of Information Management. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfo-mgt.2019.08.002.

11. Hallams E. 2010. Digital Diplomacy: The Internet, the Battle for Ideas & US Foreign Policy. CEU Political Science Journal. 5(4). P. 538-574.

12. Hossain S. 2015. Social Media and Terrorism: Threats and Challenges to the Modern Era. South Asian Survey. 22(2). P. 136-155. DOI: 10.1177/0971523117753280.

13. Jiang M., Fu K.-W. 2018. Chinese Social Media and Big Data: Big Data, Big Brother, Big Profit? Policy & Internet. 10(4). P. 372-392. DOI: 10.1002/poi3.187

14. Jin D.Y. 2015. Digital Platforms, Imperialism and Political Culture. New York: Routledge. 194 p.

15. Jin D.Y. 2017. Digital Platform as a Double-Edged Sword: How to Interpret Cultural Flows in the Platform Era. International Journal of Communication. Vol. 11. P. 3880–3898.

16. Kaplan A., Haenlein M. 2019. Rulers of the world, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Artificial Intelligence. Business Horizons. 14 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.09.003.

17. Kelsey J. 2017. The Risks for ASEAN of New Mega-Agreements that Promote the Wrong Model of e-Commerce. Developing the Digital Economy in ASEAN. Ed. by By Chen L., Kimura F. London, Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429504853-4. P. 56-90.

18. Kwet M. 2019. Digital Colonialism: US Empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South. Race and Class. 60(4). P. 3-26. DOI: 10.1177/0306396818823172

19. Levy F. 2018. Computers and Populism: Artificial Intelligence, Jobs, and Politics in the near Term. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 34(3). P. 393–417. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/gry004.

20. Montes G.A., Goertzel B. 2019. Distributed, Decentralized, and Democratized Artificial Intelligence. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. Vol. 141. P. 354–358. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.010.

21. Morozov E. 2012. The Net Delusion: How Not to Liberate the World. New York: Public Affairs. 448 p.

22. Morozov E. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs. 432 p.

23. Raikov A. 2018. Accelerating Technology for Self-Organising Networked Democracy. Futures. Vol. 103. P. 17–26.DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2018.03.015.

24. Ross A. 2011. Digital Diplomacy and US Foreign Policy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy. 6(3-4). P. 451-455. DOI: 10.1163/187119111X590556.

25. Rysman M. 2009. The Economics of Two-Sided Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 23(3). P. 125–143. DOI: 10.1257/jep.23.3.125.

26. Sadowski J. 2019. When Data is Capital: Datafication, Accumulation, and Extraction. Big Data & Society. 6(1). P. 1–12. DOI: 10.1177/2053951718820549.

27. Sætra H.S. 2019. Freedom under the Gaze of Big Brother: Preparing the Grounds for a Liberal Defense of Privacy in the Era of Big Data. Technology in Society. 58(7). P. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101160.

28. Savaget P., Chiarini T., Evans S. 2018. Empowering Political Participation through Artificial Intelligence. Science and Public Policy. 46(3). P. 369–380. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scy064.

29. Thatcher J., O’Sullivan D., Mahmoudi D. 2016. Data Colonialism through Accumulation by Dispossession: New Metaphors for Daily Data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 34(6). P. 990-1006. DOI: 10.1177/0263775816633195

30. Van Dijck J. 2013. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York: Oxford University Press. 240 p.

31. Zeng J., Khan Z., De Silva M. 2019. The Emergence of multi-Sided Platform MNEs: Internalization Theory and Networks. International Business Review. 28(6). DOI: 10.1016/j.ibus-rev.2019.101598.

32. Danilin I. 2018. Rol' BAT v razvitii kitajskih internet-rynkov i perspektivnye vyzovy cifrovoj jekonomiki KNR [BAT`s Role in The Development of Chinese Internet Markets and The Future Challenges for The PRC Digital Economy]. International Trends. P. 99–116. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2018.16.4.55.6. (In Russian)

33. Kissinger H. 2015. Mirovoj porjadok [World Order]. Moscow: AST. 512 p. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Danilin I.V. The Impact of Digital Technologies on Leadership in Global Processes: from Platforms to Markets? MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2020;13(1):100-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-1-70-100-116

Views: 2195


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)