Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

CONTEMPORARY ENERGY SECURITY STUDIES: THEORETICAL ASPECTS

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2013-4-31-219-226

Abstract

The article represents an attempt to analyze the contemporary theoretical framework of energy security research as part of international relations and foreign policy studies. Neorealism and neoliberalism are the key theoretical schools having the strongest impact on energy security research. Authors inspired by the neorealist approach, including J. Russell, D. Moran and M.Clare, insist on the role of individual state actors that seek to maximize their energy supply or their position as an energy exporter. The key areas of study of the neorealist school include military aspects of energy security and resource nationalism. The neoliberal framework, represented by such scholars as A. Goldthau and J.M.Witte, focuses on the role of institutions, international cooperation and liberal markets. Unlike neorealists, neoliberals believe that global energy markets provide the necessary conditions for the peaceful cooperation of all players. Constructivist approaches represent an interesting alternative to the “neo-neo” debate, but still remain marginal. Although proponents of neorealist and neoliberal frameworks disagree on several key points, a large number of scholars, both in Russia and abroad, prefer a combined approach based on elements on neorealist and neoliberal theories. The combined analytical framework is used by such leading Western researchers as D.Yergin, J. Stanislaw, A.Korin and G.Luft, as well as many Russian scholars, including N.Mironov, S.Zhiznin and Y.Borovsky.

About the Author

K. V. Trachuk
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University), 76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russia.
Russian Federation
PhD student at the Chair of International Relations and Foreign Policy


References

1. Миронов Н.В. Международная энергетическая безопасность. Учебное пособие. М., 2003. 165 с.

2. Боровский Ю.В. Мировая система энергоснабжения. М., 2008. 296 с.

3. Жизнин С. 3. Энергетическая дипломатия России. Электронный журнал «Экологические системы».

4. Апрель 2007. URL : http://esco-ecosys.narod.ru/2007_4/art40.htm. (дата обращения: 12.05.2013).

5. Waltz, K. N. Theory of International Politics, 1979. 251 p.

6. Aron R. Paix et guerre entre les nations, 1962. 794 p.

7. Kalicki J.H., Goldwyn D. Energy and Security. Toward a new foreign policy strategy. Woodrow Wilson Center

8. Press, Washington, D.C., 2005. 585 p.

9. Dandreuther R. International Security: The Contemporary Agenda. Polity Press, 2007. 250 p.

10. Moran D., Russell J. Energy Security and Global Politics. The militarization of resource management. Routledge,

11. 245 p.

12. Korin A., Luft G. Energy Security Challenges for the 21st Century: A Reference Handbook, Praeger Publishers,

13. 372 p.

14. Clare M. There will be blood: Political Violence, Regional Warfare, and the Risk of Great-Power Conflict over

15. Contested Energy Resources. // Korin A., Luft G. Opus cit, p.44-66.

16. Stanislaw J. A. Resource nationalism, the global scramble for energy, and the need for mutual interdependence,

17. Deloitte Center for Energy Solutions, 2009. Available at:www.deloitte.com/view/en_US/us/Industries/powerutilities/

18. d55d1ec6f6001210VgnVCM100000ba42f00aRCRD.htm (Accessed May 29, 2013).

19. Goldthau A., Witte J. M. Global Energy Governance: The New Rules of the Game. Brookings Institution,

20. 361 p.

21. Bressand A. The future of Producer-Consumer Cooperation: A Policy Perspective.// Goldthau A., Witte J. M.

22. Fettweis C. J. No Blood for Oil: Why Resource Wars Are Obsolete// Korin A., Luft G. Opus cit.

23. Buzan B., Wæver O. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge University

24. Press. 2003.

25. Kurze K. The Changing Discourse of Energy Security. A new impetus for energy policy integration in the

26. European Union? Transatlantic Research Papers in European Studies (TraPES). No. 2. Available at: www.

27. jmce.uni-osnabrueck.de (Accessed May 25, 2013).

28. Zelensky M. Changing the Energy Security Balance in the Baltic Sea Region: Building Regional Energy Security

29. Complex and Community. Nord Stream Gas Pipeleine Study. University of Tampere, CBU Programme,

30. International Relations, Master’s Thesis, October 2009. Available at: http://tutkielmat.uta.fi/pdf/gradu04082.

31. pdf (Accessed May 23, 2013).

32. Strange S. States and Markets. 2nd Revised edition, Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd., 2004.

33. p.

34. Yergin D. The Fundamentals of Energy Security, Testimony. Hearing on "Foreign Policy and National Security

35. Implications of Oil Dependence", Committee on Foreign Affairs US House of Representatives, March 22, 2007.

36. Mañé-Estrada A. Sécurité énergétique en Méditerranée occidentale : nouveaux facteurs, nouvelles politiques.

37. Un regard espagnol. Note de l’Ifri. Octobre 2008. Available at :http://www.ifri.org/files/Energie/NoteEstrada.

38. pdf (Accessed May 30,2013).

39. Hoyos С. The new Seven Sisters: oil and gas giants dwarf western rivals. Financial Times, 12 March 2007. Available

40. at : http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/471ae1b8-d001-11db-94cb-000b5df10621.html#axzz2TRC7ewU8

41. (Accessed May 20, 2013).


Review

For citations:


Trachuk K.V. CONTEMPORARY ENERGY SECURITY STUDIES: THEORETICAL ASPECTS. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2013;(4(31)):219-226. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2013-4-31-219-226

Views: 1305


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)