Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Accelerated expansion of NATO into the Balkans as a consequence of Euro-Atlantic Discord

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-2-71-70-93

Abstract

The Balkans in general and post-Yugoslav countries in particular have been under significant geopolitical pressure of the political West since the end of the bipolar global order. From the beginning of the Yugoslav Civil War in 1991, followed by Western recognition of secessionist republics in 1992 and NATO attacks on Serbs in Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1994-1995 and on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1999, the US, NATO and EU have been actively involved in the Balkan crisis. It was in concordance with the logic of unipolarity, or the New World Order, proclaimed by George W.H. Bush, in which there is “no substitute for American leadership”.

The year of 2008 marked the start of profound changes. The changes we are witnessing today are of the magnitude described by Paul Kennedy’s classic The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. Georgia’s attack on South Ossetia crossed Russia’s red lines and exposed the latter’s ambitions to regain the superpower status; China symbolically showed the same ambition with the Olympics in Beijing; the crash of the US real-estate market triggered the global economic crisis; and the NATO-sponsored unilateral declaration of secession by Kosovo Albanians set a precedent and introduced uncertainty in international law and the entire system of United Nations. By the beginning of 2020, many problems had accumulated in the EU – against the background of the ongoing migration crisis, right-wing and nationalist movements became more active, and differences between members increased. Long before COVID-19, Brexit became a serious stress test for the economy and social structure of the European Union. Dramatic changes took place on the other side of the Atlantic too, resulting in the shocking victory of staunch anti-globalist Donald Trump. The rules established during the 1991-2008 unipolarity have thus been challenged. Subsequently, post-Cold War ideological consensus in the West has also been challenged even further by the growth of non-systemic political movements – many of them directed not only against the EU expansion, but also against the EU itself.

The significance of all these events for the Balkans is somewhat surprising and paradoxical, as the mainstream forces that have been weakened in the West forcefully push for a stronger Atlantic integration of the remaining Balkan countries. At the height of the pandemic, on 27 March 2020 Northern Macedonia became the 30th member of the Alliance, having previously undergone a humiliating procedure of changing its own name for this purpose. Three years earlier, Montenegro was admitted to NATO, but its population did not have the opportunity to vote on this in a referendum. The negotiations between Belgrade and Pristina on ‘normalisation of relations’, continued pressures on the prerogatives of Republic Srpska, Croatian initiative for a new Intermarium and many other similar efforts are stages in the process of NATOisation of former Yugoslavia. Based on the analysis of a large body of narrative sources and recent literature, the article presents the main trends and possible prospects for developments in the Balkans, depending on the outcome of the ongoing ideological and political struggle within the West.

About the Authors

S. Gajić
Institute of European Studies
Czechoslovakia

Stevan Gajić – PhD (Political Sci.), Scientific Associate

Trg Nikole Pašića 11, 11000 Belgrade



E. G. Ponomareva
Mocow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation

Elena G. Ponomareva – Dr. of Science (Political Sci.), Professor of Comparative Politics Department

76 Prospect Vernadskogo, room 3026, Moscow, 119454



References

1. Bajrović R., Garčević V., Kraemer R. 2018. Hanging by a Thread: Russian’s strategy of destabilization in Montenegro. Philadelphia: Foreign Police Research Institute. URL: https://www.fpri.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/kraemer-rfp5.pdf

2. Borinski P. 2002. NATO Towards Double Enlargement: The Case of the Balkans. Journal of European Integration, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 113-136.

3. Brzezinski Z. 2016. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books.

4. Cascone G. 2010. NATO enlargement and the Western Balkans in NATO in Search of a Vision. Georgetown University Press. Pp. 175-200.

5. Chodakiewicz M.J. 2012. Intermarium: The Land between the Black and Baltic Seas, New Brunswick-New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

6. Cooper R. 2004. The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century. London: Atlantic Books.

7. Fukuyama F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.

8. Gardner H. 2019. IR Theory, Historical Analogy, and Major Power War, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

9. Graham T.E., Levitsky J.E., Munter C.P. & Wisner F.G. 2018. Time for Action in the Western Balkans: Policy Prescriptions for American Diplomacy. New York: National Committee on American Foreign Policy & East-West Institute. URL: https://www.eastwest.ngo/sites/default/files/Time-for-Action-in-the-Western-Balkans.pdf

10. Huntington S. 1996. The Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of Word Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

11. Jović D. 2018. Accession to the European Union and perception of external actors in the Western Balkans. Croatian International Relations Review, vol. 24, no. 83, pp. 6-32.

12. Kennedy P. 1987. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House.

13. Kissinger H. 1994, Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.

14. Lampe J.R. 2013. Yugoslavia's foreign policy in Balkan perspective: Tracking between the superpowers and non-alignment. East Central Europe, 40(1-2), pp. 97-113.

15. Less T. 2016. Dysfunction in the Balkans: Can the Post-Yugoslav Settlement Survive? Foreign Affairs. December 20. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/bosnia-herzegovina/2016-12-20/dysfunction-balkans

16. Majumdar M. 2017. Newly Declassified Documents: Gorbachev Told NATO Wouldn't Move Past East German Border. The National Interest. URL: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/newly-declassified-documents-gorbachev-told-nato-wouldnt-23629 (accessed 22.12. 2019).

17. Marusic D., Bedenbaugh S., Wilson D. 2017. Balkans Forward: A New US Strategy for the Region. Washington: Atlantic Council. URL: http://cd.bos.rs/online-citanka-novi-lideri--novemogucnosti-10/uploaded/Balkans_Forward_web_1128.pdf

18. Mitrović А. 2004. Време нетрпељивих: политичка историја великих држава Европе, 1919–1939 [The Age of the Intolerant: Political History of the Great European Powers, 19191939]. Podgorica: CID. (In Serb.)

19. Morrison K. 2017. The trajectory and parameters of democratic transition in Montenegro. Building Democracy in the Yugoslav Successor States: Accomplishments, Setbacks, and Challenges since 1990. Cambridge University Press.

20. Mulchinock N. 2017. NATO and the Western Balkans: From Neutral Spectator to Proactive Peacemaker in NATO and the Western Balkans: From Neutral Spectator to Proactive Peacemaker. Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 1-293.

21. Ponomareva E. G. 2020. Quo vadis, Serbia? Russia in Global Affairs. no. 1 January/March. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-1-158-179.

22. Ponomareva E., Frolov A. 2019. Agressiya NATO protiv Yugoslavii: mezhdunarodno-pravovye, voenno-strategicheskie i geopoliticheskie posledstvi [NATO Aggreshion against Yugoslavia: international-leagal, military strategic and geopolitical consequences]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. no. 2(65). pp. 32-56. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2019-2-65-32-56 (In Russ.)

23. Rakovic A. 2017. Montenegro from secession to NATO: reflection on the disorientation of the russian foreign policy (2006–2017). National interest, vol. 28, no 13, pp. 69-86. (In Serbian)

24. Vishnyakov Y., Ponomareva E. 2018. Serbiya na Balkanah: izobretenie «porohovogo pogreba Evropy» [Serbia in the Balkans: The Invention of ‘Europe’s Gun Powder Magazine’]. Contemporary Europe, no. 7, pp. 108-121. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope72018115129 (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Gajić S., Ponomareva E.G. Accelerated expansion of NATO into the Balkans as a consequence of Euro-Atlantic Discord. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2020;13(2):70-93. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-2-71-70-93

Views: 1718


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)