Globalization of Employment Amid COVID-19 Pandemic

In 2019-2020 the global economy faced an unprecedented transition to remote employment. New information technologies have made this transition possible, but prior to the pandemic it was implemented with great hesitation even in technologically advanced companies, whose activities are focused on data analysis. The sudden push toward remote work has formed a new reality of the global labor market - mass foreign outsourcing of labor in a wide range of professions. New trends are adding additional challenges for the legal regulation of labor relations at the level of states and international organizations (ILO and UN).

The article asks what the socio-economic consequences of the surge in remote employment on a state and international level will be.

The methodology of the study consists in conducting cross-country comparisons of the social behavior of employers and employees, as well as analyzing the response of international organizations and states in terms of adapting the regulatory framework to the changed social relations.

The results show that the "point of no return" in the organization of labor relations has not been reached yet. The effects of the increased scale of remote employment is observed only in individual and usually very large companies. However, at the national level the situation with remote employment returns to a large extent to the pre-crisis level, although not completely. At first glance socially comfortable model of remote employment triggers systemic risks, which, if further accelerated, will fully manifest themselves in the foreseeable future. Remote employment is one of the means of labor market globalization, the pandemic of COVID-19 has acted as an accelerator for the growth of cross-border remote employment. In this regard, we should expect an intensification of the international discussion on the need and sufficiency of national legislative borders that restrain the globalization of the labor market, which needs to liberalize remote employment with the participation of foreign citizens.

1. Abdullah N. et al. 2020. Coping with Post COVID-19: Can Work from Home be a New Norm? European Journal of Social Sciences Studies. 5(6). P. 61-81. DOI: 10.46827/ejsss.v5i6.933

2. Adams-Prassl A., Boneva T., Golin M., Rauh C. 2020. Work That Can be Done from Home: Evidence on Variation within and across Occupations and Industries. IZA Discussion Papers. №13374.

3. Andrianova M.A. 2020. Legal Regulation of Remote Work in Russia. International Scientific and Practical Conference. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-53277-2_81

4. Battista L. 2020. COVID-19 and Labour Law: Republic of San Marino. Italian Labour Law e-Journal. 13(1S). DOI: 10.6092/issn.1561-8048/10835

5. Bick A., Blandin A., Merten, K. 2020. Work from Home after the COVID-19 Outbreak. Working Paper 2017. DOI: 10.24149/wp2017

6. Bloom N., Liang J., Roberts J., Ying Z.J. 2015. Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 130(1). P. 165-218. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qju032

7. Boell S.K., Cecez-Kecmanovic D., Campbell J. 2016. Telework Paradoxes and Practices: the Importance of the Nature of Work. New Technology, Work and Employment. 31(2). P. 114-131. DOI: 10.1111/ntwe.12063

8. Charalampous M., Grant C.A., Tramontano C., Michailidis E. 2019. Systematically Reviewing Remote E-Workers’ Well-Being at work: a Multidimensional Approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 28(1). P. 51-73. DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886

9. Clancy M. 2020. The Case for Remote Work. Economics Working Papers. №20007.

10. Cohen G.D. 2020. Measuring Employment during COVID-19: Challenges and Opportunities. Business Economics. 55(4). P. 229-239. DOI: 10.1057/s11369-020-00190-4

11. Daniel D., Nicolas N., Ozden C., Rijkers B., Viollaz M., Winkler H. 2020. Who on Earth Can Work from Home? Policy Research Working Papers. №9347.

12. Fadinger H., Schymik J. 2020. The Effects of Working from Home on COVID-19 Infections and Production a Macroeconomic Analysis for Germany. Covid Economics. 9(24). P. 107139.

13. Gallacher G., Hossain I. 2020. Remote Work and Employment Dynamics under COVID-19: Evidence from Canada. Canadian Public Policy. 46(1). P. 44-54. DOI: 10.3138/CPP.2020-026

14. Gimenez-Nadal J.I., Molina J.A., Velilla J. 2019. Work Time and Well-Being for Workers at Home: Evidence from the American Time Use Survey. International Journal of Manpower. 41(2). P. 184-206. DOI: 10.1108/IJM-04-2018-0134

15. Godart O.N., Gorg H., Hanley A. 2017. Trust-Based Work Time and Innovation: Evidence from Firm-Level Data. ILR Review. 70(4). P. 894-918. DOI: 10.1177/0019793916676259

16. Hodder A. 2020. New Technology, Work and Employment in the Era of COVID-19: Reflecting on Legacies of Research. New Technology, Work and Employment. 35(3). P. 262-275. DOI: 10.1111/ntwe.12173

17. Judene P.T., Etmanski B., Durston A. 2020. Remote Work-Integrated Learning Experiences: Student Perceptions. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning. 21(4). P. 401-414.

18. Kashyap A., Raghuvanshi J. 2020. A Preliminary Study on Exploring the Critical Success Factors for Developing COVID-19 Preventive Strategy with an Economy Centric Approach. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management. 18(4). P. 357-377. DOI: 10.1108/MRJIAM-06-2020-1046

19. Leslie L.M., Manchester C.F., Park T.Y., Mehng S.A. 2012. Flexible Work Practices: A Source of Career Premiums or Penalties? Academy of Management Journal. 55(6). P. 1407-1428. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.0651

20. Madero Gomez S., Ortiz Mendoza O. E., Ramfrez J., Olivas-Lujan M.R. 2020. Stress and Myths Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic’s Effects on Remote Work. Management Research. 18(4). P. 401-420. DOI: 10.1108/MRJIAM-06-2020-1065

21. Matli W 2020. The Changing Work Landscape as a Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Remote Workers’ Life Situations in South Africa. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 40(9-10). P. 1237-1256. DOI: 10.1108/IJSSP-08-2020-0386

22. Medeiros E., Guillermo Ramfrez M., Ocskay G., Peyrony J. 2020. Covidfencing Effects on Cross-Border Deterritorialism: the Case of Europe. European Planning Studies. P. 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1818185

23. Paraciani R., Rizza R. 2021. When the Workplace is the Home: Labour Inspectors’ Discretionary Power in the Field of Domestic Work - an Institutional Analysis. Journal of Public Policy. 41(1). P. 1-16. DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X19000254

24. Perez-Zapata O., Pascual A.S., Alvarez-Hernandez G., Collado C.C. 2016. Knowledge Work Intensification and Self-Management: the Autonomy Paradox. Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation. 10(2). P. 27-49. DOI: 10.13169/workorgalaboglob.10.2.0027

25. Peters P., Ligthart P.E., Bardoel A., Poutsma E. 2016. ‘Fit’ for Telework’? Cross-Cultural Variance and Task-Control Explanations in Organizations’ Formal Telework Practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 27(21). P. 2582-2603. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2016.1232294

26. Popovici V., Popovici A.L. 2020. Remote Work Revolution: Current Opportunities and Challenges for Organizations. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series. 20(1). P. 468472.

27. Putri A., Amran A. 2021. Employees’ Work-Life Balance Reviewed from Work from Home Aspect During COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology. 1(1). P. 30-34. DOI: 10.35870/ijmsit.v1i1.231

28. Roghanizad M.M., Bohns V.K. 2017. Ask in Person: You're less Persuasive than you Think over Email. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 69. P. 223-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.002

29. Staboulis M., Lazaridou I. 2020. The Impact of COVID-19 on Economy, Employment and New Skills. Journal of European Economy. 19(3). P. 409-422.

30. Schur L.A., Ameri M., Kruse D. 2020. Telework after COVID: A “Silver Lining” for Workers with Disabilities? Journal of occupational rehabilitation. 30(4). P. 521-536. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-020-09936-5

31. Toscano F., Zappala S. 2020. Social Isolation and Stress as Predictors of Productivity Perception and Remote Work Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: the Role of Concern about the Virus in a Moderated Double Mediation. Sustainability (Switzerland). 12(23). P. 1-14. DOI:10.3390/su12239804

32. Vartolomei B. 2020. Considerations Regarding Work from Home and Telework. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence. 14(1). P. 1217-1221. DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2020-0115

33. Wang B., Liu Y., Qian J., Parker S.K. 2020. Achieving Effective Remote Working during the CO VID-19 Pandemic: a Work Design Perspective. Applied Psychology. DOI: 10.1111/apps.12290

34. Wang K., Ozbilen B. 2020. Synergistic and Threshold Effects of Telework and Residential Location Choice on Travel Time Allocation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 63. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102468

35. Wood Y.I., Zegwaard K.E., Fox-Turnbull W 2020. Conventional, Remote, Virtual and Simulated Work-Integrated Learning: a Meta-Analysis of Existing Practice. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning. 21(4). P. 331-354.

36. Ljutov N.L. 2018. Distancionnyj trud: opyt Evropejskogo Sojuza i problemy pravovogo regulirovanija v Rossii [Remote Work: Experience of the European Union and Problems of Legal Regulation in Russia]. Lex russica. 10(143). Р. 30-36. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2018.143.10.030039 (In Russian).