The Role of Chinese Small and Medium TNCs in the Modernization of the National Economy

Why does the Chinese economic modernization strategy include transnationalization of Chinese enterprises, the creation of numerous Small and Medium Foreign Affiliates (SMFAs)? The research hypothesis suggests that in the context of globalization, modernization requires influencing other participants in the global economy beyond national borders. SMFAs are able to transform the structure of the economy of the PRC and host countries to ensure demand for national innovations and highly skilled labor. The literature review highlights the challenges of modernizing the national economy in the context of globalization, as well as the advantages of TNCs and participation in global value chains (GVCs). However, the question of the connection between catchup development and transnationalization of local business, especially small and medium-sized ones, has been understudied. The novelty of the study is in the analysis of the sectoral and geographical structure of the foreign activities of Chinese TNCs and the analysis of the problems of the participation of Chinese TNCs in Western global value chains (GVCs). The main findings reveal that the creation of SMFAs is a response to the challenges of globalization, which impede the modernization of the Chinese economy. Powerful state support to SMFAs makes them dependent, and thus the government is able to direct the goals of private enterprises in accordance with the national interests. The major field of Chinese SMFAs is the promotion of products manufactured in the PRC in the American and European markets, and it contributes to the development of the national innovation system, redistributes the added value in favor of national manufacturers, and stimulates the development of hightech industries of the PRC. In developing countries SMFAs are represented by trade and manufacturing outlets within the “Belt and Road Initiative” They come after the infrastructural projects of large business, grouped in clusters, have strong coordination with other Chinese TNCs, and create Chinese GVCs. The main role of Chinese SMFAs in the modernization of the PRC economy is to ensure national interests, including industrial sovereignty and the growth of wellbeing of citizens as the basis of innovative demand. In the modern international labor division, this is achieved by a shift to high valueadded operations, accompanied by a struggle for the markets of developed countries and for sites for the low valueadded operations inside Chinese GVCs in developing countries.

1. Brown P., Bell J. 2001. Industrial Clusters and Small Firm Internationalization. Multinationals in a New Era. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 10-28.

2. Chen W., Tang H. 2014. The Dragon Is Flying West: Micro-level Evidence of Chinese Outward Direct Investment. Asian Development Review. 31(2). P. 109-140. DOI: 10.1162/ADEV_a_00032

3. Chesbrough H.W 2003. Open Innovation: The Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 272 p.

4. Chung L., Tan KH. 2017. The Unique Chinese Innovation Pathways: Lessons from Chinese Small and Medium Sized Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 190. P. 80-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.004

5. Cuervo-Cazurra A. [et al.]. 2014. Governments as Owners: State-owned Multinational Companies. Journal of International Business Studies. №45. P. 919-942. DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2014.43

6. Din FU, Dolles H, Middel R. 2013. Strategies for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises to Compete Successfully on the World Market: Cases of Swedish Hidden Champions. Asian Business & Management. 12(5). P. 591-612. DOI: 10.1057/abm.2013.19

7. Douglass J.A. 2010. Creating a Culture of Aspiration: Higher Education, Human Capital and Social Change. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2(5). P. 6981-6995. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.050

8. Gereffi G. 1999. International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chain. Journal of International Economics. 48(1). P. 37-70. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00075-0

9. He Chuanqi. 2012. Modernization Science: The Principles and Methods of National Advancement. L.; New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 648 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-64225459-8

10. Johansson J., Mattsson L. 1988. Internationalization in Industrial Systems - a Network Approach. International Studies of Management Organization. Vol. 17. P. 34-48.

11. Kolstad I., Wiig A. 2012. What Determines Chinese outward FDI? Journal of World Business. 47(1). P. 26-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2010.10.017

12. Kuznetsov A.V. 2016. Foreign Investments of Russian Companies: Competition with West European and East Asian Multinationals. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 86(2). P. 77-85. DOI: 10.1134/S1019331616020039

13. Kwan Ch. 2020. The China-US Trade War: Deep-Rooted Causes, Shift-ing Focus and Uncertain Prospects. Asian Economic Policy Review. 15(1). P. 55-72. DOI: 10.1111/aepr.12284

14. Lemoine F., Unal D. 2017. China's Foreign Trade: A «New Normal». China and World Economy. 25(2). P. 1-21. DOI: 10.1111/cwe.12191

15. Lundvall B. 2016. The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope. L.; New York: Anthem Press. 406 p. DOI: 10.26530/OAPEN_626406

16. Luo YD, Xue QZ, Han BJ. 2010. How Emerging Market Governments Promote outward FDI: Experience from China. Journal of World Business. 45(1). P. 68-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2009.04.003

17. Osgood I. 2018. Globalizing the Supply Chain: Firm and Industrial Sup-port for US Trade Agreements. International Organization. 72(2). P. 455-484. DOI: 10.1017/S002081831800005X

18. Ozawa T. 2014. Explaining the Rise of East Asian Multinationals: State-Industry Links, a Stages Model of Structural Change, and Japan as a Precedent Setter. Columbia University. Center on Japanese Economy and Business. Working Paper №337. 27 p.

19. Porter M.E. 1990. Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press. 896 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1

20. Salitskii A.I., Sin Zhao, Yurtaev VI. 2017. Sanctions and Import Substi-tution as Exemplified by the Experience of Iran and China. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 87(2). P. 205-212. DOI: 10.1134/S1019331617020058

21. Smith, K. 2007. The Systems Challenge to Innovation Policy. Industries und Glueck. Para-digmenwechsel in der Industrie und Technologie politik. №3. P. 45-54.

22. Taleb N.N. 2012. Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. New York. 519 p.

23. Shen X. 2015. Private Chinese Investment in Africa: Myths and Realities. Development Policy Review. №33. P. 83-106. DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12093

24. Zhang S., Yang D., Qiu S. [et al.]. 2018. Open innovation and firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese mechanical manufacturing industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M. Vol. 48. P. 76-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.004

25. Cao Jianfei. 2017. Jingji quanqiuhua yu woguo chanye youhua shengji [Economic Globalization and China's Industrial Optimization and Upgrade]. Beijing: Jingji guanli chubanshe. 234 p. (In Chinese).

26. Cha Risheng. 2015. Zhongguo canyu quanqiu jingji zhili moshi yanjiu [Research on China's Participation in Global Economic Governance Model - From the Perspective of Global Value Chain Governance]. Hongguan jingjiyanju [Macroeconomics]. №5. P. 9-17. (In Chinese).

27. Chen Huaiqiao, Fan Jianhong. 2014. Zhidu juli, Zhongguo kuaguo gong-si jinru zhanlue yu guojihua jixiao: jiyu zuzhi hefaxing shiqiao [Institutional Distance, Chinese MNCs' Entry Strategy and Internationalization Performance: From the Perspective of Organizational Legitimacy]. Nankai jingji yanjiu [Nankai Economic Studies]. №2. P. 99-117. (In Chinese).

28. Guo Temin, Wang Yulong, Yu Shan. 2002. Zhongguo qiye kuaguo jingying [China Enterprise International Operation]. Beijing: Zhongguo fazhan chubanshe. 411 p. (In Chinese).

29. Huang Yuchun, Zheng Jianghui, Yang Yiwen. 2012. Quanqiu jiazhilian shijiao xia zhang sanjiao chukou daoxiangxing chanye jiqunde shengji longjing yanjiu [Research on the Upgrade Path of Export-oriented Industrial Clusters in the Yangtze River Delta from the Perspective of Global Value Chain]. Keji jinbu yu duice [Science & Technology Progress and Policy]. №17. P. 45-50. (In Chinese).

30. Huang Zhiyong, Wang Yubao. 2004. FDI yu woguo chanye anquande bianzheng fenxi [Dialectical Analysis ofFDI and China's Industrial Security]. Shijie jingji yanjiu [World Economy Studies]. №6. P. 35-41. (In Chinese).

31. Jingji da qiju, Zhongguo zenma ban [The Economic Grand Chessboard, what should China do]. 2019. Xinhua News Agency Think Tank. Beijing : Xiandai chubanshe. 343 p. (In Chinese).

32. Lang Xianpin, Wang Mudi, Wang Jin et al. 2018. Zhongguo zhizaoye xia yibu: cong zhizao dao yingzao [China's Manufacturing Industry Next Step: From Manufacturing to Creation]. Beijing : Dongfang chubanshe. 179 p. (In Chinese).

33. Li Xiaohua. 2015. Guoji chanye fengong geju yu zhongguo fengong diwei fazhan qushi [The pattern of international division of labor and the development trend of China's status of division of labor]. Guoji jingmao tansuo [International Economics and Trade Research]. №6. P. 4-17. (In Chinese).

34. Wang Huiyao, Miao Lu. 2017. Zhongguo qiye quanqiuhua baogao (2017) lanpishu [Report on Chinese Enterprises Globalization (2017)]. Beijing: Shekeyuan kexue wenxian chubanshe. 360 p. (In Chinese).

35. Wang Junhao, Wu Jingjing. 2006. Jiyu guojia jingji anquande kuaguo gongsi binggou guanzhi [M & A Control of Transnational Corporations Based on National Economic Security]. Jingjiyuguanliyanjiu [Research on Economics and Management]. №10. P. 19-25. (In Chinese).

36. Yang Yaping, Wu Zhuhong. 2016. Zhongguo zhizaoye qiye OFDI dailai “diu zhizaoye” ma -qi yu weiguan shuju he touzi dongjide shizheng yanjiu [Does OFDI in Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises Bring "De-manufacturing" - An Empirical Study Based on Micro-data and Investment Motivation]. Guoji maoyi wenti [Journal of International Trade]. №8. P. 154-164. (In Chinese).

37. Brodel F. 1993. Dinamika kapitalizma [The Dynamics of Capitalism]. Smolensk: Poligram-ma. 128 p. (In Russian).

38. Galishcheva N.V 2014. Model' «Kerala» - model' ustoichivogo razvitiia indiiskoi ekono-miki [Kerala model as a model of sustainable development of Indian economy]. Mirovoe i natsionalnoe khoziaistvo. №3. URL: https://mirec.mgimo.ru/2014-03/model-kerala-model-ustojcivogo-razvitia-indijskoj-ekonomiki (accessed 16.02.2021). (In Russian).

39. Ivanter V.V. 2015. Viktor Ivanter: «u Rossiiskoi ekonomiki est' potentsial dlia rosta» [The Russian economy has potential for growth]. Finansy: Teoriia i Praktika. №3. P. 18-25. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2015-0-3-18-25 (In Russian).

40. Ivanter VV, Komkov N.I. 2007. Perspektivy i usloviia innovatsionno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiia ekonomiki Rossii [Prospects and conditions for innovative and technological development of the Russian economy]. Problemyprognozirovaniia. №3. P. 3-20. (In Russian).

41. Idrisova V.V., Litvinova Iu.O. 2016. Torgovlia dobavlennoi stoimost'iu: empiricheskii ana-liz [Trade in Value Added: Empirical Analysis]. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik. №8. P. 49-66. (In Russian).

42. Kalashnikov D.B. 2019a. Potentsial TNK v razvitii eksporta: opyt Kitaia [Export Development Practices by Chinese TNCs]. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik. №3. P. 35-48. (In Russian).

43. Kalashnikov D.B. 2019b. TNK v obespechenii natsional'nykh ekonomicheskikh interesov: opyt Kitaia [Chinese MNCs in the Protection of National Interests]. Gorizonty ekonomiki. №2 P. 69-73. (In Russian).

44. Klinov V.G. 2011. Teoreticheskaia mysl' i narodnokhoziaistvennaia politika: russkii vybor [Theoretical Thought and Economic Policy: Russian Choice]. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdun-arodnye otnosheniia. №3. P. 119-128. (In Russian).

45. Kondrat'ev V.B. 2015. Mirovaia ekonomika kak sistema global'nykh tsepochek stoimosti [World Eonomy as Globall Value Chain’s Network]. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. №3. P. 5-17. (In Russian).

46. Liu Izhu, Avdokushin E.F. 2019. Proekt «Odin poias, odin put'» 2.0. - strategiia stimuli-rovaniia global'noi ekspansii Kitaia [“One Belt One Road” Project 2.0 - A Strategy to Stimulate China’s Global Expansion]. Mir novoi ekonomiki. 13(1). P. 67-76. DOI: 10.26794/2220-64692019-13-1-67-76. (In Russian).

47. Manturov D.V. 2018. O promyshlennoi politike Rossii na perspektivu 2018-2030 gg. [On the Industrial Policy of Russia for 2018-2030]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. №4. P. 7-22. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2018-4-61-7-22. (In Russian).

48. Mel'iantsev V.A. 2016. Protivorechivye trendy v sovremennoi mirovoi ekonomike i raz-vivaiushchiesia strany. Chast' 2 [Contradictory trends in the modern global economy and developing countries. Part 2]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 13: Vostokovedenie. №3. С. 3-35. (In Russian).

49. Na puti k Kitaiskomu miru [On the way to the Pax Sinica]. 2018. Pod red. Sluki N.A. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. 352 p. (In Russian).

50. Pichkov O.B. 2015. SShA v mezhdunarodnom dvizhenii priamykh investitsii [USA in the international flows of direct investment]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet. 240 p. (In Russian).

51. Polterovich V.M. 2009. Mekhanizm global'nogo ekonomicheskogo krizisa i problemy tekhnologicheskoi modernizatsii [The mechanism of the global economic crisis and the problems of technological modernization]. Voprosy ekonomiki. №6. P. 4-22. (In Russian).

52. Rebrei S.M. 2012. Transnatsionalizatsiia iaponskogo biznesa [Transnationalization of Japanese business]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet. 133 p. (In Russian).

53. Selivanov A.I. 2017. Ekonomicheskaia bezopasnost' Rossii: teoreticheskii i prakticheskii renessans sistemnogo podkhoda [Economic Security of Russia: a Renaissance of Systems Approach]. Finansy: Teoriia i Praktika [Finance: Theory and Practice]. №2. P. 12-22. (In Russian). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2017-21-2-12-22

54. Tatarkin A. 2008. Promyshlennaia politika kak osnova sistemnoi modernizatsii ekonomiki Rossii [Industrial policy as the basis of systemic modernization of the Russian economy]. Problemy teorii ipraktiki upravleniia. №1. P. 5-17. (In Russian).

55. Kheifets B.A. 2018. Globalizatsiia ne konchaetsia, ona stanovitsia drugoi [Globalization does not End, it Becomes Another]. Kontury globalnykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika pravo. №1. P. 14-33. (In Russian). DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-1-14-33

56. Tsigelkova E., Platonova I.N., Frolova E.D. 2019. Komparativnyi analiz podderzhki malykh i srednikh predpriiatii ES i Kitaia v tseliakh povysheniia sozdavaemoi imi dobavlennoi stoimosti [Comparative Analysis of Supporting Small and Medium Enterprises for Enhancing Created Added Value in the EU and China]. Ekonomika regiona. №1. P. 256-269. DOI: 10.17059/20191-20

57. Chubarov I.G. 2018. Piat' sostavliaiushchikh vneshneekonomicheskogo kursa Kitaia «Odin poias, odin put'» [Five Connectivity Areas of the China’s Belt and Road Initiative]. Mezh-dunarodnaia analitika. №3. P. 45-58.

58. Chuvankova V.V. 2018. Kitai: rol' malogo i srednego biznesa v postroenii obshchestva «sia-okan» [China: the role of small and medium business in creation of “xiaokang society”]. Aziia i Afrika segodnia. №4. P. 40-47. DOI: 10.7868/S0321507518040062

59. Shevchenko I.V., Mudrova L.I., Shcheblykin Iu.S. 2010. Problemy transnatsionalizatsii rossiiskogo biznesa [Problems of transnationalization ofRussian business]. Finansy i kredit. №3. P. 2-10. (In Russian).