Analytical and scientific support mechanism of the US foreign policy process
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2009-6-9-97-110
Abstract
The U.S. intellectual leadership in many spheres is rarely challenged nowadays. However it is secured not only through the ability to formulate a great amount of new ideas, including fundamental innovations, but perhaps even more due to the effective system for integration of intellectual products into practice. Nevertheless this is hardly a research issue for Russian scholars. The article is an attempt to take a closer look on design and behavior of principal channels and institutions, employed by American scholars and experts for participation in shaping national foreign policy.
About the Author
I. A. Istomin
Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД России. Россия, 119454, Москва, пр. Вернадского, 76.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Vo vvedenii k spetsial'nomu nomeru zhurnala «InternationalOrganization» 1992 g., posvyashchennomu roli ekspertov v mezh-
2. dunarodnoi politicheskoi koordinatsii, P. Khaas otmechal sushchestvennoe uvelichenie v SShA chisla ministerstv i ve-
3. domstv, kolichestva gosudarstvennykh sluzhashchikh i urovnya ikh professional'noi podgotovki s 1940-kh gg. po seredinu
4. -kh gg. (Sm.: Haas P. M. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination // International Organization.
5. Vol. 46, № 1, Knowledge, Power and International Policy Coordination, P. 8-9). Khotya posle okonchaniya
6. kholodnoi voiny raskhody na provedenie vneshnei politiki byli urezany, a nekotorye struktury uprazdneny (v chast-
7. nosti, Agentstvo mezhdunarodnoi informatsii SShA), v otnoshenii poslednikh 20 let takzhe imeyutsya mnogochislennye
8. svidetel'stva rastushchego urovnya trebovanii k obrazovatel'nomu urovnyu i kompetentnosti predstavitelei gosu-
9. darstvennogo apparata. V chastnosti, pod rukovodstvom gosudarstvennogo sekretarya K. Pauella byla razrabotana
10. i osushchestvlena Initsiativa povysheniya gotovnosti diplomaticheskikh sluzhashchikh, kotoraya pozvolila uvelichit' chis-
11. lo sotrudnikov, prokhodyashchikh perepodgotovku v spetsializirovannom uchebnom zavedenii Gosdepa s 2000 po 2007 gg.
12. na 62 % (Sm.: Nakamura K. N., Epstein S. B. Diplomacy for the 21st Century: Transformational Diplomacy // Congress Research
13. Service Report. August 23, 2007. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL34141.pdf). Povyshenie professional'noi kom-
14. petentnosti sotrudnikov Gosudarstvennogo departamenta bylo takzhe zayavleno v kachestve odnoi iz zadach initsia-
15. tivy «Preobrazovatel'naya diplomatiya», provozglashennoi gossekretarem K. Rais v 2006 g.
16. Protsessformirovaniya osnov sovremennoi byurokratii i eefunktsional'noi roli proslezhen v: VeberM.Politika kak pri-
17. zvanie i professiya // VeberM. Izbrannye proizvedeniya.M.: 1990. S. 644-706.
18. Podrobnee sm.: AllisonG.T. Essence of Decision: Explaining the CubanMissile Crisis //GrahamT.Allison. Boston: Little, Brown and
19. Company, 1971. P. 67-100, 144-182.
20. Kortunov S. V. Sovremennaya vneshnyaya politika Rossii: strategiya izbiratel'noi vovlechennosti // S. V. Kortunov.M.: Izd.
21. dom Gos. un-ta - Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, 2009. S. 160.
22. Haas R.M. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination // InternationalOrganization. 1992.Vol. 46,
23. №1, Knowledge, Power and International Policy Coordination, P. 14.
24. Analiz vozrastaniya znacheniya analiticheskikh tsentrov v rezul'tate obshchego izmeneniya amerikanskoi politicheskoi siste-
25. my (dlya kotorogo proval vo V'etname stal lish' odnim iz faktorov, naryadu so mnozhestvom drugikh, preimushchestvenno vnu-
26. tripoliticheskikh prichin) sm.: RicciD.M. TheTransformation ofAmerican Politics.TheNewWashington and the Rise ofThinkTanks //
27. DavidM. Ricci. New Haven, London:Yale University Press, 1993.
28. Thinking the Unthinkable / Bratislava: UNDP Regional Buro for Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States. 2003.
29. Izucheniyuprotsessa stanovleniya i razvitiya amerikanskikh analiticheskikh tsentrov posvyashcheno dostatochnomnogo issledovanii.
30. V ikh chisle sleduet otmetit' monografiyu, spetsial'no posvyashchennuyu ikh vliyaniyu na vneshnyuyu politiku: Abelson D. E. Capitol
31. Idea:ThinkTanks and US Foreign Policy / D. E. Abelson.Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006. Sredi
32. rossiiskikh publikatsii na etu temu neobkhodimo vydelit': VoitolovskiiF. «Proizvodstvo» intellektual'nogo prostranstva
33. mirovoi politiki // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2006. Tom 4.№2.
34. Rich A. ThinkTanks, Public Policy and the Politics of Expertise /A. Rich NY: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2004. P. 15. V svoem issle-
35. dovaniiA. Rich ne uchityval analiticheskie tsentry, affilirovannye s universitetami (khotya ukazal ikh obshchee chislo - 625)
36. ili gosudarstvennymi organami. Krome togo, provedennoe issledovanie ne mozhet schitat'sya vpolne tochnym v otnoshenii
37. izmeneniya chisla tsentrov, tak kak za proshedshie tridtsat' let oni ne tol'ko poyavlyalis', no i ischezali.Odnako ono dosta-
38. tochno khorosho otrazhaet obshchuyu tendentsiyu samogo rosta.
39. McGann J. The Global «Go-To Think Tanks»: The Leading Public Policy Research Organisations in theWorld // http://www.foreignpolicy.
40. com/files/2008_Global_Go_To_Think_Tanks.pdf. P. 11. V dannom sluchae mozhno govorit' o protsesse rastushchei konsoli-
41. datsii ekspertizy.
42. Podrobnee o tipologii voin sm.: KhrustalevM.A.Analiz mezhdunarodnykh situatsii i politicheskaya ekspertiza: ocherki teo-
43. rii i metodologi //M.A. Khrustalev.M.: NOFMO, 2008. S. 24-27.
44. Bolee podrobno o prakticheskoi orientatsii teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii sm.: Chernoff F. Conventionalismas an Adequate
45. Basis for Policy-Relevant IRTheory // European Journal of International Relations. 2009.Vol. 15.№1.
46. Biografii issledovatelei, pereshedshikh na rabotu v Belyi dom v kachestve sovetnikov po natsional'noi bezopasnosti, sm.:
47. KokoshinA.A. Serye kardinaly Belogo doma //A.A. Kokoshin.M.:APN, 1986. Krome togo, podrobnyi analiz uchastiya uchenykh,
48. predstavlyayushchikh realisticheskuyuparadigmu amerikanskoi politicheskoi nauki, sm.:PobedashD.Professura pravit mirom:
49. politicheskii realizm i pravyashchaya elita SShA // Svobodnaya mysl'. 2006.№7-8. Neobkhodimo otmetit', chto khotya predsta-
50. viteli realizma naibolee chasto rekrutiruyutsya v politicheskuyu elitu, storonniki drugikh paradigm takzhe periodicheski
51. okazyvayutsya na vysshikh pravitel'stvennykh dolzhnostyakh.
52. Analogichnymobrazom«vrashchayushchiesya dveri» pozvolyayut i kadrovymchinovnikamporabotat' v universitetakh, analiticheskikh
53. tsentrakh, biznese. V spetsial'nomnomere Elektronnogozhurnala Gosdepa, posvyashchennom«mozgovymtrestam», privedena krat-
54. kaya informatsiya o naibolee izvestnykh litsakh, migrirovavshikh mezhdu gosudarstvennoi sluzhboi i analiticheskimi tsentra-
55. mi (Vneshnyaya politika SShA. Elektronnyi zhurnal Gosdepartamenta SShA. 2002.Tom 7.№3. S. 46-48).
56. Znachenie ubezhdenii v politicheskom protsesse bylo kontseptualizirovano v rabotakh P.Sabatira i G.Dzhenkins-Smita, po-
57. svyashchennykh fenomenu «ideinykh koalitsii» (sm.: Sabatier P.A.,WeibleC.M.TheAdvocacyCoalition Framework: Innovations and
58. Clarifications //Theories of the Policy Process, Second Edition // ed. PaulA. Sabatier Boulder, CO:Westview Press, 2007).
59. Opredelakh ratsional'nogomyshleniya sm. stat'i britanskogofilosofaM.Oukshota: Ratsionalizmv politike i Ratsional'noe
60. povedenie v sbornike Ratsionalizm v politike i drugie stat'i //M.Oukshot.M.: Ideya-Press, 2002. S. 7-64.
61. Podrobnyi analiz sootnosheniya ideologii i nauki sm.: VoitolovskiiF. G. Edinstvo i razobshchennost' Zapada: ideologi-
62. cheskoe otrazhenie v soznanii elit SShA i Zapadnoi Evropy transformatsii politicheskogo miroporyadka 1940-2000-e gg. /
63. F. G. Voitolovskii.M.: Kraft+, 2007.S. 42-48.Avtor monografii protivopostavlyaet ekspertno-ideologicheskii kompleks
64. SShA strogo nauchnym issledovaniyam.Slozhno ne soglasit'sya s tochkoi zreniya avtora, chto ideologicheskii komponent pochti
65. vsegda prisutstvuet v politicheskikh razrabotkakh amerikanskikh avtorov. V to zhe vremya stoit izbegat' ego absolyutizatsii.
66. V razlichnykh rabotakh ideologicheskiefaktory vliyayut v razlichnoi stepeni, poetomu vstaet vopros o stepeni vliyaniya ideo-
67. logii (podrobnee sm.: Khrustalev M. A. Analiz mezhdunarodnykh situatsii i politicheskaya ekspertiza: ocherki teorii i me-
68. todologi //M.A. Khrustalev.M.: NOFMO, 2008.S. 34-35). Politicheskuyu ekspertizu sleduet rassmatrivat' skoree kak sin-
69. teticheskoe yavlenie na styke nauchnoi i ideologicheskoi deyatel'nosti. V otsutstvii balansa mezhdu etimi aspektami ona te-
70. ryaet svoyu poleznost' dlya protsessa prinyatiya reshenii.
71. Eto vovse ne oznachaet, chto issledovateli skhodyatsya otnositel'no kharaktera i stepeni vliyaniya (sm.:AbelsonD. E.DoThinkTanks
72. Matter?Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes // D. E.AbelsonMontreal & Kingston:McGill-Queen’sUniversity Press, 2002.
73. P. 49-57).
74. Podrobnee o razlichnykh tipakh ekspertno-analiticheskoi raboty sm.: Bogdanov R. G. SShA: informatsiya i vneshnyaya politika /
75. R. G. Bogdanov iA.A. KokoshinM.: Nauka, 1979. S. 67; Khrustalev M. A. Analiz mezhdunarodnykh situatsii i politicheskaya eks-
76. pertiza: ocherki teorii i metodologi /M.A. Khrustalev.M.: NOFMO, 2008. S. 94-95.
77. Odin iz krupneishikh issledovatel'skikh tsentrov v SShA.
78. Dikson P. Fabriki mysli / P.Dikson.M.:OOO «Izdatel'stvoAST», 2004. S. 88-89.
79. VitgenshteinL.Logiko-filosofskii traktat /Tractatus logico-philosophicus /L.Vitgenshtein.M.:Kanon+ROOI«Reabilitatsiya»,
80.
81. Ish-Shalom P. Theory as a HermeneuticalMechanism:The Democratic-PeaceThesis and the Politics of Democratization // European
82. Journal of International Relations. 2006.Vol. 12,№4.
83. Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii / S. Khantington.M.: 2003.
84. Ponyatie «umnoi sily» poyavilos' v amerikanskoi publitsistike v stat'e S. Nossel' (podrobnee sm.: Nossel S. Smart Power //
85. ForeignAffairs. 2004.№2) kak sochetanie «zhestkoi sily» i «myagkogo vliyaniya».Teoreticheskaya razrabotka etoi problemati-
86. ki osushchestvlyalas' Dzh. Naem: Nye J. S. The Paradox of American Power:Why theWorld’sOnly Superpower Can’t Go It Alone / Joseph
87. S. Nye.Oxford:OxfordUniversity Press, 2002; Nye J.S. Soft Power:TheMeans to Success inWorld Politics / Joseph S. Nye. N.Y.:
88. PublicAffairs, 2004. Pervym ofitsial'nym predstavitelem amerikanskogo rukovodstva, publichno zayavivshim o priverzhen-
89. nosti amerikanskoi diplomatii idee «umnoi sily», stala Kh. Klinton v khode rassmotreniya ee kandidatury na post gosse-
90. kretarya (sm.: Statement of Senator Hillary RodhamClinton. Nominee for Secretary of State. Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
91. January 13, 2009 // http://foreign.senate.gov/testimony/2009/ClintonTestimony090113a.pdf). V deistvitel'nosti dialektika
92. «myagkoi» i «zhestkoi» sily predstavlyaet soboi zanovo sformulirovannuyuideyuo razlichnykh, v tom chisle nevoennykh putyakh
93. vliyaniya, vedushchuyuotschet s samykh istokovmezhdunarodno-politicheskikh issledovanii, v tomchisle zafiksirovannoi G.Mor-
94. gentau na zare izucheniyamezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. V svoemopisaniishesti printsipov politicheskogo realizma on pishet:
95. «Vlast' vklyuchaet v sebya vse, chto ustanavlivaet i uderzhivaet kontrol' cheloveka nad chelovekom.Takimobrazom, vlast' vklyu-
96. chaet v sebya vse sotsial'nye otnosheniya, kotorye sluzhat etoi tseli ot fizicheskogo nasiliya do samykh nezametnykh psikhologi-
97. cheskikh svyazei, s pomoshch'yukotorykh odin umkontroliruet drugoi» (MorgenthauH. J. PoliticsAmongNations.TheStruggle for Power
98. and Peace / Hans J.Morgenthau: revised KennethW.Thompson.McGraw Hill, 1993. P. 9).
99. Pokhozhaya problema byla zafiksirovanadazhe v otnosheniimenee iskushennykh v politicheskikh voprosakh issledovatelei, pred-
100. stavlyayushchikh estestvennonauchnye distsipliny.Sm.: SchillingW. Scientists, Foreign Policy and Politics //TheAmerican PoliticalScience
101. Review. 1962.№2. P. 289.
102. V stanovlenii ekspertno-analiticheskoi industrii otmechayut sotsial'no-politicheskie (RicciD.M.TheTransformation ofAmerican
103. Politics.The NewWashington and the Rise ofThinkTanks // DavidM. Ricci. New Haven, London:Yale University Press, 1993),
104. ekonomicheskie (RichA. ThinkTanks, Public Policy and the Politics of Expertise /A. RichNY:CambridgeUniversity Press, 2004) i ideo-
105. logo-politicheskie (sovetskie avtory, v pervuyu ochered' Kobrinskaya I. Ya.: «Mozgovye tresty» i vneshnyaya politika SShA /
106. I. Ya. Kobrinskaya.M.:Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1986. S. 5) faktory.
107. Predstavlenie o stepeni zagruzhennosti gosudarstvennogo apparata daet, naprimer: ShearM. D. InWestWing:Grueling Schedules,
108. Bleary Eyes // Washington Post 13.07.2009. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/12
109. AR2009071202081.html. V dannoi svyazi lyubopytno zamechanie avtoritetnogo issledovatelya «mozgovykh trestov»Dzh.Mak-
110. Ganna otnositel'no evolyutsii sredy, v kotoroi operiruyut litsa, prinimayushchie resheniya: esli v nachaleXX v. eksperty byli
111. nuzhny, tak kak politikam ne khvatalo informatsii, to seichas oni neobkhodimy, tak kak informatsii slishkom mnogo (sm.:Mak-
112. GannDzh. G. «Mozgovye tresty» i transnatsionalizatsiya vneshnei politiki // Vneshnyaya politikaSShA. Elektronnyi zhurnal
113. Gosdepartamenta SShA. 2002.Tom 7.№3. S. 15).
114. V svoei monografiiD.Abel'son opisyvaet istoriyu 1970-kh gg., kogda apparat Kongressa poluchil issledovanieAmerikan-
115. skogo instituta predprinimatel'stva po voprosu, kotoryi obsuzhdalsya za nedelyudo etogo.Uverennost', chto poyavlenie ego
116. vovremya povliyalo byna itog golosovaniya, predopredelilo reshenieP. Veirikha i E.Felnera sozdat'Fond naslediya - tsentr,
117. kotoryi otslezhivaet tekushchuyupovestku dnya v postoyannom rezhime i predostavlyaet analiz vovremya (AbelsonD. E.Capitol Idea:
118. ThinkTanks and US Foreign Policy / D. E.Abelson.Montreal&Kingston:McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006. P. 85).
119. Stone D. ThinkTanks beyondNation States //ThinkTanksTraditions. Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas / Diane Stone,Andrew
120. Denham, Eds.Manchester, NY:Manchester University Press, 2004. P. 45.
121. Otechestvennyi issledovatel'D. G. Zaitsev predlozhil ponyatie sub"ektno-institutsional'nogo dualizma dlya opisaniya eto-
122. gofenomena.Sm.: ZaitsevD. G. Analiticheskie tsentrykak sub"ektypoliticheskogo protsessa.Avtoreferat dissertatsii na so-
123. iskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata politicheskikh nauk /D. G. Zaitsev.M.: 2009. S. 8.
124. Sm., v chastnosti:RicciD.M.TheTransformation ofAmericanPolitics:TheNewWashington and theRise ofThinkTanks /D.M.Ricci.New
125. Haven,Conn.:YaleUniversityPress, 1993;McGannJ.G.TheCompetition forDollars,Scholars, and Influence in thePublicPolicyResearch
126. Industry / J.G.McGann. N.Y.:University Press ofAmerica, 1995; Abelson D. E.AmericanThinkTanks and their Role inU.S. Foreign Policy
127. /D. E.Abelson.N.Y.:St.Martin’s Press, 1996; StoneD.Capturing the Political Imagination:ThinkTanks and the Policy Process /D.Stone.
128. Portland,Ore.: Frank Cass, 1996; Abelson D. E. DoThinkTanksMatter?Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes / D. E.Abelson.
129. Montreal:McGill-Queen’sUniversity Press, 2002; RichA.ThinkTanks, Public Policy and the Politics of Expertise /A. Rich.N.Y.:CambridgeUniversity
130. Press, 2004; Abelson D. E. ACapitol Idea:ThinkTanks andUS Foreign Policy / D. E.AbelsonMontreal:McGill-Queen’s
131. UniversityPress, 2006.Sredi otechestvennykh rabot podannoi tematike stoit vydelit' sleduyushchie: KobrinskayaI.Ya. «Mozgovye tresty»ivneshnyayapolitikaSShA/I.Ya.Kobrinskaya.M.:Mezhdunarodnyeotnosheniya, 1986;Petrov-skiiV.F.Amerikanskayavnesh-
132. nepoliticheskayamysl'.Kriticheskii obzor organizatsii,metodov i soderzhaniya burzhuaznykh issledovanii vSShApo voprosam
133. mezhdunarodnykhotnosheniiivneshneipolitiki/V.F.Petrovskii.M.: «Mezhdunarodnyeotnosheniya», 1976;SheidinaI.L.SShA:
134. «fabriki mysli» na sluzhbe strategii / I.L.Sheidina.M.: Nauka, 1973;Makarychev A. S. Idei dlya politiki: Evolyutsiya siste-
135. myvneshnepoliticheskoi ekspertizyvSShA(seredina 1940-kh-nachalo 1990-kh godov) /A.S.Makarychev.N.Novgorod:NNGU, 1998.
136. Otechestvennye issledovateli datiruyut ego poyavlenie 1960-mi gg. (Kobrinskaya I. Ya. «Mozgovye tresty» i vneshnyaya poli-
137. tika SShA / I. Ya. Kobrinskaya.M.:Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1986. S. 5).
138. V otechestvennoi nauchnoi literature i osobenno publitsistike slozhilsya rezko kriticheskii vzglyad na «mozgovye tresty» is-
139. klyuchitel'no kak na instrumentypropagandy(sm., naprimer:NarochnitskayaN. «Analiticheskie instituty» - glaza, ushi imozg
140. Ameriki // http://www.nash-sovremennik.ru/p.php?y=2004&n=3&id=2).Podobnyi podkhod slabo otrazhaet protivorechivost' po-
141. lozheniya «mozgovykh trestov», nakhodyashchikhsya na styke politiki i ekspertizy. Naibolee gluboko podobnaya protivorechivost'
142. proanalizirovana v rabotakh molodogo amerikanskogo sotsiologaT.Medvettsa (sm.: MedvetzT.TerraObscura: «ThinkTanks» in
143. theU.S. Field of Power // Paper prepared for JuniorTheorists Symposium, sponsored by theTheory section of theAmerican SociologicalAssociation,
144. HarvardUniversity, July 31, 2008).
145. V ezhegodnom otchete korporatsii RENDza 2008 g. soobshchaetsya, chto kolichestvo klientov organizatsii prevysilo 800. V 2008
146. finansovom godu 78 % byudzheta korporatsii bylo polucheno za schet kontraktov, grantov i vyplat razlichnykh agentstv pra-
147. vitel'stvaSShA(Setting PoliticsAside.The RANDCorporationAnnual Report 2008 // http://www.rand.org/about/annual_report/2008
148. P. 23, 38-39, 45).
149. Sushchestvennoi problemoi ekspertnykh podrazdelenii ispolnitel'noi vlasti, kotorye dolzhnyobespechivat' ne tol'ko ana-
150. liz, no i planirovanie, yavlyaetsya ikh priblizhennost' k litsam, prinimayushchimresheniya, i, sootvetstvenno, k ikh prioritetam.
151. Uchityvaya orientatsiyu politikov v pervuyu ochered' na tekushchuyu situatsiyu, podobnye podrazdeleniya peregruzheny rabotoi
152. nad kon"yunkturnymi problemami i sushchestvuet opasnost' poteri sposobnosti k strategicheskomu videniyu.Podrobnee o di-
153. skussii po etomu povodu sm.:MadarD. Patronage, Position and Policy Planning:S/P andSecretary Kissinger // Journal of Politics.November
154. P. 1073.Otom, chto eta problema ostaetsya aktual'noi, svidetel'stvuet ee prikladnaya postanovka v: FriedbergA. L.
155. StrengtheningU.S. Strategic Planning //TheWashingtonQuarterly.Winter 2007-2008.
156. Spetsial'noe issledovanie, posvyashchennoe etomu analiticheskomu institutu Kongressa, bylo provedeno otechestvennym is-
157. sledovatelemO. V. Safronovoi (sm.: SafronovaO. V. Issledovatel'skaya sluzhba Kongressa SShA: istoriya sozdaniya i ana-
158. liz osnovnykh aspektov deyatel'nosti. N. Novgorod: Izd-vo Nizhegorodskogo gos. un-ta, 2002).
159. Kak budet pokazano nizhe, zakazchika issledovanii nezavisimykh analiticheskikh tsentrov zachastuyuvoobshche slozhno vyyavit',
160. oni obsluzhivayut sotsial'nyi zakaz.
161. V angliiskom yazyke oni imenuyutsya «endowment», to est' fondy, ch'i sredstva vkladyvayutsya v tsennye bumagi, pribyl' ot
162. operatsii s kotorymi idet na finansirovanie organizatsii.
163. V chastnosti, sredstva, poluchennye blagodarya tselevomufonduInstituta Brukingsa, v 2008finansovomgodu sostavili lish'
164. % ot dokhodnoi chasti ego byudzheta (sm.: Brookings Institute 2008 Annual Report // http://www.brookings.edu/about/~/media
165. Files/about/annualreport/2008/2008_complete.pdf. P. 39).Podrobnee ob istochnikakhfinansirovaniya mozgovykh trestov sm.:
166. Wiarda H. J.The New Powerhouses:ThinkTanks and Foreign Policy //American Foreign Policy Interests. 2008.№2. P. 115.
167. Yuridicheskoe osnovanie: U.S. Internal Revenue Code § 170 // http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/170.html.
168. Weidenbaum M. The Competition of Ideas:TheWorld ofWashingtonThinkTanks //MurrayWeidenbeum.Washington:Transaction
169. Publishers, 2008.
170. Ibid.
171. V 1947 g. pri sozdaniiOtdela pered nim byli postavleny sleduyushchie tseli:formulirovanie dolgosrochnykh programm, pro-
172. gnozirovanie problem, provedenie issledovanii poshirokim voenno-politicheskim temam i otsenka adekvatnosti tekushchego
173. kursa (Bloomfield L. P. Planning Foreign Policy: Can It Be done? // Political ScienceQuarterly. 1978.Vol. 93.№3. P. 371).
174. KobrinskayaI.Ya. «Mozgovye tresty» i vneshnyaya politikaSShA /I.Ya. Kobrinskaya.M.:Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1986.S. 7.
175. ICAssociates Programme // http://www.dni.gov/nic/IC_associates.html.
176. The Studio at Brookings // http://www.brookings.edu/media/Broadcast-Studio.aspx.
177. Stone D. Introduction:ThinkTanks, PolicyAdvice andGovernance //ThinkTankTraditions: Policy Research andThee Politics of Ideas.
178. Manchester, N.Y.:Manchester University Press, 2004. P. 13.
179. Tochnee, mezhdu tem, kto v dannyi moment yavlyaetsya ekspertom, i tem, kto v dannyi moment - chinovnikom.
180. Murden S.W. The Problem of Force: Grappling with the Global Battlefield / SimonW. Murden. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers,
181. P. 120-121.
182. O znachimosti marketingovoi sostavlyayushchei deyatel'nosti Fonda svidetel'stvuet struktura ego byudzheta. Soglasno ezhe-
183. godnomu otchetu v 2008 g., na rabotu s pressoi i gosudarstvennymi organami bylo potracheno bolee 14 mln dollarov, chto so-
184. stavilo pochti 22%ot vsekh raskhodov.Dlya sravneniya: na issledovatel'skuyu rabotu bylo zatracheno vsego 37%sredstv. Bo-
185. lee togo, naryadu s issledovaniyamiFond realizuetmasshtabnuyuobrazovatel'nuyuprogrammu dlya gosudarstvennykh sluzhashchikh i sotrudnikov apparataKongressa. Estestvenno, v ramkakh etikh programmon poluchaet dopolnitel'nye vozmozhnosti prodvigat'
186. idei i predlozheniya svoikh ekspertov. Podrobnee sm.: The Heritage Foundation 2008 Annual Report. Leadership for America //
187. http://www.heritage.org/About/upload/THF_08_Annual_Report.pdf.
188. Rich E., Uiver K. R. Propagandisty i analitiki: «mozgovye tsentry» i politizatsiya ekspertov // Pro et Contra. 2003.
189. Tom 8.№2. C. 84. Podobnaya situatsiya sootvetstvuet paradoksu, sformulirovannomu otechestvennym publitsistom
190. A. Ashkerovym: «Chem bolee skorostnymi i nasyshchennymi stanovyatsya informatsionnye potoki, tem men'she voz-
191. mozhnostei polucheniya novogo znaniya i tem somnitel'nee status novizny informatsionnykh produktov» (Ashkerov A.
192. Ekspertokratiya. Upravlenie znaniyami. Proizvodstvo i obrashchenie informatsii v epokhu ul'trakapitalizma / An-
193. drei Ashkerov. M.: Evropa, 2009. S. 8).
194. Orazlichiyakh okruzheniya uchenykh i sfery politiki sm.:MakarychevA.S.Idei dlya politiki. Evolyutsiya sistemy vneshnepoliti-
195. cheskoi ekspertizy v SShA (seredina 1940-kh-nachalo 1990-kh gg.) /A. S.Makarychev. N. Novgorod: Izd-vo NNGU, 1998. S. 220-221.
196. Odnim iz poslednikh primerov podobnogo priznaniya stalo vystuplenie Gosudarstvennogo sekretarya Kh. Klinton v Sovete
197. po vneshnei politike (sm.: Clinton H. R. Foreign PolicyAddress at the Council on Foreign Relations // http://www.state.gov/secretary
198. rm/2009a/july/126071.htm).
199. Kolichestvennoe issledovanie amerikanskikh politologov L. Yakobsa i B. Peidzha (sm.: Jacobs L. R., Page B. I.Who Influences
200. U.S. Foreign Policy? //TheAmerican Political Science Review. 2005.Vol. 99.№1) demonstriruet, chto sushchestvuet bol'shaya zavi-
201. simost' mezhdu publikatsiyami ekspertov i vneshnepoliticheskimi deistviyami pravitel'stva po sravneniyu s korrelyatsiya-
202. mi gruppyinteresov - deistviya pravitel'stva i obshchestvennoemnenie - deistviya pravitel'stva. V tozhe vremya oni ne smog-
203. li ustanovit' vektor takoi zavisimosti: vliyayut li rekomendatsii ekspertov na resheniya politikov ili politiki ispol'zuyut
204. ikh dlya legitimizatsii sobstvennykh shagov.
Review
For citations:
Istomin I.A. Analytical and scientific support mechanism of the US foreign policy process. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2009;(6(9)):97-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2009-6-9-97-110
Views:
631
ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)
Email this article 