Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Berlin Congress 1878 Through the Eyes of Phanariot Alexander Karateodori Pashi

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2021-4-79-7-25

Abstract

The article contributes to the historical literature on the Berlin Congress; it shows the events of the summer of 1878 through the eyes of the diplomats of the defeated Otto man Empire. The primary source for the article is the “Rapport” by the head of the Turkish delegation to the Сongress, Alexander Karathéodori Pasha (1833–1906), a Phanariote with Greek and Bulgarian roots, the son of the personal physician of Sultan Mahmud II and the first Ottoman lawyer. He graduated from the Sorbonne law faculty with a doctorate in law. Until recently, Turkish historians wrote about him more as a diplomat. However, in recent years, they started to pay attention to his extraordinary fate, the history of his family, in which there were many famous Phanariots. “Rapport” only in recent years began to attract the at tention of historians. The history of its creation is still unclear. It contains fascinating details of the relationship between representatives of a collective Europe at that time, the nature of their interests, and factors that outlined the fate of the Balkan region for decades to come. The report was written by Ottoman dignitaries when the Balkans finally became a “border area.” Its author noticed how the “big players” ’s geopolitical contradictions pushed the local people’s historical evolution along the “path” of future cataclysms. Alexander Karathéodori Pasha conveys, through seemingly minor details, the discord between the representatives of the “collective West” “and their desire to stop the attempts of the Ottoman Empire to follow the European paradigm of development. Against the background of the events in Berlin, Karathéodori eased the participants’ desires to start the quickest part of the “Ottoman inheritance” and drew attention to the beginning process of restructuring of international relations. He viewed the Berlin Congress analytically and realized its long-term implications.

About the Authors

R. Mihneva
Varna Free University "Chernorizets Hrabar"
Bulgaria

Rumyana Mihneva – Prof. D.Sc.

9007 Varna, k.k. Chaika, Yanko Slavchev 84



V. Kolev
Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski
Bulgaria

Valery Kolev – Associate Professor, Ph.D.

1504 Sofia, Tsar-Liberator Boulevard, 15



References

1. Генов Г.П. 1940. България и Европа. Сан-Стефано и Берлин. 1878. София: Българска историческа библиотека. 68 с.

2. Христов Хр. 1968. Освобождението на България и политиката на западните държа- ви. 1876 – 1878. София: БАН. 254 с.

3. Глени М. Реалният Берлински конгрес. Либерален преглед. С. 140-157. URL: http://www.librev.com/index.php/2013-03-30-08-56-39/prospects/europe/2046-2013-05-02-13-01-04 (дата обращения 21.08.2021)

4. Јакшић Г. 1955. Босна и Херцеговина на Берлинском конгресу. Београд: Народна књига. 67 с.

5. Маринковић М. 2009. Таjни мемоар Александра Каратеодори-паше са Берлинског конгреса. Историjски часопис. Књ. LVIII. С. 249-260. Протоколите на Берлинский конгрес. 1885. Прев. и изд. Т. Икономов. София: Книго- печатница Янко С. Ковачев. 246 с.

6. Урумов В. 2014. Анализ на международноправното положение на Вестфалския ми- рен договор от 1648 г. Юридическо списание на НБУ. №4. С. 56-76.

7. Akpınar M. 2010. Bir Tanzimat Bürokratı ve Diplomatı Olarak Aleksandır Karatodori Paşa, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Konya. 270 p.

8. Akpınar M. 2015.Osmanlı Hariciye Nazırları (1836-1922). Social ve beşeri bilimler araştirmaları dergisi Güz. Issue 35. P. 173–205.

9. Albin P. 1912. Le traité de San Stefano (19 fevrier/3 mars 1878). Les grands traités politiques. Recueil des principaux textes diplomatique depuis 1815 jusqu'à nos jours. Paris, F.Alcan. Р. 187- 201.

10. Barreille B. 1917. Les Turcs. Ce que fut leur empire, leurs comédies politiques. Paris: Perrin et Co. 324 р. https://archive.org/details/lesturcscequefut00bare/page/n5/mode/2up (accessed 21.08.2021)

11. Barreille В. 1919. Le Rapport secret sur le Congrès de Berlin adressé à la S. Porte par Karatheodory Pacha, premier plénipotentiaire ottoman, Paris. Paris: Editions Bossard. 204 p. https://archive.org/details/lerapportsecrets00bareuoft/page/6/mode/2up (accessed 21.08.2021)

12. Bаreilles B. 1918. Constantinople. Ses cités franques et levantines. Paris: Éditions Bossard. 422 p. https://archive.org/details/constantinoplese00bare (accessed 21.08.2021)

13. Çetin G. | 2007. Le français dans le contexte des réformes en Turquie à la fin du XIXe siècle : un témoignage. Documents pour l’histoire du français langue étrangère ou seconde. 38/39. http://journals.openedition.org/dhfles/296 (accessed 21.08.2021)

14. Davison R. 1979. The Secret Report on the Congress of Berlin. Tarih Dergisi. №32. Mart Istanbul. Р. 639-652.

15. Der Weg des Magdeburger Hugenotten Ludwig C.F. Detroit inspiriert noch immer. 2018. Hugenotten. 85(2). Р. 51-71; Detroit (Detroy), Ludwig Carl Friedrich (Mehemed Ali-Pascha) https://www.deutsche-biographie.de/ppn136192335.html#top (accessed 21.08.2021)

16. Efe P. 2010. Bis Osmanlı bürocratı Aleksandır Karatodori pasa Tarih Vakfı. Toplumsal Tarihi. №193. Р. 83-93.

17. Georgeon Fr. 1988. La montée du nationalisme turc dans l'État ottoman (1908-1914). Bilan et perspectives. Revue del'Occident musulman et de la Méditerranée. №50. Turquie, la croisée des chemins. Р. 30-44. DOI:10.3406/remmm.1988.2252https://www.persee.fr/doc/remmm_0035-1474_1988_num_50_1_2252 (accessed 21.08.2021)

18. Georgiadou M. 2003. Expert Knowledge between Tradition and Reform. Carathéodorys: a Neo-Phanariot Family in 19 Century Constantinople. Médecins et ingénieurs Ottomans a l’age des nationalismes. Meropi Anastassiadou-Dumont (dir.). Paris, Istanbul, IFEA, Maisonneuve & Larose, P. 243-294.

19. Hertslet Ed. 1878. Preliminary Treaty of Peace between Russia and Turkey. Signed at San Stefano 19 February, 3 March 1878 (Translation). The Map of Europe by Treaty; which have taken place since the general peace of 1814. With numerous maps and notes. Vol. IV (1875- 1891). London: Butterworths. Р. 2672-2696.

20. Hotopp-Riecke M. Der Pascha aus Magdeburg: Reflexionen. lrritationen. http://ikee.lib.auth.gr/record/126790/files/GRI-2011-6867.pdf (accessed 21.08.2021); https://paschamd.jimdo.com/biographien/mehmed-ali-pascha/ (accessed 21.08.2021)

21. Hurewitz J.C. 1961. Ottoman Diplomacy and the European State System. The Middle East Journal. XV/2. Р. 141-152.

22. Jelavich B. 1973. The Ottoman Empire, the Great Powers and the Straits Question 1870- 1887. Ontario: Indiana University Press. 209 p.

23. Mahmud Celâleddin Paşa. 1983. Mir’at-ı Hakîkat. Haz: İsmet Miroğlu. İstanbul: Berekât. 739 s.

24. Mahoney J. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society. 29(4). Р. 507-548.

25. Medlicott W.N. 1938. The Congress of Berlin and after: A Diplomatic History of the NearEastern Settlement, 1878-1880. London: Methuen.. 442 p.

26. Methodieva M. 2021. Between Empire and Nation: Muslim Reform in the Balkans. Stanford University Press. 344 p.

27. Novotny A. 1957. Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte des Berliner Kongresses 1878, Bd. 1. Österreich, die Türkei und das Balkanproblem im Jahre des Berliner Kongresses, Graz-Köln. 16 s.

28. Beskrovnyj L.G. 1977. Ot San-Stefano do Berlinskogo kongressa (k diplomaticheskoj istorii russko-tureckoj vojny 1877-1878 gg.) [From San Stefano to the Berlin Congress (on the Diplomatic History of the Russian-Turkish War of 1877-1878)]. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i vneshnyaya politika SSSR. Moscow. P. 138-149. (In Russian)

29. Vinogradov V.N. 1991. Britanskij lev na Bosfore [The British Lion on the Bosphorus.]. Moscow: Nauka. 167 p. (In Russian)

30. Vitol A.V. 1973. Turciya i evropejskie derzhavy na Berlinskom kongresse (1878 g.) [Turkey and the European Powers at the Berlin Congress (1878)]. Tyurkologicheskij sbornik. Moscow. P. 121-142. (In Russian)

31. Zadohin A.G., Nizovskij A.Yu. 2000. Porohovoj pogreb Evropy [The Powder Magazine of Europe]. Moscow: Veche. 416 p. (In Russian)

32. Zolotarev V.A. 2005. Protivoborstvo imperij. Vojna 1877-1878 gg. apofeoz vostochnogo krizisa: Animi Fortitudo [The Confrontation of Empires. The War of 1877-1878. The Apotheosis of the Eastern Crisis: Apimi Fortitudo]. Moscow. 567 p. (In Russian)

33. Narochnickij A.L. 1976. Balkanskij krizis 1875-1878 godov i velikie derzhavy [The Balkan Crisis of 1875-1878 and the Great Powers]. Voprosy istorii. №11. P. 32-52. (In Russian) Rediger A.F. 1999. Istoriya moej zhizni. Vospominaniya voennogo ministra [The Story of my Life. Memoirs of the Minister of War]. T. I. Moscow: Kanon-press; Kuchkovo pole. 576 p. (In Russian)

34. Chernov S.L. 1984. Rossiya na zavershayushchem etape Vostochnogo krizisa 1875-1878 gg. [Russia at the Final Stage of the Eastern Crisis of 1875-1878.]. Moscow: MGU. 144 p. (In Russian)

35.


Review

For citations:


Mihneva R., Kolev V. Berlin Congress 1878 Through the Eyes of Phanariot Alexander Karateodori Pashi. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2021;14(4):7-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2021-4-79-7-25

Views: 1542


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)