The Czechoslovak Crisis of 1948 in the Perception of American Diplomats and Media
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2021-4-79-26-50
Abstract
In February 1948, during the political crisis in Czechoslovakia was established a communist regime. This event completed the formation of the Soviet bloc in Europe. It directly impacted the US containment policy towards the USSR and the escalation of the Cold War. Based on archival documents and newspapers articles, the research studies these events through their perception by American media and diplomats, whose opinions and interpretations had great and decisive importance for the US public opinion and its government official reaction. The author concludes that the Czechoslovak crisis of 1948 aroused considerable interest and severe reaction in the United States. It was considered as a part of growing Soviet-American contradictions and international tension. Despite the fears of a communist coup in Czechoslovakia expressed back in 1947, American experts could not accurately predict the onset time of the crisis and its nature. The rapidity of the crisis, the Communist’s reaction, and decisiveness, lack of direct Soviet intervention, as well as the absence of democratic resistance, became a surprise for American journalists and diplomats. They believed that the communist takeover was a manifestation of Soviet expansion and the Kremlin’s desire to consolidate its control over all Eastern Europe. Despite the external legitimacy, the transfer of power to the left forces was interpreted as a coup d'état that final ized the establishment of the totalitarian regime in Czechoslovakia. Nevertheless, the US government refused to sever diplomatic relations with Prague and to initiate an international investigation. Washington found no direct evidence of Soviet intervention. It had to accept the changes in Czechoslovakia, focusing its forces on the inadmissibility of this scenario in Western Europe. The crisis directly influenced the adoption of the Marshall Plan and the intensification of the containment policy.
Keywords
About the Author
A. V. ZorinRussian Federation
Artem V. Zorin – Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of History and Political Sciences
610000, 36 Moskovskaya str., Kirov
References
1. Chekhiya i Slovakiya v XX veke: ocherki istorii. V 2 knigakh. Kniga 2. 2005. (Czechia and Slovakia in the Twentieth Century: Essays on History. In 2 books. Book 2). Moscow: Nauka. 558 p. (In Russian)
2. Diamond W. 1947. Czechoslovakia between East and West. London: Stevens and sons ltd. 258 p.
3. Gaddis J. L. 1997. We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 425 p.
4. Hogan M. J. 1998. A Cross of Ion. Harry S. Truman and the Origins of the National Security State, 1945–1954. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 525 p.
5. Kolko J., Kolko G. 1972. The Limits of Power. The World and United States Foreign Policy; 1945–1954. New York: Harper & Row. 820 p.
6. Lukes I. 2012. On the Edge of the Cold War: American Diplomats and Spies in Postwar Prague. New York: Oxford University Press. 280 p.
7. Mar'ina V. V. 2013 Vtoroj prezident Chekhoslovakii Edvard Benesh: politik i chelovek. 1884–1948 (The Second President of Czechoslovakia, Edvard Beneš: a Politician and a Person. 1884–1948). Moscow: Indrik. 488 p. (In Russian)
8. Murashko G. P. 2008. Sovetskij Soyuz i obshchestvennye transformacii v Vostochnoj Evrope v 1940–1950e gody. Nekotorye diskussionnye voprosy v sovremennoj rossijskoj i cheshskoj istoriografii (The Soviet Union and Social Transformations in Eastern Europe in the 1940s – 1950s. Some Controversial Issues in Contemporary Russian and Czech Historiography). Vlast' i obshchestvo: neprostye vzaimootnosheniya (Strany Central'noj i YUgo-Vostochnoj Evropy v XX veke) (Power and Society: Difficult Relationships (Countries of Central and South-Eastern Europe in the XX Century)). Moscow: Institut slavyanovedeniya RAN. P. 219–239. (In Russian)
9. Narinskij M. M. 1998. Sovetskij Soyuz, Chekhoslovakiya i plan Marshalla (Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia and the Marshall Plan). Fevral' 1948. Moskva i Praga. Vzglyad cherez polveka (February 1948. Moscow and Prague. A Glance in Half a Century). Moscow: Institut slavyanovedeniya i balkanistiki RAN. P. 67–83. (In Russian)
10. Offner A. Another Such Victory. President Truman and the Cold War, 1945–1953. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 626 p.
11. Orlik I. I. 1998. Chekhoslovackij krizis v fevrale 1948 g. i politika zapadnyh derzhav (The Czechoslovak Crisis in February 1948 and the Policy of the Western Powers). Fevral' 1948. Moskva i Praga. Vzglyad cherez polveka (February 1948. Moscow and Prague. A Glance in Half a Century). Moscow: Institut slavyanovedeniya i balkanistiki RAN. P. 99–106. (In Russian)
12. Potekhin A.V. 1991. Diplomatiya SShA v Vostochnoi Evrope 1945-1950 gg. (US Diplomacy in Eastern Europe 1945-1950). Kiev: Naukova dumka. 138 p. (In Russian)
13. Theoharis A. G. 1970. The Yalta Myths. An Issue in U.S. Politics, 1945–1955. Columbia: University of Missouri press. 263 p.
14. Ullmann W. 1978. The United States in Prague, 1945–1948. New York: Boulder. 205 p.
15. Vstrechnymi kursami: politika SSSR i SShA na Balkanakh, Blizhnem i Srednem Vostoke v 1939-1947 gg. 2015/ pod red. V. T. Yungblyud . (Counter courses: the policy of the USSR and the USA in the Balkans, Near and Middle East in 1939–1947 / ed. by V. T. Yungblyud). Kirov, Vyatka State Humanities University Publ. 510 p.
16. Yergin D. 1977. Shattered Peace. The Origins of the Cold War and the National Security State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. 526 p.
17. Yungblyud V. T. 2015. Novaya i ochen' nuzhnaya paradigma: «Dlinnaya» telegramma Dzh. F. Kennana kak al'ternativa printsipam Yalty (New and Needed Paradigm: J. F. Kennan's "Long" Telegram as an Alternative to the Yalta Principles). Vekhi amerikanskoi istorii. Sbornik statei. (Milestones in American History. Collection of Articles). Moscow, IVI RAN. P. 117–138.
18. Yungblyud, V. T. 1998. «Obrazy Rossiiskoi imperii» i vneshnepoliticheskoe planirovanie v SShA v 1944-1945 gg. («Images of the Russian Empire» and foreign policy planning in the United States in 1944-1945). In SShA: ekonomika, politika, ideologiya. No. 6. p. 66–78.
19. Yungblud V.T. 2020. Mirovoi porjadok 1945 g. – prozess s “otkrytym” prodolzheniem (The 1945 World Order – Process with «Open» Continuation). MGIMO Review of International Relations. 13(4):52-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-4-73-52-79
20. Zorin A. V. 2017. Ofitsial'nyi vizit prezidenta E. Benesha v SShA v 1943 g. (Official visit of President E. Benes to the USA in 1943). Voprosy istorii. № 5. P. 3–15. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Zorin A.V. The Czechoslovak Crisis of 1948 in the Perception of American Diplomats and Media. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2021;14(4):26-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2021-4-79-26-50