Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

The Role of Leaders in Formulation of the Foreign Policy Identity in Egypt

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2021-4-79-70-90

Abstract

The features of the formation of the of the state explains the high level of interest in this scientific problem in the modern theory of international relations. The study of for eign policy identity is capable of providing an understanding of the policy-making activity of the state and its positioning in the international arena. The process of forming a foreign policy identity linked to both objective and subjective factors. The objective factors should be classified as geographical, historical, cultural and religious, the key subjective factors can be considered the role of a leader. This factor is standard for Middle Eastern states, especially for Egypt, where there are traditions of strong centralized powers. Egyptian leaders have supreme power in foreign policy decisions within the framework of the political system. Egypt's foreign policy is often determined by the personal character traits of the country's leaders. This article aims to study the role of the head of the Egypt in the search for foreign policy identity in the context of an identity crisis at the national level. Egypt has a long history of authoritarian rule, because it is impossible to separate national identity from foreign policy identity. Since its independent existence, each period with its own context established a different framework of identity and worldview for decision-makers in the field of Egypt`s foreign policy. The predominance of various elements in ideological as well as worldview in the age of the rule of a particular president has led to noticeable differences in Egypt's foreign policy at the current stage. This article attempts to answer the following research questions: What place does of the institute of the heads of State in foreign policy decisions? How leader's influence does determine the foreign policy role of the state? What changes in foreign policy priorities have taken place during the analysis period? What are the reasons for the differences between the main periods of Egypt's foreign policy in goals, tools and approaches to the outside world? The author comes to the conclusion that the change of the political leader plays an important role in the transformations of Egypt's foreign policy. The article analyzes the main trends in the foreign policy self-perception of Egypt in order to confirm the hypothesis that the foreign policy identity of Egypt had not evolved a discontinuity even in the conditions of dramatic events, whether it is the Arab-Israeli conflict, the Peace treaty with Israel or the events of the Arab Spring.

About the Author

I. E. Ibragimov
Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)
Russian Federation

Ibragim E. Ibragimov – Junior Research fellow at the Center for the Middle East Studies



References

1. Ahmadian H. 2014. Egyptian Foreign Policy Identities. Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs. 5(3). Р. 5-31.

2. Aly A. M.S. 2014. Post-Revolution Egyptian Foreign Policy. Middle East Brief. №86. Р. 1-100

3. Chen T. 2011. Four Points toward the Understanding of Egypt’s Foreign Relations. Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia). 5(1). P. 83-101. DOI:10.1080/19370679.2011.12023175

4. Droz-Vincent P.A 2012. Post-Revolutionary Egyptian Foreign Policy? Not Yet. The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF). P. 1-3.

5. Duman A.H. 2020. Leaders and Egyptian Foreign Policy: Individual Factors During Nasser and Morsi Periods. Ortadoğu Etütleri. 12(2). P. 369-389.

6. Dyson S. B., Preston T. 2006. Individual Characteristics of Political Leaders and the Use of Analogy in Foreign Policy Decision Making. Political Psychology. 27(2). P. 265-288. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00006.x

7. Grimm J., Roll S. 2012. Egyptian Foreign Policy under Mohamed Morsi: Domestic Considerations and Economic Constraints. SWP Comments. №35. P. 1-3.

8. Hermann M.G. Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders. International Studies Quarterly. 1980. 24(1). P. 7-46. DOI:10.2307/2600126

9. Hermann M.G., Hermann C.F. 1989. Who Makes Foreign Policy Decisions and How: An Empirical Inquiry. International Studies Quarterly. 33(4). P. 361-387. DOI:10.2307/2600518

10. Hinnebusch R.A. Ehteshami A. 2002. The Foreign Policies of Middle East States. Lynne Rienner Publishers. 381 p.

11. Hinnebusch R. 2003. The International Politics of the Middle East. Manchester University Press. 262 p.

12. Karawan I. 2005. Foreign Policy Restructuring: Egypt's Disengagement from the Arab– Israeli Conflict Revisited. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 18(3). P. 325-338. DOI:10.22718/kga.2019.3.1.183

13. Karawan I.A. 1994. Sadat and the Egyptian–Israeli Peace Revisited. International Journal of Middle East Studies. 26(2). С. 249-266.

14. Khawaja N.A. 2013. Egypt's Foreign Policy Analysis: From Nasser to Morsi. Pakistan Horizon. 66(1/2). P. 43-63.

15. Korany B. 2012. Egypt: Between Overstretch and Pivotalness in Its Foreign Policy. Diplomacy and Developing Nations: Post-Cold War Foreign Policy-Making Structures and Processes. Routledge. 296 p.

16. Mellor N. 2015. Egyptian Dream. Edinburgh University Press. 200 p.

17. Nasser G.A. 1959. The Philosophy of the Revolution. New York. 119 p.

18. Nixon R. 2013. Leaders: Profiles and Reminiscences of Men Who Have Shaped the Modern World. Simon and Schuster.

19. Sabet A.G.E. 2017. Geopolitics of identity: Egypt’s lost peace. Contemporary Arab Affairs. 10(1). С. 51-92.

20. Selim G. M. 2020. Egyptian Foreign Policy after the 2011 Revolution: the Dynamics of Continuity and Change. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. P. 1-22. DOI: 10.1080/13530194.2020.1747983

21. Shalaby E.S.A. 1992. Egypt's Foreign Policy 1952-1992: Some Personal Reflections. Bulletin of Peace Proposals. 23(3). P. 107-115.

22. Shama N. 2013. Egyptian Foreign Policy from Mubarak to Morsi: Against the National Interest. Routledge. 280 p.

23. Telhami S., Barnett M.N. 2002. Identity and Foreign Policy in the Middle East. Cornell University Press. 224 p.

24. Blizhnij Vostok: Politika i identichnost' [The Middle East: Politics and Identity]. 2020. Collective monograph edited by I. D. Zvyagelskaya. IMEMO RAS. Moscow: Publishing house "Aspect Press". 336 p.

25. Vinogradov V.M. 2012. Egipet: Ot Nasera k Oktyabr'skoj vojne. Iz arhiva posla [Egypt: from Nasser to the October War]. From the ambassador's archive. Moscow: IV RAS. 216 p.

26. Drobot G. A. 2018. Ponyatie liderstva i inyh form vlasti i vliyaniya v mirovoj politike [The Concept of Leadership and Other Forms of Power and Influence in World Politics]. Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions. 3(3). P. 9-13.

27. Zvyagelskaya I. D. et al. 2019. Gosudarstva Blizhnego Vostoka v poiskah vneshnepoliticheskoj identichnosti [The States of the Middle East in Search of a Foreign Policy Identity]. World Economy and International Relations. 63(9). P. 93-103. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-9-93-103

28. Rozhkova L. V. 2018. Rol' politicheskogo lidera v formirovanii vneshnepoliticheskogo kursa [The Role of a Political Leader in Shaping the Foreign Policy Course]. Bulletin of the Penza State University. 1(21). P. 50-53.

29. Hermann M. D. 1991. Stili liderstva v formirovanii vneshnej politiki [Leadership styles in the formation of Pforeign policy]. Polis. Political Studies. 1(1). p. 91-98.


Review

For citations:


Ibragimov I.E. The Role of Leaders in Formulation of the Foreign Policy Identity in Egypt. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2021;14(4):70-90. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2021-4-79-70-90

Views: 1540


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)