COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact on World Politics
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-1-82-92-110
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has swept the world, affecting all socio-economic and political spheres. Over two years of the pandemic, numerous studies have examined many of its aspects. However, there is no comprehensive understanding of how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected and will still affect world politics.
The article's research question is: how has the COVID-19 pandemic affected world politics in general? The article To understand the world political consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, the following parameters were analyzed: 1) the impact of the pandemic on the (mega)trends of world political development globalization / de-globalization, integration/ disintegration, democratization / de-democratization, 2) the political organization of the world, which includes three primary levels: a) the principles of the Westphalian system, the main of which is the principle of sovereignty; b) the system of interstate relations; c) the political systems of individual states. The choice of these analysis parameters is explained in the article.
States have used various strategies to deal with the pandemic, directed towards isolationism. At the same time, the polarization of the population increased. The system of interstate interaction has not fundamentally changed despite the difficulties that have arisen. The processes of de-globalization have intensified due to the policy of states towards isolationism. At the same time, globalization understood as transnationalization, manifested itself in the active use of digital communication technologies in various fields, including at the international (transnational) level. In turn, the megatrend of democratization was expressed in the activities of volunteers, the opening of access to performances, lectures, museum exhibits on online platforms.
In general, it is shown that the world's political organization has not undergone significant changes as a result of the global crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Because of the pandemic, the trends that emerged even before it began have continued and intensified. At the same time, the rapid development of previously formed processes has led to a sharp increase in social, economic, and political contradictions, and as a result – polarization on many grounds in world politics, which creates a potential danger of conflict development.
About the Author
M. M. Lebedeva
MGIMO-University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina M. Lebedeva – Dr. of Science (Political Science), Professor, Head of World Politics Department
119454, Prospect Vernadskogo 76, Moscow, Russia
References
1. Aydın-Düzgit S., Balta E. 2020 Normative Challengers During a Pandemic: Covid-19 Reporting in Turkey and Russia. Istanbul Policy Center. Sananci University. URL: https://ipc.sabanciuniv.edu/Content/Images/CKeditorImages/20210106-01010021.pdf (accessed 17.02.2022)
2. Nye J.S., Jr., Keohane R. O. 1972. Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction. International Organization. 25(3). P. 329-349.
3. Persad G., Peek M., Emanuel E.J. 2020. Fairly Prioritizing Groups for Access to COVID-19 Vaccines. JAMA. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 324(16). DOI: 10.1001/ jama.2020.18513.
4. Schleimer, J.P., Pear, V.A., McCort, C.D. et al. 2022. Unemployment and Crime in US Cities During the Coronavirus Pandemic. J Urban Health. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-021-00605-3. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11524-021-00605-3 (accessed 17.02.2022)
5. Antonova N.L., Khafizova V.R. 2020. Gorod kak stsena molodozhnogo aktivizma: lokal'nyye praktiki v usloviyakh pandemii. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika. No 6 (74). P.15-19. [The City as a Scene of Youth Activism: Local Practices in a Pandemic]. Society: sociology, psychology, pedagogy. 6(74). P. 15-19. DOI: 10.24158/spp.2020.6.1 (In Russian).
6. Gamza L., Zaklyaz'minskaya Ye. 2020. Pandemiya COVID-19 kak faktor vneshney i vnutrenney politiki Kitaya. [The COVID-19 Pandemic as a Factor in China's Foreign and Domestic Policy]. Ways to Peace and Security. No2. Р. 63–80. DOI: 10.20542/2307-1494-2020-2-63-80. (In Russian).
7. Govorova N. 2020a. COVID-19: podderzhka zanyatosti [COVID-19: Supporting Employment]. European Union: facts and comments. Yu.A. Borko (ed.). March – May. Issue 100. P. 73-76 DOI: 10.15211/eufacts220207376 (In Russian).
8. Govorova N. 2020b. COVID-19: pomoshch' uyazvimym gruppam naseleniya [COVID-19: Helping Vulnerable Populations]. European Union: facts and comments. Yu. A. Borko (ed.). March – May. Issue 100. P. 76-80 DOI: 10.15211/eufacts220207680 (In Russian).
9. Grachova M.L. 2020. Mirovaya pandemiya Covid-19 perevela nauchnyye uchrezhdeniya v onlayn-rezhim, no ne pomeshala ikh deyatel'nosti [The Global Covid-19 Pandemic has Brought Scientific Institutions Online but did not Interfere with Their Activities]. European Union: facts and comments. Yu. A. Borko (ed.). March – May. Issue 100. P. 156-161 DOI: 10.15211/ eufacts220207680 (In Russian).
10. Gromyko Al. A. 2020. Pandemiya i krizis sistemy mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy [Pandemic and Crisis of the System of International Relations]. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 13(5). P. 6-19. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-5-1 (In Russian).
11. Kanayev Ye.A. 2020. ASEAN i COVID-19: narashchivaniye vzaimosvyazey v usloviyakh samoizolyatsii [ASEAN and COVID-19: Building Linkages in Self-Isolation]. Southeast Asia: actual development problems. No4. P. 5-19. DOI: 10.31696/2072-8271-2020-3-4-49-005-019. URL: https://sea.ivran.ru/f/SEA2020n4(49)p5-19.pdf (accessed 17.02.2022) (In Russian).
12. Krasnova G., Raynkhardt R., Shakirov O., Solov'yev D. 2020. Novyye gorizonty nauchnoy diplomatii v Rossii [New Horizons of Scientific Diplomacy in Russia]. RIAC Report. No63. 42 p. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/papers/Science-Diplomacy-Report63.pdf (accessed 17.02.2022) (In Russian).
13. Lebedeva M.M. 2016. Sistema politicheskoy organizatsii mira: «Ideal'nyy shtorm» [The System of Political Organization of the World: "The Perfect Storm"]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2(47). Р. 125-133. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2016-2-47-134-144 URL: https:// vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/518/518 (accessed 17.02.2022). (In Russian).
14. Lebedeva M.M. 2019. Sovremennyye megatrendy mirovoy politiki [Modern Megatrends in World Politics]. World economy and international relations. 63(9). Р. 29–37. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-9-29-37. (In Russian).
15. Lebedeva M.M., Kuznetsov D.A. 2021. Global'noye upravleniye v voprosakh protivodeystviya biogennym ugrozam [Global Governance of Biogenic Threats]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 14(2). Р. 7-21. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2021-2-77-7-21 (In Russian).
16. Lunkin R.N. 2021. Strakhi i nadezhdy yevropeytsev na fone pandemii [The Fears and Hopes of Europeans Amid the Pandemic]. Moscow: Institute of Europe RAS. 186 p. URL: https://www. instituteofeurope.ru/images/uploads/doklad/381.pdf (accessed 17.02.2022) (In Russian).
17. Piketti T. 2015. Kapital v XXI veke [Capital in the 21 Century]. Translated from English: Dunaev A.A. ed. per. A.Yu. Volodin. Moscow: AD Marginem Press. 592 p. (In Russian).
18. Poletayev D., Korobkov A. 2021. Mezhdunarodnaya migratsiya v epokhu pandemii: razryv svyazey, denezhnyye perevody i migrantofobiya [International Migration in the era of a pandemic: breaking ties, remittances and migrant phobia]. Report of the Valdai International Discussion Club. August. 35 p. URL: https://ru.valdaiclub.com/files/38718/ (accessed 17.02.2022) (In Russian).
19. Rogozhin A.A., Rogozhina N.G. 2020. COVID-19 v Yugo-Vostochnoy Azii: problemy i resheniya [COVID-19 in Southeast Asia: Problems and Solutions]. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 13(5). P. 181–203. DOI: 10.23932 / 2542-0240-2020-13-5-11. (In Russian).
20. Saymons G. 2020. Pandemiya koronavirusa i global'nyye preobrazovaniya: sozdaniye ili narusheniye mezhdunarodnykh poryadkov? [The Corona Virus Pandemic and Global Transformations: Making or Breaking International Orders?] Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 13(5). P. 20–37. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-5-2 (In Russian).
21. Shaposhnikov A.M. 2020. Stanet li pandemiya koronavirusa kontsom globalizatsii [Will the Coronavirus Pandemic Be the End of Globalization]. International Independent Scientific Journal. 17(2). P. 25-31. URL: https://www.iis-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ IISJ_17_2.pdf (In Russian).
22. Sungurov A.Yu. 2020. Na puti k global'nomu upravleniyu: chto nado izmenit' v OON? [Towards Global Governance]. What Should Be Changed at the UN? Pandemic as an engine of transformation: global, state and corporate governance. Materials of the international scientific and practical conference. May 25-25. V.I. Dobrosotsky (ed.). Moscow: Liters. P. 11-14. (In Russian).
23. Zhuravlova V. 2021. Amerikanskiy prezident v polyarizovannoy srede: ot Obamy k Baydenu [American President in a Polarized Environment: from Obama to Biden]. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. International relationships. 14(3). P. 334-347. DOI: 10.21638/ spbu06.2021.305. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Lebedeva M.M. COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact on World Politics. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2022;15(1):92-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-1-82-92-110
Views:
4879
Email this article 