Restructuring of Global Pharmaceutical Supply Chains after COVID-19

In recent decades, global pharmaceutical value chains have been actively developing. Formed close cross-country and inter-sectoral ties contributed the Covid-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the functioning of global pharmaceutical chains. The effects of Covid-19 were overlapped previously emerging trends towards defragmentation of global pharmaceutical production. The aim of this paper is to identify possible firm strategies and models for restructuring pharmaceutical chains aimed at increasing their resilience in response to the damaging effects of Covid-19. We suppose that the resilience of the chain as a whole depends on the resilience of its separate links, and we show that the restructuring of pharmaceutical chains takes place in the form of the so-called “link” restructuring (restructuring of separate links of the chain). The paper highlights such models of “link” restructuring of sectoral cross-border chain as “zero” restructuring (stock creation); localization (including import substitution); migration (including reshoring and regionalization); globalization, which operate both in the short and long term periods. The multistage nature of global pharmaceutical chains, as well as the dynamic development of pharmaceutical outsourcing processes, have created favorable opportunities for “link” restructuring. At the same time, the features of restructuring were influenced by various factors, among which the degree of technology intensity of the pharmaceutical chain takes a key place. The paper proposes one of the possible classifications of pharmaceutical chains depending on the technologies used, where the following are distinguished: low-tech and medium-low-tech chains (production of essential pharmaceutical goods); medium-high-tech chains (production of generics); high-tech chains (production of patented drugs, production of biopharmaceuticals, production of medical equipment). The main conclusion the author comes is as follows: the higher the technology intensity of the pharmaceutical chain, the less defragmentation of pharmaceutical production will take place. Thus, in the production of high-tech biopharmaceutical goods, the most needed strategies will be regionalization and globalization of the chain links, while in the production of essential pharmaceutical goods, the strategy of localization and import substitution will be very successful (especially in the short term). This is due to the fact that as the technological effectiveness of the pharmaceutical chain increases, investment costs grow, which makes the efficiency of the chain’s functioning no less important than its resilience.

1.

2. Baldwin R. 2013. Global Supply Chains: Why They Emerged, Why They Matter, and Where They are Going. Deborah K Elms and Patrick Low (eds.). Global value chains in a changing world. Geneva: World Trade Organization: P. 13–60.

3. Bonadio B., Huo, Z., Levchenko A., Pandalai-Nayar N. 2020. Global supply chains in the pandemic. NBER Working Paper 27224. 53 p. http://www.nber.org/papers/w27224 (accessed 20.02.2022)

4. Jones R.W. and H. Kierzkowski. 1990. The Role of Services in Production and International Trade: A Theoretical Framework. R.W. Jones and A.O. Krueger (eds.) The Political Economy of International Trade: Essays in Honour of R.E. Baldwin. Oxford: Basil Blackwell: P. 31–48.

5. Jones R.W. and H. Kierzkowski. 2001. A Framework for Fragmentation S. Arndt and H. Kierzkowski (eds.). Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in the World Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press: P. 17–34.

6. Miroudot S., Nordström H. 2019. Made in the World Revisited. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2019/84. 33 p. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3489137 (accessed 20.02.2022)

7. Flegontova T.A., Ponomareva O.V. 2020. The Crisis of Global Value Chains Amid the Coronavirus Pandemic: Recommendations for Russia [Krizis global'nyh cepochek dobavlennoj stoimosti na fone pandemii koronavirusa: rekomendacii dlya Rossii]. Monitoring ekonomicheskoj situacii v Rossii. Tendencii i vyzovy social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. 15(117). June. P. 65-72. (In Russian).

8. Porter M. 2006. Konkurentnoe preimushchestvo: kak dostich' vysokogo rezul'tata i obespechit' ego ustojchivost'. Moscow: Al'pina Biznes Buks. 715 p. (In Russian).

9. Simachev YU. V., Fedyunina A. A., Aver'yanova Yu. V. 2020. Transformaciya global'nyh cepochek sozdaniya stoimosti Rossii i stran Baltii vsledstvie effektov pandemii COVID-19: perspektivy regionalizacii i sledstviya dlya ekonomicheskoj politiki [Transformation of Global Value Chains in Russia and the Baltic States due to the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Prospects for Regionalization and Implications for Economic Policy]. Baltijskij region. 12(4). P. 128–146. (In Russian).

10. Varnavskij V. 2021. Global'nye cepochki sozdaniya stoimosti v period pandemii COVID-19 [Global value chains during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 65(1). P. 14–23. (In Russian).

11. Volgina N.A. 2021. Farmacevticheskaya cepochka sozdaniya stoimosti: vozmozhnosti dlya autsorsinga [Pharmaceutical Value Chain: Opportunities for Outsourcing]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ekonomika. 29(1). P. 150–163. DOI:10.22363/2313-23292021-29-1-150-163. (In Russian).