External Relations of Russian Border Regions

Despite de-globalization, which has become a trend in recent years, a high degree of interdependence between countries remains in the world, and the solution of global problems through international cooperation of subnational units is in demand. Intrastate regions affect interstate relations by strengthening their cultural, trade, and economic ties, often contributing to the intensification of interstate dialogue. The article looks for the primary factors and features of international activity of Russia’s border regions as territories located near foreign states and which have the most significant number of “points of contact.” It also tries to assess their impact on Russia’s foreign policy. The study shows that Russian regions have recently gained some independence in their external relations and managed to acquire all the features of influential non-state actors, according to the theory of actorness by Russet and Star. They have become integrated into a wide variety of international structures, where they can implement joint infrastructure projects with foreign regions and develop local self-government. Russian border regions become active on the international stage when they have common socio-economic and security problems, ethno-confessional, and cultural-linguistic affinity with the regions of neighboring states, and when the federal center uses their regions for important geopolitical factors for the foreign policy of the federal center. Building close ties based on cultural, linguistic, and ethnic affinity, the Russian regions perform a “compensating function,” making up for the lack of mutual understanding at the level of bilateral relations. They also act as “diplomatic agents” of the federal center in international organizations which promote local-level democracy. Regions also have the potential to build up Russia’s “soft power.” Although cross-border cooperation implies some costs, which the federal authorities try to reduce through legal regulation, it is still widely supported by federal governments.

1. Frątczak-Müller J., Mielczarek-Żejmo А. 2015. Cross-Border Partnership – the Impact of Institutions on Creating the Borderland Communities (the Case of Spree-Neisse-Bober Euroregion). Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research. 29(1). P. 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2015.1098523

2. Fry E.H. 2009. An Assessment of Quebec’s Relations with States in the U. S. Federal System. Quebec Studies. No47. DOI: 10.3828/QS.47.1.141

3. Keohane R., Nye J. 1989. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 300 p.

4. Lawrence R. 2011. Deriving Collaborative Aims and Outcomes: A Case-Study of CrossBorder Cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe. Evaluation. No17. P. 365-382.

5. Mircea B. 2010. European Instruments of Cross-border Cooperation. Case Study: the Romanian-Ukrainian Border. Maron F., Pozarlik G. Identités, citoyennetés et démocratie, 20 ans après. Bruxelles: Editions Bruylant. P. 265-280. (In French)

6. Noferini A., Berzi M., Camonita F., Durà A. 2019. Cross-Border Cooperation in the EU: Euroregions Amid Multilevel Governance and Reterritorialization. European Planning Studies. 28(1). P. 35-56. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1623973

7. Nye J.S. 2011. The future of power. New York: Public Affairs. 320 p.

8. Russett B., Starr H. 1981. World Politics. Menu for Choice. San Francisco: Freeman.

9. Sabau C. 2012. Cross-Border Cooperation in Europe: The Case of Bihor-Hajdu Bihar Euroregion. International Business Research. 5(3). P. 91-99.

10. Scott J. 2013. Constructing Familiarity in Finnish-Russian Karelia: Shifting Uses of History and the Re-Interpretation of Regions. European planning studies. 21(1). P. 75-92.

11. Sousa L. 2013. Understanding European Cross-border Cooperation: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of European Integration. 35(6). P. 669-687, DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2012.711827

12. Akimov Ju.G. 2016. Paradiplomatija kak sredstvo vyrazhenija regional'noj identichnosti sub’ektov federacij [Paradiplomacy as a Means of Expressing the Regional Identity of the Subjects of the Federation]. Administrative Consulting. 2(86). P. 25-33. (In Russian)

13. Baklanov P.Ya., Romanov M.T. 2010. Geopoliticheskie faktory razvitiya transgranichnyh regionov [Geopolitical Factors of Development of Cross-Border Regions]. Tamozhennaya politika Rossii na Dal'nem Vostoke. 2(51). P. 60-71. (In Russian)

14. Barabanov O.N. 2000. Vnutrigosudarstvennye regiony kak aktory v mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenijah: zarubezhnye tendencii i polozhenie sub’ektov RF [Domestic Regions as Actors in International Relations: Foreign Trends and the Position of the Subjects of the Russian Federation]. Obshhestvo, politika, nauka: novye perspektivy. No114. P. 477-501. (In Russian).

15. Budanova I.A. 2013. «Aktornost'» evroregionov ["Actority" of Euroregions]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. No3. P. 57–63. (In Russian)

16. Busygina I.M., Filippov M.G. 2013. Konkurentosposobnost' rossijskih regionov: horoshie instituty ili horoshaya geografiya? [Competitiveness of Russian Regions: Good Institutions or Good Geography?]. Social Sciences and Contemporary World. No6. P. 5-14. (In Russian)

17. Emirov R.M. 2014. Etnonacional'nyj faktor vo vzaimootnoshenijah Kavkaza i stran Blizhnego Vostoka [Ethno-National Factor in Relations between the Caucasus and the Countries of the Middle East]. The Authority. No12. P.207-2012. (In Russian)

18. Fedorov G.M., Gorodkov M.A., Zhukovskij I.I. 2011. Rol' Kaliningradskoj oblasti v razvitii rossijsko-germanskih svjazej [The Role of the Kaliningrad Region in the Development of Russian-German Relations]. Baltijskij region. 4(10). P. 41-48. (In Russian)

19. Glazyrina I.P., Zabelina I.A., Klevakina E.A. 2014. Ekologicheskaja sostavljajushhaja ekonomicheskogo razvitija: prigranichnye regiony Rossii i Kitaja [Ecological Component of Economic Development: Border Regions of Russia and China]. ECO Journal. 6(480). P. 5-24. (In Russian).

20. Ivanov V.N., Zhundubaev M.K. 2015. Mezhregional'noe i prigranichnoe sotrudnichestvo Rossii i Kazahstana: osnovnye prioritety [Interregional and Cross-Border Cooperation between Russia and Kazakhstan: Main Priorities]. National Interests: Priorities and Security. 7(292). P. 38-51. (In Russian)

21. Kazakov M.A., Lyscev M.S. 2018. Voennoe sotrudnichestvo kak sostavljajushhaja rossijsko-japonskih otnoshenij: 1993-2017 gg [Military Cooperation as a Component of RussianJapanese Relations: 1993-2017]. Vestnik NNGU. No2. P. 9-16. (In Russian)

22. Kolesnikova A.V., Brezgin V.S. 2012. Lesopol'zovanie v Rossii i v Kitae: sravnitel'nyj analiz [Forest Management in Russia and China: a Comparative Analysis]. ECO Journal. 11(461). C. 105-121. (In Russian)

23. Kudryashova E.V., Zarubina L.A. 2018. Mezhdunarodnaya proektnaya deyatel'nost' kak instrument regional'nogo razvitiya i stimulirovaniya sotrudnichestva (na primere uchastiya Arhangel'skoj oblasti v programme prigranichnogo sotrudnichestva "Kolarktik") [International Project Activities as a Tool for Regional Development and Stimulation of Cooperation (on the Example of the Participation of the Arkhangelsk Region in the Kolarctic Cross-Border Cooperation Program)]. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences". No6. P. 88-97. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17238/issn2227-6564.2018.6.88

24. Kuz'min V.M. 2009. Stanovlenie politicheskoj limologii i ee mesto v sisteme nauk o granicah i funkcionirovanii prigranichnyh territorij [Formation of Political Limology and its Place in the System of Sciences about Borders and Functioning of Border Areas]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. No3. P.105-115. (In Russian)

25. Kuznecov A.V. 2004. Rossijskoe uchastie v evroregionah [Russian Participation in Euroregions]. Region sotrudnichestva. No4. P. 5-19. (In Russian)

26. Lebedeva M.M. 2019. Transformacija roli gorodov i vnutrigosudarstvennyh regionov v mirovoj politike [Transformation of the Role of Cities and Intrastate Regions in World Politics]. Ojkumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovanija. No1. P. 7–16. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24866/19986785/2019-1/7-16

27. Medeubaev E.I. 2015. Problemy bezopasnosti i transgranichnogo sotrudnichestva v zone kazahstansko-rossijskih pogranichnyh territorij: opyt prigranichnogo sotrudnichestva Aktjubinskoj oblasti (RK) i Orenburgskoj oblasti (RF) [Problems of Security and Cross-Border Cooperation in the Zone of the Kazakh-Russian border Territories: the Experience of CrossBorder Cooperation of the Aktobe Region (RK) and the Orenburg Region (RF)]. Sovremennye evrazijskie issledovanija. No1. P. 54-59. (In Russian)

28. Munhbat D. 2018. Palomnichestvo mongolov: tradicii i sovremennost' [Pilgrimage of the Mongols: Tradition and Modernity]. Nations and religions of Eurasia. 2(15). P. 79-84. (In Russian) DOI: 10.14258/nreur(2018)2-07

29. Odincova A.V. 2015. Opyt i problemy prigranichnogo sotrudnichestva [Experience and Problems of Cross-Border Cooperation]. Federalizm. 4(80). P. 97-110. (In Russian)

30. Rustamova L.R. 2019. Problemy i perspektivy prigranichnogo sotrudnichestva evroregionov s uchastiem Rossii [Problems and Prospects of Cross-Border Cooperation of Euroregions with the Participation of Russia]. Regionologiya. 27(4). P. 711–733. DOI: 10.15507/24131407.109.027.201904.711-733. (In Russian)

31. Shipicina T.Ju. 2015. Sostojanie migracionnoj politiki v prigranichnyh regionah Rossii: osobennosti, tendencii i vlijanie na bezopasnost' gosudarstva v pogranichnoj sfere [The State of Migration Policy in the Border Regions of Russia: Features, Trends and Impact on State Security in the Border Area]. Vestnik GUU. No1. P. 252-258. (In Russian)

32. Sidorov S.A. 2012. Pogranichnaya politika v pogranichnom prostranstve DFO: problemy, ugr ozy, perspektivy. [Border Policy in the FEFD Border Space: Problems, Threats, Prospects]. Customs Policy of Russia in the Far East. 3(60). P. 34-41. (In Russian)

33. Stepanova S.V. 2017. Razvitie turizma v prigranichnyh rossijskih regionah [Development of Tourism in the Border Regions of Russia]. The Bulletin of the Far Eastern Federal University. Economics and Management. 4(84). P. 17-27. (In Russian)

34. Subanakov G.Ju. 2017. Analiz prigranichnogo sotrudnichestva Rossii i Mongolii (na primere Respubliki Burjatija) [Analysis of Cross-Border Cooperation between Russia and Mongolia (on the Example of the Republic of Buryatia)]. BSU Bulletin. Economics and Management. No3. P. 58-64. (In Russian) DOI: 10.18101/2304-4446-2017-3-58-64

35. Sulejmanov R.R. 2016. Vliyanie Turcii v Tatarstane: faktor "myagkoj sily" [The Influence of Turkey in Tatarstan: the Factor of "Soft Power".]. Musul'manskij mir. No1. P. 28-38. (In Russian)

36. Vendina O.I., Gricenko A.A. 2017. Kul'turnyj landshaft pogranich'ya i bor'ba za simvolicheskie resursy utverzhdeniya suvereniteta [The Cultural Landscape of the Borderlands and the Struggle for Symbolic Resources for the Assertion of Sovereignty]. V fokuse naslediya: Sbornik statej, posvyashchyonnyj 80-letiyu YU. A. Vedenina i 25-letiyu sozdaniya Rossijskogo nauchnoissledovatel'skogo instituta kul'turnogo i prirodnogo naslediya imeni D. S. Lihachyova. Ed.by Kuleshova M.E. Moscow. P. 398-416. (In Russian)

37. Verholanceva K.V. 2009. Opyt uchastiya rossijskih regionov v evropejskih transgranichnyh prostranstvah (na primere evroregiona «Kareliya») [Experience of Participation of Russian Regions in European Cross-Border Areas (on the Example of Euroregion "Karelia")]. The Authority. No3. (In Russian)

38. Volkova A.E. 2015. Kontsept «Finno-ugorskogo mira»: tsentrobezhnyye trendy i vliyaniye na vnutrennyuyu i vneshnyuyu politiku Rossiyskoy Federatsii [“Finno-Ugric World” Concept: Centrifugal Trends and Impact on Internal and Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation]. Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences. No3. P. 226-234. (In Russian) DOI: 10.12737/11697

39. Zarubina L.A., Kudryashova E.V. 2019. Programmy prigranichnogo sotrudnichestva kak resurs social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya barenceva regiona (na primere programmy “Kolarktik”) [Cross-Border Cooperation Programs as a Resource for Socio-Economic Development of the Barents Region (on the Example of the Kolarctic Program)]. Contemporary Europe – Sovremennaya Evropa. 4(89). P. 85-96. (In Russian) DOI: 10.15211/soveurope420198596

40. Zayac D.V., Zotova M.V., Turov N.L., Klyuchnikov M.I. 2017. Krizis rossijsko-ukrainskih otnoshenij: posledstviya dlya transgranichnyh vzaimodejstvij v Belgorodskoj oblasti [The Crisis of Russian-Ukrainian Relations: Implications for Cross-Border Interactions in the Belgorod Region.]. Izvestiya Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. No5. P. 42-56. (In Russian) DOI: 10.7868/S0373244417050048

41. Zotova M.V., Kolosov V.A. 2018. Transformacija transgranichnyh vzaimodejstvij na rossijsko-ukrainskom pogranich'e posle 2014 goda [Transformation of Cross-Border Interactions on the Russian-Ukrainian Borderland after 2014]. Comparative Politics Russia. No 2. P 41-61. (In Russian) DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2018-9-2-41-61

42. Zuenko I. Ju. 2020. Pandemija koronavirusa i rossijsko-kitajskoe regional'noe sotrudnichestvo [Coronavirus Pandemic and Russian-Chinese Regional Cooperation]. Oriental Institute Journal. No2. P. 15-28. DOI: 10.24866/2542-1611/2020-2/15-28 (In Russian)