The Country-of-Origin Effect on the Reputation of Russian Metallurgical Products in Central Asian Markets

The article examines the mutual influence of the country's image and its trading activities in foreign markets. Territorial products are in high demand in other countries and connected in the minds of consumers with the country of production. The authors focus their attention on Central Asia as a region with an actively developing economy and essential for Russia in building the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). There is also a high interest in this region from other countries – the USA, China, Turkey, South Korea, Japan. The article analyzes whether Russian metallurgical products can be considered a territorial product that increases the country's attractiveness as a whole in the market of Central Asian countries. The study aims to compare consumers' attitudes to Russian and Chinese metal products, as Chinese metal producers are currently becoming more active in the market of Central Asian countries. The study employs two methods: an expert interview and a survey of consumers of metallurgical products.
The authors conclude that Russian metallurgical products have a stable positive reputation in the market of Central Asian countries. Its reputation in the minds of consumers is associated not only with the price and quality of the product itself but also with a high level of metallurgical education and research and production activities in Russia. In addition, it is essential for consumers that product information is presented in a familiar language, and the cultural features of business communication of Russian suppliers are close and understandable to them. In turn, Chinese metallurgical products do not have such a reputation since Central Asian consumers do not have experience in its utilization, are not aware of the history of metallurgical production in China, scientific and technical developments, and the quality of professional education in the field of metallurgy in this country. They also do not understand China's language and business culture; they are not familiar enough with Chinese suppliers, which affects their choice in favor of a Russian supplier. On this basis, the authors conclude that Russian metallurgical products can be considered a territorial product in the market of Central Asian countries.

1. Abraham A., Patro S. 2014. Country-of-Origin’ Effect and Consumer Decision-making. Management and Labour Studies. 39(3). P. 309-318. DOI: 10.1177/0258042X15572408

2. Andehn M. 2018. Re-imagining the Country of Origin Effect. A Promulgation Approach. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 27(7). P. 884–896. DOI: 10.1108/JPBM-11-2017-1666

3. Andehn M., Nordin F., Nilsson M.E. 2016. Facets of Country Image and Brand Equity: Revisiting the Role of Product Categories in Country-of-Origin Effect Research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 15(3). P. 191-210. DOI: 10.1002/cb.1550

4. Anholt S. 2010. Places: Identity, Image and Reputation. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 168 р.

5. Diamantopoulos A., Schlegelmilch B., Palihawadana D. 2011. The Relationship between Country-of-Origin Image and Brand Image as Drivers of Purchase Intentions. A Test of Alternative Perspectives. International Marketing Review. 28(5). P. 508-524. DOI: 10.1108/02651331111167624

6. Dinnie K. 2004. Country-of-Origin 1965-2004: A Literature Review. Journal of Consumer Behavior. 3(2004). P. 165-213. DOI: 10.1362/1475392041829537

7. Josiassen A, Lukas BA, Whitwell G.J., Assaf G. 2013. The Halo Model of Origin Images: Conceptualisation and Initial Empirical Test. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 12(4). P. 253–266. DOI: 10.1002/cb.1405

8. Nye J. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs Group. 191 p.

9. O’Shaughnessy J., O’Shaughnessy N. 2000. Treating the Nation as a Brand: Some Neglected Issues. Journal of Macromarketing. 20 (1). P. 56–64. DOI: 10.1177/0276146700201006

10. Patalakh A. 2016. Assessment of Soft Power Strategies: Towards an Aggregative Analytical Model for Country-Focused Case Study Research. CIRR. 22(76). P. 85-112. DOI: 10.1515/ cirr-2016-0007

11. Wojciuk A., Michaіek M., Stormowska M. 2015. Education as a Source and Tool of Soft Power in International Relations. European Political Science. 14(3). Р. 298–317. DOI: 10.1057/ eps.2015.25.

12. Zeugner-Roth K.P., Zabkar V., Diamantopoulos A. 2015. Consumer Ethnocentrism, National Identity, and Consumer Cosmopolitanism as Drivers of Consumer Behavior: A Social Identity Theory Perspective. Journal of International Marketing. 23(2). P. 25–54. DOI: 10.1509/ jim.14.0038

13. Aliev T.M. 2013. Strukturnye sdvigi v ekonomike Kazahstana (1991-2011 gg.) [Structural Shifts in Kazakhstan''s Economy (1991-2011)]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. No8. Р. 62-70. (In Russian)

14. Atakanov N.A. 2009. Kirgiziya: sfera deyatel'nosti biznesa stanovitsya shire. Rasshirenie sfery biznesa i predprinimatel'stva v Kirgizii [Kyrgyzstan: Business Field is Widening. Widening of Business and Private Enterprise Sphere in Kyrgyzstan]. Rossijskoe predprinimatel'stvo. 10(1). P. 165-168. (In Russian)

15. Bacherikova M.L., Romanova I.M. 2017. Imidzh territorii: ponyatijno-terminologicheskaya sistematizaciya [Territorial Image: Conceptual and Terminological Systematization]. Regional'naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 1(49). (In Russian)

16. Bel'skih I.E. 2013. Institucional'nye osnovy reklamy i pablik rilejshnz firmy v sovremennoj ekonomike [Institutional Foundations of Advertising and Public Relations Firms in the Modern Economy]. Ekonomicheskij analiz: teoriya i praktika. 36(339). P. 15-24. (In Russian)

17. Bel'skih I.E. 2014. Mnogovariantnyj imidzh territorii na vnutrennem i vneshnem rynkah global'nogo mira [The Multivariate Image of the Territory in the Internal and External Markets of the Global World. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. 29(356). P. 2-10. (In Russian)

18. Galumov E.A. 2003. Mezhdunarodnyj imidzh Rossii: strategiya formirovaniya [The International Image of Russia: Formation Strategy]. Moscow: Izvestiya. 450 p. (In Russian)

19. Kachagin E.A., Mart'yanova A.YU. 2014. Marketing territorij [Marketing of territories]. Ul'yanovsk. Izd-vo UlGTU. 127 p. (In Russian)

20. Korobkova N.A. 2015. Marketing vzaimodejstviya v sisteme upravleniya social'no-ekonomicheskim potencialom territorii [diss. kand. ekon. nauk] [Interaction Marketing in the Management System of the Socio-Economic Potential of the Territory]. Penza: Penzenskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. 230 p. (In Russian)

21. Kozyrev V. V. 2011. Territoriya i eyo biznes-missiya. Brend territorii: ekonomicheskaya i psihologicheskaya sushchnost' [Brand of Territory: Economic and Psychological Nature]. Kreativnaya ekonomika. No2. P. 100-104. (In Russian)

22. Loguncova I.V. 2011. Imidzh rossijskih territorij kak ob"ekt upravleniya [Image of the Russian Regions as an Object of Management]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 21: Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo). No1. P. 29-38. (In Russian)

23. Musienko S.O., Tulepbekova A.A. 2019. Rossiya i Kazahstan v rejtingah Doing Business [Russia and Kazakhstan in Doing Business Ranking]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 1(63). P. 59-66. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-1-59-66 (In Russian)

24. Pankruhin A.P. 2006. Marketing territorij [Marketing of Territories]. St. Petersburg: Piter. 416 p. (In Russian)

25. Polozhihina M.A. 2019. Rossijsko-Kazahstanskie ekonomicheskie otnosheniya [RussianKazakh Economic Relations]. Social'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 2: Ekonomika. Referativnyj zhurnal. No1. P. 227-237. (In Russian)

26. Saidmagomedova D.S. 2018. Populyarnost' rossijskoj metallurgicheskoj produkcii u kazahskih potrebitelej: analiz poiskovyh zaprosov [Popularity of Russian Metallurgical Products among Kazakh Consumers: Analysis of Search Queries]. Strategii razvitiya social'nyh obshchnostej, institutov i territorij. Materialy IV Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Ekaterinburg, 23-24 aprelya 2018 g. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'stvo Ural'skogo universiteta. No1. P. 274-280. (In Russian)

27. Surguladze V.SH. 2015. Global'nye brendy kak provodniki i nositeli «myagkoj sily» [Global Brands as Conductors and Carriers of "Soft Power"]. Problemy nacional'noj strategii. 3(30). P. 63-188. (In Russian)