Differentiated Regional (Dis)Integration Post Brexit
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-3-84-39-60
Abstract
Exit of Britain from the European Union resuscitated academic discussions on the topic of the certainty value for the unfolding of disintegrative trends in the united Europe. Nevertheless, no general perception has emerged yet of how Brexit is likely to influence the organizational prospects and viability of the European integration grouping. In most cases the conceptualizations do not escape the presentation of dichotomy between integration and disintegration as two ultimo states in international relations. In fact, these are two processes, more complexly co-related. Each of them can include a wide array of structural arrangements, some differentiation dynamism, different levels of centralization in separate domains, as well as certain (variable) numbers of participants in distinct arrangements. In this article the meaning of Brexit as a condition of further European (dis)integration is treated, as based on Alexander Bogdanov’s theory of organization. This theory serves to reconsider the established renderings of such key notions, as integration, disintegration and differentiation.
The new sight is gained of immune after-effects of prior Europeanization for the political system of the UK. Cases of the Economic and Monetary Union and the Northern Ireland Protocol receive separate treatment. The latter one presents a path-breaking design for differentiated integration with subnational region participation. Yet to realize the potential of the Protocol in full, political will is needed from both London and Brussels.
On the most basic level, once this large country left the EU, one could hardly imagine any of its remaining 27 members to head off further progressive development of European integration. At the same time, it has to be acknowledged that, in order to make headway in terms of integration, the EU system, rather than unification and centralization, is in need of intensified differentiation. Meanwhile, the supranational institutions, and the European Commission most notably, remain oriented towards uniform integration as their priority. This can result in lower efficacy of the EU integration policy.
About the Author
M. V. Strezhneva
IMEMO RAN
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina V. Strezhneva – Dr. of Science (Political Science), Professor, Principal Researcher in International Relations
23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
References
1. Bickerton C. 2019. The Limits of Differentiation: Capitalist Diversity and Labour Mobility as Drivers of Brexit. Comparative European Politics. 17(2). P. 231-245. DOI: 10.1057/s41295019-00160-x
2. Brunazzo M. 2022. The Politics of EU Differentiated Integration: Between Crises and Dilemmas. The International Spectator. 57(1). P. 18-34. DOI: 10.1080/03932729.2022.2014103
3. Burk M., Leuffen D. 2019. On the Methodology of Studying Differentiated (Dis)integration: Or How the Potential Outcome Framework Can Contribute to Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Opting In or Out. Journal of Common Market Studies. 57(6). P. 1395-1406. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12958
4. Copeland P. 2016. Europeanization and de-Europeanization in UK Employment Policy: Changing Governments and Shifting Agendas. Public Administration. 94(4). P. 1124-1139. DOI: 10.1111/padm.2016.94.issue-4
5. Gänzle S., Leruth B., Trondal J., eds. 2021. Differentiated Integration and Disintegration in a Post-Brexit Era. London and New York: Routledge. 276 p.
6. Gstöhl S., Phinnemore D., eds. 2019. The Proliferation of Privileged Partnerships between the European Union and its Neighbours. London: Routledge. 224 p.
7. Jones E. 2018. Towards a Theory of Disintegration. Journal of European Public Policy. 25(3). P. 440-451. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1411381
8. Mazumder S., Pahl R.M. 2013. What if the UK Had Joined the Euro in 1999? Open Economies Review. 24(3). P. 447-470. DOI: 10.1007/s11079-012-9245-5
9. Radaelli C. 2001. The Domestic Impact of European Public Policy: Notes on Concepts, Methods and the Challenge of Empirical Research. Politique Européenne. No5. Р. 107-142.
10. Rosamond B. 2019. Theorising the EU in Crisis: de-Europeanisation as Disintegration. Global Discourse: An interdisciplinary journal of current affairs. 9(1). P. 31-44. DOI: 10.1332/204378918X1545393450591
11. Schimmelfennig F., Leuffen D., Rittberger B. 2015. The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: interdependence, politicization and differentiation. Journal of European Public Policy. 22(6). P. 764-782. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1020835. URL: https://samuelbhfauredotcom.files.wordpress.com/2019/09/schimmelfennig-and-alii-2015.pdf (accessed 18.06.2022)
12. Schimmelfennig F., Winzen T. 2020. Ever Looser Union? Differentiated European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 256 p.
13. Schmitter P., Lefkofridi Z. 2016. Neo-Functionalism as a Theory of Disintegration. Chinese Political Science Review. 1(1). P. 1-29. DOI: 10.1007/S41111-016-0012-4
14. Schwarzer D. 2013. The Euro Area Crises, Shifting Power Relations and Institutional Change in the European Union. Global Policy. Vol. 3. Supplement 1. P. 28-41. DOI: 10.1111/17585899.12013. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1758-5899.12013 (accessed 18.06.2022).
15. Strezhneva M., Moiseeva D. 2021. Parliamentarisation of Brexit: Legitimation Games in the Process of Regional Disintegration. Parliaments, Estates and Representation. 41(3). P. 353370. DOI: 10.1080/02606755.2021.1955569
16. Svendsen Ø., Adler-Nissen R. 2019. Differentiated (Dis)integration in Practice: The Diplomacy of Brexit and the Low Politics of High Politics. Journal of Common Market Studies. 57(6). P. 1419-1430. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12960
17. Vollaard H. 2018 European Disintegration – A Search for Explanations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 278 p.
18. Waltz K. Theory of International Politics. 1979. Reading (MA), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. 249 p.
19. Wachowiak J., Zleeg F. 2022. Brexit and the Trade and Cooperation Agreement: Implications for Internal and External EU Differentiation. The International Spectator. 57(1). P. 142-159. DOI: 10.1080/03932729.2022.2030604
20. Webber D. 2019. European Disintegration? The Politics of Crisis in the European Union London: Red Globe Press. 278 p.
21. Babynina L.O. 2012. Gibkaya integraciya v Evropejskom Soyuze: teoriya i praktika primeneniya [Flexible Integration in the European Union: Theory and Implementation Practice]. Moscow: URSS. 302 p. (In Russian)
22. Babynina L.O. 2020. Deevropeizaciya ili demontazh: kak budut stroit'sya otnosheniya ES i Velikobritanii [De-Europeanization or Dismantling: Prospects of the EU-UK Relations]. Sovremennaya Evropa. No3. P. 5-15. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope320200515 (In Russian)
23. Bogdanov A.A. 2019. Tektologiya: Vseobshchaya organizacionnaya nauka [Tektology: The General Science of Organization]. Moscow: LENAND. 680 р. (In Russian)
24. Butorina O.V. 2020. Suzhenie Evropejskogo soyuza i potencial integracii [Contraction of the European Union and Integration Potential]. Vestnik Rosssijskoj Akademii Nauk. 90(11). Р. 1058-1066. DOI: 10.31857/S0869587320110043 (In Russian)
25. Ivanova I.K. 2019. Constitutional Rationales for the United Kingdom’s Exit from the European Union. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN — Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS. 14(3). P. 167–186. DOI: 10.35427/20734522-2019-14-3-ivanova (In Russian)
26. Ignatova V.A. 2012. Integraciya i differenciaciya kak universal'nye kategorii nauki i ih otrazhenie v teorii i praktike estestvenno-nauchnogo obrazovaniya [Integration and Differentiation as Universal Scientific Categories and Their Reflection in Theory and Practice of Education in Natural Sciences]. Obrazovanie i nauka. 2(101). P. 3-17 (In Russian).
27. Kaveshnikov N.Yu. 2018. Velikobritaniya i Evropejskij soyuz: dolgaya istoriya razvoda. Stat'ya 2. Slozhnyj partnyor [United Kingdom and European Union: A Long History of Divorce Part 2. Awkward partner]. Sovremennaya Evropa. No6. P. 18-29. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope620181829 (In Russian)
28. Luhman N. 2006. Differenciaciya [Differentiation]. Moscow: "Logos". 320 p. (In Russian).
29. Nikonova A. 2019. On the Ingression Principle in the System World of A.A. Bogdanov, or no Prophet in his Own Country. HronoEconomics. 7(20). Р. 32-40 (In Russian). URL: http:// hronoeconomics.ru/07_2019.pdf (accessed 18.06.2022).
30. Turkina A.V. 2017. Novye stadii procedury chrezmernogo deficita byudzheta gosudarstv – chlenov Evropejskogo soyuza i ocenka ih effektivnosti [New Steps in the Excessive Deficit Procedure for the Member-States Budgets and Estimation of Their Effiсiency]. Vestnik Baltijskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki. No 4. P. 11-17 (In Russian).
31. Vilkova M.Yu. 2018. Pravo secessii v evropejskoj integracii: opyt Grenlandii i Velikobritanii [Right of Secession in European Integration]. Vestnik Universiteta im. O.E. Kutafina. No5. P. 78-83. DOI: 10.17803/2311-5998.2018.45.5.078-083 (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Strezhneva M.V. Differentiated Regional (Dis)Integration Post Brexit. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2022;15(3):39-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-3-84-39-60
Views:
1319
Email this article 