Bolsonaro’s ‘Anti-Diplomacy'
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-3-84-77-97
Abstract
The article compares Brazil’s president Jair Bolsonaro diplomacy with the traditional one and explains in what terms and why his foreign policy is different from a classical approach.
Before he came to power, such principles as peaceful coexistence with neighbors, aspiration for national grandeur, peaceful conflict settlement and independent decision making were inherent in Brazilian diplomacy. Today the country’s foreign policy is unpredictable, inconsistent, and far from traditional peacefulness. Before changes in the US administration in 2021, Bolsonaro, as well as many of his predecessors, bet on the USA to solve national problems. Unilateral concessions to Washington predictably gave no results and lowered Brazilian independence in decision making. The USA was not interested in strengthening its rival in Latin America, no matter how friendly the relations between the two countries were. Bolsonaro’s policy is influenced by different lobby groups with opposing interests in government agencies. An important role is played by the military and followers of the theoretician Olavo de Carvalho. Paying attention to each of these groups, Bolsonaro implements an inconsistent foreign policy and runs a risk of not putting important political projects into practice and of finding himself in an international isolation.
The changes in foreign policy take place amidst political and economic crisis in Brazil. Coronavirus pandemic aggravated the conflict of the branches of power. To strengthen his positions, the president appeals to the population, looks for support in the Parliament and pushes through an administrative bill aimed at making the president more autonomous in managing the executive branch structures.
The appearance of the “right-wing” president and powerful influence of the conservative military stem from the economic and political crisis in Brazil, and Bolsonaro’s “special” governance style fits a worldwide trend of populism and active politics coverage in social networks.
About the Author
J. A. Timofeeva
Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Julia А. Timofeeva – lecturer at the Department of Roman Languages
76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russia
References
1. Federico G. 1989. The Kennedy-Johnson Years. John D Martz (eds) United States Policy in Latin America. University of Nebraska Press.
2. Milani C. 2019. Brazil’s Foreign Policy on the Couch. Folha de São Paulo. Aug. 8. URL: https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/en/brazil/2019/08/brazils-foreign-policy-on-thecouch.shtml (accessed 11.06.2022).
3. Almeida PR. 2019. Miséria da diplomacia. A destruição da inteligência no Itamaraty [Misery of Diplomacy. Intellect Destruction in Itamaraty]. Boa Vista: Editora da UFRR. 163 p. (In Portuguese).
4. Cervo AL. 2008. Inserção Internacional: formação dos conceitos brasileiros [International Insertion: Formation of Brazilian Concepts]. São Paulo: Editora Saraiva. 298 p. (In Potuguese).
5. Manzur T.M. 2014. A política externa independente (PEI): antecedentes, apogeu e declínio [Independent Foreign Policy (IEP): Background, Heyday and Decline]. Lua nova. No93. P. 169–199. (In Portuguese).
6. Pereira M.G. 2012. Barão do Rio Branco 100 anos de memória [Baron Rio Branco: 100 years of memory]. Brasília: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão. 748 p. (In Portuguese)
7. Santos T. 2000. O debate sobre a dependência [Debate on Dependency]. Santos T., Livros I. Teoria da dependência: balanço e perspectivas. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira. (In Portuguese).
8. Schutte R.G., Fonseca B.C., Carneiro G.S. 2019. Jogo de dois níveis voltado ao eleitorado: uma análise da política externa bolsonarista [Two-Level Game Targeted at the Electorate: an Analysis of the Pocket Foreign Policy]. Revista Conjuntura Global. 8(2). P.97-116. (In Portuguese).
9. Souto Maior L. 2001. Brasil-Estados Unidos: desafios de um relacionamento assimétrico [Brazil – the United States: Challenges of an Asymmetric Relationship]. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. 44(1). P. 55-68. (In Portuguese).
10. Bezerra M. 2016. Kak daleko namerena prodvinutsa NATO? [How far Does NATO Intend to Move?] The International Affairs. No3. P. 71–87. (In Russian).
11. Bezerra M. 2020. Diplomatiya Zhaira Bolsonaru: demontazh traditsionnoy brazil’skoy vneshney politiki [Jair Bolsonaro’s Diplomacy: Dismantling Traditional Foreign Policy of Brazil]. Cuadernos Iberoamericanos. 8(3). P. 35-42. DOI: 10.46272/2409-3416-2020-8-3-35-42 (In Russian).
12. Martynov B.F. 2004. “Zolotoy kantsler”. Baron de Rio-Branko – velikiy diplomat Latinskoy Ameriki. ["Golden Chancellor". Baron de Rio Branco is a Great Latin American Diplomat] Мoscow: ILA RAS. 160 p. (In Russian).
13. Martynov B.F. 2010. Braziliya: Prioritety I fobii voskhodyaschey derzhavy [Brazil: Priorities and Fobias of an Emerging Power]. Security Index. 16(4,95). P. 43-57. (In Russian).
14. Martynov B.F., Borzova A.Yu. 2021. Istoriya vneshney politiki I diplomatii Brazilii [History of Brazilian Foreign Policy and Diplomacy]. Мoscow: Aspekt press. 288 p. (In Russian).
15. Okuneva L.S. 2020. Latinskaya Amerika prishla v dvizheniye: v chem smysl sotsial’nykh protestov oktyabrya 2019 goda? [Latin America Has Set in Motion: What is the Meaning of Social Protests in October 2019?] Latin America. 1. P. 8-21. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0007755-9 (In Russian).
16. Pivovarova N.S. 2015. Istoki programmy “Soyuz radi progressa v ideye “Panamerikanskoy operatsii” Zh.Kubicheka. [The Origins of the "Alliance For Progress" in The Idea of J. Kubitschek’s "Pan-American Operation"]. Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2(34). P. 95-96. DOI 10.17223/19988613/34/15 (In Russian).
17. Sudarev V.P.2019. Vozmozhnosti i predely gegemonii SSHA v Latinskoy Amerike [Possibilities and Limits of the US Hegemony in Latin America]. Latin America. No11. P. 6-14. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0006894-2 (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Timofeeva J.A. Bolsonaro’s ‘Anti-Diplomacy'. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2022;15(3):77-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-3-84-77-97
Views:
1198
Email this article 