Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Strategy of Balancing in Turkish Foreign Policy

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-3-84-115-142

Abstract

The new offensive approach of Turkey's foreign policy is the sign of President Erdogan's ambitions to redistribute power in the Middle East and the Eastern Mediterranean and a way to legitimize his own regime. On the one hand, this can be seen as the ambitions of «neo-Ottomanism», on the other hand, there is a new attempt to solve five foreign policy problems: the «Kurdish issue», the «Aegean dispute», the return of territories mentioned in the “National Oath” (Misak-i Milli), breakthrough from disillusionment with integration with the EU and overcoming inequality in allied relations with the United States to satisfy antiAmerican nationalism.
The article examines Turkey's foreign policy since Erdogan gained full control of power and intervened in the civil war in Syria in 2014-2015. The aim is to determine the reason for Turkey's offensive strategy from the perspectives of Neorealism theory of International Relations and Bargaining model of war. The main findings are as follows. Erdogan's policy of power redistribution has focused on relations with the United States, the EU, and Russia as well as regional powers and has employed dominance in bargaining power as the main tool. A show of Turkey's force makes counterparts more compliant and serves as a tool to convince that the cost of deterring Turkey will be greater than the cost of concession.
The main feature of Erdogan's policy is the use of contradictions between partners. According to Neorealism, if a state becomes too powerful, the balancing coalition occurs. But Turkey's offensive policy does not face a balancing coalition (or an international system, especially on the NATO and the EU directions), because there are many contradictions between potential opponents, which Erdogan masterfully uses. At some point, Turkey balances each of them by the threat to move closer to its opponent thus creating a balancing lever in “balancing triangle”. In this way Erdogan uses a series of “balancing triangles” to put pressure on Russia, the US, and the EU simultaneously.

About the Author

D. B. Grafov
Institute of Oriental Studies of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Dmitry B. Grafov – Candidate of Political Science, Senior Research Fellow

12, Rozhdestvenka street, Moscow, Russia, 107031



References

1. Cook A. 2018. Neither Friend nor Foe: The Future of U.S.-Turkey Relations. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. 28 p.

2. Fearon J.D. 1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization. 49(3). P. 379-414.

3. Hameed A. Hassan. 2019. From Border Security to National Security: Change in Turkish Foreign Policy Towards the Middle East After 2016 (A Realistic Perspective). Tikrit Journal for Political Science. P. 411-433. DOI: 10.25130/poltic.v0i0.173.

4. Mearsheimer J.J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. 568 p.

5. Reiter D. 2003. Exploring the Bargaining Model of War – Perspectives on Politics. Perspectives on Politics. 1(1). P. 27–43.

6. Schweller R.L. 1998. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest. Columbia University Press. 267 p.

7. Van Evera S. 1999. Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict. Ithaca. New York: Cornell University Press. 288 p.

8. Walt S. 1986. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 336 p.

9. Walt S. 2002. The Enduring Relevance of the Realist Tradition. Katznelson I., Milner H.

10. Political Science: State of the Discipline III. Norton. P. 197-230.

11. Waltz K.N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. 251 p.

12. Avatkov V.A. 2019. Ideyno-tsennostnyy faktor vo vneshney politike Turtsii [Ideology and Values in Turkey's Foreign Policy]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 12(4). P. 113-129. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2019-4-67-113-129

13. Avatkov V.A. Kochkin M.V. 2016. Osnovnyye napravleniya krizisa vo vnutrenney i vneshney politike Turetskoy Respubliki [Principle Trajectories of the Domestic and Foreign Policy Crises in Modern Turkish Republic]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2(47). P. 7-14. (In Russian.)

14. Avatkov V.A., Sbitneva A. 2020. Politicheskij kurs sovremennoj Turcii. Glavnye osobennosti vnutrennej i vneshnej politiki 2019 g. [The Political Course of Modern Turkey. Key Features of Domestic and Foreign Policy in 2019]. Svobodnaya mysl'. 2(1680). P. 115-128. (In Russian)

15. Cygankov P. A. 1994. Politicheskaya sociologiya mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij. Glava V. Zakonomernosti mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij. Soderzhanie zakonomernostej mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij [Political Sociology of International Relations. Chapter V. Patterns of International Relations. The Content of the Laws of International Relations]. Moscow: Radiks. P. 67-78. (In Russian)

16. Davydov A.A. 2019. Sistemnyy krizis amerikano-turetskikh otnosheniy pri D. Trampe [Systemic Crisis in the US-Turkish Relations under the Presidency of D. Trump]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 12(4). P. 145-160. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-20194-67-145-160

17. Konyshev V.N. 2020. Neoklassicheskiy realizm v teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy [Neoclassical Realism in the Theory of International Relations]. Polis. Political Studies. No4. P. 94-111. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.04.07

18. Shlykov P.V. 2018. Transformatsiya roli Turtsii v bor’be s mezhdunarodnym terrorizmom na Blizhnem Vostoke [The Transformation of Turkey's Role in the Fight Against International Terrorism in the Middle East]. MSU Vestnik. Series 13. Orientalism. No2. P. 53-74. (In Russian)

19. Svistunova I.A. 2016. V poiskah novoy modeli: ontnosheniya Turtsii i SSHA v sphere bezopasnosti [The Security Aspect of Turkey-United States Relations: in Search for a New Model]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2(47). P. 53-61. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24833/20718160-2016-2-47-53-61

20. Svistunova I.A. 2018. Regional'naya politika Turcii: strategiya v otnoshenii stran Afriki [Regional Policy of Turkey: Strategy in Relation to African Countries]. Problemy nacional'noj strategii. 4(49). P. 67-80. (In Russian)

21. Svistunova I.A. 2020. Balkanskaya politika Turtsii: Rol’ etno-konfessional’nykh men’shinstv [Turkey’s Policy in the Balkans: The Role of Ethnic and Religious Minorities]. Modern Europe. 4(97). P. 61-71. (In Russian) DOI: 10.15211/soveurope420206171


Review

For citations:


Grafov D.B. Strategy of Balancing in Turkish Foreign Policy. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2022;15(3):115-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-3-84-115-142

Views: 2430


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)