Managing the Investment Attractiveness of the Federal Subjects of Russia in the Context of the UN Sustainable Development Goals
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-3-84-202-230
Abstract
Inter-regional gaps in the investment sphere and sanction pressure on the national economy have actualized the issue of improving the efficiency of managing investment attractiveness at the mesoscale using modern high-precision methods of economic and mathematical modeling. A number of well-known thematic ratings are used to assess the investment attractiveness of the Russian regions, whose critical analysis made it possible to identify their main shortcomings. Therefore, in the course of the study, the authors make an attempt to build an adequate rating of the investment attractiveness of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation using artificial intelligence. The results of the retrospective assessment are deepened by clustering the Russian regions based on the achieved level of investment attractiveness by the method of Kohonen self-organizing cards. To implement the prognostic function, a Bayesian ensemble of dynamic neural network models was formed. As a result of the empirical study three hypotheses have been confirmed: on significant inter-regional gaps in the sphere of investment attractiveness; on a negative change in the cluster structure (in the field of investment attractiveness) of the Russian regions in 2013-2018 due to sanctions pressure on the national economy; and on the persistence of significant inter-regional gaps (in the investment sphere) in the medium term (on the example of the leading regions). The results can be used to update the provisions of the economic policy of a number of constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Moreover, the authors’ approach might be applied for analyzing other countries in the context of the UN Sustainable Development Goals at the meso-level.
About the Authors
A. N. Borisov
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksey N. Borisov – Candidate of Political Sciences, First Deputy Chairman, United Nations Association of Russia, Head of the UNESCO Department
76, Vernadsky prospect, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119454
A. I. Borodin
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr I. Borodin – Doctor of Economics, Professor at the Department of Financial Management
36, Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, Russian Federation, 117997
R. V. Gubarev
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Roman V. Gubarev – Ph.D. (Economics), Associate Professor of the Department of Economic Theory
36, Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, Russian Federation, 117997
E. I. Dzyuba
Branch of the All-Russian Popular Front in the Republic of Bashkortostan
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeniy I. Dzyuba – Expert
Kirov Street, Ufa, Russian Federation, 450077
E. R. Sagatgareev
Bashkir Institute of Physical Culture
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Eduard R. Sagatgareev – Senior Lecturer of the Department of Humanities and Natural Scinces
67, Kommunisticheskaya Street, Ufa, Russian Federation, 450077
References
1. Akerlof G.A., Snower D.J. 2015. Bread and Bullets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. No126. P. 58-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.22015.10.021
2. Bondarenko T., Borodin A., Zholamanova M., Panaedova G., Belyanchikova T., Gurieva L. 2020. Investments to the Petrochemical Sector: the Value of the Competitiveness of Petrochemical Companies. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. No7. P. 2510-2525. DOI: 10.977/ jesi.2020.7.3(70)
3. Collier P. 2016. The Cultural Foundations of Economic Failure: A Conceptual Toolkit. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. No126. P. 5-24. DOI: 10.1016/J.JEBO.2015.10.017
4. Damodaran A. 2017. Narrative and Numbers: The Value of Stories in Business. New York; Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia Business School Publishing.
5. Gagarina G.Y., Moiseev N.A., Ryzhakova A.V., Ryzhakov G.V. 2016. Estimation and Forecast of Regional Competitiveness Level. Economy of Region. No4. P. 1040-1049. DOI: 10.17059/2016-4-6
6. Grinberg R.S., Akhunov R.R., Volodin A.I., Gubarev R.V., Dzyuba E.I. 2018. Performancebased Pay – a New (mixed) Payment Scheme for Russian Civil Servants. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. No6. P. 163-183. DOI: 10.15838/ESC.2018.6.60.10
7. Gubarev R.V., Dzyuba E.I. 2019. Neuromathematics as an Effective Tool for Forecasting Social Development of Russian Regions. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Fiziko-Matematicheskie Nauki. 161(2). P. 315-321. DOI: 10.26907/2541-7746.2019.2.315-321
8. Izotov D.A. 2019. Inflow of Foreign Direct Investments in Russia’s Regions: Potential and Risk Factors. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends. Forecast. No2. P. 56-72. DOI: 10.15838/ esc.2019.2.62.3
9. Mordhorst M., Schwarzkopf S. 2017. Theorising Narrative in Business History. Business History. No8. P. 1155-1175. DOI: 10.1080/0076791.2017.1357697
10. Shiller R.J. 2017. Narrative Economics. American Economic Review. 107(4). P. 967-1004. DOI: 10.1257/aer.107.4.967
11. Bakhtizin A.R., Bukhvald Ye.M., Kolchugina A.V. 2016. Ranzhirovanie subyektov Rossiyskoj Federatsii po potentsialu i tempam sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Ranking the Subjects of the Russian Federation Based on Their Potential and Rates of Socio-Economic Development]. Region: Economics & Sociology. No2. P. 3-22. (In Russian)
12. Borisov V., Pochukaeva O. 2017. Effektivnost' investitsionnoj i innovatsionno-tekhnologicheskoy deyatel'nosti (na primere Arkticheskogo proekta) [Investment And Innovative Technological Efficiency: Case Study Of The Arctic Project]. Studies on Russian Economic Development. No2. P. 65-77. (In Russian)
13. Borshchevskiy G.A. 2018. Otsenka deyatel'nosti regional'nyh pravitel'stv po privlecheniyu vnebyudzhetnyh investitsiy v razvitie infrastruktury [Regional Governments’ Policy Evaluation for Extra-Budgetary Investments in Public Infrastructure]. Public Administration Issues. No4. P. 7-41. (In Russian)
14. Chernov V.A. 2020. Realizatsiya tsifrovyh tekhnologiy v finansovom upravlenii hozyaystvennoy deyatel'nost'yu [Implementation of Digital Technologies in Financial Management]. Economy of region. 16(1). P. 283-297. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17059/2020-1-21
15. Dobrolyubova E.I. 2018. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie po rezul'tatam v epohu tsifrovoyj transformatsii: obzor zarubezhnogo opyta i perspektivy dlya Rossii [Performance Management in Public Administration in the Digital Era: Review of International Practices and Prospects for Russia]. Public Administration Issues. No 4.P. 70-93. (In Russian)
16. Dynkin A.A. 2020. Mezhdunarodnaya turbulentnost' i Rossiya [International Turbulence and Russia]. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 90(3). P. 208-219. (In Russian) DOI: 10.31857/S0869587320030032
17. Eskindarov M.A., Maslennikov V.V., Maslennikov O.V. 2019. Riski i shansy tsifrovoy ekonomiki v Rossii [Risks and Chances of the Digital Economy in Russia]. Finance: Theory and Practice. 29(5). P. 6-17. (In Russian) DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2018-23-5-6-17
18. Hines A. 2019. Kak podgotovit'sya k «bezrabotnomu» budushchemu [Getting Ready for a Post-Work Future]. Foresight and STI Governance. 13(1). P. 19-30. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.1.19.30
19. Ignatyeva Ye.D., Mariev O.S. 2013. Metodologiya i instrumentariy strukturnofunktsional'nogo analiza regional'nogo razvitiya [Methodology Attitude and Instruments for Structural and Functional Analysis of the Regional Development]. Economy of Region. No1. P. 226-237. (In Russian)
20. Kashin V.B. 2017. Kitayskie reformy sistemy upravleniya voennymi innovatsiyami: otvet na amerikanskuyu «tret'yu strategiyu kompensatsii» [Chinese Reforms of Military Innovation Management System: a Response to the U.S. Third Offset Strategy?]. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics. No4. P. 42-66. (In Russian)
21. Kleiner G.B. 2020. Intellektual'naya ekonomika cifrovogo veka [Intellectual Economy of the Digital Age]. Economics and Mathematical Methods. 56(1). P. 18-33. (In Russian) DOI: 10.31857/S04247388008562-7
22. Klimenko M.S. 2009. Sovremennye metodologicheskie podhody k otsenke potentsiala regional'nogo promyshlennogo razvitiya na primere otdel'nyh subyektov Yuzhnogo federal'nogo okruga [Contemporary Methodological Approaches to the Estimation of the Potential of Regional Industrial Development Based on The Example of the Individual Subjects of the Southern Federal Region]. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice. No36. P. 65-70. (In Russian)
23. Kokovikhin A.Y., Kansafarova T.A., Sharapova N.V. 2018. Novaya industrializatsiya: razryv v kompetentsiyah i instituty rynka truda [New Industrialization: a Competency Gap and Labor Market Institutions]. Journal of Economic Theory. 15(2). P. 316–324. (In Russian)
24. Kramer U., Mitskevich L.A., Vasilyeva A.F. 2019. Elektronnye formy v administrativnom protsesse Rossii i Germanii [Electronic Forms in the Administrative Procedure of Russia and Germany]. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Law. 10(4). P. 756-780. (In Russian) DOI: 10.21638/spbu14.2019.410
25. Ladykova T., Bersenyov V. 2018. Tipologiya makroekonomicheskih parametrov dohodov naseleniya [Typology of Macroeconomic Parameters of Population Income]. Economy of Region. 14(2). P. 380-394. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17059/2018-2-4
26. Litvinova V.V. 2014. Investitsionnaya privlekatel'nost' i investitsionnyy klimat regiona: k voprosu o definitsiyah i otsenke [The Investment Attractiveness and Investment Climate of a Region: to the Issue of Definition and Assessment]. Bulletin of The Financial University. No1. P. 139-152. (In Russian)
27. Litvintseva G., Shchekoldin V., Schits E. 2017. Prognozirovanie rezul'tatov innovatsionnoy deyatel'nosti s uchetom znachimyh faktorov v rossiyskih regionah [Forecasting the Results of Innovative Activity Taking into Account Significant Factors in the Regions of Russia]. Studies on Russian Economic Development. No5. P. 88-98. (In Russian)
28. Loseva O.V. 2016. Intellektual'nyj potentsial regiona: otsenka i mekhanizm upravleniya v innovatsionnoj deyatel'nosti [Intellectual Potential of a Region: Appraisal and Control Tool in Innovative Activity]. Management Sciences in Russia. No2. P. 38-47. (In Russian)
29. Matskulyak I.D., Sapozhnikova N.T., Kharchilava G.P. 2019. Proryvnaya ekonomika: k teorii upravleniya izmeneniyami ekonomicheskih system [A Breakthrough Economy: On the Theory of Economic Systems Change Management]. The Manager. 10(4). P. 75-84. (In Russian) DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2019-10-4-7
30. Naiden S., Belousova A. 2018. Metodicheskiy instrumentariy otsenki blagosostoyaniya naseleniya: mezhregional'noe sopostavlenie [Methodological Tools to Assess of the Population Welfare: Interregional Comparison]. Economy of Region. 14(1). P. 53-68. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17059/2018-1-5
31. Nikitin A.S. 2016. Investitsionnyy reyting kak instrument stimulirovaniya effektivnosti upravleniya razvitiem regionov Rossii [Investment Rating as an Instrument of Effective Govern Management Stimulation in Russian Region]. Economic Policy. 11(6). P. 192-221. (In Russian) DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2016-6-09
32. Nureev R.M., Busygin E.G. 2016. Ekonomicheskie sanktsii zapada i rossiyskie antisanktsii: uspekh ili proval? [Economic Sanctions of the West and Russian Anti-Sanctions: Success or a Failure?]. Journal of Institutional Studies. 8(4). P. 6-27. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17835/20766297.2016.8.4.006-027
33. Pavlova I.A., Maliutina A.P. 2017. Reytingi kak model' kompleksnoy otsenki innovatsionno-investitsionnogo razvitiya ekonomicheskih sistem mezourovnya na primere Tomskoy oblasti [Rankings as a Comprehensive Model to Assess Innovation and Investment Development of Mesolevel Economic Systems (Case of Tomsk Region)]. Siberian Journal of Science. No2. P. 17-35. (In Russian)
34. Romanova O.A., Ponomareva A.O. 2020. Promyshlennaya politika: novye realii, problemy formirovaniya i realizatsii [Industrial Policy: New Realities, Formation and Implementation Issues]. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 13(2). P. 25-40. (In Russian) DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.2.68.2
35. Rücker Schaeffer P., Fischer B., Queiroz S. 2018. Ne tol'ko obrazovanie: rol' issledovatel'skih universitetov v innovatsionnyh ekosistemah [Beyond Education: The Role of Research Universities in Innovation Ecosystems]. Foresight and STI Governance. 12(2). P. 50-61. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2018.2.50.61
36. Sukharev O.S. 2019. Tekhnologicheskoe razvitie: vliyanie struktury investitsiy [Technological Development: Investment Structure Impact]. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 12(2). P. 36-55. (In Russian) DOI: 10/15838/esc.2019.2.62.2
37. Tret’yakova E., Osipova M. 2018. Otsenka pokazateley ustoychivogo razvitiya regionov Rossii [Evaluation of Sustainable Development Indicators for Regions of Russia]. Studies on Russian Economic Development. No2. P. 24-35. (In Russian)
38. Volchik V.V., Maslyukova E.V. 2018. Narrativy, idei i instituty [Narratives, Ideas and Institutions]. Terra Economicus. No2. P. 150-168. (In Russian) DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2018-16-2150-168
39. Zemtsov S.P., Smelov Y.A. 2018. Faktory regional'nogo razvitiya v Rossii: geografiya, chelovecheskiy kapital ili politika regionov [Factors of Regional Development in Russia: Geography, Human Capital and Regional Policies]. Journal of the New Economic Association. 4(40). P. 84-108. (In Russian) DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2018-40-4-4
40. Zhukova N.U., Tsykareva E.V. 2017. Regional'naya politika prodvizheniya brenda territoriy: determinanty investitsionnoy privlekatel'nosti. [Regional Policy of Territory Brand Promotion: Investment Attractiveness Determinants]. Public Administration Issues. No4. P. 173-206. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Borisov A.N., Borodin A.I., Gubarev R.V., Dzyuba E.I., Sagatgareev E.R. Managing the Investment Attractiveness of the Federal Subjects of Russia in the Context of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2022;15(3):202-230. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-3-84-202-230
Views:
1264
Email this article 