Before Westphalia: a history of international relations ante litteram
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-3-84-262-278
Abstract
Book review: Fenenko A.V. 2022. Istoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij v dovetsfal’skuyu epokhu [History of International Relations in the Pre-Westphalian Epoch]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo “Aspekt Press”. 752 p. (in Russian)
About the Author
N. N. Gudalov
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay N. Gudalov – Candidate of Political Science, Associate Professor, Department of European Studies
st. Smolny 1/3, entr. 8, St. Petersburg, Russia, 191060
References
1. Baele S., Bettiza G. 2021. ‘Turning’ Everywhere in IR: On the Sociological Underpinnings of the Field's Proliferating Turns. International Theory. 13(2). P. 314-340. DOI: 10.1017/ S1752971920000172
2. Ball T. 1985. Hobbes’ Linguistic Turn. Polity. 17(4). P. 739–760. DOI: 10.2307/3234572 Cohen R., Westbrook R. (eds). 2000. Amarna Diplomacy: The Beginnings of International
3. Relations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 312 p.
4. Costa Lopez J. 2020. Political Authority in International Relations: Revisiting the Medieval
5. Debate. International Organization. 74(2). P. 222-252. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818319000390 Grimm S. R. 2017. Why Study History? On Its Epistemic Benefits and Its Relation to the
6. Sciences. Philosophy. 92(3). P. 399-420. DOI: 10.1017/S003181911700002X
7. Haddock B. 2011. Contingency and Judgement in History of Political Philosophy: A Phenomenological Approach. Floyd J., Stears M. (eds) Political Philosophy versus History? Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 65-83.
8. Hobson J.A. 1902. Imperialism: A Study. New York: James Pott & Company. 400 p. Huntington S.P. 1997. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster. 367 p.
9. Kaplan M.A. 2005. System and Process in International Politics. Colchester: ECPR Press. 253 p.
10. Kokaz N. 2001. Moderating Power: A Thucydidean Perspective. Review of International Studies. 27(1). P. 27-49. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210500010275
11. Lebow R.N. 2008. The Ancient Greeks and Modern Realism: Ethics, Persuasion, and Power. Bell D. (ed) Political Thought and International Relations: Variations on a Realist Theme. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 26-40.
12. Stewart J. 2020. The Emergence of Subjectivity in the Ancient and Medieval World: An Interpretation of Western Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 416 p.
13. Teschke B. 2003. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations. London and New York: Verso. xii, 308 p.
14. Kembridjskaya istoriya drevnego mira [The Cambridge Ancient History]. 2007-2020. Vols. II.1 – XII. Trans. from Eng. Moscow: Nauchno-izdatelskij tsentr “Ladomir”. (In Russian)
15. Potemkin V.P. (ed). 1941-1945. Istoriya diplomatii [A History of Diplomacy]. 3 vols. Moscow: Sotsekgiz. (In Russian)
16. Rodionov M.A. 2008. Islam klassicheskiy [Classical Islam]. Saint Petersburg: “Azbukaklassika”; “Peterburgskoye Vostokovedeniye». 224 p. (In Russian)
17. Rybakov R.B., Yakobson V.A. (eds). 2002. Vostok v drevnosti [The Ancient Orient]. Istoriya Vostoka [A History of the Orient]. 6 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Vost. lit. 688 p. (In Russian)
18. Sirotenko V.T. 1975. Istoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij v Evrope vo vtoroj polovine IV – nachale VI v [A History of International Relations in Europe in the Second Half of the 4th – Early 6th c]. Perm: [Perm un-t]. 281 p. (In Russian)
19. Zhigunin V.D. 1980. Mezhdunarodniye otnosheniya ellinisticheskikh gosudarstv v 280-220 gg. do n. e. [The International Relations of the Hellenistic States in 280-220 B.C.]. Kazan: Izd-vo Kazan. un-ta. 192 p. (In Russian)
20. Zhigunin V.D., Gabelko O.L. (eds). 2000. Mezhgosudarstvennye otnosheniya i diplomatiya v antichnosti [Interstate Relations and Diplomacy in Antiquity]. Kazan. 352 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Gudalov N.N. Before Westphalia: a history of international relations ante litteram. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2022;15(3):262-278. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-3-84-262-278
Views:
1244
Email this article 