India’s Policies in Support of the New Space
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-5-86-113-134
Abstract
Just like in the Cold War, space has re-emerged as an arena of international rivalry. However, this time, the space industry sees new actors partaking in the race to the top, as the competition is not just between states; commercial players are increasingly taking the field. The latter is not limited to established large companies but includes small and medium-sized innovative enterprises, forming the so-called New Space. Among the countries facing such a multifaceted challenge is India, whose space industry is pursuing a catch-up strategy in many respects and has only recently stepped up the growth of the commercial space segment.
Considering the key importance of the public support for this segment, the article discusses the main trends, factors, and specifics of the Indian New Space policy. We use comparative analysis to assess the current state and prospects of the industry and its possible implications for the Indian global positions.
The study shows that New Delhi aims to embrace new realities amidst ambitious economic targets, social challenges, and growing geopolitical tensions with China, with the pandemic acting as a catalyst. Thanks to innovative measures, India has already become one of the central space players, but it still falls short of leadership in the New Space due to its resourceconstrained and state-centered course. Nevertheless, although its New Space is still at its infant stage, the future looks promising. However, the success of the Indian astropreneurs will also depend on the rise of efficiency of the national policies – a process likely to happen due to internal and global challenges.
Keywords
About the Authors
I. V. Danilin
The Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan V. Danilin – Candidate of Political Sciences (PhD), Head of the Department of Science and Innovation
117997, Moscow, Profsoyuznaya st., 23
E. P. Shavlay
The Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elina P. Shavlay – Candidate of Historical Sciences (PhD), Research Fellow at the Department of Science and Innovation
117997, Moscow, Profsoyuznaya st., 23
References
1. Cornell A. 2011. Five Key Turning Points in the American Space Industry in the Past 20 Years: Structure, Innovation, and Globalization Shifts in the Space Sector. Acta Astronautica 69(11–12). P. 1123–1131. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.05.033
2. Denis G., Alary D., Pasco X., Pisot N., Texier D., Toulza S. 2020. From New Space to Big Space: How Commercial Space Dream is Becoming a Reality. Acta Astronautica. No166. P. 431443. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.08.031
3. Gopalakrishnan V., Rishiraj B. 2022. Unlocking the Potentials of Space Sector in India: The Way Forward. New Space. 10(1). P. 14-19. DOI: 10.1089/space.2021.0040
4. Gopalaswamy B., Kampani G. 2014. India and Space Weaponization: Why Space Debris Trumps Kinetic Energy Antisatellite Weapons as the Principal Threat to Satellite. India Review 13(1). P. 40-57. DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2014.873678
5. Hertzfeld H.R. 2007. Globalization, Commercial Space and Spacepower in the USA. Space Policy. 23(4). P. 210-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2007.09.004
6. Hossain M. 2020. Frugal Innovation: Conception, Development, Diffusion, and Outcome. Journal of Cleaner Production. No262. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121456
7. Johnson-Freese J., Erickson A.S. 2006. The Emerging China–EU Space Partnership: A Geotechnological Balancer. Space Policy. 22(1). P. 12–22. DOI:10.1016/j. spacepol.2005.11.001
8. Khan Z., Khan A. 2019. Space Security Trilemma in South Asia. Astropolitics. 17(1). P. 4-22. DOI: 10.1080/14777622.2019.1578931
9. Lele A. 2016. Power Dynamics of India’s Space Program. Astropolitics. 14(2-3). P. 120-134. DOI: 10.1080/14777622.2016.1237212
10. Mazzucato M., Robinson DKR. 2017. Co-creating and Directing Innovation Ecosystems? NASA’s Changing Approach to Public-Private Partnerships in Low Earth Orbit. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. No136. P. 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.034
11. Misty D. 1998. India’s Emerging Space Program. Pacific Affairs. 71(2). P. 151–174. DOI: 10.2307/2760974
12. Moltz J.C. 2019. The Changing Dynamics of Twenty-First-Century Space Power. Journal of Strategic Security. 12(1). P. 15-43. DOI: 10.5038/1944-0472.12.1.1729
13. Mohanty S. 2022. New Space India and Indian National Space Promotion and Authorization Centre: A Fledgling and Critical Partnership. New Space. 10(1). P. 3-12. DOI: 10.1089/ space.2021.0068
14. Murthi K.R.S., Rao M.K. 2015. India’s Space Industry Ecosystem: Challenges of Innovations and Incentives. New Space. No3. P. 165–171. DOI: 10.1089/space.2015.0013
15. Pardesi M.S. 2015. Is India a Great Power? Understanding Great Power Status in Contemporary International Relations. Asian Security. 11(1). P. 1-30. DOI: 10.1080/14799855.2015.1005737
16. Reddy V.S. 2018. The Space X Effect. New Space. 6(2). P. 125–134
17. Siddiqi A. 2016. Another Global History of Science: Making Space for India and China. BJHS Themes. No1. P. 115-143. DOI: 10.1017/bjt.2016.4
18. Danilin I.V. 2018. NASA, astroprenjory i risky budushego: novye modely innovatsionnoj politiki SSHA v kosmicheskoj sfere. [NASA, Astropreneurs and Future Markets: New Models of the U.S. Innovation Policy for Space Industry]. Outlines of Global transformations: politics, economics, law. 11(2). P. 166-183. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-2-166-183 (In Russian).
19. Kamolov S.G., Mirakova D.A. 2019. Kommertsializatsija kosmicheskoj dejatelnosti. Kljuchevye trendy sovremennosty. [Commercial Space: Key Modern Trends. Intellekt. Innovatsi. Investitsii. No7. P. 52–63. DOI: 10.25198/2077-7175-2019-7-52 (In Russian).
20. Payson D.B. 2016. Fenomen kompanii SpaceX kak vyzov mezhdunarodnomu kosmicheskomu rynku. [The Phenomen of the SpaceX or a Challenge to the International Space Market]. Issledovanija kosmosa. No1. P. 36–50. DOI: 10.7256/2453-8817.2016.1.20451 (In Russian).
21. Shavlay E.P. 2020. Indija kak novyj «global'nyj aktor». [India as a New Global Actor]. Vostok v menjajushhemsja mire: vyzovy, perspektivy, reshenija: kollektivnaja monografija. Moscow: Institut vostokovedenija RAN. P. 110–117. (In Russian).
22. Yanik A.A. 2019. Kosmicheskaja transformatsija ekonomiki: predvestniki i tendentsii. [Formation of a Model for Managing the Science Intensity of Enterprises of Rocket and Space Engineering]. Russian Journal of Management. No12. P. 1-14. DOI: 10.29039/2409-6024-2021-92-16-20 (In Russian).
23. Zheleznyakov A.V., Korablev V.V. 2016. Chastnaja kosmonavtika: tendentsii i perspektivy. [Private Astronautics: Trends and Prospects]. Innovation. 7(213). P. 8-13. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Danilin I.V., Shavlay E.P. India’s Policies in Support of the New Space. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2022;15(5):113-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-5-86-113-134
Views:
775
Email this article 