Foreign Policy Orientation and Electoral Behavior: Analyzing Opinion Polls in Belarus, Georgia, and Kazakhstan
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-6-87-55-85
Abstract
In the post-pandemic years of 2021–2022, the post-Soviet space has entered a stage of decisive transformation, which will test the maturity of the state institutions formed 30 years ago for the region’s countries. The study captures a snapshot of public sentiment in these countries on the eve of this wave of transformation it is based on a series of largescale opinion polls in Belarus, Georgia and Kazakhstan, conducted immediately after the last elections to the lower houses of the parliaments of these countries in the pre-crisis era. The main research question of the sociological study was to identify demographic and geographical patterns in determining the attitude of voters toward the prospects for relations with Russia. Countries with traditionally different strategies of relations with Russia were taken: Belarus is a strategic ally, Kazakhstan is friendly but pursues a multi-vector policy, and Georgia is generally hostile at the level of the political class. The analysis showed that in matters of orientation towards positive relations with Russia, the voters of these countries nevertheless had more in common than differences. Based on the analysis results, several lines of delimitation can be distinguished. Firstly, the “macro-regional, geopolitical” line runs between Belarus and Kazakhstan, on the one hand, and Georgia, on the other. The second split along the “center-periphery” line takes place within states, i.e., Such a demarcation was singled out by many researchers, singled out concerning Russia; however, we found the same demarcations in Belarus (“Minsk and the rest of the country”) partly in Georgia and Kazakhstan. Finally, the authors admit to it the possibility of delimitation along the north-south lines: in Georgia and, to some extent, in Kazakhstan, as a result of territorial differentiation in the residence of Russians in the northern regions of the republic, where sympathy for Russia is more clearly manifested than in the southern regions remote from it; and this demarcation is less pronounced in Belarus, where it refers to the regions bordering Russia and Ukraine.
About the Authors
I. Yu. Okunev
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor Yu. Okunev – Ph.D. in Political Science, Associate Professor, Director, Center for Spatial Analysis in International Relations, Institute for International Studies
119454, Moscow, Vernadsky Avenue, 76
M. N. Shestakova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marianna N. Shestakova - Ph.D. in Geography, Leading Expert of the Department of Master's Training, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Comparative Political Science
119454, Moscow, Vernadsky Avenue, 76
References
1. Alexander M.G., Levin S., Henry P.J. 2005. Image Theory, Social Identity, and Social Dominance: Structural Characteristics and Individual Motives Underlying International Images. Political Psychology. 26(1). Р. 27–45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00408.x
2. Boulding K.E. 1959. National Images and International Systems. Journal of conflict resolution. 3(2). P. 120-131.
3. Castano E., Bonacossa A., Gries P. 2015. National Images as Integrated Schemas: Subliminal Primes of Image Attributes Shape Foreign Policy Preferences. Political Psychology. 37(3). P. 351–366. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12259
4. Deutsch K. et al. 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 228 p.
5. Fisher A. 2020. Demonizing the Enemy: the Influence of Russian State-Sponsored Media on American Audiences. Post-Soviet Affairs. 36(4). P. 281-296.
6. Jervis R. 1970. The Logic of Images in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 281 p.
7. Hazbun W. 2011. The Middle East through the lens of critical geopolitics: Globalization, terrorism, and the Iraq war. In Michael E. Bonine, Michael Gasper, and Abbas Amanat, eds. Is There a Middle East? The Evolution of a Geopolitical Concept. Stanford: Stanford University Press. P. 207-230.
8. Kalinina E., Menke M. 2016. Negotiating the Past in Hyperconnected Memory Cultures: Post-Soviet nostalgia and National Identity in Russian Online Communities. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics. 12(1). P. 59-74. DOI: 10.1386/macp.12.1.59_1
9. Kunczik M. 1996. Images of Nations and International Public Relations. London and New York: Routledge. 337 p.
10. Kolossov V. 2003. 'High' and 'Low' Geopolitics: Images of Foreign Countries in the Eyes of Russian Citizens. Geopolitics. 8(1). P. 121-148. DOI: 10.1080/714001015
11. Kolossov V. 2013. The Vision of Europe and the world as seen by large powers: The case of the BRIC countries. Geographia Polonica. 86(2). P. 89-98. DOI: GPol.2013.10
12. Lee M. 2011. Nostalgia as a Feature of "Glocalization": Use of the Past in Post-Soviet Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs. 27(2). P. 158-177. DOI: 10.2747/1060-586X.27.2.158
13. Mazur L. 2015. Golden Age Mythology and the Nostalgia of Catastrophes in post-Soviet Russia. Canadian Slavonic Papers. 57(3-4). P. 213-238. DOI: 10.1080/00085006.2015.1090731
14. Okunev I.Yu., Shestakova M.N., Bibina E.S. 2020 Neighborhood with Russia: Implications for Regional Differentiation of Public Opinion in Belarus. Russia in Global Affairs. 18(4(72)). P. 10–36.
15. O'Reilly K.P. 2007. Perceiving Rogue States: The Use of the “Rogue State” Concept by US foreign Policy Elites. Foreign Policy Analysis. 3(4). P. 295-315. DOI: 10.1111/j.17438594.2007.00052.x
16. Schweller R.L. 2004. Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing. International Security. 29(2). P. 159-201. DOI: 10.1162/0162288042879913
17. Sharp J. 2011. A subaltern Critical Geopolitics of the War on terror: Postcolonial Security in Tanzania. Geoforum. 42(3).P. 297-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.005
18. Sriramesh K., Verčič D. 2003. The Global Public Relations Handbook Theory, Research, and Practice. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 564 p.
19. Strüver A. 2007. The Production of Geopolitical and Gendered Images through Global aid Organisations. Geopolitics. 12(4). P. 680-703. DOI: 10.1080/14650040701546111
20. White S. 2010. Soviet Nostalgia and Russian Politics. Journal of Eurasian studies. 1(1). P. 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.euras.2009.11.0
21. Akhremenko A.S. 2005. Strukturirovanie elektoral'nogo prostranstva v rossijskih regionah: faktornyj analiz parlamentskih vyborov 1995 [Structuring the Electoral Space in Russian Regions: Factor Analysis of the 1995 Parliamentary Elections]. Polis. No2. P. 26-46. (In Russian)
22. Belanovsky S.A. 2019. Glubokoe interv'yu i fokus gruppy [In-depth Interviews and Focus Groups]. Moscow. 371 p. (In Russian)
23. Bryman A., Bell E. 2012. Metody social'nyh issledovanij. Gruppy, organizacii i biznes [Methods of Social Research. Groups, Organizations and Businesses]. Publishing house of the Humanitarian Center. 776 p. (In Russian)
24. Kazantsev A.A., Merkushev V.N. 2008. Rossiya i postsovetskoe prostranstvo: perspektivy ispol'zovaniya “myagkoj sily” [Russia and the post-Soviet Space: Prospects for the Use of “Soft Power”]. Polis. Political studies. No2. P. 122-135. (In Russian)
25. Kotlyarov I.V. 2013. Dinamika vzaimootnoshenij Rossijskoj Federacii i Respubliki Belarus': sociologicheskij analiz [Dynamics of relations between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus: Sociological Analysis]. The Sociological Almanac. No4. P. 107-119. (In Russian)
26. Lebedeva M.M., Kharkevich M.V. 2014. «Myagkaya sila» Rossii v razvitii integracionnyh processov na evrazijskom prostranstve [The Role of the Russian Soft Power in Eurasian Integration]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2(35). From 10-13. DOI: 10.24833/2071-81602014-2-35-10-13 (In Russian)
27. Loshkarev I.D. 2015. Rol' diaspor v sovremennoj mirovoj politike [The Role of Diasporas in the Current World Politics]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2(41). C. 120-126. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2015-2-41-120-126 (In Russian)
28. Manakov A.G. 2016. Faktor granicy v zhizni naseleniya zapadnyh rajonov Pskovskoj oblasti [The Border Factor in the Life of the Population of the Western Districts of the Pskov Region]. Socio-economic, Geopolitical and Socio-Cultural Problems of the Development of the Border Regions of Russia Materials of the XXXII annual session of the Economic and Geographical Section of MARS. P. 190-198. (In Russian)
29. Manakov A.G. 2021. Osnovnye trendy etnicheskoj i yazykovoj transformacii postsovetskogo prostranstva [The Main Trends of Ethnic and Linguistic Transformation of the post-Soviet Space]. History, Theory, Methods, Practice. Collection of scientific articles of the VII All-Russian Scientific Conference with international participation. Smolensk. pp. 339-346. (In Russian)
30. Mosaki N.Z. 2018. Etnicheskaya kartina Gruzii po rezul'tatam perepisi 2014 g. [Ethnic Picture of Georgia according to the Results of the 2014]. Ethnographic review. No1. P. 104-120. (In Russian)
31. Okunev I.Yu. 2009. Geograficheskoe voobrazhenie kak predmet issledovaniya kriticheskoj geopolitiki (obzor) [Geographical Imagination as a Subject of Critical Geopolitics Research (Review)]. Political science. No4. P. 126-137. (In Russian)
32. Okunev I.Yu., Shmatkova L.P. 2021. Effekt sosedstva v Bol'shoj Evrazii: prostranstvennyj avtokorrelyacionnyj i klasternyj analiz. [Neighborhood effect in Greater Eurasia: spatial autocorrelation and cluster analysis]. News of Irkutsk State University. Political Science series. Religious Studies. Vol. 37. P. 58-65. (In Russian)
33. Popova O.V. 2019. Gosudarstvennaya politika identichnosti kak teoreticheskij konstrukt i real'naya praktika: opyt ekspertnyh ocenok rossijskih issledovatelej [State identity policy as a Theoretical Construct and Real Practice: the Experience of Expert Assessments of Russian Researchers]. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences. 20(4). P. 74-91. (In Russian)
34. Savchuk G.A., Frants V.A., Saidmagomedova D.S. 2022. Effekt strany proiskhozhdeniya v reputacii rossijskoj metallurgicheskoj produkcii na rynkah stran Central'noj Azii [The Countryof-Origin Effect on the Reputation of Russian Metallurgical Products in Central Asian Markets]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 15(1). P. 207-229. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-20221-82-207-229 (In Russian)
35. Shestakova M.N. 2019. Elektoral'nye processy v pogranich'e: k postanovke problemy [Electoral Processes in the Borderlands: towards the Formulation of the Problem]. Trajectories of Russia's Political Development: institutions, projects, actors. Materials of the All-Russian scientific conference RAPN with international participation. Moscow Pedagogical State University. Moscow. P. 443-444. (In Russian)
36. Shestakova M.N. 2021. Territorial'naya differenciaciya obshchestvennyh nastroenij v sovremennoj Gruzii (opyt sociologicheskogo oprosa) [Territorial Differentiation of Public Attitudes in Modern Georgia (the Experience of a Sociological Survey)]. Social and humanitarian knowledge. 7(2). P. 146-157. (In Russian)
37. Suzdaltsev A.I. 2020. Krizis soyuznogo gosudarstva Belorussii i Rossii [The Crisis of the Union state of Belarus and Russia]. World Economy and International Relations. 64(3). P. 56-67. (In Russian)
38. Tarasov I.N. Fidrya E.S. 2016. Geografiya elektoral'noj volatil'nosti v Varminsko-Mazurskom voevodstve Pol'shi [The Geography of Electoral Volatility in the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship of Poland]. The Baltic region. 8(4). P. 78-89. (In Russian)
39. Turovsky R.F. 2006. Regional'noe izmerenie elektoral'nogo processa [Regional Dimension of the Electoral Process]. Social sciences and modernity. No5. P. 1-20. (In Russian)
40. Venkatesh S. 2017. Glavar' bandy na den'. Izgoj-sociolog vyhodit na ulicy [The Leader of the Gang for the Day. An Outcast Sociologist Takes to the Streets]. Moscow: Ripol Classic. 320 p. (In Russian)
41. Vinogradov V.V. 2020. Kazahstan kak chast' postsovetskogo prostranstva: osobennosti elektoral'nogo processa [Kazakhstan as a Part of the post-Soviet Space: Features of the Electoral Process]. The Eurasian Union: Issues of International Relations. 9(3(33)). P. 166-180. (In Russian)
42. Zarubina N.E. 2018. Rol' ocenochnoj leksiki v formirovanii obraza Rossii v zapadnyh SMI. [The role of Evaluative Vocabulary in Shaping the Image of Russia in the Western media]. Bulletin of Kostroma State University. 24(2). P. 244-247. (In Russian)
43. Zinoviev A.S. 2015. Geopoliticheskij raskol v elektoral'noj geografii Litvy [The Geopolitical Split in the Electoral Geography of Lithuania]. Regional studies. 3(49). C. 48–56. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Okunev I.Yu., Shestakova M.N. Foreign Policy Orientation and Electoral Behavior: Analyzing Opinion Polls in Belarus, Georgia, and Kazakhstan. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2022;15(6):55-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-6-87-55-85
Views:
650
Email this article 