Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Settlement of Tax Disputes in the Russian Federation and Germany

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2015-2-41-269-275

Abstract

This article is devoted to the settlement of tax disputes in the Russian Federation and the Federal Republic of Germany. The features of the conflict settlement mechanism are both shown in the stage of administrative and judicial review. In accordance with German law, the administrative stage of dispute resolution, carried out by the tax authority, always precedes the filing of a complaint to a court. Consequently, the taxpayer submits his first application in writing to the tax authority that issued the tax act, though in some cases to a higher tax authority. This obligatory procedure was borrowed by the Russian tax system. The trial stage of tax dispute settlement in Germany is carried out by specialized courts, forming a two-level system for legal proceedings. Thus, the tax dispute submitted to the Court is settled first by the financial lands courts and then by the higher Federal Financial Court. However, the Federal Financial Court takes into consideration only certain categories of actions listed in the Act (the Regulations) of finance courts (Finanzgerichtordnung). In Russia appeals of administrative review of tax conflicts, unlike in the German system, are handled by arbitration and general jurisdiction courts. The Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation is the supreme judicial body for settling economic disputes and other cases considered by arbitration courts in implementing federal procedural judicial supervision over their activities and provides explanations regarding judicial practices. Arbitration courts established at the level of the Federation to resolve disputes involving commercial entities, e.g. enterprises and entrepreneurs, resolve the bulk of tax disputes. These courts are composed of specially created panels of judges known as bars, i.e. groups of judges who specialize in reviewing taxation cases.

About the Author

A. A. Konyukhova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the MFA of Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Конституция Российской Федерации 1993 г. [Электронный ресурс]// Режим доступа: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=2875 (Дата обращения 12.11.2014).

2. Арбитражный процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации от 24.07.2002 N 95-ФЗ (принят ГД ФС РФ 14.06.2002).

3. Гражданский процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации от 14.11.2002 N 138-ФЗ (принят ГД ФС РФ 23.10.2002).

4. Налоговый кодекс Российской Федерации от 31.07.1998.

5. Иванов М.А. Институционально-правовой механизм рассмотрения налоговых споров во Франции: Дис.. канд. юрид. наук. 2006. 207 с.

6. Кучеров И.И. Налоговое судопроизводство в России и за рубежом // Бухгалтерский учёт. 2007. N 4.

7. Михайлова О.Р. Налоговый суд Канады // Ваш налоговый адвокат. 2001. Вып. 1 (15).

8. Налогообложение: проблемы науки и практики. Монография / Под. ред. проф. Ю.Б. Иванова. М.: ФЛП Либуркина Л.М., 2009.

9. Модеров С.В. По решению суда освобожден.. от налогов. // Финансовый директор. 2009. № 7.

10. Румянцев А.Г. Система исков в финансовом процессе ФРГ // Финансовые и бухгалтерские консультации. 1995. N 2.

11. Румянцев А.Г. Финансовые суды в ФРГ // Финансовые и бухгалтерские консультации. 1995. N 1.

12. Закон о финансовых судах от 6 октября 1965 г. (Finanzgerichtsordnung) § 33.

13. Закон о федеральном конституционном суде от 12.03.1951 г. (Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz - BverfGG).

14. Буссе Р. Решение налоговых конфликтов и споров: опыт Германии // Капитал страны, 2011.

15. Kaspar F.D. Der Anwalt im Kampf ums Recht. JZ, 1995.

16. Wassermeyer F. Die beschrankte Steuerpflicht // Vogel, K. (utg.) Grundfragen des International Steuerrechts. Koln:Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt KG, 1985, pp. 49-71.

17. Досудебное урегулирование налоговых споров http://www.ist-profy.ru/files/dyns.pdf


Review

For citations:


Konyukhova A.A. Settlement of Tax Disputes in the Russian Federation and Germany. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2015;(2(41)):269-275. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2015-2-41-269-275

Views: 1218


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)