President Erdogan’s Discourse on the Kurdish Issue
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-1-88-201-218
Abstract
The article analyzes Turkey's changing regime of ethnicity between 2004 and 2019. Turkey is a multiethnic republic that used assimilation as the key policy in its early days to create the nation-state. The Kurds, as the most populous ethnic minority, had suffered the most. The ethnic anti-minority regime was reflected in the discourse of state officials. The ethnicity regime changed only after the Justice and Development Party came to power. The state authorities acknowledged Kurds as a distinct ethnic minority, admitted the previous human rights violations, and tried to make up for past mistakes. The article reviews the evolution of the ethnicity regime through analysis of its official discourse from initially being anti-minority and through tumultuous changes to the current inclusive one. It focuses on analyzing President Erdogan's public speeches in Diyarbakir. The main finding of the article is that when the state moved away from anti-minority policies towards the Kurds, President's discourse became more inclusive. Previous studies acknowledged the agency of the state as the determining power behind changing the regime of ethnicity. The second significant contribution of this study is that organized minority groups have an independent agency; their actions significantly contributed to changing the regime of ethnicity.
About the Author
Ayşe İrem Aycan Özer
Bogazici University
Marmara University
Turkey
Turkey
Ayşe İrem Aycan Özer – PhD Candidate
4342 Bebek/Istanbul, Turkey
References
1. Aktürk Ş. 2011. Regimes of Ethnicity: Comparative Analysis of Germany, the Soviet Union/Post-Soviet Russia, and Turkey. World Politics. 63(1). P. 115–164. DOI: 10.1017/ S0043887110000304
2. Aktürk Ş. 2012. Regimes of Ethnicity and Nationhood in Germany, Russia, and Turkey. Cambridge University Press.
3. Alptekin H. 2017. A Theory of Ethnic Violence: Ethnic Incorporation and Ethno-Political Mobilization in Bulgaria and Cyprus. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 40(15). P. 2672–90. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2016.1266008.
4. Aslan S. 2014. Nation-Building in Turkey and Morocco: Governing Kurdish and Berber Dissent. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bozarslan H. 2008. Kurds and the Turkish State. The Cambridge History of Turkey. DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521620963.013.
6. Brake S. 2018. Representation and De-Legitimation in Semi-Democratic Regimes: The Case of the Arab Citizens in Israel. Sociology and Anthropology. 6(5). P. 447–58. DOI: 10.13189/ sa.2018.060501.
7. Brown D. 1994. The State and Ethnic Politics in Southeast Asia. Routledge.
8. Cagaptay S. 2006. Islam, Secularism and Nationalism in Modern Turkey: Who is a Turk? Routledge.
9. Christie P. 2006. Changing Regimes: Governmentality and Education Policy in PostApartheid South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development. 26(4). P. 373–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.09.006.
10. Clercq F. 1997. Policy Intervention and Power Shifts: An Evaluation of South Africa’s Education Restructuring Policies. Journal of Education Policy. 12(3). P. 127-146.
11. Falk R., Tilley V. 2017. Israeli Practices towards the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid. Palestine and the Israeli Occupation. 1(1). URL: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ps_ pubs/9 (accessed 26.02.2023)
12. Gordon E.T. 1998. Disparate Diasporas-Identity and Politics in an African-Nicaraguan Community. University of Texas Press.
13. Hepburn E., Zapata-Barrer R. 2014. The Politics of Immigration in Multi-Level States: Governance and Political Parties. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Heper M. 2007. The State and Kurds in Turkey: The Question of Assimilation. Springer. Hooker J. 2005. Indigenous Inclusion/Black Exclusion: Race, Ethnicity and Multicultural
15. Citizenship in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies. 37(2). Р. 285–310.
16. Köse S.C. 2012. Müzakereci Demokrasi Kuramı ve Toplumsal ve Politik Dönüşümün İmkanları: Kürt Açılımı Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies. 4(2). P. 89116.
17. Köse T. 2017. Çözüm Sürecinin Yükseliş ve Düşüşü. Türkiye Ortadoğu Çalışmaları Dergisi. 4(1). P. 13–40. DOI: 10.26513/tocd.315152.
18. Kymlicka W. 2007. Multicultural Odysseys. Ethnopolitics. 6(4). P. 585–97. DOI: 10.1080/17449050701659789.
19. Lijphart A. 1969. Consociational Democracy. World Politics. 21(2). P. 207–225. DOI: 10.2307/2009820
20. Mattes R. 2012. The ‘Born Frees’: The Prospects for Generational Change in PostApartheid South Africa. Australian Journal of Political Science. 47(1). P. 133–53. DOI: 10.1080/10361146.2011.643166.
21. McDowall D. 2000. A Modern History of the Kurds. 3rd edition. IB Tauris.
22. O’Leary B., John M. 1993. The Politics of Ethnic Conflict Regulation: Case Studies of Protracted Ethnic Conflicts. New York: Routledge.
23. O’Neil M.L. 2007. Linguistic Human Rights and the Rights of Kurds. Arat and Folk (ed.) Human Rights in Turkey. University of Pennsylvania Press. P. 72–86.
24. Sessiz Devrim Türkiye’nin Demokratik Değişim ve Dönüşüm Envanteri. 2021. Içişleri Bakanliği. https://docplayer.biz.tr/12660195-sessiz-devrim-turkiye-nin-demokratik-degisimve-donusum-envanteri.html (accessed 26.02.2023).
25. Straw D. 2013. Human Rights Violation in Turkey: Rethinking Sociological Perspectives. Springer. DOI: 10.1057/9781137317155.
26. Terry M. 2001. The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939. Cornell University Press.
27. Tunçel H. 2000. Türkiye’de İsmi Değiştirilen Köyler. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 10(2). P. 23–34.
28. Van Cott D.L. 2000a. Latin America: Constitutional Reform and Ethnic Right | Parliamentary Affairs. Oxford Academic. Parliamentary Affairs. 53(1). P. 41–54.
29. Van Cott D.L. 2000b. The friendly liquidation of the past: the politics of diversity in Latin America. University of Pittsburgh Press.
30. Yavuz MH 1997. Political Islam and the Welfare (Refah) Party in Turkey. Comparative Politics. 30(1). DOI: 10.2307/422193.
31. Yildiz K. 2012. Turkey's Kurdish conflict: pathways to progress. Insight Turkey. 14(4). P. 151-174.
Review
For citations:
Aycan Özer A. President Erdogan’s Discourse on the Kurdish Issue. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2023;16(1):201-218. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-1-88-201-218
Views:
680
Email this article 