Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Russia-India cooperation on Post-American Afghanistan

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-2-89-235-250

Abstract

Russian foreign policy has long championed multipolarity in international relations. As relations between Russia and the West have deteriorated, Russia has sought to establish a Eurasian project involving non-Western great powers. India has been identified by Russia as one of the major pillars of this global realignment. However, India’s global reach and power have been undermined by its entanglement in regional disputes and volatile relations with some of its partners. While some minor differences exist on the regional level in Eurasia between Russia and India, a major disagreement has been the role of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which Russia views as a global organization, and India sees it as regional. Our analysis suggests that the US military presence in Afghanistan, along with its plans for geoeconomic and geopolitical dominance in Eurasia, has been a major distracting factor in Russia-India relations. The US withdrawal from Afghanistan and the decline of its influence may provide new opportunities for regional cooperation between Russia and India. Our research indicates that Afghanistan may be one such country where the interests of Russia and India can converge. Both countries are interested in a stable and secure Afghanistan, and both may be willing to accept Taliban rule, subject to certain conditions, if it helps achieve that goal. In Central Asia, Russia and India have previously pursued divergent agendas, with Russia being somewhat protective of its natural sphere of interests. However, we conclude that with the elimination of external disturbances in the form of US military occupation of Afghanistan, the interests of both countries could be reconciled in relation to Central Asia. By working in synergy, Russia and India could collaborate more effectively in this region.

About the Authors

Ivan Safranchuk
MGIMO University National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Ivan A. Safranchuk – Cand.Sci. (Political Science), Director, Center of Eurasian Studies, Institute for Interna- tional Studies; Associate Professor, School of International Affairs

76 Prospect Vernadsko- go, Moscow, Russia, 119454; 20 Myasnitskaya Ulitsa, Moscow, Russia, 101000



Alexandre Knyazev
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Alexandre А. Knyazev – Dr.Sci. (History); Leading Research Fellow, Center of Eurasian Studies, Institute for International Studies

76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, Russia, 119454



References

1. Basu P. P. 2007. India and Post-Taliban Afghanistan: Stakes, Opportunities and Challenges. India Quarterly. 63 (3). P. 84-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/097492840706300304

2. Denisov I.E., Safranchuk I.A. 2019. Four Problems of the SCO in Connection with Its Enlargement. Russian Social Science Review, 60(2). P. 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/106114 28.2019.1601976.

3. Dixit A. 1992. Future Course of Events in Afghanistan: Implications for Indian Foreign Policy. India International Centre Quarterly. 19 (3). P. 61-70.

4. Hettne B. 2005. Beyond the ‘new’ regionalism. New Political Economy. 10(4). P. 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460500344484

5. Kaushiki N. 2013. The New Great Game and India’s Connect Central Asia Policy: Strategic Perspectives and Challenges. Journal of International and Area Studies. 20(2). P. 83-100.

6. Kothari R.M. 2014. India’s ‘Connect Central Asia Policy’: Emerging Economic and Security Dimensions. Sociology and Anthology. 2(6). P. 239-245.

7. Machitidze, G.G., 2020. U.S. – Taliban: Comparative analysis of the stages of negotiations. Comparative Politics Russia. 11(1). P. 65-74. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10005

8. Rubin B. R. 2020. Afghanistan: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press. Safranchuk I. 2019. Afghanistan’s Political Future and Its Role in Eurasian Cooperation. India Quarterly. 75(2). P. 1-14. http://doi.org/10.1177/0974928418821467

9. Safranchuk I.A., Zhornist V.M. 2021. The Taliban Enigma and the Polycentric World. Russia in Global Affairs. 19(3). P. 10-24. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2021-19-3-10-24. Söderbaum F. 2003. Introduction: Theories of New Regionalism. F. Söderbaum, T. Shaw (ed.).

10. Theories of New Regionalism. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403938794_1 Stepanova E.A. 2021. Russia and the Search for a Negotiated Solution in Afghanistan. Europe-Asia Studies. 73(5). P. 928-952. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1826908

11. Stobodan P. 2015. Central Asia India’s Northern Exposure. IDSA Monograph Series. No. 44. P. 1-69

12. Warleigh-Lack A. 2006. Towards a conceptual framework for regionalisation: Bridging ‘new regionalism’ and ‘integration theory’. Review of International Political Economy. 13(5). P. 750-771. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290600950639

13. Wheeler S.M. 2002. The New Regionalism: Key Characteristics of an Emerging Movement. Journal of the American Planning Association. 68 (3). P. 267-278. https://doi. org/10.1080/01944360208976272

14. Banerjee I. 2007. Indiia i novaia ‘bol’shaia igra’ v TsA. [India and the new "Big Game" in Central Asia]. Great Game: politics, business, security in Central Asia. No. 2. P. 28–37. (In Russian).

15. Karaganov S. 2017. Ot povorota na Vostok k Bol'shoj Evrazii [From Eastward Pivot to Greater Eurasia]. International Affairs. No. 4. P. 1–13. (In Russian).

16. Stepanova E.A. 2019. Mirnyj process po Afganistanu i rol' Rossii. [Peace process in Afghanistan and the role of Russia]. Pathways to Peace and Security. 57(2). P. 21-33. https://doi. org/10.20542/2307-1494-2019-2-21-33 (In Russian).

17. Vardomsky L.B., Pylin A.G. (Eds.). (2014). Vneshneekonomicheskie svyazi postsovetskikh stran v kontekste evraziiskoi integratsii [Foreign economic ties of post-Soviet states in the context of Eurasian integration]. Moscow: Institute of Economic of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 218 p. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Safranchuk I., Knyazev A. Russia-India cooperation on Post-American Afghanistan. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2023;16(2):235-250. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-2-89-235-250

Views: 794


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)